Rainer Glauben1, Marilena Letizia1, Carl Weidinger2. 1. Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Gastroenterology, Infectious Diseases and Rheumatology, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany. 2. Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Gastroenterology, Infectious Diseases and Rheumatology, Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: carl.weidinger@charite.de.
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is characterized by chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal system and its incidence is rising worldwide. Current concepts of the pathogenesis of IBD suggests that IBD is predominantly triggered by environmental factors in genetically susceptible individuals, ultimately resulting in impaired immune cell homeostasis and deterred intestinal epithelial barrier functions by enterocytes and goblets cells.2, 3, 4 Current treatment of IBD consists of tumor necrosis factor blockers, integrin inhibitors, JAK-inhibitors, and interleukin 12/23 blocking antibodies, which predominantly inhibit immune cell activation and function. In contrast, no treatment is currently available that would effectively improve epithelial barrier functions in intestinal inflammation by targeting epithelium intrinsic pathways. As a large proportion of patients with IBD does not sufficiently respond to available biologics, new treatment concepts are urgently required. To date, the molecular pathways regulating the differentiation, function, and survival of enterocytes and goblet cells are incompletely understood and deeper insights into mechanisms controlling apoptosis in intestinal epithelial cells (IEC) during chronic inflammation are lacking. In this issue of Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Liang et al provide evidence that the stromal interaction molecule (STIM), which controls Store-operated Ca2+ entry (SOCE), may be a pertinent molecule to target in epithelial cells.SOCE, mediated by calcium release activated channels (CRAC) and STIM proteins, represents the predominant Ca2+ influx pathway in lymphocytes but can also be observed in a large variety of other cells including enterocytes and goblet cells.,, Activation of SOCE can be detected on agonist stimulation of various surface receptors on the plasma membrane of cells, such as the T cell receptor on T cells or the acetylcholine receptor on neural cells inducing a phospholipase C–dependent production of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3). Subsequently, IP3 binds to and opens the IP3 receptors located on the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), resulting in a transient release of Ca2+ from the ER into the cytoplasm. The consecutive decrease in ER Ca2+ concentrations is sensed by N-terminal EF-hand motifs of ER-based STIM1 and STIM2 proteins, inducing their oligomerization and translocation to the plasma membrane, where they bind to ORAI1-CRAC channels resulting in sustained influx of extracellular Ca2+ into the cytoplasm. SOCE not only controls the activation of transcription factors, such as NFAT, but also regulates multiple cellular functions including mitochondrial activation, apoptosis, and trafficking of cellular vesicles., The importance of SOCE is highlighted by patients with loss-of-function mutations in STIM1 or ORAI1, who suffer from immunodeficiency, muscular hypotonia, and impaired enamel formation.12, 13, 14Liang et al now identify the SOCE-signaling component STIM1 as an important modulator of intestinal epithelial barrier functions during intestinal inflammation. Thus, the authors showed that STIM1 expression is increased in IEC of inflamed tissues from patients with IBD. The authors next developed mice with a conditional genetic deletion of Stim1 in IEC to investigate the impact of decreased SOCE-activity on IEC function. Remarkably, the deletion of STIM1 in IEC had no impact on epithelial differentiation and gut homeostasis at steady state. In contrast, on induction of acute or chronic dextran sulfate sodium colitis, Stim1 mice displayed reduced disease severity, decreased inflammation, and improved epithelial regeneration. This effect could be traced back to reduced loss of goblet cells during the inflammatory phase of dextran sulfate sodium colitis and, subsequently, to faster epithelial reconstitution. Remarkably, increased protection of the epithelial barrier in STIM1-deficient mice under inflammatory conditions was paralleled by an increased expression of tight junction proteins. Furthermore, Liang et al observed an augmented survival of goblet cells in the acute phase of dextran sulfate sodium, caused by decreased levels of intracellular Ca2+ and reduced ER stress, leading to an increased production of mucin by goblet cells and an enhanced thickness of the intestinal mucus layer, ultimately reducing the translocation of commensal bacteria in Stim1 mice.Because Liang et al detected increased expression of STIM1 in IEC and in lamina propria mononuclear cells in inflamed tissue of patients with IBD, one may anticipate a beneficial dual effect of the pharmacologic blockade of SOCE in IBD. On the one hand, blocking SOCE might decrease the decay of goblet cells by reducing ER stress under inflammatory conditions, stabilize the inner mucus layer, and prevent bacterial translocation. On the other hand, inhibition of SOCE might suppress effector functions of proinflammatory lymphocytes in IBD. Thus, STIM1-deficient T cells display impaired production of interleukin-17, tumor necrosis factor-α, and interferon-γ and fail to induce colitis in mice. In regard of ongoing clinical trials testing the SOCE-inhibitor Auxora in the treatment of overwhelming immunity in COVID-19 and its promising safety profiles, the application of SOCE-inhibitors might represent a new concept for treating IBD.
Authors: Natalie A Molodecky; Ing Shian Soon; Doreen M Rabi; William A Ghali; Mollie Ferris; Greg Chernoff; Eric I Benchimol; Remo Panaccione; Subrata Ghosh; Herman W Barkema; Gilaad G Kaplan Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2011-10-14 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Colin W Taylor; Taufiq Rahman; Stephen C Tovey; Skarlatos G Dedos; Emily J A Taylor; Saroj Velamakanni Journal: Immunol Rev Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 12.988
Authors: Jen Liou; Man Lyang Kim; Won Do Heo; Joshua T Jones; Jason W Myers; James E Ferrell; Tobias Meyer Journal: Curr Biol Date: 2005-07-12 Impact factor: 10.834
Authors: Kaushal Parikh; Agne Antanaviciute; David Fawkner-Corbett; Marta Jagielowicz; Anna Aulicino; Christoffer Lagerholm; Simon Davis; James Kinchen; Hannah H Chen; Nasullah Khalid Alham; Neil Ashley; Errin Johnson; Philip Hublitz; Leyuan Bao; Joanna Lukomska; Rajinder Singh Andev; Elisabet Björklund; Benedikt M Kessler; Roman Fischer; Robert Goldin; Hashem Koohy; Alison Simmons Journal: Nature Date: 2019-02-27 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Sascha Kahlfuss; Ulrike Kaufmann; Axel R Concepcion; Lucile Noyer; Dimitrius Raphael; Martin Vaeth; Jun Yang; Priya Pancholi; Mate Maus; James Muller; Lina Kozhaya; Alireza Khodadadi-Jamayran; Zhengxi Sun; Patrick Shaw; Derya Unutmaz; Peter B Stathopulos; Cori Feist; Scott B Cameron; Stuart E Turvey; Stefan Feske Journal: EMBO Mol Med Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 12.137