| Literature DB >> 35528554 |
Na Su1,2, B C Qin3, K J Zhu1,2, Z Y Liu1,4, P Shahi1,5, J P Sun1, B S Wang1,2,6, Y Sui4, Y G Shi1,2,6, L D Zhao3, J-G Cheng1,2,6.
Abstract
We evaluate the influence of pressure on the thermoelectric power factors PF ≡ S 2 σ of pristine and Na-doped SnSe crystals by measuring their electrical conductivity σ(T) and Seebeck coefficient S(T) up to ∼22 kbar with a self-clamped piston-cylinder cell. For both cases, σ(T) is enhanced while S(T) reduced with increasing pressure as expected, but their imbalanced variations lead to a monotonic enhancement of PF under pressure. For pristine SnSe, σ(290 K) increases by ∼4 times from ∼10.1 to 38 S cm-1, while S(290 K) decreases by only ∼12% from 474 to 415 μV K-1, leading to about three-fold enhancement of PF from 2.24 to 6.61 μW cm-1 K-2, which is very close to the optimal value of SnSe above the structural transition at ∼800 K at ambient pressure. In comparison, the PF of Na-doped SnSe at 290 K is enhanced moderately by ∼30% up to 20 kbar. In contrast, the PF of isostructural black phosphorus with a simple band structure was found to decrease under pressure. The comparison with black phosphorus indicates that the multi-valley valence band structure of SnSe is beneficial for the enhancement of PF by retaining a large Seebeck coefficient under pressure. Our results also provide experimental confirmation on the previous theoretical prediction that high pressure can be used to optimize the thermoelectric efficiency of SnSe. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 35528554 PMCID: PMC9070544 DOI: 10.1039/c9ra05134a
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 3.361
Fig. 1Powder XRD patterns of (a) pristine and (b) Na-doped SnSe after Rietveld refinements, images of SEM, EDS, and element distribution maps for (c) pristine and (d) Na-doped SnSe. Inset of (a) shows the crystal structure of SnSe at the low-temperature Pnma phase.
Fig. 2(a) A schematic drawing of the setup for high-pressure Seebeck coefficient and resistivity measurements inside a clamp-type piston-cylinder cell. (b) A picture of the sample assembly inside the Teflon container.
Fig. 3Temperature dependence of (a) electrical conductivity σ(T), (b) Seebeck coefficient S(T), and (c) power factor PF ≡ S2σ of pristine SnSe crystal under various pressures up to 22.5 kbar.
Fig. 5Pressure dependence of (a) conductivity σ, (b) Seebeck coefficient S, and (c) power factor PF at 290 K for pristine SnSe (left) and Na-doped SnSe (right). The PF values of SnSe at high temperatures and ambient pressure (pentagon and star symbols) in (c) are taken from ref. 5 and 9, respectively.
Fig. 4Temperature dependence of (a) electrical conductivity σ(T), (b) Seebeck coefficient S(T), and (c) power factor PF of Na-doped SnSe crystal under various pressures up to 19.2 kbar.
Fig. 6Pressure dependence of (a) electrical conductivity σ, (b) Seebeck coefficient S, and (c) power factor PF at 290 K for black phosphorus. The Lifshitz transition taking place around 12 kbar is marked by the dotted vertical line.