Literature DB >> 35528373

Foundations of information governance for smart manufacturing.

K C Morris1, Yan Lu1, Simon Frechette1.   

Abstract

The manufacturing systems of the future will be even more dependent on data than they are today. More and more data and information are being collected and communicated throughout product development lifecycles and across manufacturing value chains. To enable smarter manufacturing operations, new equipment often includes built-in data collection capabilities. Older equipment can be retrofitted inexpensively with sensors to collect a wide variety of data. Many manufacturers are in a quandary as to what to do with increasing quantities of data. Much hype currently surrounds the use of AI to process large data sets, but manufacturers struggle to understand how AI can be applied to improve manufacturing system performance. The gap lies in the lack of good information governance practices for manufacturing. This paper defines information governance in the manufacturing context as the set of principles that allow for consistent, repeatable, and trustworthy processing and use of data. The paper identifies three foundations for good information governance that are needed in the manufacturing environment-data quality, semantic context, and system context-and reviews the surrounding and evolving body of work. The work includes a broad base of standard methods that combines to create reusable information from raw data formats. An example from an additive manufacturing case study is used to show how those detailed specifications create the governance needed to build trust in the systems.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer integrated manufacturing; Information governance; context awareness; part qualification; system verification; systems integration

Year:  2020        PMID: 35528373      PMCID: PMC9074743          DOI: 10.1520/ssms20190041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Smart Sustain Manuf Syst        ISSN: 2572-3928


  8 in total

1.  Dynamic Production System Identification for Smart Manufacturing Systems.

Authors:  Peter Denno; Charles Dickerson; Jennifer Anne Harding
Journal:  J Manuf Syst       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 8.633

2.  IDENTIFYING PERFORMANCE ASSURANCE CHALLENGES FOR SMART MANUFACTURING.

Authors:  Moneer Helu; Katherine Morris; Kiwook Jung; Kevin Lyons; Swee Leong
Journal:  Manuf Lett       Date:  2015-10

3.  Contextualising manufacturing data for lifecycle decision-making.

Authors:  William Z Bernstein; Thomas D Hedberg; Moneer Helu; Allison Barnard Feeney
Journal:  Int J Prod Lifecycle Manag       Date:  2018

4.  A review of diagnostic and prognostic capabilities and best practices for manufacturing.

Authors:  Gregory W Vogl; Brian A Weiss; Moneer Helu
Journal:  J Intell Manuf       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 6.485

5.  Defining Near-Term to Long-Term Research Opportunities to Advance Metrics, Models, and Methods for Smart and Sustainable Manufacturing.

Authors:  Arvind Shankar Raman; Karl R Haapala; Kamyar Raoufi; Barbara S Linke; William Z Bernstein; K C Morris
Journal:  Smart Sustain Manuf Syst       Date:  2020

6.  ENABLING SMART MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGIES FOR DECISION-MAKING SUPPORT.

Authors:  Moneer Helu; Don Libes; Joshua Lubell; Kevin Lyons; K C Morris
Journal:  Proc ASME Des Eng Tech Conf       Date:  2016

7.  The Metadata Coverage Index (MCI): A standardized metric for quantifying database metadata richness.

Authors:  Konstantinos Liolios; Lynn Schriml; Lynette Hirschman; Ioanna Pagani; Bahador Nosrat; Peter Sterk; Owen White; Philippe Rocca-Serra; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Chris Taylor; Nikos C Kyrpides; Dawn Field
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2012-07-20
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.