| Literature DB >> 35520596 |
Chathuri Peiris1,2, Oshani Nayanathara1, Chanaka M Navarathna3, Yohan Jayawardhana4, Samadhi Nawalage1, Griffin Burk3, Akila G Karunanayake5, Sunith B Madduri6, Meththika Vithanage7, M N Kaumal2, Todd E Mlsna3, El Barbary Hassan6, Sachith Abeysundara8, Felio Ferez9, Sameera R Gunatilake1.
Abstract
Tea-waste is an abundant feedstock for producing biochar (BC) which is considered to be a cost effective carbonaceous adsorbent useful for water remediation and soil amendment purposes. In the present study, tea-waste BC (TWBC) produced at three different temperatures were subjected to nitric, sulfuric and hydrochloric acid modifications (abbreviated as NM, SM and HM respectively). Characteristics of the raw and modified BC such as ultimate and proximate analyses, surface morphology, surface acidity and functionality, point of zero charge, cation exchange capacity (CEC) and thermal stability were compared to evaluate the influence of pyrolysis temperature and of modifications incorporated. The amount of carboxylic and phenolic surface functionalities on TWBC was seen to decrease by 93.44% and 81.06% respectively when the pyrolysis temperature was increased from 300 to 700 °C. Additionally, the yield of BC was seen to decrease by 46% upon the latter temperature increment. The elemental analysis results provided justification for high-temperature BC being more hydrophobic as was observed by the 61% increase in H/C ratio which is an indication of augmented aromatization. The CEC was the highest for the low-temperature BC and was seen to further increase by NM which is attributed to the 81.89% increase in carboxylic functionalities. The surface area was seen to significantly increase for BC700 upon NM (∼27 times). The SM led to pore wall destruction which was observed in scanning electron microscopy images. Findings would enable the rational use of these particular modifications in relevant remediation and soil amendment applications. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 35520596 PMCID: PMC9064594 DOI: 10.1039/c9ra02729g
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 3.361
Fig. 1SEM images of raw BCs (A) BC300, (B) BC500 and (C) BC700, and modified BCs (D) SM300, (E) NM300 and (F) HM300.
Fig. 2FTIR spectra of (A) raw BCs and (B) modified BCs.
Fig. 3High resolution (HR) O1s, C1s and N1s XPS spectra for (A) raw BC, (B) HMBC, (C) NMBC and (D) SMBC.
Fig. 4Proposed reaction mechanisms involved in (A) nitric, (B) sulfuric and (C) hydrochloric modification.
Fig. 5Surface Functional Groups (SFGs) comparison for (A) raw BCs, (B) modified 300BCs, (C) modified 500BCs and CEC variation under different pH values (D) modified 300BCs and (E) modified 500BCs.
| Sample | Proximate analysis | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yield (%) | Moisture (%) | Ash (%) | pH | pHPZC | EC (μS cm−1) | |
| BC300 | 52.17 ± 1.28 | 6.33 ± 0.57 | 6.15 ± 0.22 | 7.16 ± 0.01 | 6.31 | 12 025.00 ± 0.07 |
| BC500 | 32.58 ± 2.17 | 9.70 ± 0.60 | 11.40 ± 0.25 | 7.04 ± 0.02 | 9.16 | 2514.50 ± 0.07 |
| BC700 | 28.17 ± 1.89 | 7.97 ± 0.04 | 9.26 ± 0.37 | 10.09 ± 0.05 | 7.51 | 1984.00 ± 1.41 |
| NM300 | 2.80 ± 0.28 | 2.40 ± 0.01 | 4.67 | 1457.65 ± 0.70 | ||
| NM500 | 3.10 ± 0.35 | 2.44 ± 0.00 | 4.96 | 1264.50 ± 0.70 | ||
| NM700 | 2.50 ± 0.71 | 2.57 ± 0.01 | 5.55 | 1224.50 ± 1.41 | ||
| SM300 | 4.00 ± 0.35 | 3.40 ± 0.01 | 5.35 | 1187.00 ± 1.41 | ||
| SM500 | 3.50 ± 0.79 | 2.35 ± 0.04 | 5.45 | 1607.50 ± 0.07 | ||
| SM700 | 6.50 ± 1.01 | 4.16 ± 0.00 | 6.95 | 663.00 ± 2.82 | ||
| HM300 | 3.10 ± 0.18 | 2.55 ± 0.00 | 5.67 | 482.50 ± 0.70 | ||
| HM500 | 3.80 ± 0.53 | 2.65 ± 0.00 | 5.60 | 418.00 ± 1.41 | ||
| HM700 | 7.00 ± 0.83 | 2.49 ± 0.01 | 2.65 | 1191.00 ± 1.41 | ||
NM represents nitric acid modification, whereas SM and HM represent sulfuric acid and hydrochloric acid modifications respectively.
| Ultimate analysis | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C (%) | H (%) | N (%) | O (%) | Molar H/C | Molar O/C | Molar (O + N)/C | |
| Tea-waste | 47.80 | 5.12 | 3.75 | 42.17 | 1.29 | 0.68 | 0.75 |
| BC300 | 57.80 | 4.42 | 3.66 | 34.12 | 0.92 | 0.44 | 0.50 |
| BC500 | 69.66 | 2.96 | 2.55 | 24.82 | 0.51 | 0.27 | 0.30 |
| BC700 | 71.03 | 2.11 | 3.12 | 23.74 | 0.36 | 0.25 | 0.29 |
| NM300 | 57.03 | 4.47 | 5.51 | 32.99 | 0.94 | 0.43 | 0.52 |
| NM500 | 56.57 | 4.39 | 5.26 | 33.78 | 0.93 | 0.45 | 0.53 |
| NM700 | 71.30 | 2.21 | 3.80 | 22.69 | 0.37 | 0.24 | 0.28 |
| SM300 | 60.79 | 4.69 | 3.87 | 30.65 | 0.93 | 0.38 | 0.43 |
| SM500 | 61.27 | 4.55 | 3.92 | 30.26 | 0.89 | 0.37 | 0.43 |
| SM700 | 71.37 | 2.14 | 3.04 | 23.45 | 0.36 | 0.25 | 0.28 |
| HM300 | 63.15 | 4.75 | 3.92 | 28.18 | 0.90 | 0.34 | 0.39 |
| HM500 | 63.35 | 4.17 | 3.88 | 28.07 | 0.79 | 0.33 | 0.39 |
| HM700 | 74.02 | 2.22 | 3.15 | 20.62 | 0.36 | 0.21 | 0.25 |