| Literature DB >> 35528534 |
Yehui Zhou1, Ming Yang1.
Abstract
Compared with traditional acupuncture, it is urgently needed for more effective method for the disease to serve the clinical treatment. This paper combines acupuncture and massage to treat lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion, uses a controlled trial to study the clinical effects of acupuncture combined with massage for the treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion, combines mathematical statistics to test the data, and compares and analyzes the statistical object parameters. Through experimental research, it is known that in the treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion, in order to obtain a faster and better effect, traditional acupuncture treatment should be combined with massage therapy. On the basis of fully eliminating the pathological factors, the intervertebral disc is reset by mechanical treatment, which makes the patient more likely to heal. Therefore, it is a comprehensive treatment plan that is worth adopting.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35528534 PMCID: PMC9076308 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6803124
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Bionics Biomech ISSN: 1176-2322 Impact factor: 1.664
Comparison of disease course before treatment.
| Number | Control group | Test group | Number | Control group | Test group |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 19.83 | 18.25 | 17 | 19.76 | 19.25 |
| 2 | 18.72 | 19.68 | 18 | 18.29 | 18.89 |
| 3 | 18.88 | 19.02 | 19 | 19.57 | 19.32 |
| 4 | 18.68 | 18.42 | 20 | 19.95 | 18.82 |
| 5 | 18.18 | 18.35 | 21 | 19.75 | 19.76 |
| 6 | 19.62 | 19.46 | 22 | 19.40 | 18.72 |
| 7 | 19.00 | 18.08 | 23 | 19.47 | 19.14 |
| 8 | 19.02 | 19.33 | 24 | 19.00 | 18.95 |
| 9 | 19.80 | 19.83 | 25 | 19.57 | 18.42 |
| 10 | 19.33 | 18.90 | 26 | 18.10 | 19.48 |
| 11 | 18.84 | 18.02 | 27 | 19.42 | 18.25 |
| 12 | 19.07 | 19.05 | 28 | 19.24 | 19.77 |
| 13 | 18.26 | 18.63 | 29 | 18.04 | 19.94 |
| 14 | 19.43 | 19.01 | 30 | 18.71 | 19.91 |
| 15 | 18.83 | 18.84 | 31 | 18.65 | 19.41 |
| 16 | 18.33 | 19.55 | 32 | 19.93 | 18.93 |
VAS score before treatment.
| Number | Control group | Test group | Number | Control group | Test group |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.52 | 5.30 | 17 | 6.10 | 6.42 |
| 2 | 4.46 | 6.35 | 18 | 4.67 | 4.88 |
| 3 | 6.23 | 4.58 | 19 | 3.65 | 4.62 |
| 4 | 4.82 | 6.09 | 20 | 5.12 | 5.07 |
| 5 | 6.78 | 4.69 | 21 | 5.44 | 5.11 |
| 6 | 3.87 | 4.96 | 22 | 4.01 | 5.23 |
| 7 | 6.76 | 4.97 | 23 | 6.08 | 6.50 |
| 8 | 5.40 | 5.28 | 24 | 5.19 | 5.31 |
| 9 | 7.16 | 4.90 | 25 | 7.00 | 4.92 |
| 10 | 3.86 | 6.07 | 26 | 3.65 | 4.76 |
| 11 | 3.90 | 6.48 | 27 | 5.97 | 4.73 |
| 12 | 7.04 | 6.20 | 28 | 6.36 | 6.60 |
| 13 | 4.96 | 6.48 | 29 | 5.01 | 6.45 |
| 14 | 5.84 | 6.35 | 30 | 6.03 | 4.61 |
| 15 | 6.29 | 5.13 | 31 | 3.87 | 5.23 |
| 16 | 3.98 | 5.42 | 32 | 7.04 | 4.49 |
Comparison of the overall efficacy of the two groups of patients.
| Number | Control group | Test group | Number | Control group | Test group |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 84.46 | 96.14 | 17 | 83.36 | 95.83 |
| 2 | 84.90 | 95.40 | 18 | 84.20 | 96.27 |
| 3 | 83.13 | 96.68 | 19 | 83.69 | 95.26 |
| 4 | 84.45 | 95.51 | 20 | 83.99 | 97.37 |
| 5 | 84.78 | 97.44 | 21 | 84.52 | 95.03 |
| 6 | 83.60 | 96.88 | 22 | 83.64 | 95.60 |
| 7 | 83.82 | 96.22 | 23 | 83.89 | 97.65 |
| 8 | 83.90 | 96.36 | 24 | 84.18 | 96.44 |
| 9 | 83.70 | 96.47 | 25 | 83.23 | 96.26 |
| 10 | 84.21 | 97.54 | 26 | 83.01 | 95.54 |
| 11 | 84.03 | 97.85 | 27 | 84.31 | 97.36 |
| 12 | 84.94 | 95.84 | 28 | 83.11 | 95.66 |
| 13 | 83.43 | 96.74 | 29 | 84.79 | 97.60 |
| 14 | 83.95 | 95.16 | 30 | 83.05 | 97.24 |
| 15 | 84.72 | 96.88 | 31 | 83.52 | 97.80 |
| 16 | 84.94 | 97.93 | 32 | 84.24 | 96.23 |
Comparison of VAS scores between the two groups of patients after treatment.
| Number | Control group | Test group | Number | Control group | Test group |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.29 | 0.80 | 17 | 2.57 | 0.61 |
| 2 | 3.86 | 0.84 | 18 | 1.24 | 2.67 |
| 3 | 1.03 | 2.39 | 19 | 1.23 | 1.18 |
| 4 | 3.14 | 0.62 | 20 | 2.65 | 1.69 |
| 5 | 3.44 | 1.58 | 21 | 2.97 | 0.37 |
| 6 | 1.89 | 1.65 | 22 | 1.73 | 1.43 |
| 7 | 3.38 | 1.45 | 23 | 1.40 | 2.98 |
| 8 | 3.28 | 2.92 | 24 | 3.35 | 2.48 |
| 9 | 2.56 | 0.31 | 25 | 4.00 | 0.22 |
| 10 | 2.70 | 0.27 | 26 | 3.96 | 2.18 |
| 11 | 1.74 | 0.38 | 27 | 2.95 | 2.92 |
| 12 | 2.52 | 1.48 | 28 | 2.03 | 1.46 |
| 13 | 2.82 | 1.11 | 29 | 1.40 | 2.99 |
| 14 | 3.76 | 0.84 | 30 | 1.62 | 1.13 |
| 15 | 3.30 | 2.12 | 31 | 2.66 | 1.60 |
| 16 | 1.54 | 1.28 | 32 | 3.77 | 1.09 |
Safety evaluation of treatment methods.
| Number | Control group | Test group | Number | Control group | Test group |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 73.68 | 89.53 | 17 | 75.83 | 92.18 |
| 2 | 77.18 | 93.56 | 18 | 76.61 | 92.60 |
| 3 | 74.39 | 90.92 | 19 | 74.29 | 92.45 |
| 4 | 78.22 | 93.41 | 20 | 72.32 | 89.48 |
| 5 | 72.76 | 93.63 | 21 | 73.26 | 91.44 |
| 6 | 72.45 | 92.96 | 22 | 76.46 | 91.00 |
| 7 | 75.22 | 93.63 | 23 | 72.67 | 91.66 |
| 8 | 76.04 | 93.54 | 24 | 73.69 | 91.01 |
| 9 | 77.71 | 92.83 | 25 | 76.00 | 90.81 |
| 10 | 78.58 | 89.86 | 26 | 76.05 | 93.47 |
| 11 | 71.57 | 93.32 | 27 | 71.16 | 91.21 |
| 12 | 72.33 | 92.73 | 28 | 78.51 | 91.80 |
| 13 | 77.25 | 89.63 | 29 | 77.59 | 89.35 |
| 14 | 73.92 | 93.34 | 30 | 74.70 | 92.54 |
| 15 | 72.75 | 92.00 | 31 | 76.50 | 92.07 |
| 16 | 74.49 | 92.03 | 32 | 74.34 | 93.81 |
Patient satisfaction survey.
| Number | Control group | Test group | Number | Control group | Test group |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 84.48 | 95.10 | 17 | 85.72 | 96.84 |
| 2 | 87.37 | 95.11 | 18 | 82.57 | 94.65 |
| 3 | 89.15 | 96.97 | 19 | 85.86 | 96.02 |
| 4 | 84.66 | 96.53 | 20 | 87.10 | 96.42 |
| 5 | 83.09 | 95.35 | 21 | 87.97 | 95.16 |
| 6 | 81.69 | 94.24 | 22 | 82.77 | 95.66 |
| 7 | 80.87 | 96.07 | 23 | 89.03 | 94.96 |
| 8 | 85.85 | 95.50 | 24 | 80.19 | 95.36 |
| 9 | 80.17 | 96.94 | 25 | 89.76 | 95.51 |
| 10 | 82.08 | 97.47 | 26 | 89.49 | 97.23 |
| 11 | 87.26 | 96.18 | 27 | 82.98 | 95.87 |
| 12 | 85.92 | 97.23 | 28 | 88.64 | 97.40 |
| 13 | 87.95 | 93.30 | 29 | 89.42 | 97.15 |
| 14 | 90.46 | 95.47 | 30 | 79.47 | 97.20 |
| 15 | 85.75 | 97.57 | 31 | 85.39 | 97.60 |
| 16 | 79.96 | 94.69 | 32 | 79.50 | 94.65 |