Literature DB >> 35524734

Effects of yeast-based pre- and probiotics in lactation diets of sows on litter performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of sows.

Jenna A Chance1, Joel M DeRouchey1, Raghavendra G Amachawadi2, Victor Ishengoma2, Tiruvoor G Nagaraja3, Robert D Goodband1, Jason C Woodworth1, Mike D Tokach1, Qing Kang4, Joseph A Loughmiller5, Brian Hotze5, Jordan T Gebhardt3.   

Abstract

A total of 80 sows (Line 241; DNA, Columbus, NE) across three farrowing groups were used in a study to evaluate the effect of feeding live yeast and yeast extracts to lactating sows on sow and litter performance and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) patterns of sow fecal E. coli. Sows were blocked by farrowing group, BW, and parity on day 110 of gestation and allotted to 1 of 2 dietary treatments. Dietary treatments consisted of a standard lactation diet with or without yeast-based pre- and probiotics (0.10% Actisaf Sc 47 HR+ and 0.025% SafMannan; Phileo by Lesaffre, Milwaukee, WI). Diets were fed from day 110 of gestation until weaning (approximately d 19 post-farrow). A tendency (P = 0.073) was observed for increased feed intake through lactation when sows were fed a diet with yeast additives compared with the control diet. There was no evidence (P > 0.10) that treatment influenced any other sow or litter performance measurements. Fecal samples were collected upon entry into the farrowing house and at weaning from the first farrowing group (27 sows) to determine the resistance patterns of E. coli. E. coli was isolated from fecal samples and species confirmed by PCR detection of uidA and clpB genes. Microbroth dilution method was used to determine the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of E. coli isolates to 14 antimicrobials. Isolates were categorized as either susceptible, intermediate, or resistant based on Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. An interaction (P = 0.026) of diet × sampling day was observed for cefoxitin where fecal E. coli showed no evidence of treatment differences (P = 0.237) in MIC values at entry, but sows fed the control diet had lower (P = 0.035) MIC values at weaning compared with sows fed yeast additives. There were no diet main effects (P > 0.10) on the resistance of fecal E. coli. There was an increased (P < 0.02) toward resistance for 11 of the 14 antimicrobials over time. Fecal E. coli were resistant to tetracycline and ceftriaxone at weaning. Fecal E. coli were susceptible or intermediate in all sampling days to the remaining antimicrobials. In conclusion, feeding live yeast and yeast extracts tended to increase feed intake during lactation but did not influence either sow or litter performance measurements or the resistance of fecal E. coli during lactation except for cefoxitin, which had a higher MIC at the end of lactation when yeast additives were present in the diet. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antimicrobial resistance; litter performance; live yeast; sows; yeast extract

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35524734      PMCID: PMC9175290          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skac165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.338


  18 in total

1.  Effect of live yeast supplementation to gestating sows and nursery piglets on postweaning growth performance and nutrient digestibility.

Authors:  Hang Lu; Pete Wilcock; Olayiwola Adeola; Kolapo M Ajuwon
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Effects of supplementing Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product in sow diets on performance of sows and nursing piglets.

Authors:  Y B Shen; J A Carroll; I Yoon; R D Mateo; S W Kim
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 3.  The Plasmidome of Firmicutes: Impact on the Emergence and the Spread of Resistance to Antimicrobials.

Authors:  Val Fernández Lanza; Ana P Tedim; José Luís Martínez; Fernando Baquero; Teresa M Coque
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2015-04

4.  Dynamics and diversity of Escherichia coli in animals and system management of the manure on a commercial farrow-to-finish pig farm.

Authors:  Mauricio Marchant; Miguel A Moreno
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Live yeast and yeast extracts with and without pharmacological levels of zinc on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial susceptibilities of fecal Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Jenna A Chance; Joel M DeRouchey; Raghavendra G Amachawadi; Victor Ishengoma; Tiruvoor G Nagaraja; Robert D Goodband; Jason C Woodworth; Mike D Tokach; Hilda I Calderón; Qing Kang; Joseph A Loughmiller; Brian Hotze; Jordan T Gebhardt
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Influence of yeast-based pre- and probiotics in lactation and nursery diets on nursery pig performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Jenna A Chance; Joel M DeRouchey; Raghavendra G Amachawadi; Victor Ishengoma; Tiruvoor G Nagaraja; Robert D Goodband; Jason C Woodworth; Mike D Tokach; Qing Kang; Joseph A Loughmiller; Brian Hotze; Jordan T Gebhardt
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.338

7.  Presence of antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial use in sows are risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in their offspring.

Authors:  Bénédicte Callens; Christel Faes; Dominiek Maes; Boudewijn Catry; Filip Boyen; Delphine Francoys; Ellen de Jong; Freddy Haesebrouck; Jeroen Dewulf
Journal:  Microb Drug Resist       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 3.431

8.  Effects of dietary yeast strains on immunoglobulin in colostrum and milk of sows.

Authors:  Galliano Zanello; François Meurens; Delphine Serreau; Claire Chevaleyre; Sandrine Melo; Mustapha Berri; Romain D'Inca; Eric Auclair; Henri Salmon
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 2.046

9.  Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli strains isolated from Swiss weaned pigs and sows.

Authors:  C Stannarius; E Bürgi; G Regula; M A Zychowska; C Zweifel; R Stephan
Journal:  Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 0.845

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.