| Literature DB >> 35520640 |
Abstract
Worldwide, each year the sugar industry generates bagasse fly ash (BFA) in the process of producing sugar including ethanol and jaggery. With the increasing average value of 2% consumption of sugar per annum, the quantity of solid waste BFA continuously increases and creates environmental problems. The valorisation of BFA is a convenient and sustainable means for decreasing the environmental burden. This paper aims to review the various important analyses and valorisation of BFA. BFA is a porous material and has oxides of several elements, such as silicon, aluminium, iron, sodium and other metals. Based on some of its excellent properties, untreated and modified BFA can represent an important source in different fields. Metals, dyes, petrochemicals, insecticides and other contaminants can be adsorbed using BFA, where the maximum adsorption capacities can be described using different adsorption variables and isotherms. It is convenient and a sustainable resolution to use traditional adsorbents for water treatment. This also decreases the environmental solid burden, eventually reducing greenhouse gas emissions. This ash has been incorporated into different construction materials, including cement and brick in different percentages to enhance their mechanical characteristics and durability, thus maintaining economic and environmental sustainability. Also, several products such as zeolites, silica, briquette catalyst and other important materials, which are promising energy sources, have been prepared using the BFA. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 35520640 PMCID: PMC9056422 DOI: 10.1039/d0ra06422j
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Fig. 1World sugar production by continents.[6]
Fig. 2Asian sugar production by major countries.[6]
Various properties of BFAa
| Type of analysis | Particular | Reference |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| MgO | 0.80 |
|
| Al2O3 | 16.9 | |
| SiO2 | 63.1 | |
| Cl | 3.00 | |
| K2O | 3.27 | |
| CaO | 3.50 | |
| TiO2 | 0.34 | |
| MnO | 0.12 | |
| Fe2O3 | 4.40 | |
| Na2O | 4.57 | |
|
| ||
| Specific density | 1.882 | |
| Bulk density (g cm−3) | 1.725 | |
| Dry density (g cm−3) | 1.081 | |
| Void ratio | 0.747 | |
| Fractional porosity | 0.428 | |
| pHpzc | 8.18 | |
|
| ||
| Moisture content | 2.51 |
|
| Loss on drying | 12.3 | |
| Ash content | 30.95 | |
| Volatile matter | 23.48 | |
| Fixed carbon | 43.03 | |
|
| ||
| BET | 168.39 |
|
| BJH – adsorption cumulative | 70.90 | |
| BJH – desorption cumulative | 45.30 | |
|
| ||
| BET | 25.54 | |
| BJH – adsorption cumulative | 49.85 | |
| BJH – desorption cumulative | 58.44 | |
|
| ||
| Single point total | 0.1067 |
|
| BJH adsorption | 0.0844 | |
| BJH desorption | 0.0622 | |
|
| ||
| Average adsorption pore diameter (nm) | 6.33 |
|
| Average desorption pore diameter (nm) | 5.23 | |
| Total pore volume (cm3 g−1) | 0.0669 | |
|
| ||
| Carbon | 60.04 |
|
| Hydrogen | 0.62 | |
| Nitrogen | 0.28 | |
| Sulphur | 0.00 | |
| Oxygen | 6.77 | |
| Others | 32.29 | |
XRF – X-ray fluorescence, pHpzc – the point of zero charge, BET – Brunauer–Emmett–Teller, BJH – Barrett–Joyner–Halenda.
Fig. 3FT-IR spectrum of BFA.[15]
Fig. 4X-ray diffraction pattern of BFA.[16]
d-Spacing values of the diffraction of BFA and its minerals[16]
| S. no. |
| Preferable mineral |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.690 | Geothite |
| 2 | 3.740 | Mullite |
| 3 | 2.730 | Hematite |
| 4 | 2.528 | Kaolinite |
| 5 | 2.234 | α-Quartz |
| 6 | 2.012 | γ-Aumina |
| 7 | 1.496 | Hematite |
| 8 | 1.314 | Hematite |
Fig. 5Possibilities for the valorisation of BFA.
Details of metal adsorption study using BFA and its activated forms
| S. no. | Adsorbate | Variable | Details of adsorption study | Maximum adsorption capacity | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cr( | pH, temperature, time duration, adsorbent dose, initial concentration | Adsorption isotherms (batch and column); thermodynamic study; regeneration of adsorbent; cost estimation | 5.0 × 103 mol g−1 |
|
| 2 | Pb( | pH, adsorbent dose, initial concentration | Adsorption isotherms (batch); thermodynamic study; regeneration of adsorbent | 2.60 × 103 mol g−1 |
|
| 3 | Cu( | pH, adsorbent dose, initial concentrations, temperature, particle size | Adsorption isotherms (batch and column); thermodynamic study; regeneration of adsorbent | 2.36 & 2.54 |
|
| 4 | Zn( | pH, time duration, adsorbent dose, initial concentration | Adsorption isotherms (batch); thermodynamic study; kinetic analysis; cost estimation | 2.02 × 104 mol g−1 |
|
| 5 | Cd( | pH, adsorbent dose, initial concentrations, temperature, particle size | Adsorption isotherms (batch); thermodynamic study; kinetic analysis | 2.00 & 1.70 |
|
| 6 | Pb( | pH, adsorbent dose, initial concentrations, contact duration, temperature, particle size | Adsorption isotherms (batch and column); thermodynamic study; regeneration of adsorbent; cost estimation | 2.50 & 4.35 |
|
| 7 | Cr( | Hydrogen ion concentration, contact time, adsorbent dose, initial concentration, particle size | Adsorption isotherms (batch) including Bhattacharya and Venkobachar model | 0.001 & 0.001 |
|
| 8 | Pb( | pH, agitation time, adsorbent dose, initial concentration, temperature | Adsorption isotherms (batch and column); thermodynamic study; regeneration of adsorbent | 93.20 & 77.10 |
|
| 9 | Cd( | pH, contact duration | Adsorption isotherms (single & multi-components); regeneration of adsorbent | 6.1942 & 6.4887 |
|
| 10 | Cd( | Temperature, initial concentration | Adsorption isotherms (batch); thermodynamic study | 0.225, 0.432 & 0.399 mmol g−1 |
|
| 11 | Cd( | Adsorbent dose, temperature, initial concentration, contact duration | Determination of statistic parameters | — |
|
| 12 | Cd( | Initial concentration | Adsorption isotherms (single & multi-components) | 6.13, 6.49 & 7.03 |
|
The value of the maximum adsorption capacity is corresponds to the Langmuir isotherm.