Yi Zhao1, Mary Beth Nebel2,3, Brian S Caffo4, Stewart H Mostofsky2,3,5, Keri S Rosch2,5,6. 1. Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 2. Center for Neurodevelopmental and Imaging Research, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA. 3. Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 4. Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD USA. 5. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA. 6. Department of Neuropsychology, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Abstract
Background: Studies of brain functional connectivity (FC) typically involve massive univariate tests, performing statistical analysis on each individual connection. In this study we apply a novel whole-matrix regression approach referred to as Covariate Assisted Principal (CAP) regression to identify resting-state FC brain networks associated with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and response control. Methods: Participants included 8-12 year-old children with ADHD (n=115, 29 girls) and typically developing controls (n=102, 35 girls) who completed a resting-state fMRI scan and a go/no-go task (GNG). We modeled three sets of covariates to identify resting-state networks associated with an ADHD diagnosis, sex, and response inhibition (commission errors) and variability (ex-Gaussian parameter tau). Results: The first network includes FC between striatal-cognitive control (CC) network subregions and thalamic-default mode network (DMN) subregions and is positively related to age. The second consists of FC between CC-visual-somatomotor regions and between CC-DMN subregions and is positively associated with response variability in boys with ADHD. The third consists of FC within the DMN and between DMN-CC-visual regions and differs between boys with and without ADHD. The fourth consists of FC between visual-somatomotor regions and between visual-DMN regions and differs between girls and boys with ADHD and is associated with response inhibition and variability in boys with ADHD. Unique networks were also identified in each of the three models suggesting some specificity to the covariates of interest. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate the utility of our novel covariance regression approach to studying functional brain networks relevant for development, behavior, and psychopathology.
Background: Studies of brain functional connectivity (FC) typically involve massive univariate tests, performing statistical analysis on each individual connection. In this study we apply a novel whole-matrix regression approach referred to as Covariate Assisted Principal (CAP) regression to identify resting-state FC brain networks associated with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and response control. Methods: Participants included 8-12 year-old children with ADHD (n=115, 29 girls) and typically developing controls (n=102, 35 girls) who completed a resting-state fMRI scan and a go/no-go task (GNG). We modeled three sets of covariates to identify resting-state networks associated with an ADHD diagnosis, sex, and response inhibition (commission errors) and variability (ex-Gaussian parameter tau). Results: The first network includes FC between striatal-cognitive control (CC) network subregions and thalamic-default mode network (DMN) subregions and is positively related to age. The second consists of FC between CC-visual-somatomotor regions and between CC-DMN subregions and is positively associated with response variability in boys with ADHD. The third consists of FC within the DMN and between DMN-CC-visual regions and differs between boys with and without ADHD. The fourth consists of FC between visual-somatomotor regions and between visual-DMN regions and differs between girls and boys with ADHD and is associated with response inhibition and variability in boys with ADHD. Unique networks were also identified in each of the three models suggesting some specificity to the covariates of interest. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate the utility of our novel covariance regression approach to studying functional brain networks relevant for development, behavior, and psychopathology.
Authors: Elseline Hoekzema; Susana Carmona; J Antoni Ramos-Quiroga; Vanesa Richarte Fernández; Rosa Bosch; Juan Carlos Soliva; Mariana Rovira; Antonio Bulbena; Adolf Tobeña; Miguel Casas; Oscar Vilarroya Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2013-02-18 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Damien A Fair; Deepti Bathula; Kathryn L Mills; Taciana G Costa Dias; Michael S Blythe; Dongyang Zhang; Abraham Z Snyder; Marcus E Raichle; Alexander A Stevens; Joel T Nigg; Bonnie J Nagel Journal: Front Syst Neurosci Date: 2010-05-18
Authors: Brian D Mills; Oscar Miranda-Dominguez; Kathryn L Mills; Eric Earl; Michaela Cordova; Julia Painter; Sarah L Karalunas; Joel T Nigg; Damien A Fair Journal: Netw Neurosci Date: 2018-06-01
Authors: Anna C K van Duijvenvoorde; Bianca Westhoff; Frank de Vos; Lara M Wierenga; Eveline A Crone Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2019-05-17 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Baptiste Couvy-Duchesne; Jane L Ebejer; Nathan A Gillespie; David L Duffy; Ian B Hickie; Paul M Thompson; Nicholas G Martin; Greig I de Zubicaray; Katie L McMahon; Sarah E Medland; Margaret J Wright Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-01-08 Impact factor: 3.240