| Literature DB >> 35524189 |
Pingping Wang1, Qingyu Fu1, Hongbo Yin1, Lin Wang1, Longqian Liu2,3,4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Paediatric traumatic cataracts are an important but preventable cause of acquired blindness. Understanding the epidemiology of paediatric traumatic cataracts is a prerequisite for prevention. This study aimed to characterize the epidemiological profile of paediatric traumatic cataracts in southwest China.Entities:
Keywords: Epidemiology; Infectious endophthalmitis; Paediatric traumatic cataract; Southwest China
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35524189 PMCID: PMC9075711 DOI: 10.1186/s12886-022-02435-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Ophthalmol ISSN: 1471-2415 Impact factor: 2.086
Fig. 1A line chart showing the number of cases of paediatric traumatic cataracts in different years
Fig. 2A bar chart showing the number of cases of traumatic cataracts in boys and girls in different age-based groups, and the line chart showing the ratios of boys to girls suffering traumatic cataract in different age-based groups
Causes of ocular injuries leading to traumatic cataract
| Cause of Ocular Injury | Number (n) | All (n) | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 112/54/26/14/7/5 | 218 | 30.4% | |
| 78/15/27 | 120 | 16.8% | |
| 45/20/9/4 | 78 | 10.9% | |
| 43/8 | 51 | 7.1% | |
| 27/4/7/2 | 40 | 5.6% | |
| 37 | 37 | 5.2% | |
| 29 | 29 | 4.1% | |
| 24 | 24 | 3.4% | |
| 20 | 20 | 2.5% | |
| 19 | 19 | 2.4% | |
| 11 | 11 | 1.5% | |
| 10 | 10 | 1.4% | |
| 8 | 8 | 1.1% | |
| 3/5 | 8 | 1.1% | |
| 6 | 6 | 0.8% | |
| 3 | 3 | 0.4% | |
| 3 | 3 | 0.4% | |
| 1 | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 30 | 30 | 4.2% | |
| 716 | 716 | 100% |
The top three causative agents of traumatic cataract in different age-based groups
| Gender | Boys | Girls | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | Primary | Secondary | Tertiary | Primary | Secondary | Tertiary |
| Sharp metal objects | Glass | Botanical sticks | Sharp metal objects | Botanical sticks | Fall | |
| Sharp metal objects | Botanical sticks | Firecracker | Sharp metal objects | Botanical sticks | Fall | |
| Sharp metal objects | Botanical sticks | Stationery items | Sharp metal objects | Botanical sticks | Stationery items | |
| Stationery items | Sharp metal objects | Botanical sticks | Sharp metal objects | Toy | Stationery items | |
| Botanical sticks | Sharp metal objects | Stationery items | Sharp metal objects | Toy | Stationery items | |
| Botanical sticks | Stationery items | Firecracker | Stationery items | Glass | Sharp metal objects | |
| Sharp metal objects | Firecracker | Stationery items | Stationery items | Sharp metal objects | Botanical Sticks | |
Fig. 3A line chart showing the percentage of the three leading causative agents in different years
Distribution of patients according to different seasons
| Season | Spring (March-May) | Summer (June-August) | Autumn (September-November) | Winter (December-February) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year | ||||
| 6 | 12 | 16 | 22 | |
| 22 | 21 | 15 | 22 | |
| 23 | 13 | 9 | 23 | |
| 24 | 15 | 16 | 25 | |
| 7 | 5 | 14 | 28 | |
| 26 | 11 | 18 | 26 | |
| 24 | 21 | 13 | 15 | |
| 23 | 26 | 20 | 25 | |
| 19 | 10 | 9 | 13 | |
| 13 | 16 | 16 | 33 | |
| 22.5 | 14 | 15.5 | 25 | |
| 187(26.1%) | 150(20.9%) | 146(20.4%) | 233(32.5%) |
Complications associated with trauma
| Complications | Penetrating | Rate (%) | Rupture | Rate(%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 39 | 8.4 | 38 | 15.1 | 0.004 | |
| 31 | 6.7 | 43 | 17.1 | 0.000 | |
| 31 | 6.7 | 34 | 13.5 | 0.002 | |
| 19 | 4.1 | 29 | 11.6 | 0.000 | |
| 39 | 8.4 | 29 | 11.6 | 0.107 | |
| 84 | 18.1 | 47 | 18.7 | 0.451 | |
| 56 | 12.0 | 30 | 12.0 | 0.537 |
Postoperative visual acuity
| Postoperative visual acuity | ≤5 years old | 6-10 years old | 11-14 years old |
|---|---|---|---|
| ≤0.1 | 55(44.4%) | 21(20.4%) | 7(18.4%) |
| 0.1 -0.3 | 27(21.8%) | 27(26.2%) | 11(28.9%) |
| >0.3 | 42(33.9%) | 55(53.4%) | 20(52.6%) |
| Total | 124(100%) | 103(100%) | 38(100%) |
Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses of the causative factors for infectious endophthalmitis
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate- logistic regression analysis | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cause | Case number | OR (odds ratio) | 95% CI | |||
| 18/6/14/2 | 0.83/0.54/5.71/0.74 | 0.51/0.16/0.00/0.76 | – | – | – | |
| 22/11/4 | 1.91/3.26/1.64 | 0.016/0.002/0.50 | – | – | – | |
| 4/2 | 0.44/1.50 | 0.12/0.64 | – | – | – | |
| 4 | 1.20 | 0.76 | – | – | – | |
| 3 | 2.72 | 0.17 | – | – | – | |
| 7 | 1.10 | 0.92 | – | – | – | |
| 12/2/3 | 1.69/0.49/2.26 | 0.13/0.40/0.38 | – | – | – | |
| 3 | 0.63 | 0.60 | – | – | – | |
| 2 | 0.32 | 0.11 | – | – | – | |
| 2 | 0.49 | 0.40 | – | – | – | |
| 1 | – | – | – | – | – | |
| 5 | 1.01 | 1.00 | – | – | – | |
| 1 | 0.44 | 0.50 | – | – | – | |
| 3 | 0.23 | 0.48 | – | – | – | |
| – | – | – | 1.00 | 0.23 | 0.99-1.00 | |
| – | – | – | 1.91 | 0.023 | 1.09-3.34 | |
| – | – | – | 4.93 | 0.000 | 2.24-10.86 | |
| – | – | – | 3.94 | 0.002 | 1.59-7.36 | |