| Literature DB >> 35519810 |
Pei-Long Wang1,2, Xiao-Jin Lei1, Yuan-Yuan Wang1, Bai-Chao Liu1, Dan-Ni Wang1, Zhong-Yuan Liu1, Cai-Qiu Gao1.
Abstract
Cadmium (Cd) pollution is widely detected in soil and has been recognized as a major environmental problem. Tamarix hispida is a woody halophyte, which can form natural forest on the desert and soil with 0.5 to 1% salt content, making it an ideal plant for the research on response to abiotic stresses. However, no systematic study has investigated the molecular mechanism of Cd tolerance in T. hispida. In the study, RNA-seq technique was applied to analyze the transcriptomic changes in T. hispida treated with 150 μmol L-1 CdCl2 for 24, 48, and 72 h compared with control. In total, 72,764 unigenes exhibited similar sequences in the Non-redundant nucleic acid database (NR database), while 36.3% of all these unigenes may be new transcripts. In addition, 6,778, 8,282, and 8,601 DEGs were detected at 24, 48, and 72 h, respectively. Functional annotation analysis indicated that many genes may be involved in Cd stress response, including ion bonding, signal transduction, stress sensing, hormone responses and ROS metabolism. A ThUGT gene from the abscisic acid (ABA) signaling pathway can enhance Cd resistance ability of T. hispida by regulating the production of ROS under Cd stress and inhibit absorption of Cd. The new transcriptome resources and data that we present in this study for T. hispida may facilitate investigation of molecular mechanisms governing Cd resistance.Entities:
Keywords: ABA; H2O2; Tamarix hispida Willd; cadmium stress; differentially expressed genes; transcriptomic analysis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35519810 PMCID: PMC9062237 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.843725
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 6.627
FIGURE 1Cd stress analysis of T. hispida. The leaves Cd (A) and H2O2 (B) concentrations in T. hispida at control or under 150 μmol L– 1 CdCl2 treated for 24, 48, or 72 h. (C) DAB staining of T. hispida leaves under control or after cadmium stress. * (P < 0.05) indicate signification difference compared with control.
FIGURE 2DEGs of T. hispida under cadmium treatments. (A) Gene number analysis of DEGs between the cadmium treated transcriptomes compared with the control. (B) Venn diagrams of these DEGs.
FIGURE 3Verification of eight selected DEGs by qRT-PCR. Comparison of RNA-seq data (Red point) with qRT-PCR data (Blue point). The normalized expression level (FPKM; expected number of Fragments Per Kilobase of transcript sequence per Millions base pairs sequenced) of RNA-seq is indicated on the y-axis to the left. The relative qRT-PCR expression level of selected DEGs is shown on the y-axis to the right. β-actin was used as the internal control. Three biological replicates were used.
FIGURE 4GO terms and KEGG pathways involved in ROS and hormones production analysis. GO analysis of biological process terms (A), molecular function terms (B,C) KEGG pathways involved in hormones between the cadmium treated transcriptomes compared with the control. The x-axis in (A,B) indicates the percentage of DEG snumbers vs. background gene numbers in each GO term. The x-axis in (C) indicates the percentage of DEGs numbers vs. background gene numbers in each KEGG pathway.
Top 30 KEGG pathways based on the percentage of DEGs in 24 h vs. control.
| Term | Total | 24 h vs. control | 48 h vs. control | 72 h vs. control | |||
| DEGs | % | DEGs | % | DEGs | % | ||
| Glucosinolate biosynthesis | 7 | 2 | 28.6 | 1 | 14.3 | 2 | 28.6 |
| Photosynthesis – antenna proteins | 48 | 10 | 20.8 | 1 | 2.1 | 10 | 20.8 |
| Cutin, suberin, and wax biosynthesis | 77 | 7 | 9.1 | 2 | 2.6 | 9 | 11.7 |
| Brassinosteroid biosynthesis (BRs) | 31 | 2 | 6.5 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 3.2 |
| Flavonoid biosynthesis | 73 | 4 | 5.5 | 1 | 1.4 | 11 | 15.1 |
| Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis | 372 | 19 | 5.1 | 12 | 3.2 | 49 | 13.2 |
| Stilbenoid, diarylheptanoid, and gingerol biosynthesis | 61 | 3 | 4.9 | 0 | 0.0 | 10 | 16.4 |
| Cyanoamino acid metabolism | 161 | 7 | 4.4 | 6 | 3.7 | 13 | 8.1 |
| Phenylalanine metabolism (SA) | 123 | 5 | 4.1 | 1 | 0.8 | 17 | 13.8 |
| Nitrogen metabolism | 104 | 4 | 3.9 | 4 | 3.9 | 11 | 10.6 |
| Arachidonic acid metabolism | 57 | 2 | 3.5 | 1 | 1.8 | 5 | 8.8 |
| Phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan biosynthesis | 206 | 7 | 3.4 | 8 | 3.9 | 9 | 4.4 |
| alpha-Linolenic acid metabolism (JA) | 184 | 6 | 3.3 | 4 | 2.2 | 10 | 5.4 |
| Tryptophan metabolism (IAA) | 134 | 4 | 3.0 | 1 | 0.8 | 7 | 5.2 |
| Alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism | 241 | 7 | 2.9 | 4 | 1.7 | 22 | 9.1 |
| Ascorbate and aldarate metabolism | 214 | 6 | 2.8 | 7 | 3.3 | 19 | 8.9 |
| Pentose phosphate pathway | 215 | 6 | 2.8 | 7 | 3.3 | 15 | 7.0 |
| Amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism | 408 | 11 | 2.7 | 6 | 1.5 | 24 | 5.9 |
| Cysteine and methionine metabolism (ETH) | 342 | 9 | 2.6 | 9 | 2.6 | 23 | 6.7 |
| Terpenoid backbone biosynthesis | 190 | 5 | 2.6 | 3 | 1.6 | 4 | 2.1 |
| Taurine and hypotaurine metabolism | 76 | 2 | 2.6 | 0 | 0.0 | 7 | 9.2 |
| Steroid biosynthesis | 123 | 3 | 2.4 | 1 | 0.8 | 8 | 6.5 |
| Plant hormone signal transduction | 633 | 15 | 2.4 | 11 | 1.7 | 30 | 4.7 |
| Butanoate metabolism | 128 | 3 | 2.3 | 1 | 0.8 | 2 | 1.6 |
| Photosynthesis | 131 | 3 | 2.3 | 3 | 2.3 | 12 | 9.2 |
| Carbon fixation in photosynthetic organisms | 306 | 7 | 2.3 | 8 | 2.6 | 28 | 9.2 |
| Plant-pathogen interaction | 482 | 11 | 2.3 | 13 | 2.7 | 20 | 4.2 |
| Glutathione metabolism | 264 | 6 | 2.3 | 8 | 3.0 | 18 | 6.8 |
| Pentose and glucuronate interconversions | 221 | 5 | 2.3 | 4 | 1.8 | 13 | 5.9 |
| Sphingolipid metabolism | 133 | 3 | 2.3 | 4 | 3.0 | 5 | 3.8 |
Hormone-related KEGG pathways have a gray background.
FIGURE 5Analysis of temporal expression pattern of genes. (A) Heat map analysis of DEGs. (B) Expressive trend pattern analysis of DEGs. The value of ratios take the base 2 logarithm were used to analysis each gene‘s expression trend in every group. For each gene, ratios = FPKM of the gene in sample/FPKM value of the gene in control.
The top 20 GO molecular function based on number of common DEGs.
| Gene Ontology Molecular Function | DEG_item |
| protein binding | 88 |
| ATP binding | 52 |
| DNA binding | 45 |
| zinc ion binding | 33 |
| nucleic acid binding | 31 |
| oxidoreductase activity | 28 |
| protein kinase activity | 24 |
| metal ion binding | 21 |
| structural constituent of ribosome | 20 |
| RNA binding | 18 |
| transcription factor activity, sequence-specific DNA binding | 17 |
| calcium ion binding | 14 |
| transmembrane transporter activity | 14 |
| catalytic activity | 13 |
| hydrolase activity, hydrolyzing O-glycosyl compounds | 12 |
| GTP binding | 10 |
| electron carrier activity | 9 |
| GTPase activity | 9 |
| heme binding | 9 |
| nucleotide binding | 8 |
FIGURE 6The expression levels of ThUGT gene in transiently transformed T. hispida under different CdCl2 stress conditions.
FIGURE 7Cadmium tolerance analysis of ThUGT gene. (A) qRT-PCR analysis (B) staining analysis and (C) physiological indicators determination of ThUGT transgenic T. hispida under 100 μmol L– 1 CdCl2 stress. * (P < 0.05) indicate signification difference compared with control.