Alexander T Hawkins1, Russell Rothman2, Timothy M Geiger1, Kemberlee R Bonnet3, Matthew G Mutch4, Scott E Regenbogen5, David G Schlundt3, David F Penson6,7. 1. Division of General Surgery, Section of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN. 2. Center for Health Services Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN. 3. Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN. 4. Department of Surgery, Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri. 5. Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 6. Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN. 7. Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN.
Abstract
Objective: This study employs qualitative methodology to assess surgeons' perspective on decision making in management of recurrent diverticulitis to improve patient-centered decision making. Summary Background Data: The decision to pursue colectomy for patients with recurrent diverticulitis is nuanced. Strategies to enact broad acceptance of guidelines for surgery are hindered because of a knowledge gap in understanding surgeons' current attitudes and opinions. Methods: We performed semi-structured interviews with board-certified North American general and colorectal surgeons who manage recurrent diverticulitis. We purposely sampled specialists by both surgeon and practice factors. An iterative inductive/deductive strategy was used to code and analyze the interviews and create a conceptual framework. Results: 25 surgeons were enrolled over a nine-month period. There was diversity in surgeons' gender, age, experience, training, specialty (colorectal vs general surgery) and geography. Surgeons described the difficult process to determine who receives an operation. We identified seven major themes as well as twenty subthemes of the decision-making process. These were organized into a conceptual model. Across the spectrum of interviews, it was notable that there was a move over time from decisions based on counting episodes of diverticulitis to a focus on improving quality of life. Surgeons also felt that quality of life was more dependent on psychosocial factors than the degree of physiological dysfunction. [What about what surprised you/]. Conclusions: Surgeons mostly have discarded older dogma in recommending colectomy for recurrent diverticulitis based on number and severity of episodes. Instead, decision making in recurrent diverticulitis is complex, involving multiple surgeon and patient factors and evolving over time. Surgeons struggle with this decision and education- or communication-based interventions that focus on shared decision making warrant development.
Objective: This study employs qualitative methodology to assess surgeons' perspective on decision making in management of recurrent diverticulitis to improve patient-centered decision making. Summary Background Data: The decision to pursue colectomy for patients with recurrent diverticulitis is nuanced. Strategies to enact broad acceptance of guidelines for surgery are hindered because of a knowledge gap in understanding surgeons' current attitudes and opinions. Methods: We performed semi-structured interviews with board-certified North American general and colorectal surgeons who manage recurrent diverticulitis. We purposely sampled specialists by both surgeon and practice factors. An iterative inductive/deductive strategy was used to code and analyze the interviews and create a conceptual framework. Results: 25 surgeons were enrolled over a nine-month period. There was diversity in surgeons' gender, age, experience, training, specialty (colorectal vs general surgery) and geography. Surgeons described the difficult process to determine who receives an operation. We identified seven major themes as well as twenty subthemes of the decision-making process. These were organized into a conceptual model. Across the spectrum of interviews, it was notable that there was a move over time from decisions based on counting episodes of diverticulitis to a focus on improving quality of life. Surgeons also felt that quality of life was more dependent on psychosocial factors than the degree of physiological dysfunction. [What about what surprised you/]. Conclusions: Surgeons mostly have discarded older dogma in recommending colectomy for recurrent diverticulitis based on number and severity of episodes. Instead, decision making in recurrent diverticulitis is complex, involving multiple surgeon and patient factors and evolving over time. Surgeons struggle with this decision and education- or communication-based interventions that focus on shared decision making warrant development.
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Jenaya L Goldwag; Racquel V Lyn; Lauren R Wilson; Matthew Z Wilson; Srinivas J Ivatury Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2019-04-22 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Jason Hall; Karin Hardiman; Sang Lee; Amy Lightner; Luca Stocchi; Ian M Paquette; Scott R Steele; Daniel L Feingold Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Antonello Forgione; Joel Leroy; Ronan A Cahill; Charles Bailey; Michele Simone; Didier Mutter; Jacques Marescaux Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Sara Shaw; Gemma Hughes; Tim Stephens; Rupert Pearse; John Prowle; Richard Edmund Ashcroft; Ester Avagliano; James Day; Mark Edsell; Jennifer Edwards; Leslie Everest Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-05-05 Impact factor: 2.692