| Literature DB >> 35520611 |
M N Coelho Pinheiro1,2,3, R O Madaleno1, Luis M M N Castro1,4,3.
Abstract
Air convective dehydration was carried out at a laboratory scale using two fruits of cultivars produced in different regions of Portugal: Bravo de Esmolfe apple, from Beiras province, and Cavendish banana, from Madeira Island. Fresh fruits were dried in a tray drier with a hot airstream at different temperatures (35, 40, 45, and 50 °C) and velocity of 1.6 m s-1. Drying rate curves were obtained using a simple mathematical approach applied to the moisture content curves adjusting linear and polynomial functions. Different drying rate stages were noticed in the experiments made with apples (one constant drying rate period followed by two falling drying rate periods), while in the case of the banana the constant drying rate period was not perceived, being dried entirely during a unique falling drying rate period. As expected, the constant drying rate value obtained at the beginning of the experiments with apples is higher when these were conducted at higher temperatures, changing from 8.103 to 14.474 g m-2 s-1 when the airstream temperature increases from 35 to 50 °C. The correspondent critical moisture contents in the Bravo de Esmolfe apples, at the instant the constant drying rate period stops and the drying rate starts to fall, slightly decreases from 4.800 to 4.134 kgwater/kgdry solid. This study explored for the first time the drying behavior of these two important fruits that have been increasingly used in the food industry in Portugal, giving important information for the industrialization of its production.Entities:
Keywords: Bravo de Esmolfe apple; Characteristic drying curve; Drying kinetics; Madeira Island banana
Year: 2022 PMID: 35520611 PMCID: PMC9065619 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09341
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Figure 1Fruit samples arrangement in the tray before drying in the dryer: (a) apple samples and (b) banana samples.
Hot air conditions used in drying experiments performed at different temperatures with apple and banana. The mean values of the airstream temperature and velocity followed by the associated standard deviation are depicted.
| apple | banana | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| temperature (°C) | velocity (m s−1) | temperature (°C) | velocity (m s−1) |
| 35.13 ± 0.05 | 1.60 ± 0.00 | 35.0 ± 0.2 | 1.59 ± 0.02 |
| 40.01 ± 0.08 | 1.59 ± 0.01 | 40.0 ± 0.1 | 1.59 ± 0.01 |
| 45.0 ± 0.2 | 1.60 ± 0.01 | 45.1 ± 0.1 | 1.59 ± 0.01 |
| 50.1 ± 0.2 | 1.61 ± 0.01 | 49.9 ± 0.4 | 1.62 ± 0.00 |
Figure 2Dimensionless moisture content evolution during drying carried out with the air-drying stream (1.6 m s−1) at different temperatures for: (a) Bravo de Esmolfe apple samples and (b) Madeira banana samples.
Moisture content in both fruits (Bravo de Esmolfe apple and Madeira banana) for fresh samples (before drying) and equilibrium conditions with the airstream used in the experiments performed with different temperatures. For the apple, the values obtained at the constant drying rate period and the moisture content at the transitions to the falling drying rate periods () are also depicted.
| 35 | 40 | 45 | 50 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.838 | 6.045 | 5.682 | 5.239 | ||
| 0.196 | 0.201 | 0.147 | 0.146 | ||
| 8.103 | 10.088 | 11.845 | 14.474 | ||
| 4.800 | 4.258 | 4.155 | 4.134 | ||
| 85.26 | 67.20 | 53.51 | 34.32 | ||
| Madeira banana | 3.039 | 3.023 | 3.535 | 3.255 | |
| 0.210 | 0.199 | 0.240 | 0.214 |
transition between constant and first falling drying rate periods/transition between first and second drying rate periods.
Model constants and parameters used as criteria for selecting the best model to define drying curves for Bravo de Esmolfe apples and banana from Madeira Island: root mean square error (RMSE), determination coefficient (r2) and, reduced chi-square (χ2). The parameters determining the best quality of the fit are in bold.
| linear+empirical model | linear+empirical model | linear+Page model | linear+empirical model | linear+empirical model | linear+Page model | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| model constants | -2.436407 | -2.402638 | -2.421454 | -2.688558 | -2.640009 | -2.666309 | |
| 6.877598 | 6.864049 | 6.872123 | 6.064842 | 6.049799 | 6.058570 | ||
| 3.333160 | - | - | 4.663870 | - | - | ||
| -3.004796 | - | - | -3.315373 | - | - | ||
| 7.126061 | - | - | 6.290342 | - | - | ||
| -4.610000 | -3.610000 | - | -7.700000 | -5.977264 | - | ||
| 7.787260 | 6.462290 | - | 10.46253 | 8.618384 | - | ||
| -4.403784 | -3.842411 | - | -4.760146 | -4.133162 | - | ||
| 8.554439 | 7.803983 | - | 7.479953 | 6.808940 | - | ||
| - | - | 4.983710 | - | - | 6.922362 | ||
| - | - | 1.304615 | - | - | 1.296889 | ||
| correlation parameters | RMSE | 0.01971 | 0.06481 | 0.01640 | 0.06726 | ||
| 0.99990 | 0.99888 | 0.99991 | 0.99840 | ||||
| χ2 | 0.0003899 | 0.0042085 | 0.0002704 | 0.0045352 | |||
| linear+empirical model | linear+empirical model | linear+Page model | linear+empirical model | linear+empirical model | linear+Page model | ||
| model constants | -2.996639 | 2.945945 | -2.978738 | -3.508272 | -3,349337 | -3.399622 | |
| 5.758742 | 5.744749 | 5.754283 | 5.337561 | 5.304671 | 5.317321 | ||
| 5.487220 | - | - | 6.669760 | - | - | ||
| -3.583882 | - | - | -3.966049 | - | - | ||
| 5.921480 | - | - | 5.434810 | - | - | ||
| -9.690000 | -9.150000 | - | -18.02000 | -17.19502 | - | ||
| 11.75382 | 11.23324 | - | 17.48122 | 16.82145 | - | ||
| -4.759035 | -4.601809 | - | -5.635577 | -5.471018 | - | ||
| 6.604801 | 6.458611 | - | 6.211207 | 6.083763 | - | ||
| - | - | 8.881999 | - | - | 9.418408 | ||
| - | - | 1.294241 | - | - | 1.319492 | ||
| correlation parameters | RMSE | 0.01401 | 0.05582 | 0.01562 | 0.06331 | ||
| 0.99992 | 0.99874 | 0.99988 | 0.99806 | ||||
| 0.0001973 | 0.0031245 | 0.0002457 | 0.0040212 | ||||
| linear+empirical model | linear+Page model | linear+empirical model | linear+Page model | ||||
| model constants | -1.370608 | - | -2.646832 | - | |||
| 5.027515 | - | 7.884100 | - | ||||
| -6.261850 | - | -7.904981 | - | ||||
| 2.875060 | - | 2.892177 | - | ||||
| - | 9.475404 | - | 10.55466 | ||||
| - | 0.921827 | - | 0.931220 | ||||
| correlation parameters | RMSE | 0.04330 | 0.05230 | ||||
| 0.99646 | 0.99476 | ||||||
| 0.0018764 | 0.0027380 | ||||||
| linear+empirical model | linear+Page model | linear+empirical model | linear+Page model | ||||
| model constants | -5.967737 | - | -8.528760 | - | |||
| 14.33405 | - | 18.07846 | - | ||||
| -11.60724 | - | -12.61829 | - | ||||
| 3.429281 | - | 3.155837 | - | ||||
| - | 9.846221 | - | 16.73897 | ||||
| - | 0.957166 | - | 0.918859 | ||||
| correlation parameters | RMSE | 0.06263 | 0.08700 | ||||
| 0.99465 | 0.98673 | ||||||
| 0.0039284 | 0.0075795 | ||||||
Falling Drying Rate Period.
Figure 3Deviations between experimental data and predictions obtained with the tested models (linear + empirical model) with one FDRP and two FDRP, and (linear + Page model) for Bravo de Esmolfe apples dried at 40 °C.
Figure 4Histogram for deviations between experimental data and predictions obtained with the tested models (linear + empiric model) with one FDRP and two FDRP, and (linear + Page model) for Bravo de Esmolfe apples dried at 40 °C.
Figure 5Deviations between experimental data and predictions obtained with the tested models (linear + empirical model and linear + Page model) for Madeira Island bananas dried at 40 °C.
Figure 6Drying rate curves obtained with the air-drying stream (1.6 m s−1) at different temperatures for: (a) Bravo de Esmolfe apple samples and (b) Madeira banana samples.
Figure 7Normalized drying rate curves obtained from the experiments performed with different temperatures of the air-drying stream for: (a) Bravo de Esmolfe apple samples and (b) Madeira banana samples.