Literature DB >> 35526835

Discordance between Immunohistochemistry and Erb-B2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinase 2 mRNA to Determine Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Low Status for Breast Cancer.

Keying Xu1, Jane Bayani2, Elizabeth Mallon3, Gregory R Pond4, Tammy Piper5, Annette Hasenburg6, Christos J Markopoulos7, Luc Dirix8, Caroline M Seynaeve9, Cornelis J H van de Velde10, Daniel W Rea11, John M S Bartlett12.   

Abstract

Novel human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-directed antibody-drug conjugates have demonstrated efficacy in HER2-low expressing breast cancers, which are currently defined as those with immunohistochemistry (IHC) scores of 1+ or 2+ with a negative in situ hybridization assay. However, current HER2 testing methods are designed to identify HER2-amplified tumors with high expression levels. The true definition of HER2-low expressing breast cancers remains controversial. Using quantitative molecular analysis of breast cancers based on RNA expression, the dynamic range of HER2 expression exceeds that detected by in situ IHC approaches. Erb-B2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ERBB2) mRNA expression levels across IHC groups using patient samples derived from the Tamoxifen Exemestane Adjuvant Multicenter Trial were investigated. The standardized mean differences in ERBB2 mRNA scores in log base 2 are 0.47 (95% CI, 0.36-0.57), 0.58 (95% CI, 0.26-0.70), and 0.32 (95% CI, -0.12 to 0.75) when comparing IHC 0+ without staining versus IHC 0+ with some staining, IHC 0+ with some staining versus IHC 1+, and IHC 1+ versus IHC 2+/fluorescence in situ hybridization-negative, respectively. The results showed immunohistochemical methods have a comparatively limited dynamic range for measuring HER2 protein expression. The range of expression based on RNA abundance suggests a molecular method defining HER2-low cancers may better serve the treatment decision needs of this group. Indeed, the validity of RNA abundance to identify HER2-low cancers and predict treatment response needs to be further evaluated by prospective clinical trials.
Copyright © 2022 Association for Molecular Pathology and American Society for Investigative Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35526835     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2022.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.341


  2 in total

1.  Can HER2 1+ Breast Cancer Be Considered as HER2-Low Tumor? A Comparison of Clinicopathological Features, Quantitative HER2 mRNA Levels, and Prognosis among HER2-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Lan Shu; Yiwei Tong; Zhuoxuan Li; Xiaosong Chen; Kunwei Shen
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 6.575

2.  Comparison of Management and Outcomes in ERBB2-Low vs ERBB2-Zero Metastatic Breast Cancer in France.

Authors:  Ombline de Calbiac; Amélie Lusque; Audrey Mailliez; Thomas Bachelot; Lionel Uwer; Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier; George Emile; Christelle Jouannaud; Anthony Gonçalves; Anne Patsouris; Véronique Diéras; Marianne Leheurteur; Thierry Petit; Paul Cottu; Jean-Marc Ferrero; Véronique D'Hondt; Isabelle Desmoulins; Joana Mourato-Ribeiro; Anne-Laure Martin; Jean-Sébastien Frenel
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-09-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.