| Literature DB >> 35522139 |
Nina J Wesdorp1, Ruby Kemna1, Jaap Stoker1, Geert Kazemier1, Karen Bolhuis1, Jan H T M van Waesberghe1, Irene M G C Nota1, Femke Struik1, Ikrame Oulad Abdennabi1, Saffire S K S Phoa1, Susan van Dieren1, Martinus J van Amerongen1, Thiery Chapelle1, Cornelis H C Dejong1, Marc R W Engelbrecht1, Michael F Gerhards1, Dirk Grünhagen1, Thomas M van Gulik1, John J Hermans1, Koert P de Jong1, Joost M Klaase1, Mike S L Liem1, Krijn P van Lienden1, I Quintus Molenaar1, Gijs A Patijn1, Arjen M Rijken1, Theo M Ruers1, Cornelis Verhoef1, Johannes H W de Wilt1, Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg1, Cornelis J A Punt1, Joost Huiskens1.
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate interobserver variability in the morphologic tumor response assessment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) managed with systemic therapy and to assess the relation of morphologic response with gene mutation status, targeted therapy, and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 measurements. Materials and Methods Participants with initially unresectable CRLM receiving different systemic therapy regimens from the randomized, controlled CAIRO5 trial (NCT02162563) were included in this prospective imaging study. Three radiologists independently assessed morphologic tumor response on baseline and first follow-up CT scans according to previously published criteria. Two additional radiologists evaluated disagreement cases. Interobserver agreement was calculated by using Fleiss κ. On the basis of the majority of individual radiologic assessments, the final morphologic tumor response was determined. Finally, the relation of morphologic tumor response and clinical prognostic parameters was assessed. Results In total, 153 participants (median age, 63 years [IQR, 56-71]; 101 men) with 306 CT scans comprising 2192 CRLM were included. Morphologic assessment performed by the three radiologists yielded 86 (56%) agreement cases and 67 (44%) disagreement cases (including four major disagreement cases). Overall interobserver agreement between the panel radiologists on morphology groups and morphologic response categories was moderate (κ = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.48, 0.58 and κ = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.47, 0.60). Optimal morphologic response was particularly observed in patients treated with bevacizumab (P = .001) and in patients with RAS/BRAF mutation (P = .04). No evidence of a relationship between RECIST 1.1 and morphologic response was found (P = .61). Conclusion Morphologic tumor response assessment following systemic therapy in participants with CRLM demonstrated considerable interobserver variability. Keywords: Tumor Response, Observer Performance, CT, Liver, Metastases, Oncology, Abdomen/Gastrointestinal Clinical trial registration no. NCT02162563 Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2022.Entities:
Keywords: Abdomen/Gastrointestinal; CT; Liver; Metastases; Observer Performance; Oncology; Tumor Response
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35522139 PMCID: PMC9152692 DOI: 10.1148/rycan.210105
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Radiol Imaging Cancer ISSN: 2638-616X