| Literature DB >> 35521311 |
Zhihui Li1, Xinglai Qi1, Yanlong Gao1, Yonghui Zhou2, Nairong Chen1, Qinzhi Zeng1, Mizi Fan1,2, Jiuping Rao1,2.
Abstract
In order to solve the practical problem of heat transfer during the hot pressing process of a novel wood-plastic composite plywood, this paper investigates the perforation treatment of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) plastic films and their plywood composites. The PVC films were pretreated by the physical punching method, and the effects of PVC perforation diameter, hot pressing time and hot pressing temperature on the mechanical properties of the plywood composites were investigated by orthogonal experimental design. The results showed that the optimum hot pressing time was 7 min, the hot pressing temperature was 170 °C, and the PVC perforation diameter was 15 mm for the optimum mechanical properties. The punching pretreatment of PVC films gave rise to a reduction of the hot pressing time by 51 s due to improved heat transfer and heat loss by 5.06%, and allowed an increase in the initial moisture content of the veneer by 2-3%, thereby cutting down the drying cost in the veneer production process, which is conducive to energy conservation and environmental protection. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 35521311 PMCID: PMC9066172 DOI: 10.1039/c9ra02848j
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Fig. 1PVC films pretreated with different pore sizes (A, B, C and D opening diameters were 5 mm, 10 mm, 15 mm and 20 mm respectively).
Fig. 3DSC diagram of PVC films.
Experimental factors and levels
| Levels | Factors | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hot pressing time (A)/min | Hot pressing temperature (B)/°C | Hole size of PVC (C)/mm | |
| 1 | 6 | 150 | 5 |
| 2 | 7 | 160 | 10 |
| 3 | 8 | 170 | 15 |
| 4 | 9 | 180 | 20 |
Fig. 2Combination structure of plastic plywood composites.
Mechanical properties and processing parameters of wood-plastic composite plywood
| Processing parameters | Performance index | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trial | Pressing time (A) | Pressing temperature (B) | Hole size of PVC (C) | Bonding strength (MPa) | MOR (MPa) | MOE (MPa) |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.31 | 27.5 | 2300 |
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0.65 | 41.0 | 3931 |
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0.73 | 46.3 | 4510 |
| 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0.61 | 37.1 | 3820 |
| 5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.70 | 42.3 | 4480 |
| 6 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0.71 | 45.3 | 4491 |
| 7 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0.49 | 31.1 | 3010 |
| 8 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0.68 | 39.8 | 3902 |
| 9 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.74 | 46.2 | 4552 |
| 10 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 0.76 | 47.0 | 4604 |
| 11 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0.53 | 33.9 | 3495 |
| 12 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0.46 | 30.1 | 2979 |
| 13 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 0.69 | 39.8 | 3913 |
| 14 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0.60 | 38.3 | 3801 |
| 15 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 0.61 | 37.9 | 3815 |
| 16 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0.59 | 36.9 | 3787 |
Fig. 4Heat transfer curve of the core layer in wood-plastic composite plywood.
Range analysis of the main performance
| Pressing time (A) | Pressing temperature (B) | Hole size of PVC (C) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bonding strength (MPa) |
| 0.610 | 0.535 | 0.465 |
|
| 0.680 | 0.605 | 0.637 | |
|
| 0.590 | 0.688 | 0.695 | |
|
| 0.585 | 0.637 | 0.667 | |
|
| 0.095 | 0.153 | 0.230 | |
| Superior level | A2 | B3 | C3 | |
| MOR (MPa) |
| 38.950 | 35.900 | 31.750 |
|
| 42.900 | 37.825 | 38.625 | |
|
| 37.300 | 42.650 | 43.125 | |
|
| 35.975 | 38.750 | 41.625 | |
|
| 6.925 | 6.750 | 11.375 | |
| Superior level | A2 | B3 | C3 | |
| MOE (MPa) |
| 3811.250 | 3518.250 | 3022.500 |
|
| 4206.750 | 3801.250 | 3810.250 | |
|
| 3707.500 | 4191.250 | 4345.250 | |
|
| 3622.000 | 3836.750 | 4169.500 | |
|
| 584.750 | 673.000 | 1322.750 | |
| Superior level | A2 | B3 | C3 |
Variance analysis of the main performancea
| Factors | Sum of squares of deviations | Degrees of freedom | Value | Significance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bonding strength | Pressing time | 0.023 | 3 | 2.706 | |
| Pressing temperature | 0.049 | 3 | 5.765 | ** | |
| Hole size | 0.129 | 3 | 15.176 | *** | |
| Error | 0.02 | 6 | |||
| MOR | Pressing time | 108.247 | 3 | 9.344 | ** |
| Pressing temperature | 96.737 | 3 | 8.351 | ** | |
| Hole size | 305.672 | 3 | 26.386 | *** | |
| Error | 23.17 | 6 | |||
| MOE | Pressing time | 801 493.250 | 3 | 3.415 | * |
| Pressing temperature | 913 490.750 | 3 | 3.892 | * | |
| Hole size | 4 132 000.250 | 3 | 17.603 | *** | |
| Error | 469 455.50 | 6 |
F 0.1 (3,6) = 3.290, F0.05 (3,6) = 4.760, F0.01 (3,6) = 9.780. When F < F0.1, the influence of factors on performance indicators was not significant; when F0.1 < F < F0.05, the influence of factors on performance indicators was generally significant, expressed by “*”; when F0.05 < F < F0.01, the influence of factors on performance indicators was more significant, expressed by “**”; when F > F0.01, the influence of factors on performance indicators was extremely significant, expressed by “***”.
Fig. 5Microstructures of veneer combined with PVC films with and without perforated holes.
Fig. 6Mass loss of PVC–wood laminate with different perforated diameters.
Degradation of four types of composite laminates in two stages
| Types | Loss of the first stage (%) | Loss of the second stage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 5 mm | 4.18 | 54.2 |
| 10 mm | 5.07 | 51.95 |
| 15 mm | 3.03 | 50.29 |
| 20 mm | 5.08 | 49.52 |
Fig. 7Effect of moisture content of veneer on mechanical properties (PVC-0: un-perforated PVC films plywood laminates; PVC-1: perforated PVC films plywood laminate with a hole diameter of 15 mm).