| Literature DB >> 35528637 |
Jack P Hughes1,2, Felipe D Blanco3, Craig E Banks1,2, Samuel J Rowley-Neale1,2.
Abstract
A screen-printable ink that contained varying percentage mass incorporations of two dimensional tungsten disulphide (2D-WS2) was produced and utilized to fabricate bespoke printed electrodes (2D-WS2-SPEs). These WS2-SPEs were then rigorously tested towards the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction (HER) within an acidic media. The mass incorporation of 2D-WS2 into the 2D-WS2-SPEs was found to critically affect the observed HER catalysis with the larger mass incorporations resulting in more beneficial catalysis. The optimal (largest possible mass of 2D-WS2 incorporation) was the 2D-WS2-SPE40%, which displayed a HER onset potential, Tafel slope value and Turn over Frequency (ToF) of -214 mV (vs. RHE), 51.1 mV dec-1 and 2.20 , respectively. These values significantly exceeded the HER catalysis of a bare/unmodified SPE, which had a HER onset and Tafel slope value of -459 mV (vs. RHE) and 118 mV dec-1, respectively. Clearly, indicating a strong electrocatalytic response from the 2D-WS2-SPEs. An investigation of the signal stability of the 2D-WS2-SPEs was conducted by performing 1000 repeat cyclic voltammograms (CVs) using a 2D-WS2-SPE10% as a representative example. The 2D-WS2-SPE10% displayed remarkable stability with no variance in the HER onset potential of ca. -268 mV (vs. RHE) and a 44.4% increase in the achievable current over the duration of the 1000 CVs. The technique utilized to fabricate these 2D-WS2-SPEs can be implemented for a plethora of different materials in order to produce large numbers of uniform and highly reproducible electrodes with bespoke electrochemical signal outputs. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 35528637 PMCID: PMC9069938 DOI: 10.1039/c9ra05342e
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 3.361
Comparison of current literature using WS2 and related catalytic materials towards the HERa
| Catalyst | Supporting electrode | Electrolyte | Deposition technique | HER/OER onset potential | Tafel value | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WS2 | NPG | 0.5 M H2SO4 | Electrochemical reduction | −0.11 V ( | 74 mV dec−1 |
|
| W | GC | 0.5 M H2SO4 | Drop casting | −0.078 V ( | 45.9 mV dec−1 |
|
| WC nanowall | SW | 0.5 M H2SO4 | Plasma assisted deposition | −0.052 V ( | 67 mV dec−1 |
|
| WS2 | GC | 0.5 M H2SO4 | Drop casting | −0.10 V ( | 48 mV dec−1 |
|
| WSe2P | CF | 0.5 M H2SO4 | High temperature/drop casting | −0.22 V ( | 69 mV dec−1 |
|
| WC nanotubes | GC | 0.5 M H2SO4 | Drop casting | −0.31 V ( | 69 mV dec−1 |
|
| rGO/WS2/WO3 | GC | 0.5 M H2SO4 | Drop casting | −0.09 V ( | 37 mV dec−1 |
|
| N-WC | CFP | 0.5 M H2SO4 | Drop casting | −0.30 V ( | 149 mV dec−1 |
|
| W2C | GC | 0.5 M H2SO4 | Spin coating | −0.30 V ( | 145 mV dec−1 |
|
| WS2/W | GC | 0.5 M H2SO4 | Drop casting | −0.14 V ( | 46.8 mV dec−1 |
|
| W2C/WP | GC | 0.5 M H2SO4 | Drop casting | −0.10 V ( | 61 mV dec−1 |
|
| Fe-WO | GC | 0.5 M H2SO4 | Drop casting | −0.075 V ( | 41.9 mV dec−1 |
|
| W2C-NC-WN | GC | 0.5 M H2SO4 | Drop casting | −0.13 V ( | 96.4 mV dec−1 |
|
| 2D-WS2-SPE5% | SPE | 0.5 M H2SO4 | Screen printing | −0.28 V ( | 111 mV dec−1 | This work |
| 2D-WS2-SPE10% | SPE | 0.5 M H2SO4 | Screen printing | −0.27 V ( | 70.5 mV dec−1 | This work |
| 2D-WS2-SPE20% | SPE | 0.5 M H2SO4 | Screen printing | −0.23 V ( | 64.9 mV dec−1 | This work |
| 2D-WS2-SPE40% | SPE | 0.5 M H2SO4 | Screen printing | −0.21 V ( | 51.1 mV dec−1 | This work |
NPG; nanoporous gold, GC; glassy carbon, SW; silicon wafer, CF; copper foil, CFP; carbon filter paper, WS2; tungsten disulfide, WC; tungsten carbide, WSe2; tungsten diselenide, P; phosphide, rGO; reduced graphene oxide, WO3; tungsten trioxide, NC; nitrogen carbide, WN; tungsten nitride, Mo; molybdenum, RHE; reversible hydrogen electrode, SPE; screen printed electrode.
Fig. 1Characterization of commercially sourced 2D-WS2 (A) XRD spectra of the 2D-WS2, (B) Raman spectra of the 2D-WS2.
Fig. 2Characterization of commercially sourced 2D-WS2 (A) high resolution XPS survey spectrum of the 2D-WS2 (wide fit), (B and C) high resolution XPS spectra of the W5p, W4f and S2p regions in 2D-WS2, respectively.
Fig. 3SEM images of the surface of a bare/unmodified SPE (A and B) and the 2D-WS2-SPE10% (C and D). (E and F) represent images of the WS2 powder. SEM magnifications of ×1k (scale bar, 10 μm) and ×10k (scale bar, 1 μm) for the images (A to B, C to D and E to F) were used, respectively.
Fig. 4(A) Linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) of a bare/unmodified SPE and the 2D-WS2-SPE5%, 2D-WS2-SPE10%, 2D-WS2-SPE20%, and 2D-WS2-SPE40%, exhibiting the onset potential of the HER, in the potential range 0.2 to −1.2 V (vs. SCE). Scan rate: 25 mV s−1 (vs. RHE) in 0.5 M H2SO4. (B) Tafel analysis; potential (vs. RHE) vs. log(current density) (j mA cm−2) for the faradaic region of the LSV displayed in (A). (C) Cycling stability testing of the 2D-WS2-SPE10%via LSV in the potential window 0.2 to −1.2 V (vs. SCE) at a scan rate of 100 mV s−1 (vs. RHE), repeated for 1000 cycles.
Fig. 5Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) displaying the charge transfer resistance of each SPE variant utilised in this study; 2D-WS2-SPE5%, 2D-WS2-SPE10%, 2D-WS2-SPE20%, 2D-WS2-SPE40% and bare/unmodified. The frequency range was from 0.1–100 000 Hz at an amplitude of 10 mV (vs. RHE) using 1 mM potassium ferrocyanide (II)/ferricyanide (III) in 0.1 M KCl. Inset shows equivalent circuit.