| Literature DB >> 35528885 |
Yingjie Qian1, Sang Yung Jeong1, Sung-Hyeon Baeck1, Myung-Jong Jin1, Sang Eun Shim1.
Abstract
Porous organic polymers (POPs) with well-distributed and tunable functional groups acting as ligands for specific reactions are promising supports for confining useful novel metals such as Pd, Au, and Pd. Herein, a thiadiazole-containing POP has been successfully synthesized and used for immobilizing Pd species. Pd immobilized inside the micropores (2.3 nm) of the POP material is easily prepared owing to a large amount of the strong anchoring group, thiadiazole, which is intrinsically distributed in the as-prepared POP. The rigid thiadiazole-containing polymer can stabilize the central metal rather than poisoning it. The as-prepared catalyst shows excellent catalytic activity in Suzuki-Miyaura coupling reactions under mild reaction conditions and low catalyst loading. Importantly, the intrinsically distributed thiadiazole ligands can stabilize the Pd moiety, preventing aggregation and leaching, and afford excellent catalytic lifetimes. Consequently, the catalyst can be reused 10 times without a significant loss of its catalytic activity. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 35528885 PMCID: PMC9073541 DOI: 10.1039/c9ra06709d
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Scheme 1(a) Synthesis of fully conjugated DTE and (b) schematic representation of the synthesis of DTE supported Pd@DTE.
Fig. 1(a) FT-IR spectra of 1,3,5-triethylnylbenzene and DTE and (b) solid-state 13C NMR spectrum of DTE.
Fig. 2(a) C 1s. (b) N 1s. (c) S 2p. (d) Pd 3d XPS spectra of Pd@DTE.
Fig. 3Characterizations of Pd@DTE: (a and b) low-magnification TEM images. (c and d) High-magnification TEM images. (e) Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) mapping of composition element, M, S, and Pd, respectively.
Fig. 4Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms of DTE and Pd@DTE.
BET surface area (SBET) and the total pore volumes (Vtotal) from N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms for DTE and Pd@DTE
| Sample |
|
|
|
| Pore size [nm] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DTE | 309 ± 7 | 0.174 | 0.094 | 0.08 | 2.3 |
| Pd@DTE | 244 ± 5 | 0.141 | 0.075 | 0.066 | 2.2 |
Optimization for Suzuki–Miyaura coupling of 2-bromoanisole with phenylboronic acida
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | Base | Catalyst (mol%) | Solvent (total 2 ml) | Yield |
| 1 | K2CO3 | 0.1 | H2O | 57.5 |
| 2 | K2CO3 | 0.1 | EtOH | 42.0 |
| 3 | K2CO3 | 0.1 | Isopropanol | 11.5 |
| 4 | K2CO3 | 0.1 | Toluene | 0.7 |
| 5 | K2CO3 | 0.1 | Propylene glycol | 20.4 |
| 6 | K2CO3 | 0.1 | DMF | 0.8 |
| 7 | K2CO3 | 0.1 | EtOH/H2O (1 : 1) | 84.1 |
| 8 | KOH | 0.1 | EtOH/H2O (1 : 1) | 65.6 |
| 9 | KOtBu | 0.1 | EtOH/H2O (1 : 1) | 58.1 |
| 10 | Na2CO3 | 0.1 | EtOH/H2O (1 : 1) | 81.9 |
| 11 | NEt3 | 0.1 | EtOH/H2O (1 : 1) | 37.2 |
Reaction conditions: aryl halide (0.4 mmol), boronic acid (0.48 mmol), Pd@DTE (0.1 mol%), base (0.8 mmol), TBAB (0.2 mmol), solvent (2 ml), 50 °C.
GC yield was determined using n-dodecane as an internal standard.
Fig. 5The yield versus time for Suzuki–Miyaura coupling reaction of 2-bromoanisole with phenylboronic acid at different volume ratio of H2O and EtOH at 50 °C.
Suzuki–Miyaura coupling of aryl halides with arylboronic acidsa
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | Aryl halide | Product | Time (h) | Yield |
| 1 |
|
| 6 | 94.2 |
| 2 |
|
| 4 | 98.4 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 | 99.2 |
| 4 |
|
| 4 | 98.1 |
| 5 |
|
| 6 | 97.8 |
| 6 |
|
| 1 | 100 |
| 7 |
|
| 1 | 100 |
| 8 |
|
| 4 | 100 |
| 9 |
|
| 1 | 100 |
| 10 |
|
| 1 | 100 |
Reaction conditions: aryl halide (1 mmol), arylboronic acid (1.5 mmol), Pd@DTE (0.1 mol%), K2CO3 (2.0 mmol), TBAB (0.5 mmol), H2O (2.0 ml), EtOH (2.0 ml), 50 °C.
GC yield was determined using n-dodecane as an internal standard.
Suzuki–Miyaura coupling of aryl halides with arylboronic acidsa
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | Aryl halide | Product | Time (h) | Yield |
| 1 |
|
| 20 | 100 |
| 2 |
|
| 20 | 91 |
| 3 |
|
| 20 | 97.2 |
| 4 |
|
| 20 | 96.9 |
| 5 |
|
| 20 | 89.3 |
| 6 |
|
| 20 | 92 |
| 7 |
|
| 20 | 93 |
| 8 |
|
| 20 | 87 |
Reaction conditions: aryl halide (1 mmol), arylboronic acid (1.5 mmol), Pd@DTE (0.1 mol%), K2CO3 (2.0 mmol), TBAB (0.5 mmol), H2O (2.0 ml), EtOH (2.0 ml), 50 °C.
GC yield was determined using n-dodecane as an internal standard.
The reaction was carried out at 75 °C.
Reusability of Pd@DTE in the Suzuki–Miyaura couplinga
|
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Entry | Time (h) | Yield |
| 1st batch | 1 | 100 |
| 2nd batch | 1 | 100 |
| 3rd batch | 1 | 99.1 |
| 4th batch | 1 | 98.5 |
| 5th batch | 1 | 99.2 |
| 6th batch | 1 | 98.2 |
| 7th batch | 1 | 98 |
| 8th batch | 1 | 98.7 |
| 9th batch | 1 | 98.4 |
| 10th batch | 1 | 97.6 |
Reaction conditions: aryl halide (1 mmol), arylboronic acid (1.5 mmol), Pd@DTE (0.1 mol%), K2CO3 (2.0 mmol), TBAB (0.5 mmol), H2O (2.0 ml), EtOH (2.0 ml), 50 °C.
GC yield was determined using n-dodecane as an internal standard.
Comparison of Pd@DTE with reported sulfur containing heterogeneous Pd catalysts
| Catalyst | Solvent | Temp. (°C) | Loading (mol%) | Time (h) | Yield (%) | Substrate | Number of cycles & Substrate | TOF | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pd@DTE | Water & ethanol | 50 | 0.1 | 4 | 100 |
|
| 250 | This work |
| PdNPs@COF | Water & DMF | 50 | 0.1 | 3 | 82.9 |
|
| 276 |
|
| P.SBA-15SHPd | Ethanol | 60 | 0.12 | 3 | 80 |
|
| 222 |
|
| ZrDMTD-Pd | Ethanol | 80 | 1 | 5 | 86 |
|
| 17.2 |
|
| Pd–P/polythiophene | Water & ethanol | RT | 1 | 24 | 87 |
| N/A | 4 |
|
| Pd@CB-PN | Water | RT | 5 | 2 | 100 |
|
| 10 |
|
Fig. 6Hot filtration experiments. Suzuki–Miyaura coupling reaction of 2-bromoanisole with phenylboronic acid was carried out at 100 °C.