| Literature DB >> 35520288 |
Diana Nur Afifah1,2, Yesi Pratama Aprilia Ningrum1, Tazkiah Syahidah1, Nuryanto Nuryanto1,2, Fitriyono Ayustaningwarno1,2, Denny Nugroho Sugianto1,3.
Abstract
Lindur (Bruguiera gymnorrhiza L.) fruit as a mangrove species has not been widely developed. However, the combination of lindur fruit functional food with soybean flour has high carbohydrates and protein potential to serve as an additional food product in emergency conditions. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the nutritional content, dietary fiber, organoleptic quality, and sagon shelf-life estimation of lindur and soybean flour, in accordance with emergency food quality requirements. The shelf life was determined using the Accelerated Shelf-life Testing (ASLT) method with the Arrhenius equation, where the sample was stored in an incubator at a temperature of 27, 37, as well as 47°C for 30 days, and the water content, peroxide number, and free fatty acid content were tested every 5 days. In addition, formulation P1 comprising 45% lindur flour and 35% soybean flour was discovered to be the best formulation, with a composition of 251.5 kcal/bar of energy, 6.3 g of fat, 4.4 g of protein, 30 g of carbohydrates, 15.79% dietary fiber, 1.84% ash content, and 4.03% water content. Therefore, the nutritional content of sagon substitution for lindur flour is in accordance with the emergency food quality requirements, except for the protein content. Also, the P2 sagon sample's shelf life was estimated to be 37 days in polypropylene plastic packaging at a room temperature of 27°C.Entities:
Keywords: emergency food; lindur; nutrition content; organoleptic quality; sagon; shelf life
Year: 2022 PMID: 35520288 PMCID: PMC9063520 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.878539
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
Formulation of sagon from lindur and soybean flour.
| Quantity of ingredients (100 g) | ||||
| P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | |
| 15 | 13.33 | 11.67 | 10 | |
| Soybean flour | 11.67 | 13.33 | 15 | 16.67 |
| Glutinous rice flour | 6.67 | 6.67 | 6.67 | 6.67 |
| Grated coconut | 38.09 | 38.09 | 38.09 | 38.09 |
| Sugar | 19.05 | 19.05 | 19.05 | 19.05 |
| Oil | 9.52 | 9.52 | 9.52 | 9.52 |
| Salt | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.57 |
P1 (lindur 45%: soybean flour 35%), P2 (lindur 40%: soybean flour 40%), P3 (lindur 35%: soybean flour 45%), P4 (lindur 30%: soybean flour 50%).
The results of proximate analysis of sagon formulated with lindur and soybean flour.
| Nutrient content/100 g (mean ± SD) | ||||
|
| ||||
| Nutrients | Treatment | |||
| P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | |
| Energy (kcal) | 503.06 ± 19.46 | 514.44 ± 5.5 | 540.52 ± 18.37 | 557.07 ± 14.47 |
| Proteins (grams) | 8.78 ± 0.06 | 9.30 ± 0.03 | 9.82 ± 0.03 | 11.45 ± 0.20 |
| Fat (grams) | 25.31 ± 3.81 | 27.53 ± 0.98 | 31.94 ± 3.80 | 35.05 ± 2.76 |
| Carbohydrates (grams) | 60.06 ± 3.91 | 57.35 ± 0.89 | 53,45 ± 3.97 | 48.95 ± 2.56 |
| Water content (% wb) | 4.03 ± 0.16 | 3.98 ± 0.14 | 2.86 ± 0.39 | 2.46 ± 0.08 |
| Ash content (% wb) | 1.84 ± 0.10 | 1.84 ± 0.11 | 1.93 ± 0.40 | 2.09 ± 0.12 |
| Crude fiber (%) | 7.62 ± 0.41 | 10.12 ± 3.32 | 12.64 ± 1.05 | 12.25 ± 2.99 |
| Soluble dietary fiber (% wb) | 1.01 ± 0.08 | 1.24 ± 0.03 | 1.36 ± 0.00 | 1.48 ± 0.06 |
| Insoluble dietary fiber (% wb) | 14.78 ± 0.18 | 15.39 ± 0.10 | 16.74 ± 0.06 | 17.64 ± 0.13 |
| Total dietary fiber (% wb) | 15.79 ± 0.21 | 16.63 ± 0.11 | 18.10 ± 0.07 | 19.12 ± 0.07 |
Numbers followed by different superscript letters (a, b, c, and d) indicate a significant difference. *Testing with one-way ANOVA. **Testing with Kruskal–Wallis test. n = 12 (4 experiments × 3 replications) for proximate analysis. P1 (lindur 45%: soybean flour 35%), P2 (lindur 40%: soybean flour 40%), P3 (lindur 35%: soybean flour 45%), and P4 (lindur 30%: soybean flour 50%).
Caloric contribution of sagon formulated with lindur and soybean flour.
| Macronutrient caloric contribution | |||||
|
| |||||
| Nutrients | P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | Emergency food standard |
| Proteins (%/50 g) | 6.98 | 7.242 | 7.29 | 8.23 | 10–15% |
| Fat (%/50 g) | 45.28 | 49.46 | 53.40 | 56.72 | 35–45% |
| Carbohydrates (%/50 g) | 47.74 | 45.78 | 39.66 | 35.20 | 40–50% |
| Total calories (kcal/50 g) | 251.53 | 257.22 | 270.34 | 278.54 | 233–250 kcal |
| Ash content (%) | 1.85 | 1.84 | 1.93 | 2.09 | 2–3% |
| Water content (%) | 4.03 | 3.98 | 2.86 | 2.46 | <14% |
| Dietary fiber (%) | 15.79 | 16.63 | 1.10 | 19.12 | >6 g/100 g |
P1 (lindur 45%: soybean flour 35%), P2 (lindur 40%: soybean flour 40%), P3 (lindur 35%: soybean flour 45%), and P4 (lindur 30%: soybean flour 50%).
The results of the organoleptic evaluation of sagon formulated with lindur and soybean flour.
| Parameter | Organoleptic quality (mean ± SD) | |||
| Treatment | ||||
| P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | |
| Color | 3.60 ± 0.77 | 4.13 ± 0.63 | 4.10 ± 0.66 | 4.37 ± 0.49 |
| Taste | 4.07 ± 0.83 | 4.17 ± 0.75 | 3.77 ± 0.94 | 3.90 ± 0.85 |
| Aroma | 3.87 ± 0.63 | 3.80 ± 0.76 | 3.57 ± 0.97 | 3.57 ± 0.97 |
| Texture | 2.87 ± 0.86 | 2.97 ± 0.99 | 3.10 ± 1.29 | 3.63 ± 0.96 |
Numbers followed by different superscript letters (a and b) show a significant difference with the Kruskal–Wallis testing. P1 (lindur 45%: soybean flour 35%), P2 (lindur 40%: soybean flour 40%), P3 (lindur 35%: soybean flour 45%), and P4 (lindur 30%: soybean flour 50%). N = 12 (4 experiments × 3 replications) for organoleptic evaluation.
The results of the determination of the best formulation.
| Formula/yield value (Nh) | P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 |
| Energy | 0.1818 | 0.0871 | 0.0461 | 0.0000 |
| Protein | 0.0000 | 0.0318 | 0.0637 | 0.1636 |
| Fat | 0.1455 | 0.1122 | 0.0461 | 0.0000 |
| Carbohydrate | 0.1273 | 0.0965 | 0.0513 | 0.0000 |
| Total dietary fiber | 0.0000 | 0.0276 | 0.0756 | 0.1091 |
| Coarse fiber | 0.0909 | 0.0457 | 0.0000 | 0.0070 |
| Water content | 0.0000 | 0.0024 | 0.0541 | 0.0727 |
| Ash content | 0.0019 | 0.0000 | 0.0204 | 0.0545 |
| Organoleptic quality | 0.0000 | 0.0227 | 0.0045 | 0.0364 |
| Hedonic test | 0.0074 | 0.0182 | 0.0050 | 0.0000 |
| Total of yield value (Nh) | 0.5547 | 0.4443 | 0.3669 | 0.4434 |
*The yield value (Nh) is obtained from the De Garmo effectiveness index. n = P1 (lindur 45%: soybean flour 35%), P2 (lindur 40%: soybean flour 40%), P3 (lindur 35%: soybean flour 45%), and P4 (lindur 30%: soybean flour 50%).
FIGURE 1Change in water content (%wb) (A), free fatty acid (%) (B), peroxide value (mEq) (C), during storage at 27, 37, and 47°C. (◆ = 27°C), (■ = 37°C), and (▲ = 47 °C). Error bar is standard error. n = 4 (2 experiments × 2 replications) for water content, free fatty acid and peroxide number.
FIGURE 2The relationship between water content and free fatty acid (A), the relationship between water content and peroxide number (B), during storage at 27, 37, and 47°C. (◆ = 27°C), (■ = 37°C), and (▲ = 47°C). Error bar is standard error. n = 4 (2 experiments × 2 replications).
Comparison of the order of water content parameters, free fatty acid, peroxide number, and activation energy.
| Test parameter | Temperature (°C) | Regression equation |
| Activation energy Ea (kcal/mol) | ||
|
|
| |||||
| Ordo 0 | Ordo 1 | Ordo 0 | Ordo 1 | |||
| Water content | 27 | y = 0.0939x + 5.9875 | y = 0.0129x + 1.7988 | 0.9843 | 0.9751 | 1.18 |
| 37 | y = 0.0946x + 6.166 | y = 0.0127x + 1.8265 | 0.9423 | 0.9349 | ||
| 47 | y = 0.1065x + 5.4194 | y = 0.0148x + 1.7139 | 0.8711 | 0.8893 | ||
| Free fatty acid | 27 | y = 0.0001x + 0.0005 | y = 0.0635x − 7.0748 | 0.9007 | 0.8456 | 2.77 |
| 37 | y = 0.0002x + 0.0006 | y = 0.064x − 6.8981 | 0.8997 | 0.8989 | ||
| 47 | y = 0.0002x + 0.0006 | y = 0.0689x − 6.9056 | 0.8785 | 0.8679 | ||
| Peroxide number | 27 | y = 0.1822x + 0.9674 | y = 0.0501x + 0.417 | 0.8650 | 0.8900 | 0.94 |
| 37 | y = 0.157x + 1.9421 | y = 0.0394x + 0.7886 | 0.9434 | 0.9140 | ||
| 47 | y = 0.02x + 1.5675 | y = 0.0472x + 0.7096 | 0.9778 | 0.9680 | ||
Estimation of sagon shelf life* (54).
| Temperature (°C) | Initial value of quality (mEq/Kg) | Critical value of quality (mEq/Kg)* | Decreasing rate of quality (K) | Shelf life (days) |
| 27 | 1.792 | 8.00 | 0.1707 | 37 |
| 37 | 1.792 | 8.00 | 0.1796 | 35 |
| 47 | 1.792 | 8.00 | 0.1884 | 33 |