Literature DB >> 3551996

A comparison of three methods of oral reconstruction.

F M McConnel, J F Teichgraeber, R K Adler.   

Abstract

A protocol is presented that was designed to provide comparative data on the two primary oral cavity functions affected by surgery: speech and swallowing. Three types of reconstruction (skin grafts, hemitongue flaps, and myocutaneous flaps) and results of a series of tests given to 15 surgical patients with T2 and T3 tongue and/or floor of mouth lesions were evaluated. The patients who had split-thickness skin grafts had the best oral function results. The study suggests that tongue mobility is the most significant variable in determining post-operative speech results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3551996     DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1987.01860050042011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0886-4470


  3 in total

1.  Change in reimbursement and costs in German oncological head and neck surgery over the last decade: ablative tongue cancer surgery and reconstruction with split-thickness skin graft vs. microvascular radial forearm flap.

Authors:  Sebastian Hoefert; Oliver Lotter
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Dysphagia following head and neck cancer surgery.

Authors:  M B Kronenberger; A D Meyers
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.438

3.  Guide flange prosthesis for early management of reconstructed hemimandibulectomy: a case report.

Authors:  Pravinkumar Gajanan Patil; Smita Pravinkumar Patil
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 1.904

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.