Literature DB >> 35520385

Evaluation of two simulation methods for teaching a disaster skill.

Sherrill Smith1, Sharon L Farra2, Eric Hodgson3.   

Abstract

Introduction: With increasing use of virtual reality simulation (VRS) in nursing education, there is a paucity of research exploring learning outcomes following training with VRS as compared with traditional mannequin-based simulation. Given the resource intensive nature of mannequin-based simulation, especially for disaster education, understanding outcomes from newer technologies like VRS are needed.
Methods: A quasi-experimental design was used to examine the differences in learning outcomes for the disaster skill of decontamination, based on type of simulation. The study was framed by the National Leage for Nursing (NLN) Jeffries Simulation Theory, with participant outcomes identified by the framework (satisfaction, self-confidence and performance). Outcomes were measured using the NLN Student Satisfaction and Self- Confidence in Learning scale and a Decontamination Checklist. Senior nursing students in the final semester of a baccalaureate nursing programme were recruited to participate during one of their scheduled laboratory days. Following a didactic presentation, students were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups (VRS or mannequin-based simulation training) to learn the skill of decontamination.
Results: A total of 121 participants took part in the study. No statistically significant results were noted for any of the study outcomes: performance (accuracy and time), satisfaction and self-efficacy. Results of the study demonstrate that VRS is as effective as mannequin-based simulation in training participants for the skill of decontamination. Conclusions: Simulation-based education experiences must be matched to learning outcomes and evaluated for effectiveness. As evidence emerges regarding use of newer technologies, like VRS, educators will have more options for providing students with opportunities that best match available resources. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  disaster simulation; nursing student; simulation-based education; virtual reality

Year:  2020        PMID: 35520385      PMCID: PMC8936753          DOI: 10.1136/bmjstel-2019-000572

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn        ISSN: 2056-6697


  9 in total

Review 1.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.

Authors:  Philip M Podsakoff; Scott B MacKenzie; Jeong-Yeon Lee; Nathan P Podsakoff
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2003-10

2.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Axel Buchner; Albert-Georg Lang
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2009-11

3.  Development of an assessment instrument to evaluate performance of the skill of decontamination.

Authors:  Sharon Farra; Sherrill Smith; DeAnne French; Gordon Gillespie
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.442

Review 4.  Disaster Preparedness among Health Professionals and Support Staff: What is Effective? An Integrative Literature Review.

Authors:  Jeremy R Gowing; Kim N Walker; Shandell L Elmer; Elizabeth A Cummings
Journal:  Prehosp Disaster Med       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 2.040

5.  Effects of Virtual Reality Simulation on Worker Emergency Evacuation of Neonates.

Authors:  Sharon Farra; Eric Hodgson; Elaine T Miller; Nathan Timm; Whittney Brady; Matt Gneuhs; Jun Ying; Jackie Hausfeld; Emily Cosgrove; Ashley Simon; Michael Bottomley
Journal:  Disaster Med Public Health Prep       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 1.385

6.  Effectiveness of Two Varying Levels of Virtual Reality Simulation.

Authors:  Sherrill J Smith; Sharon L Farra; Deborah L Ulrich; Eric Hodgson; Stephanie Nicely; Angelia Mickle
Journal:  Nurs Educ Perspect       Date:  2018 Nov/Dec

7.  Virtual reality and live simulation: a comparison between two simulation tools for assessing mass casualty triage skills.

Authors:  Pier Luigi Ingrassia; Luca Ragazzoni; Luca Carenzo; Davide Colombo; Alba Ripoll Gallardo; Francesco Della Corte
Journal:  Eur J Emerg Med       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.799

8.  Nursing leadership in disaster preparedness and response.

Authors:  Ann R Knebel; Lauren Toomey; Mark Libby
Journal:  Annu Rev Nurs Res       Date:  2012

9.  Comparative Cost of Virtual Reality Training and Live Exercises for Training Hospital Workers for Evacuation.

Authors:  Sharon L Farra; Matthew Gneuhs; Eric Hodgson; Burhan Kawosa; Elaine T Miller; Ashley Simon; Nathan Timm; Jackie Hausfeld
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.985

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.