| Literature DB >> 35520614 |
Mir-Jamal Hosseini1,2, Niloofar Mahmoodi2, Javad Eskandari2, Soroush Bijani1, Ali Reza Yazdinezhad3, Mahdieh Anoush1,2.
Abstract
Ethnopharmacological relevance: Alzheimer's disease (AD) as the most common type of dementia, is affecting the life of many senior individuals around the world. Vinca herbacea Waldst. & Kit. (V. herbacea) as a middle east originated plant demonstrated antioxidant and antitumor effects. This plant traditionally used to treat diabetes and hypertension, but its mechanism remains unclear. Aim of the study: In the present study, post-treatment effects of V. herbacea on learning and memory functions, antioxidant cellular defense and oxidative stress were investigated using the scopolamine rat model of AD. Materials and methods: Wistar male rats (170-190 g) were administered Scopolamine, an anti-muscarinic drug, (2 mg/kg) for 10 days followed by V. herbacea extract (200, 300 and 400 mg/kg) and/or donepezil (DON; 1 mg/kg, which were administered before behavioral studies for 10 consecutive days. All the rats were then subjected to Morris water maze (MWM) task. Biochemical parameters of oxidative stress were quantified using the whole brain.Entities:
Keywords: Hepatotoxicity; Indole alkaloids; Memory impairment; Neurotoxicity; Scopolamine; Vinca herbacea extract
Year: 2022 PMID: 35520614 PMCID: PMC9061637 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09295
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Figure 1Effects administration of V. herbacea extract and Donepezil on Q2 time/total time percentage. Values are expressed as the mean ± SD and were analyzed using One-way ANOVA was used followed by Tukey's post hoc test. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01 and ∗∗∗P < 0.001 compared with control group. #P < 0.05 and ##P < 0.01 and ###P < 0.001 compared with CPF treated rats. NS: Non significant with CPF treated rats (n = 8–10).
Figure 2Randomized select of swimming patterns in the water maze task.
Figure 3Effects administration of V. herbacea extract and Donepezil on MDA amount of (A) Brain samples and (B) Liver samples. Values are expressed as the mean ± SD and were analyzed using One-way ANOVA was used followed by Tukey's post hoc test. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01 and ∗∗∗P < 0.001 compared with control group. #P < 0.05 and ##P < 0.01 and ###P < 0.001 compared with CPF treated rats. NS: Non significant with CPF treated rats (n = 3).
Figure 4Effects administration of V. herbacea extract and Donepezil on PCO amount of (A) Brain samples and (B) Liver samples. Values are expressed as the mean ± SD and were analyzed using One-way ANOVA was used followed by Tukey's post hoc test. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01 and ∗∗∗P < 0.001 compared with control group. #P < 0.05 and ##P < 0.01 and ###P < 0.001 compared with CPF treated rats. NS: Non significant with CPF treated rats (n = 3).
Figure 5Effects administration of V. herbacea extract and Donepezil on Frap amount of (A) Brain samples and (B) Liver samples. Values are expressed as the mean ± SD and were analyzed using One-way ANOVA was used followed by Tukey's post hoc test. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01 and ∗∗∗P < 0.001 compared with control group. #P < 0.05 and ##P < 0.01 and ###P < 0.001 compared with CPF treated rats. NS: Non significant with CPF treated rats (n = 3).
Figure 6Effects administration of V. herbacea extract and Donepezil on GSH amount of (A) Brain samples and (B) Liver samples. Values are expressed as the mean ± SD and were analyzed using One-way ANOVA was used followed by Tukey's post hoc test. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01 and ∗∗∗P < 0.001 compared with control group. #P < 0.05 and ##P < 0.01 and ###P < 0.001 compared with CPF treated rats. NS: Non significant with CPF treated rats (n = 3).