| Literature DB >> 35527993 |
Yu-Guo Wang1, Fei-Ju Xu2, Enock Adjei Agyekum2, Hong Xiang3, Yuan-Dong Wang4, Jin Zhang2, Hui Sun5, Guo-Liang Zhang6, Xiang-Shu Bo2, Wen-Zhi Lv7, Xian Wang2, Shu-Dong Hu8, Xiao-Qin Qian2.
Abstract
BRAFV600E is the most common mutated gene in thyroid cancer and is most closely related to papillary thyroid carcinoma(PTC). We investigated the value of elasticity and grayscale ultrasonography for predicting BRAFV600E mutations in PTC.Entities:
Keywords: BRAF-V600E; model; papillary thyroid carcinoma; radiomic; ultrasonic examination
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35527993 PMCID: PMC9074386 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.872153
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ISSN: 1664-2392 Impact factor: 6.055
Figure 1Schematic diagram of the patient selection. PTC, papillary thyroid carcinoma.
Figure 2Ultrasound image feature selection using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression model in the training dataset. (A) The 10-fold cross-validation and the minimal criteria process were used to generate the optimal penalization coefficient lambda in the LASSO model. (B) LASSO coefficient profiles of the BMUS and ES features. The dotted vertical line was drawn at the value selected by 10-fold cross-validation when the optimal λ resulted in eight (BMUS) and five (ES) nonzero coefficients, respectively.
Clinical characteristics of the patients in the training and test cohorts.
| Characteristic | Training cohort (n=96) | test cohort (n=42) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 41.78 ± 10.99 | 44.33 ± 12.81 | 0.152 |
|
| |||
| >45 | 48.63 ± 5.23 | 49.90 ± 5.89 | 0.218 |
| ≤45 | 34.61 ± 5.17 | 34.76 ± 7.87 | 0.670 |
|
| |||
| Male | 36 | 15 | 0.851 |
| Female | 60 | 27 | |
|
| 26.04 ± 8.51 | 26.63 ± 8.55 | 0.074 |
|
| |||
| Right lobe | 28 | 15 | 0.318 |
| Left lobe | 30 | 16 | |
| Isthmus | 38 | 11 | |
|
| |||
| Upper pole | 31 | 18 | 0.325 |
| Lower pole | 27 | 13 | |
| Middle | 38 | 11 | |
|
| |||
| Solid | 56 | 19 | 0.269 |
| Predominantly solid | 40 | 23 | |
|
| |||
| 1 | 13 | 5 | 0.375 |
| 2 | 22 | 15 | |
| 3 | 15 | 7 | |
| 4 | 26 | 7 | |
| 5 | 20 | 8 | |
|
| |||
| With cystic change | 52 | 20 | 0.579 |
| Without cystic change | 44 | 22 | |
|
| |||
| Microcalcification | 37 | 11 | 0.143 |
| Macrocalcification | 41 | 17 | |
| Rim calcification | 18 | 14 | |
|
| |||
| Clear | 37 | 13 | 0.510 |
| Less clear | 31 | 18 | |
| Fuzzy | 28 | 11 | |
|
| 61 | 31 | 0.327 |
Relationship between BRAF mutations and US imaging characteristics through visual assessment of papillary thyroid carcinomas.
| BRAF mutation (n=63) | No BRAF mutation (n=75) | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, mean ± SD, years | 38.03 ± 10.41 | 36.68 ± 10.05 | 0.377 |
|
| |||
| Male | 22 | 29 | 0.724 |
| Female | 41 | 46 | |
|
| 24.12 ± 8.6 | 23.98 ± 11.01 | 0.928 |
|
| |||
| Solid | 33 | 42 | 0.733 |
| Predominantly solid | 30 | 33 | |
|
| |||
| Markedly hypoechoic | 41 | 20 | 0.000 |
| Hypoechoic | 10 | 21 | |
| Isoechoic | 9 | 14 | |
| Hyperechoic | 3 | 20 | |
|
| |||
| Irregular | 32 | 43 | 0.443 |
| Round to oval | 31 | 32 | |
|
| |||
| ≥1 | 41 | 27 | 0.001 |
| <1 | 22 | 48 | |
|
| |||
| Spiculated/microlobulated | 30 | 25 | 0.183 |
| Ill-defined | 21 | 28 | |
| Smooth | 12 | 22 | |
|
| |||
| Microcalcification | 26 | 22 | 0.127 |
| Macrocalcification | 27 | 31 | |
| Rim calcification | 10 | 22 | |
|
| |||
| Low suspicion | 16 | 31 | 0.058 |
| Intermediate suspicion | 17 | 23 | |
| High suspicion | 30 | 22 | |
|
| 47 | 45 | 0.102 |
Figure 3(A) Grayscale features were reduced to eight BRAFV600E mutation-related features in the training cohort. (B) The elasticity features were reduced to five risk predictors in the training cohort.
Performance of the sequences models.
| Cohort | Model | AUC | SEN | SPE | PPV | NPV | ACC | Cutoff value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| dataset | grayscale | 0.792 (0.703–0.882) | 69.1 | 78.0 | 80.9 | 65.3 | 72.9 | 0.372 |
| elasticity | 0.952 (0.914–0.990) | 85.5 | 97.6 | 97.9 | 83.3 | 90.6 | 0.469 | |
| grayscale + elasticity | 0.985 (0.965–1.000) | 96.4 | 97.6 | 98.1 | 95.2 | 96.9 | 0.628 | |
| Test dataset | grayscale | 0.725 (0.569–0.880) | 54.2 | 83.3 | 81.2 | 57.7 | 66.7 | 0.372 |
| elasticity | 0.931 (0.841–1.000) | 83.3 | 94.4 | 95.2 | 81.0 | 88.1 | 0.469 | |
| grayscale + elasticity | 0.938 (0.851–1.000) | 83.3 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 81.8 | 90.5 | 0.628 |
AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.
SEN, sensitivity.
SPE, specificity.
PPV, positive predictive value.
NPV, negative predictive value.
ACC, balanced accuracy.
Figure 4The ROC curves of the three models. ROC, receiver operating characteristic. (A) Training cohort (B) Test cohort.
Figure 5Decision curve analysis (DCA) of each model in predicting BRAFV600E Mutations for papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). The vertical axis measures standardized net benefit. The horizontal axis shows the corresponding risk threshold. The DCA showed using the risk_two radiomics (red curve) derived in the present study to predict BRAFV600E Mutations provided the greatest benefit. (A) DCA in training cohort (B) DCA in the test cohort.