Literature DB >> 3552356

Deep-freezing versus 4 degrees preservation of avascular osteocartilaginous shell allografts in rats.

J J Rodrigo, E Thompson, C Travis.   

Abstract

Osteocartilaginous allografts (distal femurs of rats) were stored at 4 degrees for six, 12, 24, and 48 hours and at -80 degrees for five days and then evaluated for viability of the bone and cartilage. Storage at 4 degrees for 12 or 24 hours had little effect on cartilage viability but decreased bone viability to 40% and 10% of controls, respectively. Storage at -80 degrees for five days resulted in nonviable bone in all cases but showed an either/or response of cartilage, with high viability in two cases and nonviability in the other eight cases. In a second set of experiments, femurs from rats were stored in situ at 4 degrees for 12 or 24 hours or were harvested and stored at -80 degrees for five days, after which they were transplanted into rats of a different strain. The antibody response to each set of femurs was measured at two, six, and 12 weeks after operation. The 4 degrees storage resulted in a moderately decreased immunogenicity, whereas the storage at -80 degrees resulted in significantly reduced immunogenicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3552356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  9 in total

1.  Fresh osteochondral allografts for posttraumatic knee defects: long-term followup.

Authors:  A E Gross; W Kim; F Las Heras; D Backstein; O Safir; K P H Pritzker
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Osteochondral allografts for osteochondritis dissecans and osteonecrosis of the femoral condyles.

Authors:  F Marco; F Lopez-Oliva; J M Fernández Fernández-Arroyo; J A de Pedro; A J Perez; C Leon; L Lopez-Duran
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Effectiveness of Lavage Techniques in Removing Immunogenic Elements from Osteochondral Allografts.

Authors:  Maximilian A Meyer; Mark A McCarthy; Matthew E Gitelis; Sarah G Poland; Atsushi Urita; Susan Chubinskaya; Adam B Yanke; Brian J Cole
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Rabbit trochlear model of osteochondral allograft transplantation.

Authors:  Nhat To; Shane Curtiss; Corey P Neu; Christopher J Salgado; Amir A Jamali
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 0.982

5.  Impact of storage solution formulation during refrigerated storage upon chondrocyte viability and cartilage matrix.

Authors:  Gregory J Wright; Kelvin G M Brockbank; Eliza Rahn; Dina O Halwani; Zhen Chen; Hai Yao
Journal:  Cells Tissues Organs       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 2.481

6.  Treatment of articular cartilage defects in the goat with frozen versus fresh osteochondral allografts: effects on cartilage stiffness, zonal composition, and structure at six months.

Authors:  Andrea L Pallante; Simon Görtz; Albert C Chen; Robert M Healey; Derek C Chase; Scott T Ball; David Amiel; Robert L Sah; William D Bugbee
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Use of fresh osteochondral allograft in repair of distal femur after trauma.

Authors:  Drew W Taylor; Kyle C Bohm; Jennifer E Taylor; Allan E Gross
Journal:  Mcgill J Med       Date:  2011-06

8.  Osteochondral Allografts in the Ankle Joint: State of the Art.

Authors:  Francesca Vannini; Roberto Buda; Gherardo Pagliazzi; Alberto Ruffilli; Marco Cavallo; Sandro Giannini
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Pulsed lavage cleansing of osteochondral grafts depends on lavage duration, flow intensity, and graft storage condition.

Authors:  Yang Sun; Weibo Jiang; Esther Cory; Jason P Caffrey; Felix H Hsu; Albert C Chen; Jincheng Wang; Robert L Sah; William D Bugbee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.