| Literature DB >> 35524075 |
João Vasco Santos1,2,3,4, João Viana5,6, Carla Pinto7, Júlio Souza5,6, Fernando Lopes5,6, Alberto Freitas5,6, Sílvia Lopes8,9.
Abstract
The aims of this study were to assess All-Patient Refined Diagnosis-Related Groups' (APR-DRG) Severity of Illness (SOI) and Risk of Mortality (ROM) as predictors of in-hospital mortality, comparing with Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI) scores. We performed a retrospective observational study using mainland Portuguese public hospitalizations of adult patients from 2011 to 2016. Model discrimination (C-statistic/ area under the curve) and goodness-of-fit (R-squared) were calculated. Our results comprised 4,176,142 hospitalizations with 5.9% in-hospital deaths. Compared to the CCI and ECI models, the model considering SOI, age and sex showed a statistically significantly higher discrimination in 49.6% (132 out of 266) of APR-DRGs, while in the model with ROM that happened in 33.5% of APR-DRGs. Between these two models, SOI was the best performer for nearly 20% of APR-DRGs. Some particular APR-DRGs have showed good discrimination (e.g. related to burns, viral meningitis or specific transplants). In conclusion, SOI or ROM, combined with age and sex, perform better than more widely used comorbidity indices. Despite ROM being the only score specifically designed for in-hospital mortality prediction, SOI performed better. These findings can be helpful for hospital or organizational models benchmarking or epidemiological analysis.Entities:
Keywords: Charlson Comorbidity Index; Diagnosis-Related Groups; Elixhauser Comorbidity Index; In-hospital mortality; Prediction; Risk of Mortality; Severity of Illness
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35524075 DOI: 10.1007/s10916-022-01805-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Syst ISSN: 0148-5598 Impact factor: 4.460