Literature DB >> 35519909

A Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Manifestations, Management and Outcome of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Associated with Coronavirus Disease-2019 Infection in Children.

Mihir Sarkar1, Bratesh Das1, Manas K Mahapatra1, Satyabrata Roychowdhoury1, Sambhunath Das1, Mithun C Konar1.   

Abstract

Background: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) associated with COVID-19 in children is not well described in the literature, so this study was designed to assess the severity, clinical course, different treatment measures, and outcome of this group of patients. Patients and methods: This descriptive study was performed by retrospective chart review of children admitted in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) in the age-group of 1 month to 12 years over the period of 6 months (July-December 2020) in a tertiary care pediatric COVID facility in eastern India. Severity of ARDS, ventilator settings, oxygenation and laboratory parameters, and outcomes were documented. Predictors associated with severe ARDS were evaluated.
Results: Among 128 laboratory-confirmed pediatric COVID-19 cases admitted in PICU, 18 (14%) developed ARDS, 6 (33.3%) had severe ARDS, and 3 (16.6%) succumbed to death. Outcome was measured by median hospital stay [20 days (IQR 19, 21)], PICU stay [13 days (IQR 10, 16)], and 28-day ventilator-free days [14 days (IQR 13, 22)]. Half (n = 9) of our study cohort had different comorbidities and congenital heart disease being the most common (4, 22.2%). Median positive end-expiratory pressure requirement was 10 cm H2O (9, 11) for invasively ventilated children (n = 13, 72.2%) along with peak inspiratory pressure of 24 cm H2O (20, 29) and mean airway pressure of 17 cm H2O (14, 20). Median oxygenation index was 13.3 (10.5, 18.6). Nine (69.2%) out of 13 intubated children had undergone prone ventilation. C-reactive protein (CRP) and D-dimer levels were significantly high in children with severe ARDS alongside pSOFA and lung USG score.
Conclusion: Incidence of ARDS in pediatric COVID-19 though less but is not rare. Elevated CRP, D-dimer values, and high lung USG scores were associated with severe ARDS. Those who died had significant comorbidity. How to cite this article: Sarkar M, Das B, Mahapatra MK, Roychowdhoury S, Das S, Konar MC. A Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Manifestations, Management and Outcome of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Associated with Coronavirus Disease-2019 Infection in Children. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(3):331-338.
Copyright © 2022; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute respiratory distress syndrome; Children; Coronavirus disease-2019; Pediatric intensive care unit

Year:  2022        PMID: 35519909      PMCID: PMC9015940          DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0972-5229


Introduction

In December 2019, a pandemic of Coronavirus disease-2019 or COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2 started in the Wuhan province of China and gradually involved almost every continent.[1] It has been seen to cause severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), leading to intensive care unit (ICU) admission and considerable mortality.[2] In an adult study, the incidence of ARDS was found to be around one-third of the admitted patients with COVID-19, and among them, more than half of the patients needed invasive ventilatory support in an ICU.[2] Several studies have reported varied mortality rate from 13 to 85% among adult population.[3,4] Although there are not enough data present in the pediatric age-group, early studies from China suggested less disease severity in children.[5] In due course, we have learned about entities like multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C), which may complicate the disease process by precipitating shock and multiorgan failure.[6] Later on, pediatric data have shown an increase in severity and incidence of ARDS, PICU admission rate, and requirement of ventilatory support among children affected with COVID-19.[7] A recent meta-analysis showed that children with comorbidities such as congenital heart disease, preexisting malignancy, CNS diseases, and chronic respiratory diseases have worse outcomes if infected with the virus.[8] Alongside comorbidities and complications, adult studies showed that ARDS caused by SARS-CoV-2 is different from ARDS caused by other etiology, in respect to time of onset from clinical insult, compliance of respiratory system, severity based on oxygenation index, and management protocols.[9] Nevertheless, there is paucity of literature examining the presentation, progression, management, and prognosis of pediatric ARDS (PARDS) cases associated with COVID-19. The clinical course of adult COVID-19 associated ARDS has been described in many studies,[2-4,9] but questions remain regarding optimum management of PARDS. Hence, this study was set out to understand the pattern, course, severity, and outcome of pediatric ARDS and guide therapy in the future.

Objective

The objective of this study was to determine clinical course of children with COVID-19 ARDS. Predictors of severe ARDS were also assessed.

Methodology

This descriptive study was performed by retrospective chart review of children admitted in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) in the age-group of 1 month to 12 years, over the period of 6 months (July 2020–December 2020) in a tertiary care-dedicated pediatric COVID facility in eastern India. Case records of all patients admitted to PICU during the study period were screened to identify the children having PARDS. Approval from institutional ethics committee was obtained and permission taken for waiving informed consent. COVID-19 infection was confirmed by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction testing a specimen of nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swab. ARDS and its severity were defined using PALICC criteria in respect to oxygenation index (OI) in invasively ventilated children and PaO2/FiO2 (P/F) ratio in nonintubated children.[10] Management of ARDS was based on lung-protective ventilation strategy according to the practice recommendation for treating children with COVID-19, endorsed by European Society of Pediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC).[11] All the patients who developed ARDS along with COVID-19 were initially started on pressure-regulated volume control mode (PRVC) in MAQUET Servo i ventilator, as per the running protocol in our PICU. Bedside incremental positive-end expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration was performed with continuous monitoring of SpO2, blood pressure, dynamic lung compliance and dynamic driving pressure. Optimum PEEP was determined by the level where the ceiling of SpO2 (For moderate ARDS 94% and for severe ARDS 90%) and dynamic compliance observed and lowest requirement of dynamic driving pressure noted. Those who responded to incremental PEEP titration were not proned. Those cases where P/F ratio was <150 after PEEP titration were proned. Definition from World Health Organization (WHO) was used to define pneumonia and respiratory distress with its severity.[12] Acute kidney injury (AKI) was defined using the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) classification, based upon a change in serum creatinine level and creatinine clearance.[13] Pediatric Surviving Sepsis Guidelines were used to define sepsis and septic shock, and MIS-C was defined according to WHO definition.[14,15] Demographic, clinical, and radiographic data and different relevant laboratory parameters were extracted from medical records during the PICU stay. Investigations performed within 24 hours of PICU admission were taken for analysis. The cut-off values for different laboratory markers were taken as—thrombocytopenia (<150 × 103/mm3), high procalcitonin (>2 ng/mL), raised N-Terminal pro-BNP (>125 pg/mL), elevated IL-6 (>7 pg/mL), hyperferritinemia (>700 ng/mL),[16] raised C-reactive protein (>10 mg/L), and high D-dimer (>0.5 µg/mL). Basic laboratory investigations were taken into our records, and cut-off values were defined as per age-specific standards.[17] To monitor organ function, pediatric sequential organ failure assessment (pSOFA) score was taken at PICU admission.[18] The type of respiratory support and its duration during the course of illness was recorded. Arterial blood gas (ABG) measurements, ventilator modes and settings, oxygenation-related variables, maximum ventilator settings, and their duration were extracted from our records. Bedside lung USG was done by Philips HD7 (Philips Healthcare, Netherlands) with the high-frequency linear probe (L 7–12 mHz) at the time of PICU admission, and lung USG score was calculated in 12 zones for each patient.[19,20] Available echocardiography findings of the patients were noted. According to our PICU protocol, ejection fraction <55% by modified Simpson's method was considered as systolic dysfunction. Records of coronary abnormalities, valvular insufficiencies and pericardial effusion were extracted. According to the COVID-19 management guideline, CT scan is not recommended for diagnosis and routine management in pediatric patients. In the study group in one patient CT scan was performed as the patient was requiring prolonged high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) support in postextubation period. In case of mild ARDS, we gave trial of HFNC, and in moderate ADRS, we tried noninvasive ventilation (NIV) initially, if there are no significant neurological or hemodynamic issues. But, if patient did not improve after getting high-flow oxygen at 2 L/kg/minute and 60% FiO2 for 2 hours, we considered it as HFNC failure and trial of NIV was given. In case of noninvasive ventilation, if the requirement of PEEP was >8 cm H2O and PIP of >15 cm H2O and FiO2 >60%, we termed it as NIV failure and patient shifted to invasive ventilation. Severe ARDS, inability to maintain airway, hemodynamic instability requiring high dose of inotropes were the indications of invasive ventilation, straight way. We compared the relevant laboratory investigations, inflammatory markers, lung USG scores, organ dysfunction scores between patients who had severe ARDS with those having mild to moderate ARDS. Outcomes were measured in the form of PICU stay, 28-day ventilator-free days, hospital stay, and mortality. Data were entered and analyzed using the statistical package SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Science; SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA) version 23. Continuous variables were expressed as median, interquartile range, and mean standard deviation; while categorical variables, as numbers and percentages. Comparison of laboratory parameters, organ dysfunction, lung USG scores between the two groups—who had severe ARDS and who had mild to moderate ARDS category, were analyzed by Fischer's exact test or Chi-square test for categorical variables, and Mann-Whitney tests or unpaired t-test for continuous variable. p value less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

During the defined period, 128 patients were admitted in PICU, and 18 (14%) had PARDS and required respiratory support in the form of invasive or noninvasive ventilation. The median age of the cohort was 7.5 (IQR 3, 25.2) months, with a preponderance of female sex (10, 55.5%) (Table 1). Eleven (61.1%) patients were infants, nine (50%) patients had comorbidities and predominant being complex congenital heart disease (4, 22.2%). Respiratory distress was the most common symptom (14, 77.7%), and the median duration of symptoms was 4 days (IQR 3, 5) before admission. Eleven (61.1%) patients developed shock, and among them, nine were invasively ventilated, nine had myocardial dysfunction, and four patients were blood culture positive. The median PICU stay of the patients having shock were 15 days (IQR 13, 17.5), whereas those who did not develop shock had a median PICU stay of 12 days (IQR 9.5, 13.5). The median value of pSOFA score was 11 (IQR 7.25, 12), which points out the significant disease burden in our study cohort. Corticosteroids (16, 88.8%) and intravenous immunoglobulin (6, 33.3%) were used as decided by the treating physician. Out of 16 patients who received steroid, two required 10 mg/kg/day pulse dose of methylprednisolone due to the presence of MIS-C. Rest of the 14 patients were treated with standard dose of either methylprednisolone (N:12) or dexamethasone[21] (N:2) as per the discretion of treating physician. Intravenous steroid therapy was stopped as and when there was resolution of fever and decreasing trend of inflammatory markers and the mean duration being 5 days. Intravenous immunoglobulin was given to six patients at a dose of 2 g/kg over 48 hours; among them three had severe (EF <40%) and other three had moderate myocardial dysfunction (EF: 40–55%). Two patients met diagnostic criteria of MIS-C. Remdesivir was administered in 15 (83.3%) patients, and 8 (44.4%) patients received low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH).
Table 1

Demographics and clinical characteristics of children with ARDS and COVID-19 infection (n = 18)

Parameters Median or percentage or mean values
Age (in months)7.5 (IQR 3, 25.2)
Sex (female)10 (55.5%)
Fever12 (66.6%)
Cough10 (55.5%)
Respiratory distress14 (77.7%)
Shock11 (61.1%)
Myocardial dysfunction9 (50%)
MIS-C2 (11.1%)
AKI4 (22.2%)
Convulsion9 (50%)
Comorbidity9 (50%)
Neurological abnormality3 (16.6%)
Congenital heart disease4 (22.2%)
Childhood malignancy2 (11.1%)
Median duration of symptoms4 days (IQR 3, 5)
Vital signs at the time of admission
Temperature (°F)100.6 (IQR 98.6, 101.1)
Heart rate  154 (IQR 123.5, 163.5)
SpO2 (%)95.5 (IQR 93.2, 97)
Respiratory rate56 (IQR 41, 60.2)
Median pSOFA score11 (IQR 7.25, 12)
Treatment received
Vasopressors or inotropes used
Noradrenaline12 (85.7%)
Adrenaline7 (50%)
Dobutamine12 (85.7%)
Vasopressin4 (28.5%)
Levosemendan1 (7.1%)
Milrinone1 (7.1%)
Median VIS  65 (IQR 42.5, 78.7)
Median duration (in days) 7 (5.5, 9)
  Mild ARDS Moderate ARDS Severe ARDS Total
Patients needed vasopressor support26614 (77.7%)
Intravenous immunoglobulin1236 (33.3%)
Remdesivir18615 (83.3%)
LMWH0448 (44.4%)
Neuromuscular blockade0055 (27.7%)
Steroid19616 (88.8%)
Type of steroidMethylprednisoloneDexamethasone
 14 (87.5%)2 (12.5%)
Mean duration of steroid therapy 5 days 
Renal replacement therapy 1 (5.5%) 
Need for anticonvulsants 9 (50%) 
Need for RICP management 5 (27.7%) 

MIS-C, Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children; AKI, acute kidney injury; pSOFA, pediatric sequential organ failure assessment; VIS, vasoactive-inotropic score; LMWH, low-molecular-weight heparin; RICP, raised intracranial pressure

Demographics and clinical characteristics of children with ARDS and COVID-19 infection (n = 18) MIS-C, Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children; AKI, acute kidney injury; pSOFA, pediatric sequential organ failure assessment; VIS, vasoactive-inotropic score; LMWH, low-molecular-weight heparin; RICP, raised intracranial pressure Among all the patients (n = 18) in our cohort, six had severe, nine had moderate, and three had mild ARDS. Flowchart 1 describes the different types of respiratory support received by the patient according to the severity of ARDS and disease progression time line. Median PEEP requirement was 10 cm H2O (IQR 9, 11) for invasively ventilated children, set tidal volume was 7 mL/kg (IQR 6, 7.5) along with peak inspiratory pressure of 24 cm H2O (IQR 20, 29) and median airway pressure (MAP) of 17 cm H2O (IQR 14, 20) (Table 2). Nine (69.2%) patients among all the intubated children had undergone prone ventilation. The mean duration of proning was 32 hours (IQR 0, 49.5), and median ventilator stay was 8 days (IQR 7, 9). None of the patients who needed noninvasive ventilation were kept prone, because they didn't tolerate awake proning (Suppl. Table 1).
Flowchart 1

Different respiratory supports used in patients with ARDS

Table 2

Ventilation-related parameters of individual-intubated patients (n = 13)

    Maximum settings         
SI. No Comorbidity Age (in months) PEEP PIP TV (mL/kg) FiO2 (%) Duration of proning (hours) Lung USG score OI OI after 24 h of PEEP titration or proning Severity of ARDS pSOFA score Duration of IMV (days) Outcome
1Nil65147550129.26.4Moderate66Discharge
2Neurological abnormality271225880482019.315.8Severe128Discharge
3Congenital heart disease114297100282610.57.6Moderate166Death
4Neurological abnormality206166500155.74.5Mild1211Death
5Nil210217100321612.29.1Moderate87Discharge
6Nil910248100541817.915.6Severe89Discharge
7Nil121023675301312.512.2Moderate1126Discharge
8Nil38207700198.26.4Moderate56Discharge
9Neurological abnormality99198100511828.819.4Severe1135Discharge
10Nil31129785541916.813.2Severe128Discharge
11Congenital heart disease31131690482018.612.6Severe188Discharge
12AML48102869001913.49.2Moderate199Death
13Nil311297100321718.811.8Severe87Discharge
 Total (median value):6 (3, 16)10 (9, 11)24 (20, 29)7 (6, 7.5)90 (72.5, 100)32 (0, 49.5)18 (15.5, 19.5)13.3 (10.5, 18.6)11.8 (7, 14.4)11 (8, 14)8 (7, 9)

PEEP, positive-end expiratory pressure (cm H2O); PIP, peak inspiratory pressure (cm H2O); TV, tidal volume; FiO2, fraction of inspired oxygen; OI, oxygenation index; IMV, invasive mechanical ventilation; AML, acute myelogenous leukemia

Different respiratory supports used in patients with ARDS Ventilation-related parameters of individual-intubated patients (n = 13) PEEP, positive-end expiratory pressure (cm H2O); PIP, peak inspiratory pressure (cm H2O); TV, tidal volume; FiO2, fraction of inspired oxygen; OI, oxygenation index; IMV, invasive mechanical ventilation; AML, acute myelogenous leukemia Median Hb% of all the patients with ARDS with COVID-19 was 7.9 g/dL (IQR 6.5, 8.7), and thrombocytopenia was noted in seven (38.8%) children (Table 3). Seventeen (94.4%) patients had elevated levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), and same number of patients had raised D-dimer. On lung USG, breakage of pleural line (15, 83.3%) followed by posterior subpleural consolidation (14, 77.7%) over more than two zones were the two most common findings in our study cohort.
Table 3

Laboratory parameters in children with ARDS and COVID-19 infection (n = 18)

Laboratory parameters Median values or percentage in PICU admitted patients
Hb% (g/dL)7.9 (6.5, 8.7)
Platelets (≤150 × 103/mm3)7 (38.8%)
TLC (cells/mm3)10240 (8700, 18525)
ALC (cells/mm3) 2687 (1768.5, 5316)
TSB (mg/dL)  0.6 (0.4, 0.9)
ALT (IU/L)42 (27, 74.2)
AST (IU/L)  65 (38.7, 172.5)
Creatinine (higher than age-specific cut-off) 13 (72.2%)
Ferritin (>700 ng/mL)5 (27.7%)
NT Pro-BNP (>125 pg/mL)13 (72.2%)
IL-6 (>7 pg/mL)15 (83.3%)
C-reactive protein (>10 mg/L)17 (94.4%)
D-dimer (>0.5 µg/mL)17 (94.4%)
Procalcitonin level (>2 ng/mL)7 (38.8%)
Bedside echocardiography
EF <40%3 (16.6%)
EF 40–55%6 (33.3%)
EF >55%9 (50%)
Pericardial effusion1 (5.5%)
Lung USG
Posterior subpleural consolidation14 (77.7%)
Breakage of pleural line15 (83.3%)
Collapse of one or more lobes3 (16.6%)
Pleural effusion1 (5.5%)
Infiltrates in chest X-ray16 (88.8%)
Positive cultures during PICU stay
+Blood culture4 (22.2%)
+Bronchoalveolar lavage culture1 (5.5%)
+CSF culture1 (5.5%)
Outcome parameters
Median PICU stay13 days (IQR 10, 16)
Median 28-day ventilator-free days20 days (IQR 2, 21)
Median hospital stay14 days (IQR 13, 22)
Death3 (16.6%)

TLC, total leukocyte count; ALC, absolute lymphocyte count; TSB, total serum bilirubin; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase

Laboratory parameters in children with ARDS and COVID-19 infection (n = 18) TLC, total leukocyte count; ALC, absolute lymphocyte count; TSB, total serum bilirubin; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase On comparison of laboratory parameters, CRP (p-value: 0.001) and D-dimer (p-value: 0.004) were significantly elevated in patients with severe ARDS. Notably, higher pSOFA (p-value: 0.001) and lung USG score (p-value: 0.001) within first 24 hours of PICU admission were observed in severe ARDS (Table 4).
Table 4

Comparison of laboratory parameters, severity, and oxygenation indices between patients suffering from mild to moderate and severe ARDS

Parameters Severe ARDS (n = 6) Mild to moderate ARDS (n = 12) p value
Hb (g/dL)  8.1 (6.9, 8.3)6.9 (6.2, 11.4)0.960
TLC (cells/mm3)8750 (7600, 11300)14100 (10700, 40000)0.056
ALC (cells/mm3)2436 (1824, 5000)5564 (1410, 13175)0.490
CRP (mg/L)  96.7 (58.4, 117)18.4 (14, 22.5) 0.001
Pro-BNP (pg/mL)  1153 (413.4, 12466)  855 (103.1, 1076)0.138
IL-6 (pg/mL)72.9 (57.4, 77.6)28.4 (25.6, 37)0.238
Ferritin (ng/mL)596.4 (187, 737.3)110.2 (97.4, 111.4)0.138
D-dimer (µg/mL)5.02 (4.2, 7.8)1.2 (0.7, 1.3) 0.004
pSOFA score12 (11, 13)5 (4, 6) 0.001
P/F ratio112.7 (102.5, 132.2)198.1 (187.6, 212.8) 0.001
PaO2112.7 (106.3, 139.9)158.5 (149, 178) 0.048
PaCO259 (51.7, 62)46 (42, 51) 0.020
USG score18 (16, 19)9 (8, 9) 0.001

Bold values indicate significant p value (p <0.05)

Comparison of laboratory parameters, severity, and oxygenation indices between patients suffering from mild to moderate and severe ARDS Bold values indicate significant p value (p <0.05) In this study, the median stay in PICU was 13 days (IQR 10, 16), and median hospital stay was 14 days (IQR 13, 22). Three (16.6%) patients died in PICU, and among them one had tetralogy of fallot with absent pulmonary valve, one other patient had neurodegenerative disorder with super-refractory convulsion leading to brain death, and the third patient had acute myeloid leukemia with massive intracranial bleed. Details of their ARDS severity and ventilator strategies were described in Table 2.

Discussion

In the present study, 14% (n = 18) of PICU-admitted COVID-19 pediatric patients suffered from ARDS. Most of them (13, 72.2%) required invasive mechanical ventilation. Comorbidity was present in half of the patients and was also contributing factor for mortality. Median OI was 13.3 (IQR 10.5, 18.6), median PEEP of 10 cm H2O, PIP of 24 cm H2O were required in our cohort. Along with P/F ratio, CRP and D-dimer were found to be associated with severity of the disease. In an early report from China, it has been described that proportion of “severe and critical” cases was 10.6% in infant age-group, and severe illness was defined as ARDS with or without shock, encephalopathy, myocardial injury or heart failure, coagulation dysfunction, and AKI. But details of clinical analysis of these children were not included in this study.[5] A multicenter study from Italy reported that out of 168 infected children, 14 patients developed severe acute respiratory illness.[22] Another report from Europe mentioned that 10 out of 198 pediatric patients had ARDS, and all of them required mechanical ventilation.[23] In our study, the median age of participants was 7.5 months, and 55.5% of the study population were female. In the early part of pandemic, infants were seen to be more vulnerable,[5] but a more recent study from New York, which was designed to describe clinical manifestation and outcome of critically ill children, had 30% ARDS cases. In this study, male developed more ARDS, and median age was also high (15 years, IQR 9, 19).[24] Among the comorbidities we recorded in our cohort, congenital heart disease was most common followed by neurological abnormalities and childhood malignancy. Researchers from other parts of the world had also confirmed high rate of comorbidities among the critically ill children admitted in PICU due to COVID-19 infection.[8,25,26] It was seen in our study that CRP and D-dimer were the most frequently elevated inflammatory markers (in 94.4% patients for both) followed by IL-6 (83.3%) and procalcitonin (38.8%). NT-pro BNP was elevated in 13 (72.2%) patients, whereas myocardial dysfunction was seen in 9 (50%) patients. Hence, NT-Pro BNP may increase probably in states of heightened inflammation besides being a marker for heart failure. Thrombocytopenia was evident in 38.8% cases in our cohort. High levels of IL-6 and low platelet count were noted to be associated with pediatric ARDS by Derespina et al.[24] A study from UK found that thrombocytopenia, high neutrophil count, and elevated CRP were associated with PICU admission.[27] Study by Musolino et al.in a tertiary care hospital of Rome[28] found vertical artifact (70%), pleural irregularities (60%), areas of white lung (10%), and subpleural consolidation (10%) in lung USG in 10 consecutively admitted children with COVID-19. In our study, most common lung USG findings were breakage of pleural line (83.3%) followed by posterior subpleural consolidation (77.7%). Severe ARDS cases were significantly associated with high lung USG score. The study from New York reported that 18 out of 21 COVID-19-infected children with ARDS were supported by invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and 3 required proning. Their median IMV duration was 191.4 hours (107.5, 309.5).[24] Barbosa et al. from Brazil reported that 14 out of 79 children (18%) required invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) with median PEEP requirement of 9.5 cm H2O and median duration of IMV of 7.5 days (IQR 5, 10).[25] In this study, six children were classified to have severe ARDS and three patients required intermittent proning. In our study, 13 out of 18 patients required invasive mechanical ventilation. Lung protective ventilation strategies were followed and 9 out of 13 (69.2%) patients required proning for mean duration of 15.6 hours/day. The median duration of IMV in our study was 8 days (IQR 7, 9). Application of prone ventilation was higher in our study in comparison with other studies.[24,25] On contrary, Chao et al.[7] had shown that lung protective strategies were not sufficient to manage ARDS children with mechanical ventilation in their study cohort as they required median PEEP of 10 cm H2O and median PIP of 35 cm H2O on day 3 of ventilation. The main limitation of our study was that it was a single-center retrospective study. Due to small sample size, multivariate analysis to determine independent predictors of severe ARDS was not possible. A multicenter study could have provided a more representative data on pediatric ARDS associated with COVID-19 in a developing country like India. But till date, this study is one of the largest studies analyzing different aspects of presentation, treatment, and outcome of pediatric ARDS due to COVID-19. Data on pediatric COVID-19 ARDS are rare and insufficient. So this study may help bridge this deficiency and contribute to formulate effective management strategies for pediatric ARDS.

Conclusion

COVID-19 can cause ARDS in children with varying severity. Elevated CRP, D-dimer values, and high lung USG scores at PICU admission can be useful marker to predict severe ARDS. All diseased patients had significant comorbidity.
  24 in total

1.  Epidemiology of COVID-19 Among Children in China.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Dong; Xi Mo; Yabin Hu; Xin Qi; Fan Jiang; Zhongyi Jiang; Shilu Tong
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Clinical Manifestations and Outcomes of Critically Ill Children and Adolescents with Coronavirus Disease 2019 in New York City.

Authors:  Kim R Derespina; Shubhi Kaushik; Anna Plichta; Edward E Conway; Asher Bercow; Jaeun Choi; Ruth Eisenberg; Jennifer Gillen; Anita I Sen; Claire M Hennigan; Lillian M Zerihun; Sule Doymaz; Michael A Keenaghan; Stephanie Jarrin; Franscene Oulds; Manoj Gupta; Louisdon Pierre; Melissa Grageda; H Michael Ushay; Vinay M Nadkarni; Michael S D Agus; Shivanand S Medar
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 4.406

3.  COVID-19 in children and adolescents in Europe: a multinational, multicentre cohort study.

Authors:  Florian Götzinger; Begoña Santiago-García; Antoni Noguera-Julián; Miguel Lanaspa; Laura Lancella; Francesca I Calò Carducci; Natalia Gabrovska; Svetlana Velizarova; Petra Prunk; Veronika Osterman; Uros Krivec; Andrea Lo Vecchio; Delane Shingadia; Antoni Soriano-Arandes; Susana Melendo; Marcello Lanari; Luca Pierantoni; Noémie Wagner; Arnaud G L'Huillier; Ulrich Heininger; Nicole Ritz; Srini Bandi; Nina Krajcar; Srđan Roglić; Mar Santos; Christelle Christiaens; Marine Creuven; Danilo Buonsenso; Steven B Welch; Matthias Bogyi; Folke Brinkmann; Marc Tebruegge
Journal:  Lancet Child Adolesc Health       Date:  2020-06-25

4.  Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Chaolin Huang; Yeming Wang; Xingwang Li; Lili Ren; Jianping Zhao; Yi Hu; Li Zhang; Guohui Fan; Jiuyang Xu; Xiaoying Gu; Zhenshun Cheng; Ting Yu; Jiaan Xia; Yuan Wei; Wenjuan Wu; Xuelei Xie; Wen Yin; Hui Li; Min Liu; Yan Xiao; Hong Gao; Li Guo; Jungang Xie; Guangfa Wang; Rongmeng Jiang; Zhancheng Gao; Qi Jin; Jianwei Wang; Bin Cao
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Prognostic value of bedside lung ultrasound score in patients with COVID-19.

Authors:  Li Ji; Chunyan Cao; Ying Gao; Wen Zhang; Yuji Xie; Yilian Duan; Shuangshuang Kong; Manjie You; Rong Ma; Lili Jiang; Jie Liu; Zhenxing Sun; Ziming Zhang; Jing Wang; Yali Yang; Qing Lv; Li Zhang; Yuman Li; Jinxiang Zhang; Mingxing Xie
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  Severe COVID-19 Infection and Pediatric Comorbidities: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Boyan K Tsankov; Joannie M Allaire; Michael A Irvine; Alison A Lopez; Laura J Sauvé; Bruce A Vallance; Kevan Jacobson
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Characteristics and Outcomes of Children With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Infection Admitted to US and Canadian Pediatric Intensive Care Units.

Authors:  Lara S Shekerdemian; Nabihah R Mahmood; Katie K Wolfe; Becky J Riggs; Catherine E Ross; Christine A McKiernan; Sabrina M Heidemann; Lawrence C Kleinman; Anita I Sen; Mark W Hall; Margaret A Priestley; John K McGuire; Konstantinos Boukas; Matthew P Sharron; Jeffrey P Burns
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 16.193

Review 8.  Acute respiratory failure in COVID-19: is it "typical" ARDS?

Authors:  Xu Li; Xiaochun Ma
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19.

Authors:  Peter Horby; Wei Shen Lim; Jonathan R Emberson; Marion Mafham; Jennifer L Bell; Louise Linsell; Natalie Staplin; Christopher Brightling; Andrew Ustianowski; Einas Elmahi; Benjamin Prudon; Christopher Green; Timothy Felton; David Chadwick; Kanchan Rege; Christopher Fegan; Lucy C Chappell; Saul N Faust; Thomas Jaki; Katie Jeffery; Alan Montgomery; Kathryn Rowan; Edmund Juszczak; J Kenneth Baillie; Richard Haynes; Martin J Landray
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  COVID-19 and multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Li Jiang; Kun Tang; Mike Levin; Omar Irfan; Shaun K Morris; Karen Wilson; Jonathan D Klein; Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 71.421

View more
  1 in total

1.  Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in COVID-19 Pandemic: Is it the Puzzle of the Century?

Authors:  Rohit Bhowmick; Krishna M Gulla
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2022-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.