Qingfeng Tang1,2, Shoujiang Xu2,3, Mengjuan Guo1, Guangjun Wang1, Zhigeng Pan2,4, Benyue Su1. 1. The University Key Laboratory of Intelligent Perception and Computing of Anhui Province, Anqing Normal University, 1318 Jixian North Road, Anqing, 246133 China. 2. School of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, 2318 Yuhangtang Road, Hangzhou, 311121 China. 3. Jiangsu Food and Pharmaceutical Science College, Huai'an, 223023 China. 4. School of Artificial Intelligence, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210044 China.
Abstract
Purpose: Vascular age (VA) is the direct index to reflect vascular aging, so it plays a particular role in public health. How to obtain VA conveniently and cheaply has always been a research hotspot. This study proposes a new method to evaluate VA with wrist pulse signal. Methods: Firstly, we fit the pulse signal by mixed Gaussian model (MGM) to extract the shape features, and adopt principal component analysis (PCA) to optimize the dimension of the shape features. Secondly, the principal components and chronological age (CA) are respectively taken as the independent variables and dependent variable to establish support vector regression (SVR) model. Thirdly, the principal components are fed into the SVR model to predicted the vascular aging of each subject. The predicted value is regarded as the description of VA. Finally, we compare the correlation coefficients of VA with pulse width (PW), inflection point area ratio (IPA), Ratio b/a (RBA), augmentation index (AIx), diastolic augmentation index (DAI) and pulse transit time (PTT) with those of CA with these six indices. Results: Compared with the CA, the VA is closer to PW (r = 0.539, P < 0.001 to r = 0.589, P < 0.001 in men; r = 0.325, P < 0.001 to r = 0.400, P < 0.001 in women), IPA (r = - 0.446, P < 0.001 to r = - 0.534, P < 0.001 in men; r = - 0.623, P < 0.001 to r = - 0.660, P < 0.001 in women), RBA (r = 0.328, P < 0.001 to r = 0.371, P < 0.001 in women), AIx (r = 0.659, P < 0.001 to r = 0.738, P < 0.001 in men; r = 0.547, P < 0.001 to r = 0.573, P < 0.001 in women), DAI (r = 0.517, P < 0.001 to r = 0.532, P < 0.001 in men; r = 0.507, P < 0.001 to r = 0.570, P < 0.001 in women) and PTT (r = 0.526, P < 0.001 to r = 0.659, P < 0.001 in men; r = 0.577, P < 0.001 to r = 0.814, P < 0.001 in women). Conclusion: The VA is more representative of vascular aging than CA. The method presented in this study provides a new way to directly and objectively assess vascular aging in public health.
Purpose: Vascular age (VA) is the direct index to reflect vascular aging, so it plays a particular role in public health. How to obtain VA conveniently and cheaply has always been a research hotspot. This study proposes a new method to evaluate VA with wrist pulse signal. Methods: Firstly, we fit the pulse signal by mixed Gaussian model (MGM) to extract the shape features, and adopt principal component analysis (PCA) to optimize the dimension of the shape features. Secondly, the principal components and chronological age (CA) are respectively taken as the independent variables and dependent variable to establish support vector regression (SVR) model. Thirdly, the principal components are fed into the SVR model to predicted the vascular aging of each subject. The predicted value is regarded as the description of VA. Finally, we compare the correlation coefficients of VA with pulse width (PW), inflection point area ratio (IPA), Ratio b/a (RBA), augmentation index (AIx), diastolic augmentation index (DAI) and pulse transit time (PTT) with those of CA with these six indices. Results: Compared with the CA, the VA is closer to PW (r = 0.539, P < 0.001 to r = 0.589, P < 0.001 in men; r = 0.325, P < 0.001 to r = 0.400, P < 0.001 in women), IPA (r = - 0.446, P < 0.001 to r = - 0.534, P < 0.001 in men; r = - 0.623, P < 0.001 to r = - 0.660, P < 0.001 in women), RBA (r = 0.328, P < 0.001 to r = 0.371, P < 0.001 in women), AIx (r = 0.659, P < 0.001 to r = 0.738, P < 0.001 in men; r = 0.547, P < 0.001 to r = 0.573, P < 0.001 in women), DAI (r = 0.517, P < 0.001 to r = 0.532, P < 0.001 in men; r = 0.507, P < 0.001 to r = 0.570, P < 0.001 in women) and PTT (r = 0.526, P < 0.001 to r = 0.659, P < 0.001 in men; r = 0.577, P < 0.001 to r = 0.814, P < 0.001 in women). Conclusion: The VA is more representative of vascular aging than CA. The method presented in this study provides a new way to directly and objectively assess vascular aging in public health.
Authors: Y Aiba; S Ohshiba; S Horiguchi; I Morioka; K Miyashita; I Kiyota; G Endo; H Takada; H Iwata Journal: Ind Health Date: 1999-01 Impact factor: 2.179
Authors: K Takazawa; N Tanaka; M Fujita; O Matsuoka; T Saiki; M Aikawa; S Tamura; C Ibukiyama Journal: Hypertension Date: 1998-08 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Giuseppe Mancia; Stéphane Laurent; Enrico Agabiti-Rosei; Ettore Ambrosioni; Michel Burnier; Mark J Caulfield; Renata Cifkova; Denis Clément; Antonio Coca; Anna Dominiczak; Serap Erdine; Robert Fagard; Csaba Farsang; Guido Grassi; Hermann Haller; Anthony Heagerty; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Wolfgang Kiowski; Jean Michel Mallion; Athanasios Manolis; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Peter Nilsson; Michael H Olsen; Karl Heinz Rahn; Josep Redon; José Rodicio; Luis Ruilope; Roland E Schmieder; Harry A J Struijker-Boudier; Pieter A van Zwieten; Margus Viigimaa; Alberto Zanchetti Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 4.844
Authors: Aymen A Awad; Ala S Haddadin; Hossam Tantawy; Tarek M Badr; Robert G Stout; David G Silverman; Kirk H Shelley Journal: J Clin Monit Comput Date: 2007-10-17 Impact factor: 2.502
Authors: Peter Willeit; Lena Tschiderer; Michael J Sweeting; Simon G Thompson; Matthias W Lorenz; Elias Allara; Kathrin Reuber; Lisa Seekircher; Lu Gao; Ximing Liao; Eva Lonn; Hertzel C Gerstein; Salim Yusuf; Frank P Brouwers; Folkert W Asselbergs; Wiek van Gilst; Sigmund A Anderssen; Diederick E Grobbee; John J P Kastelein; Frank L J Visseren; George Ntaios; Apostolos I Hatzitolios; Christos Savopoulos; Pythia T Nieuwkerk; Erik Stroes; Matthew Walters; Peter Higgins; Jesse Dawson; Paolo Gresele; Giuseppe Guglielmini; Rino Migliacci; Marat Ezhov; Maya Safarova; Tatyana Balakhonova; Eiichi Sato; Mayuko Amaha; Tsukasa Nakamura; Kostas Kapellas; Lisa M Jamieson; Michael Skilton; James A Blumenthal; Alan Hinderliter; Andrew Sherwood; Patrick J Smith; Michiel A van Agtmael; Peter Reiss; Marit G A van Vonderen; Stefan Kiechl; Gerhard Klingenschmid; Matthias Sitzer; Coen D A Stehouwer; Heiko Uthoff; Zhi-Yong Zou; Ana R Cunha; Mario F Neves; Miles D Witham; Hyun-Woong Park; Moo-Sik Lee; Jang-Ho Bae; Enrique Bernal; Kristian Wachtell; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Michael H Olsen; David Preiss; Naveed Sattar; Edith Beishuizen; Menno V Huisman; Mark A Espeland; Caroline Schmidt; Stefan Agewall; Ercan Ok; Gülay Aşçi; Eric de Groot; Muriel P C Grooteman; Peter J Blankestijn; Michiel L Bots Journal: Circulation Date: 2020-06-17 Impact factor: 29.690