| Literature DB >> 35529264 |
Abstract
Objective: To explore the effect of humanistic care combined with predictive nursing on the negative emotions and incidence of cardiovascular events in hemodialysis patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35529264 PMCID: PMC9076300 DOI: 10.1155/2022/7562525
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Math Methods Med ISSN: 1748-670X Impact factor: 2.238
General data in the two groups.
| General data | Control group ( | Study group ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender ( | ||||
| Male | 23 (51.11) | 21 (46.67) | 0.178 | 0.673 |
| Female | 22 (48.89) | 24 (53.33) | ||
| Age ( | 64.28 ± 5.34 | 64.51 ± 5.32 | 0.205 | 0.838 |
| BMI ( | 23.01 ± 2.17 | 22.87 ± 2.25 | 0.300 | 0.765 |
| Disease type ( | ||||
| Hypertensive nephropathy | 16 (35.56) | 17 (37.78) | ||
| Diabetic nephropathy | 21 (46.67) | 19 (42.22) | 0.189 | 0.910 |
| Glomerulonephritis | 8 (17.77) | 9 (20.00) | ||
| Educational level ( | ||||
| Elementary or junior high school | 24 (53.33) | 19 (42.22) | ||
| Senior high school | 18 (40.00) | 21 (46.67) | 1.312 | 0.519 |
| College and above | 3 (6.67) | 5 (11.11) |
cTn I level in the two groups (x ± s, ng/L).
| Groups | Before nursing | After nursing |
|---|---|---|
| Control group ( | 53.27 ± 6.21 | 39.57 ± 3.44a |
| Study group ( | 53.36 ± 6.18 | 31.54 ± 3.15a |
|
| 0.069 | 11.549 |
|
| 0.945 | <0.001 |
Note: versus before nursing, aP < 0.05.
Negative emotion scores in the two groups (x ± s).
| Groups | HAMD scores | HAMA scores | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before nursing | After nursing | Before nursing | After nursing | |
| Control group ( | 21.08 ± 1.76 | 15.34 ± 1.23a | 37.58 ± 4.12 | 21.45 ± 3.51a |
| Study group ( | 21.23 ± 1.85 | 9.51 ± 1.36a | 37.88 ± 4.20 | 14.56 ± 3.21a |
|
| 0.394 | 21.328 | 0.342 | 9.717 |
|
| 0.694 | ≤ 0.001 | 0.733 | ≤0.001 |
Note: versus before nursing, aP < 0.05.
Quality of life scores in the two groups (x ± s).
| Groups | Time | Social relationship | Physiological domain | Social environment | Psychological domain |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group ( | Before nursing | 31.25 ± 2.18 | 34.17 ± 3.09 | 38.54 ± 2.86 | 29.74 ± 2.35 |
| After nursing | 98.43 ± 9.57a | 93.62 ± 9.49a | 105.24 ± 9.65a | 103.41 ± 10.25a | |
| Study group ( | Before nursing | 30.78 ± 2.31 | 33.91 ± 3.14 | 37.89 ± 2.93 | 29.46 ± 2.54 |
| After nursing | 105.25 ± 9.89ab | 98.27 ± 9.68ab | 112.08 ± 10.06ab | 113.54 ± 10.35ab |
Note: versus before nursing, aP < 0.05; versus the control group, bP < 0.05.
Nursing satisfaction in the two groups.
| Groups | Satisfied ( | Basically satisfied ( | Dissatisfied ( | Satisfaction rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group ( | 18 (40.00) | 15 (33.33) | 12 (26.67) | 73.33% (33/45) |
| Study group ( | 25 (60.00) | 18 (66.67) | 2 (4.44) | 95.56% (43/45) |
|
| 8.459 | |||
|
| 0.004 |
Adverse cardiovascular events in the two groups (n (%)).
| Groups | Angina pectoris | Arrhythmia | Chronic heart failure | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group ( | 4 (8.89) | 2 (4.44) | 1 (2.22) | 7 (15.56) |
| Study group ( | 0 (0.00) | 1 (2.22) | 0 (0.00) | 1 (2.22) |
|
| 4.45 | |||
|
| ≤0.001 |