Literature DB >> 35529321

Analysis of digital noise and reduction methods on classifiers used in automated visual evaluation in cervical cancer screening.

Zhiyun Xue1, Sandeep Angara1, David Levitz1,2, Sameer Antani1.   

Abstract

The burden of cervical cancer disproportionately falls on low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Automated visual evaluation (AVE) is a technology being considered as an adjunct tool for the management of HPV-positive women. AVE involves analysis of a white light illuminated cervical image using machine learning classifiers. It is of importance to analyze various impacts of different kinds of image degradations on AVE. In this paper, we report our work regarding the impact of one type of image degradation, Gaussian noise, and one of its remedies we have been exploring. The images, originated from the Natural History Study (NHS) and ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study (ALTS), were modified by the addition of white Gaussian noise at different levels. The AVE pipeline used in the experiments consists of two deep learning components: a cervix locator which uses RetinaNet (an object detection network), and a binary pathology classifier that uses the ResNeSt network. Our findings indicate that Gaussian noise, which frequently appears in low light conditions, is a key factor in degrading the AVE's performance. A blind image denoising technique which uses Variational Denoising Network (VDNet) was tested on a set of 345 digitized cervigram images (115 positives) and evaluated both visually and quantitatively. AVE performances on both the synthetically generated noisy images and the corresponding denoised images were examined and compared. In addition, the denoising technique was evaluated on several real noisy cervix images captured by a camera-based imaging device used for AVE that have no histology confirmation. The comparison between the AVE performances on images with and without denoising shows that denoising can be effective at mitigating classification performance degradation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep learning; automated visual evaluation; cervical cancer; denoising; low resource settings

Year:  2022        PMID: 35529321      PMCID: PMC9074910          DOI: 10.1117/12.2610235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng        ISSN: 0277-786X


  13 in total

1.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity.

Authors:  Zhou Wang; Alan Conrad Bovik; Hamid Rahim Sheikh; Eero P Simoncelli
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 10.856

2.  Human papillomavirus testing for triage of women with cytologic evidence of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: baseline data from a randomized trial. The Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance/Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions Triage Study (ALTS) Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Interobserver agreement in the evaluation of digitized cervical images.

Authors:  Jose Jeronimo; L Stewart Massad; Philip E Castle; Sholom Wacholder; Mark Schiffman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Design and methods of a population-based natural history study of cervical neoplasia in a rural province of Costa Rica: the Guanacaste Project.

Authors:  R Herrero; M H Schiffman; C Bratti; A Hildesheim; I Balmaceda; M E Sherman; M Greenberg; F Cárdenas; V Gómez; K Helgesen; J Morales; M Hutchinson; L Mango; M Alfaro; N W Potischman; S Wacholder; C Swanson; L A Brinton
Journal:  Rev Panam Salud Publica       Date:  1997-05

5.  Baseline dimensions of the human vagina.

Authors:  Kurt T Barnhart; Adriana Izquierdo; E Scott Pretorius; David M Shera; Mayadah Shabbout; Alka Shaunik
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Prevention of persistent human papillomavirus infection by an HPV16/18 vaccine: a community-based randomized clinical trial in Guanacaste, Costa Rica.

Authors:  Rolando Herrero; Sholom Wacholder; Ana C Rodríguez; Diane Solomon; Paula González; Aimee R Kreimer; Carolina Porras; John Schussler; Silvia Jiménez; Mark E Sherman; Wim Quint; John T Schiller; Douglas R Lowy; Mark Schiffman; Allan Hildesheim
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 39.397

7.  Performance Evaluation of a Generative Adversarial Network for Deblurring Mobile-phone Cervical Images.

Authors:  Prasanth Ganesan; Zhiyun Xue; Sanjana Singh; Rodney Long; Behnaz Ghoraani; Sameer Antani
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2019-07

8.  Evaluation of a Smartphone-Based Training Strategy Among Health Care Workers Screening for Cervical Cancer in Northern Tanzania: The Kilimanjaro Method.

Authors:  Karen E Yeates; Jessica Sleeth; Wilma Hopman; Ophira Ginsburg; Katharine Heus; Linda Andrews; Mary Rose Giattas; Safina Yuma; Godwin Macheku; Aziz Msuya; Olola Oneko
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2016-05-04

9.  Ensemble Deep Learning for Cervix Image Selection toward Improving Reliability in Automated Cervical Precancer Screening.

Authors:  Peng Guo; Zhiyun Xue; Zac Mtema; Karen Yeates; Ophira Ginsburg; Maria Demarco; L Rodney Long; Mark Schiffman; Sameer Antani
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.