Literature DB >> 35522139

Interobserver Variability in CT-based Morphologic Tumor Response Assessment of Colorectal Liver Metastases.

Nina J Wesdorp1, Ruby Kemna1, Jaap Stoker1, Geert Kazemier1, Karen Bolhuis1, Jan H T M van Waesberghe1, Irene M G C Nota1, Femke Struik1, Ikrame Oulad Abdennabi1, Saffire S K S Phoa1, Susan van Dieren1, Martinus J van Amerongen1, Thiery Chapelle1, Cornelis H C Dejong1, Marc R W Engelbrecht1, Michael F Gerhards1, Dirk Grünhagen1, Thomas M van Gulik1, John J Hermans1, Koert P de Jong1, Joost M Klaase1, Mike S L Liem1, Krijn P van Lienden1, I Quintus Molenaar1, Gijs A Patijn1, Arjen M Rijken1, Theo M Ruers1, Cornelis Verhoef1, Johannes H W de Wilt1, Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg1, Cornelis J A Punt1, Joost Huiskens1.   

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate interobserver variability in the morphologic tumor response assessment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) managed with systemic therapy and to assess the relation of morphologic response with gene mutation status, targeted therapy, and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 measurements. Materials and Methods Participants with initially unresectable CRLM receiving different systemic therapy regimens from the randomized, controlled CAIRO5 trial (NCT02162563) were included in this prospective imaging study. Three radiologists independently assessed morphologic tumor response on baseline and first follow-up CT scans according to previously published criteria. Two additional radiologists evaluated disagreement cases. Interobserver agreement was calculated by using Fleiss κ. On the basis of the majority of individual radiologic assessments, the final morphologic tumor response was determined. Finally, the relation of morphologic tumor response and clinical prognostic parameters was assessed. Results In total, 153 participants (median age, 63 years [IQR, 56-71]; 101 men) with 306 CT scans comprising 2192 CRLM were included. Morphologic assessment performed by the three radiologists yielded 86 (56%) agreement cases and 67 (44%) disagreement cases (including four major disagreement cases). Overall interobserver agreement between the panel radiologists on morphology groups and morphologic response categories was moderate (κ = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.48, 0.58 and κ = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.47, 0.60). Optimal morphologic response was particularly observed in patients treated with bevacizumab (P = .001) and in patients with RAS/BRAF mutation (P = .04). No evidence of a relationship between RECIST 1.1 and morphologic response was found (P = .61). Conclusion Morphologic tumor response assessment following systemic therapy in participants with CRLM demonstrated considerable interobserver variability. Keywords: Tumor Response, Observer Performance, CT, Liver, Metastases, Oncology, Abdomen/Gastrointestinal Clinical trial registration no. NCT02162563 Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdomen/Gastrointestinal; CT; Liver; Metastases; Observer Performance; Oncology; Tumor Response

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35522139      PMCID: PMC9152692          DOI: 10.1148/rycan.210105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer        ISSN: 2638-616X


  34 in total

Review 1.  Bevacizumab.

Authors:  Filis Kazazi-Hyseni; Jos H Beijnen; Jan H M Schellens
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010-08-05

2.  Comparison of early radiological predictors of outcome in patients with colorectal cancer with unresectable hepatic metastases treated with bevacizumab.

Authors:  Thibault Mazard; Piyaporn Boonsirikamchai; Evelyne M Loyer; Scott Kopetz; Michael J Overman; Mohamed A Asran; Haesun Choi; Delise Herron; Cathy Eng; Dipen M Maru; Marc Ychou; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Predictive value of optimal morphologic response to first-line chemotherapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Hiroki Yoshita; Ayumu Hosokawa; Akira Ueda; Takayuki Ando; Shinya Kajiura; Hiroshi Kato; Hideto Kawabe; Gakuto Tomizawa; Naoki Horikawa; Kazuhisa Yabuhita; Masayuki Note; Toshiro Sugiyama
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 3.216

4.  Nationwide trends in incidence, treatment and survival of colorectal cancer patients with synchronous metastases.

Authors:  Lydia G M van der Geest; Jorine't Lam-Boer; Miriam Koopman; Cees Verhoef; Marloes A G Elferink; Johannes H W de Wilt
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 5.  Chemotherapy before liver resection of colorectal metastases: friend or foe?

Authors:  Kuno Lehmann; Andreas Rickenbacher; Achim Weber; Bernhard C Pestalozzi; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Radiological Morphology of Colorectal Liver Metastases after Preoperative Chemotherapy Predicts Tumor Viability and Postoperative Outcomes.

Authors:  Yujiro Nishioka; Junichi Shindoh; Ryuji Yoshioka; Wataru Gonoi; Hiroyuki Abe; Naoki Okura; Shuntaro Yoshida; Masaru Oba; Masaji Hashimoto; Goro Watanabe; Kiyoshi Hasegawa; Norihiro Kokudo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Non-size-based response criteria to preoperative chemotherapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases: the morphologic response criteria.

Authors:  Junichi Shindoh; Yun Shin Chun; Evelyne M Loyer; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
Journal:  Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep       Date:  2013-06-01

8.  The oncosurgery approach to managing liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a multidisciplinary international consensus.

Authors:  René Adam; Aimery De Gramont; Joan Figueras; Ashley Guthrie; Norihiro Kokudo; Francis Kunstlinger; Evelyne Loyer; Graeme Poston; Philippe Rougier; Laura Rubbia-Brandt; Alberto Sobrero; Josep Tabernero; Catherine Teh; Eric Van Cutsem
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-09-07

9.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

Authors:  E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.162

10.  Prognostic Survival Associated With Left-Sided vs Right-Sided Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fausto Petrelli; Gianluca Tomasello; Karen Borgonovo; Michele Ghidini; Luca Turati; Pierpaolo Dallera; Rodolfo Passalacqua; Giovanni Sgroi; Sandro Barni
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 31.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.