Literature DB >> 35520010

Electromyographic Examination of Hip and Knee Extension Hex Bar Exercises Varied by Starting Knee and Torso Angles.

Edward Jo1, Kevin A Valenzuela2, Whitney Leyva1, Jennifer Rivera1, Kalin Tomlinson1, Elisabeth Zeitz1.   

Abstract

Variations of the deadlift can be executed using the hexagonal (hex) bar by altering, for instance, the knee and torso angles while maintaining a constant hip angle at the start position.
PURPOSE: To examine muscle activation patterns of the biceps femoris, rectus femoris, and erector spinae during three deadlift variations using the hex bar.
METHODS: Twenty resistance-trained male and female subjects performed hex bar deadlift variations in three different starting knee flexion positions: 128.4 ± 8.5°, 111.9 ± 8.7°, and 98.3 ± 6.5°. Subjects performed three repetitions at 75% of their three-repetition maximum. Electromyography sensors were placed on the dominant biceps femoris, rectus femoris, and lumbar erector spinae. A one-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to detect differences in mean and peak EMG values normalized to maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) (p < 0.05).
RESULTS: As knee flexion increased at the starting position, mean activation of the rectus femoris increased (24.7 ± 21.5 → 35.5 ± 25.4 → 62.1 ± 31.3% MVIC, p < 0.001), while biceps femoris (40.6 ± 17.9 → 34.0 ± 16.4 → 28.1 ± 14.5% MVIC, p = 0.003) and erector spinae (73.0 ± 27.6 → 65.9 ± 34.4 → 54.9 ± 32.5% MVIC, p = 0.009) activation decreased. Peak activation of the rectus femoris increased (46.9 ± 33.0 → 60.9 ± 38.7 → 99.3 ± 41.6% MVIC, p < 0.001) while decreasing in the erector spinae (118.6 ± 47.1 → 105.9 ± 49.4 → 89.1 ± 40.1% MVIC, p = 0.008). The rectus femoris experienced the greatest mean differences of the three muscles.
CONCLUSIONS: Practitioners should consider the muscular goals when adjusting the starting position of a hex bar deadlift as posterior chain recruitment diminished and quadriceps activation increased as knee flexion increased.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Resistance exercise; electromyography; neuromuscular

Year:  2022        PMID: 35520010      PMCID: PMC9022700     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci        ISSN: 1939-795X


  18 in total

1.  Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures.

Authors:  H J Hermens; B Freriks; C Disselhorst-Klug; G Rau
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.368

2.  Electromyographic analysis of gluteus medius and gluteus maximus during rehabilitation exercises.

Authors:  Kristen Boren; Cara Conrey; Jennifer Le Coguic; Lindsey Paprocki; Michael Voight; T Kevin Robinson
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2011-09

3.  Relationship between moments at the L5/S1 level, hip and knee joint when lifting.

Authors:  O D Schipplein; J H Trafimow; G B Andersson; T P Andriacchi
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Multiple-joint exercises using elastic resistance bands vs. conventional resistance-training equipment: A cross-over study.

Authors:  Vegard M Iversen; Paul Jarle Mork; Ottar Vasseljen; Ronny Bergquist; Marius S Fimland
Journal:  Eur J Sport Sci       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 4.050

5.  Comparison of Muscle Involvement and Posture Between the Conventional Deadlift and a "Walk-In" Style Deadlift Machine.

Authors:  Benjamin J Snyder; Courtney P Cauthen; Scott R Senger
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  The 1 Repetition Maximum Mechanics of a High-Handle Hexagonal Bar Deadlift Compared With a Conventional Deadlift as Measured by a Linear Position Transducer.

Authors:  Robert G Lockie; Matthew R Moreno; Adrina Lazar; Fabrice G Risso; Tricia M Liu; Alyssa A Stage; Samantha A Birmingham-Babauta; Ibett A Torne; John J Stokes; Dominic V Giuliano; DeShaun L Davis; Ashley J Orjalo; Samuel J Callaghan
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  An Examination of Muscle Activation and Power Characteristics While Performing the Deadlift Exercise With Straight and Hexagonal Barbells.

Authors:  Kevin D Camara; Jared W Coburn; Dustin D Dunnick; Lee E Brown; Andrew J Galpin; Pablo B Costa
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  Effect of a Hexagonal Barbell on the Mechanical Demand of Deadlift Performance.

Authors:  Jason Lake; Freddie Duncan; Matt Jackson; David Naworynsky
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2017-10-24

9.  Determining the optimal maximal and submaximal voluntary contraction tests for normalizing the erector spinae muscles.

Authors:  Gemma Biviá-Roig; Juan Francisco Lisón; Daniel Sánchez-Zuriaga
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  An electromyographic and kinetic comparison of conventional and Romanian deadlifts.

Authors:  Sangwoo Lee; Jacob Schultz; Joseph Timgren; Katelyn Staelgraeve; Michael Miller; Yuanlong Liu
Journal:  J Exerc Sci Fit       Date:  2018-08-11       Impact factor: 3.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.