Zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF)-derived porous carbon materials for supercapacitors: an overview.

The present analysis focuses on the synthetic methods used for the application of supercapacitors with various mysterious architectures derived from zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIFs). ZIFs represent an emerging and unique class of metal-organic frameworks with structures similar to conventional aluminosilicate zeolites, consisting of imidazolate linkers and metal ions. Their intrinsic porous properties, robust functionalities, and excellent thermal and chemical stabilities have resulted in a wide range of potential applications for various ZIF materials. In this rapidly expanding area, energetic research activities have emerged in the past few years, ranging from synthesis approaches to attractive applications of ZIFs. In this analysis, the development of high-performance supercapacitor electrodes and recent strategies to produce them, including the synthesis of various heterostructures and nanostructures, are analyzed and summarized. This analysis goes via the ingenuity of modern science when it comes to these nanoarchitecture electrodes. Despite these significant achievements, it is still difficult to accurately monitor the morphologies of materials derived from metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) because the induction force during structural transformations at elevated temperatures is in high demand. It is also desirable to achieve the direct synthesis of highly functionalized nanosized materials derived from zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIFs) and the growth of nanoporous structures based on ZIFs encoded in specific substrates for the construction of active materials with a high surface area suitable for electrochemical applications. The latest improvements in this field of supercapacitors with materials formed from ZIFs as electrodes using ZIFs as templates or precursors are discussed in this review. Also, the possibility of usable materials derived from ZIFs for both existing and emerging energy storage technologies is discussed. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.

Introduction

In addition to batteries, supercapacitors are relatively new devices that are capable of producing high power rates. Although supercapacitors deliver thousands of times more power than batteries, they cannot hold the same amount of charge as batteries, normally 3–30 times less. Hence, supercapacitors can prove to be ideal for certain applications that need power outbursts, but not those where high energy storage capacity is required.[1-3] Supercapacitors can also be used in battery-based energy storage systems (ESS) to configure their energy and power capabilities, boost the capacity, achieve the energy and power requirements and increase the lifespan.[4,5]

The power output of supercapacitors compared to electrolytic capacitors is very low, while their specific energy is many times higher.[3,6] Supercapacitors are of interest because they are an improvement over batteries and conventional capacitors, which can store significant quantities of energy at lower power densities (1 kW kg−1) due to their storage mechanism. Fig. 1 shows that a battery can provide almost 150 W h kg−1 of energy density, which is basically around 10 times the capability of an electrochemical capacitor. In terms of energy density, batteries do not have the potential to reach electrochemical capacitor values. Batteries barely reach 200 W kg−1, approximately 20 times less than the estimated output of electrochemical capacitors.[7,8] This is because batteries suffer drawbacks such as a sudden decrease in efficiency due to fast charging cycles or cold ambient temperatures; they are expensive to sustain and have short service lives.[2,9]

Fig. 1

Ragone plots of different energy storage systems.[6]

However, Ragone plots do not clarify some other key parameters, such as total cost, cycle stability or safety. To obtain a better understanding of the benefits and drawbacks of a certain energy storage technology, these criteria must be described separately.

Hence, this is a very significant factor when considering that supercapacitors are not only able to discharge in a small amount of time, but can also be charged in a matter of seconds.[10] The efficiency of supercapacitors has become a significant advantage for energy revival systems, such as ‘dynamic braking’ for transportation networks. One more key aspect of supercapacitors is their lifespan. Due to their charging storage systems, these devices will run for millions of cycles, in which they store the charges in an electric double layer at the surface of the electrode.[11] This helps to extend the cycle-life of the batteries. The exceptionally reversible electrostatic charging storage does not affect the volume of the electrode, which removes the bulging that happens during charging/discharging cycles in a normal redox reaction within the bulk of active material of a battery.[12] Because of the electrochemical kinetics without polarization resistance, supercapacitor electrodes do not have the same drawbacks as redox battery electrodes. The operating voltage of a supercapacitor cell is the primary drawback associated with its charging storage system because it should be kept small to prevent chemical decomposition of the electrolyte.[13] The trait to note is the range of working temperatures. Also, at −40 °C, supercapacitors can reach high power outputs, while batteries are currently unable to function at that temperature.[4] In terms of high power charging and discharging, supercapacitors can also be described as safer than batteries. Electric-double-layer capacitors do not depend on the chemistry of the used metals; therefore, they do not have the risk of metal plating, which is a principal factor in battery degradation and failure and a real security issue which leads to circuit breaks and energetic chemical reactions.[2]

Supercapacitors: working principle and types

Supercapacitors comprise two electrodes with a separator between them, as displayed in Fig. 2. Supercapacitors can be classified as symmetric and asymmetric by the fact that the electrodes in a supercapacitor can be indistinguishable or distinct. The separator is used to avoid electrical contact between the two electrodes during immersion in the electrolyte. The material for the separator should be selected based on high ionic conductivity, low thickness and high electrical resistance to attain the best performance. In general, polymer or paper separators are used for organic electrolytes, whereas ceramic or glass fiber separators are a better alternative for aqueous electrolytes. The breakdown potential of electrolytes at one of the electrodes confines the achievable cell voltage, while the relative series resistance (ESR) of the cell relies on the conductivity of the electrolyte. While the breakdown voltage of aqueous electrolytes is low (1 V) compared to that of organic electrolytes (3 V), the conductivity required for high-power devices is higher for the former than the latter. Aqueous electrolytes are also cost-effective and easy to handle.

Fig. 2

Representation of various supercapacitors: (a) electrical double-layer capacitors (EDLCs); (b) pseudo-capacitors (PCs) (where M exemplifies a metal atom; if electrolyte anions participate in reversible redox reactions, they move in the opposite route to the cations).[14]

Based on their distinct charge storing methods, supercapacitors are categorized into three types, namely electrical double-layer capacitors (EDLCs), pseudo-capacitors (PCs), and hybrid capacitors.[15-17] These include three main classes for electrode materials: transition metal oxides/hydroxides (TMO/Hs), carbon-based materials, and conducting polymers (CPs), as mentioned in Fig. 2.[18,19] EDLCs are constructed on the theory of electric-double layers put forward in 1874 by German physicist Helmholtz[20] and afterward modified by Gouy[21] in 1957, H. I. Becker demonstrated the operational use of a double-layer capacitor which stores electrostatic energy.[13] In EDLCs, the energy is stored in the middle of the activated electrode materials and the electrolytes at the boundary. The EDLCs can indeed be simplified with the following formulation as parallel plate capacitors:[22]Here, εr represents the “dielectric constant” of the electrolyte, εo refers to the permittivity of vacuum, ‘d’ represents the Debye length and ‘A’ shows an active surface area that is in connection with the electrolyte. This formula shows that capacitance is affected by the active surface area. Therefore, materials based on carbon, which has a high specific surface area, high electrical conductivity, chemical stability, lower price, etc., are generally used for EDLCs. However, the limitations of carbonaceous materials, such as limited specific capacitance and low energy densities, restrict their commercialization on a large scale.[1] Conway initially studied pseudo-capacity in the 1960s, and the PCs generally depend on the strong, reversible faradic and redox reactions at the surface.[4]Table 1 shows a comparison of supercapacitor types, electrode materials, and performance parameters.

Comparison of supercapacitor types, electrode materials, and performance parameters

Supercapacitor types	Reaction process	Materials used as electrodes	Stability	Performance
Electric double-layer capacitors	Non-faradaic process, i.e. electrostatic	Carbonaceous materials	Good rate capability	Low energy density
			High cyclic life	Low capacitance
Pseudocapacitors	Redox reactions (faradaic process)	Metal oxides	Low rate capability	High energy density
		Conducting polymers		High specific capacitance
				High power density
Hybrid capacitors	Faradaic and non-faradaic processes	Combination of carbon and metal oxide/conducting polymer	Polymer/carbon composite has a moderate coast & stability	High energy density
				High power density

Electrochemical parameters

In assessing the deliverable efficiency of a supercapacitor for real-life applications, determining its energy and power densities is crucial. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) and charge–discharge (CD) techniques can determine both energy and power densities, which can be determined from the equations shown below :[8,23-27]

The specific capacitance (C, F g−1) of the device can be calculated using cyclic voltammetry:Here, ∫IdV is the integral area of the CV curves (A–V), m is the mass of the active material on the electrode (g), ν is the scan rate and the V is the voltage window.

The charge–discharge (CD) curves can also be used to evaluate the specific capacitance by the following equation.where I/m, Δt, V, and IR are the current density, discharge time, voltage window, and voltage drop during discharge, respectively.

The specific energy density (watt-hours per kilogram) stored within a supercapacitor isHere, E refers to the energy density and V represents the voltage, which is influenced through the electroactive materials and electrolyte stability.

The specific power density (watt per kilogram) defines how quickly a device can deliver energy under a content current density to external loads. The maximum specific power density is calculated asHere, Pmax is the maximum power of the supercapacitor, m represents the total mass of the supercapacitor, and R represents the resistance of the equivalent series (in ohms).

EIS can also be used to measure and compute the ESR. Moreover, further insight into other electrical characteristics is provided by EIS. This approach provides supercapacitors with an alternating current (AC) with a small magnitude over a frequency range of 0.01 Hz to 1 MHz. The response is displayed in a Nyquist plot, which plots the imaginary resistance (Z′′) against the real resistance (Z). The intersection of the impedance curve at the x-axis corresponds to the ESR from the Nyquist map. At low frequencies, the impedance response of a supercapacitor deviates from the ideal capacitor. This deviation is caused by the equivalent distributed resistance (EDR), which accounts for the ionic resistance of the electrolyte within the pores of the electrodes.[28] Hence, increasing the number of pores in an active electrode will induce an elevated EDR.

Electrode materials for supercapacitors

The electrochemical presentation of a supercapacitor can also be affected by the electrode material used. The ideal electrode material blends mechanical strength and high electrochemical performance; however, most materials excel in only one of these respects. Herein, both storage mechanisms share common qualifications and strategies for selecting appropriate materials in electrodes, as demonstrated in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Strategies adopted for the improvement of electrode performance.

As mentioned above, the capacitance and charge storage of a supercapacitor rely closely on the materials that are utilized for the electrodes. Therefore, an extremely effective method to address problems is to create new materials with greater ability and better functioning in comparison to the current electrode materials. The supercapacitor capacitance is highly dependent upon the high surface areas of the electrode materials.[29,30] Because the entire surface area is not electrochemically accessible when the material comes into contact with an electrolyte, there is no linear shift in the measured capacitance of different materials when the surface area is increased. Therefore, a description of the electrochemically active surface area may be a better representation of the action of the electrode capacitance for certain useful surface areas.[31-33] The pore size of the electrode material performs a crucial role within the electroactive surface area. Similarly, as per Largeot et al., the pore sizes of the electrode materials producing extreme double-layer capacitance was equally close to the electrolyte ion size (for an ionic liquid electrolyte), and both types of pores were either larger or smaller, resulting in a substantial decrease in the capacitance.[34] An enlargement in the pore sizes, however, widens the average distance between the center of the ion and the pore wall and thus decreases the capacity of materials with larger pores, as per eqn (1). The porosity associated with the production of high capacity is a significant parameter which includes both the pore size and pore size dissemination for a particular area of the material. Therefore, the capacitance relies heavily on the surface area of the electrode that is reachable to the electrolyte. Normally, electrode materials are classified into three main types: (i) transition metal oxides (ii), carbon-based materials, and (iii) conductive polymers. From the morphology point of view, numerous electrode materials, such as RuO2, NiO, MnO2, NiCo2O4, polyaniline (PANI), polypyrrole (PPy), one-dimensional materials (nanotubes and nanowires), two-dimensional materials (nanosheets and nanodiscs), and three-dimensional materials (nanoarchitectures), have been investigated; these cannot be addressed in detail in a brief review article. Hence, a brief comparison of the most relevant constraints is presented in Table 2.

Overall comparison of electrode materials with different parameters

Materials used	Surface area	Pore size distribution	Specific capacitance	Conductivity	Rate capability	Stability
Carbon	High	Numerous approaches to tailor pore size distribution	Low	High	High	Good
Metal oxides	Low	Difficult to tailor pore size distribution	High	Low	Low	Poor
Metal oxide/conducting polymer–carbon composite	Controlled by a carbon support	Numerous approaches to tailor pore size distribution	High	Medium to high	High	Good

By enhancing the capacitive double-layer charge and surface area, carbonaceous materials tend to increase the interaction between the deposited material and electrolyte.[16] Additionally, efficiency can be improved by the development of porous nanostructures, which provide added ion-adsorption and active sites for the charge transfer reactions.[35]

Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), also known as porous (coordination) polymers (PCPs), are a class of compounds that consists of metal ions linked with organic linkers to form single, two, or three-dimensional structures.[35-38] Importantly, MOFs are considered to be bifunctional materials with both sacrificial templates and metal precursors; thus, they can play a significant part in the development of nano, micro, or hollow structured materials with internal holes and operational shells.[17,39] Due to their increased surface areas, tunable pores, adjustable structures, and prospective applications, these porous materials have attracted enormous interest. Various research groups make significant contributions to the coordinated development of MOFs on the nano and microscales. We also published several research papers focused on MOFs in Elsevier and other respected journals.[40-58] Another report discusses the possibilities of using MOFs as a template to prepare functional nanostructures.[59]

Electrode materials based on zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIFs)

Zeolitic imidazolate frame (ZIFs), a MOF class, can be synthesized with different characteristics of unique particle shapes, exceptional porosities, and surface functionality by combining organic and inorganic constituents.[18,19] With selective pyrolysis through a controlled environment, as shown in Fig. 4, ZIFs can be transformed into porous carbon (PC) or metal compounds featuring special nanostructures. Parent ZIFs can also be prepared by the combination of organic and inorganic compositions via facile coordination chemistry with the management and manipulation of the surface area, pore volume and porous structure. Due to their porous structure, ZIFs are being explored as a template for the preparation of porous carbon/metal oxides, etc. The improved pores of the surface area can be used for interfacial transport and also provide small diffusion paths for the electrolyte.[60-62]

Fig. 4

Production of ZIF-8 and ZIF-67-derived nanoporous carbon and its advantages and disadvantages. Reproduced with permission from the American Chemical Society, ref. 63, Copyright 2015.

Compared with other carbon-based materials produced via utilizing traditional methods, templates, or precursors, ZIF-derived carbons have outstanding merits of facile preparation with inherent diversity, offering accurate control of the physicochemical properties. In the last decade, the use of materials derived from ZIFs in the field of electrochemical conversion and energy storage has developed into a rapidly expanding research area.[37]

Zeolitic imidazolate framework-derived nanoporous carbon (NPC)

The preparation of ZIF materials with required properties and morphologies strongly depends on the selection of the initiating materials (such as solvents, inorganic salts, and organic ligands, and solvents) and the synthesis conditions (i.e. pH, composition, reaction temperature, and solvent concentration).[64] To date, a wide range of synthetic methods have been established, including solvothermal, sonochemical, and hydrothermal processes.[65-68] The general synthesis schemes for powder-based ZIFs and ZIF-derived porous carbon-based materials are shown in Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Summary of the synthetic methods to convert ZIFs to ZIF-derived NPC and MO materials.

In the solvothermal synthesis process, solvents such as ethanol, methanol, dialkyl formamide, and pyridine are most commonly used. Generally, the reaction takes several hours based on the precursors used. Salunkhe et al. used zinc nitrate and cobalt nitrate as the metal suppliers and methanol as the solvent to mix with 2-methylimidazolate (MeIm) for the preparation of Zn/Co-ZIFs.[69]

Cobalt nitrate hexahydrate and 2-methyl imidazole solutions were mixed and stirred to obtain ZIF-67 (Co) under ambient conditions, after which the resulting precipitates were washed and then vacuum-dried. In the strong reduction atmosphere (Ar/H2), the obtained ZIF-67 can be further transformed into carbon nanotubes by a controlled two-step annealing cycle.[70] Recently, the hydrothermal method for synthesizing ZIFs has become highly preferred, wherein water as a solvent has been utilized for the facile formation of various types of ZIFs. ZIFs can be used with different metals for the facile formation of organic–inorganic ZIF networks. By changing the reaction conditions, temperature, and time, different ZIF coordination structures can be formulated.[71]Fig. 6a displays the proposed crystal structure for bimetallic ZIFs. Upon changing the cobalt ratio in the formulation, the color of the ZIF powders changed from white to purple, lavender, and ultimately purple (Fig. 6b). These results indicate that the bimetallic ZIF possesses a polyhedron morphology (Fig. 6c).[69] The same method was used to prepare Zn–Co-ZIF as the precursor of porous ZnCo2O4 (Fig. 7). Huang and his coworkers synthesized porous hollow Co3O4 with rhombic dodecahedral nanostructures from a well-known MOF compound, i.e. ZIF-67, using the precursor by a solvothermal process followed by two-step calcination.[73]

Fig. 6

(a) Preparation of Zn/Co-ZIFs and (b) colors of Zn/Co-ZIFs with various compositions; (c) TEM image, (d) elemental mapping and (e) SEM image of Zn/Co-ZIFs. Reproduced with permission from ref. 72, Copyright 2016, Nature Publishing Group.

Fig. 7

Synthesis of a Co/Zn hybrid MOF and nano-porous carbon. (a) Preparation of Co/Zn (2 : 1) hybrid-ZIF from a metal precursor and 2-methylimidazole organic linker followed by carbonization to produce graphitic and amorphous nanoporous carbons. (b) Pictures of 2 L-scale production. SEM images of (c) a bimetallic Co/Zn hybrid ZIF and (d) carbonized nano-porous carbon. Reproduced with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry ref. 78, copyright 2016.

Sol–gel is a simple technique to synthesize materials with superior concentration and uniformity. This technique is called the sol–gel method because the micro-particles in the solution agglomerate under standardized conditions to form an interconnected grid (gel). There are two different versions of the sol–gel method based on the kind of precursor utilized, i.e. the colloidal method and polymeric or alkoxide method.

Liu et al.[74] demonstrated that the sol–gel deposition of NiCo2O4 thin films showed a better specific capacitance of 2157 F g−1 at a current density of 0.133 mA cm−2 and good cyclic stability of 96.5% capacity retention over 10 000 cycles. Fig. 8 shows the synthesis schematic of a hybrid ZIF from a metal precursor and organic linker, thus producing porous carbon.

Fig. 8

Representation of the preparation of nanoporous carbons and nano-porous Co3O4 from ZIF-67 as a precursor, which shows the retention of the morphology of the parent ZIF-67, as shown in the SEM and TEM images. Reproduced with permission from American Chemical Society, ref. 35, Copyright 2015.

Moreover, carbon and hybrid materials based on metals can be fabricated using MOF-based templates. The benefits of this preparation method include: (1) the wide variety of MOF materials with various metal ion compositions offer diverse selections for target materials; (2) in high-temperature carbonization, the harmonization of metal ions with organic ligands in MOFs can efficiently avert the accumulation of metal oxide-based nanoparticles and damage of the nanostructures; (3) loading positions for the incorporation of active materials can be provided by the highly porous structures of MOFs; (4) the synthesis procedures are simple, and the synthesis conditions are generally mild; and (5) the as-obtained materials are characterized by diverse morphologies, such as nanorods, nanowires, nano-cubes, hollow polyhedrons, and hollow spheres. For example, 2-methylimidazoles of ZIF-67 can be fabricated to a composite of N-doped PC and Co nanoparticles by simple pyrolysis under an inert environment, leading to Co/N-doped PC nanocomposites with high dispersion.[75] A facile ZIF-induced strategy was proposed by An and co-workers to synthesize core–shell structured PC decorated with Co/Co3O4 nanoparticles.[76] Core–shell CNT@NiO hybrids were synthesized via a wet chemical method accompanied by high-temperature treatment, while porous carbon polyhedrons were prepared by the direct calcination of Zn-based MOFs. An asymmetric supercapacitor based on CNT@NiO//porous carbon polyhedrons showed very good performance for energy storage, such as extraordinary power density, large energy density, and robust cycling stability.[77]

Nanocomposites of ZIF-derived nanoporous carbon and metal oxides

Because of the existence of a basic surface area of the ZIF-derived porous carbon and transition metal oxides, ZIFs have been one of the most promising architectures and precursors for the preparation of carbons with a high surface area for energy storage, CO2 uptake, hydrogen adsorption, and electrocatalysis with the presence of rich carbon and nitrogen species.[37,79,80] The structure of ZIF-derived carbon can be modified via carbonization and activation processes. When this activation of nanostructures is completed, then diffusion of ions occurs over the pores of their nanostructures. As this activation of nanostructures is achieved, through the pores of their nanostructures, ion diffusion occurs. This free ion diffusion is a major factor in the electrodes' effective electrochemical function.[81,82]

Yamauchi et al.[83] demonstrated the development of an asymmetric supercapacitor that has both nano-porous carbon and nano-porous cobalt oxides (Co3O4) from ZIF-67. When this precursor was heated under nitrogen gas, it formed nano-porous carbons; however, when it was heated in the presence of air, it caused the organic species to decompose, which further resulted in nanoporous Co3O4. The original morphology (polyhedral) of the parent MOF, i.e. ZIF-67, was retained in both of the above cases (Fig. 8).

Many nano-pores were detected on the surface of the nanoporous carbons. Nano-porous Co3O4, on the other hand, was composed of arbitrarily accumulated granulated nanocrystals with an average size of 15–20 nm. The measurements of the surface area of the as-prepared nano-porous carbons and the nano-porous Co3O4 were respectively 350 and 148 m2 g−1. The asymmetric supercapacitor formed by the combination of the above two electrodes (Co3O4//carbon) represented very high specific energy and specific power of approximately 36 W h kg−1 and 8000 W kg−1 in comparison to the symmetric supercapacitors (carbon//carbon (∼7 W h kg−1) and Co3O4//Co3O4 (∼8 W h kg−1)).

Zhang et al. reported an initial example of Co3O4 nanostructures which were obtained from Co(ii) MOF precursors.[84] He prepared a Co(ii) MOF with a p-benzene dicarboxylic acid (BDC) ligand using the solvothermal technique. Characterization of the MOF was performed by FTIR and TGA/DSC. The authors suggested the formula as [Co·(BDC)2]. At 450 °C, solid-state heat treatment of the Co(ii) MOF was performed, forming porous nano-/micro superstructures of Co3O4. The nanostructure thus formed was characterized via XRD and SEM diffraction techniques. The specific capacitance of 208 F g−1 at a current density of 1 A g−1 and retention capacity of 97 percent with 1000 charge/discharge cycles in 6.0 M aqueous KOH solution as an electrolyte was demonstrated by electrochemical characterization of prepared porous Co3O4 superstructures, demonstrating their supercapacitor property.

Wang et al.[85] fabricated an asymmetric supercapacitor using one 2D MOF precursor. A 2D sheet-like Co-MOF was prepared via the reaction of Co2+ and 2-methylimidazole in H2O, and it was developed on the surface of carbon (CC@Co-MOF). Its 2D layered crystal structure was confirmed by Pawley's refinement of the PXRD data. The as-prepared 2D cobalt-based ZIF precursor was further converted to Co3O4 nanosheets (CC@Co3O4) or CC@NC through the process of thermolysis. Lastly, using CC@Co3O4 as a cathode and CC@NC as an anode with a poly(vinyl alcohol) KOH gel as the electrolyte, a flexible, asymmetric supercapacitor was developed. In comparison to the MOF-based supercapacitors, it is evident from the Ragone plot that the CC@Co3O4/CC@NC system showed exceptional electrochemical efficiency, reflecting the significance of this extraordinary asymmetric supercapacitor. Table 3 summarizes the specific capacitance reported for porous carbon electrodes derived from ZIFs at different scan rates or current densities in supercapacitors.

Summary of the performance of ZIF-derived porous carbon electrodes in supercapacitors

ZIF precursor	ZIF derived electrode	Specific surface area (m2 g−1)	Electrolyte	Capacitance	Scan rate/current density	Ref.
ZIF-69	Activated carbon	2264	0.5 M H2SO4	168 F g−1	5 mV s−1	86
ZIF-8	3D carbon	655	1 M H2SO4	206 F g−1	100 mV s−1	87
ZIF-8	Nanoporous carbon	1523	1 M H2SO4	251 F g−1	5 mV s−1	82
ZIF-8	Nanoporous carbon/GO	1304	1 M H2SO4	246 F g−1	2 mV s−1	88
ZIF-8	Porous carbon	n/a	6 M KOH	185 F g−1	5 mV s−1	89
ZIF-8	Porous carbon	1823	1 M H2SO4	219 F g−1	5 mV s−1	90
ZIF-8	N-doped porous carbon	943	6 M KOH	285.8 F g−1	0.1 A g−1	37
ZIF-8	N-doped porous carbon sheets	1190	1 M H2SO4	290 F g−1	1 A g−1	91
ZIF-8	Carbon nanofiber	314	1 M H2SO4	322 F g−1	1A g−1	92
ZIF-8/GO	Porous carbon	280	1 M H2SO4	238 F g−1	1 A g−1	93
ZIF-8/67	Nanoporous carbon	415	0.5 M H2SO4	286 F g−1	2.5 A g−1	78
ZIF-67	Carbon polyhedron/nanotube	1723	6 M KOH	190 F g−1	0.5 A g−1	94
ZIF-8/MWCNT	Porous carbon	569	1 M H2SO4	326 F g−1	1 A g−1	95
ZIF-8/MWCNT	MWCNT/nanoporous carbon	928	1 M H2SO4	293.4 F g−1	5 mV s−1	96
ZIF-8/CNT	ZnO/porous carbon/CNT	600	1 M Na2SO4	250 F g−1	1 A g−1	97
ZIF-8/PANI	Core–shell nanoporous carbon	1610	1 M H2SO4	236 F g−1	1 A g−1	98
ZIF-67	Nanoporous carbon	943	0.5 M H2SO4	240 F g−1	20 mV s−1	99
ZIF-67	N-doped porous carbon	683	1 M H2SO4	305 F g−1	1 A g−1	100
ZIF-7/glucose	Porous carbon	783	6 M KOH	228 F g−1	0.1 A g−1	101
ZIF-67	Nanoporous carbon/CoS	521.4	2 M KOH	677 F g−1	10 mV s−1	54
ZIF-67	BIC carbon	1361	1 M KOH	119 F g−1	0.5 Ag	102
ZIF-8	Hollow carbon spheres	920	6 M KOH	280 F g−1	1 A g−1	103
ZIF-8	NiAl LDH/porous carbon	383	1 M KOH	1370 F g−1	1 A g−1	104
ZIF-8	Nanoporous carbon	1873	2 M NEt4BF4/PC	21 F g−1	10 mV s−1	105

ZIF-derived metal oxide/sulfide-based electrodes

Generally, a highly porous architecture promotes the transport of electrolyte ions and thus improves the supercapacitor behavior of the electrode; the electrical conductivity also contributes significantly to increasing the capacitance.[106] One promising approach is the growth or mixing of MOF-derived metal compounds on or with highly conductive substrates or additives, such as nickel foam (NF), CNTs, graphene, activated carbon, carbon aerogel, and MoS2.[107-111] Not only the electrical conductivity but also the number of active sites on the surface of the electrode can be improved by tuning the linkage compound amongst the active material and the conductive substrate/additive.[112] Compared with nickel oxides, nickel sulfides often have better structural stability and faster electron transfer, which is ascribed to the lesser electronegativity value of sulfur in comparison to oxygen.[113,114] The replacement of O2− by S2− in MOF-derived Ni oxides can effectively improve its conductivity and electrochemical activity.

Ahmad and her co-workers demonstrated a framework of N-doped carbon nanotubes (N-CNTs) from a single precursor of ZIF-67 (Fig. 9). The ZIF-67 precursor not only functions as the template to form the hollow framework but also serves as the source of C and N to aid the growth of CNTs by the catalysis of in situ formed metallic Co nanoparticles. The derived materials exhibit excellent performance for high-performance supercapacitors. The Co/NC/S@NH hierarchical hybrid electrode displayed enhanced capacitance of 1636 F g−1 at 1 A g−1 (982 C g−1 or 273 mA h−1) with exceptional cyclic stability. The Co/NC/S@NH exhibited capacity retention of 94% over 5000 cycles.[40]

Fig. 9

SEM images of before (a) and after (b and c) the synthesis of ZIF-67 derived n-doped CNTs decorated with sulfur and nickel hydroxide, (d) specific capacitance calculated from CV curves as a function of scan rate for the Co/NC, Co/NC/S, and Co/NC/S@NH electrodes, (e) Bode phase angle plots of synthesized electrodes on Ni foam. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier, ref. 40, and Copyright 2020.

Chen et al.[115] synthesized self-supported Ni3S2 nanosheet arrays by the thermal decomposition of a MOFs precursor followed by sulfidation. The as-obtained Ni3S2 nanosheet arrays exhibited outstanding supercapacitance properties, delivering capacitance of 1000 F g−1 at a very high current density of 50 A g−1 for enormous cycles of charge–discharge, i.e. 20 000 cycles. The unique nanosheet structure of Ni3S2 contributed to the outstanding electrochemical behavior because it significantly facilitated the surface faradaic redox reaction. Also, NiS has received particular interest as a favorable material for electrodes due to its high theoretical specific capacitance. Lou et al.[116] synthesized cubic frame-like NiS hollow nanoparticles via the calcination of MOFs precursors coupled with an anion exchange method. The NiS nanoframe (300 nm) displayed a superb specific capacitance of 2112 F g−1 at a current density of 1 A g−1. Liu et al.[117] introduced S2− ions into ZIF-derived NiCo2O4 to enhance its intrinsic conductivity and supercapacitance performance. Increases in both the sizes of the pores and the surface area were observed after the introduction of S2−. Compared to O2−, S2− ion possesses a larger anion size, which could lead to a larger strain inside the crystalline structure to create defects. Thus, the structural change induced by the incorporation of S2− allows the liquid electrolyte to more easily access the inner space of the porous materials.[118]

Table 4 lists the performance of selected MOF-derived metal oxide and metal sulfide-based compounds as active electrodes of supercapacitors. Lou et al.[119] prepared CoS nanoboxes with a double-shelled hollow structure via a “hard template method” utilizing ZIF-67 nanocubes as a precursor and a subsequent sulfidation procedure. The synthesized CoS nanoboxes had unique morphology features of excellent robustness, suitable mesopores, and high specific surface area, and they showed excellent cycling performance, fast transportation of ions, and rich redox reactions. Using leaf-like ZIF as the precursor and subsequent sulfidation, porous cobalt sulfide nanosheets were successfully prepared, showing outstanding capacitance of 1010 F g−1 without the use of any binder.[120] ZIF-67-derived Co9S8 hollow nanoparticles were also applied as high-performance electrodes in supercapacitors.[121]

Summary of the performance of ZIF-derived metal oxide/sulfide and hydroxide-based electrodes in supercapacitors

ZIF precursor	ZIF derived electrode	Specific surface area (m2 g−1)	Electrolyte	Capacitance	Current density	Ref.
ZIF-derived metal oxides/sulfides and hydroxides based electrodes
ZIF-67	Co3O4	n/a	1 M KOH	706 F g−1	1 A g−1	122
ZIF-67	Co3O4/rGO	6.5	6 M KOH	321 F g−1	1 A g−1	107
ZIF-67	Co3O4/MoS2	257	2 M KOH	1076 F g−1	1 A g−1	123
ZIF-67	Co(OH)2	630	6 M KOH	1263 F g−1	1 A g−1	124
ZIF-67	Co(OH)2/nanocages/graphene	n/a	1 M KOH	1205 F g−1	1 A g−1	125
Ni-ZIF-8	Carbon/NiO nanosheet	138	0.5 M K2SO4	414 F g−1	5 A g−1	126
ZIF-67	Co3O4/NiCo2O4	15.2	2 M KOH	972 F g−1	5 A g−1	127
ZIF-67	CoS	110	2 M KOH	980 F g−1	1 A g−1	119
Co-ZIF	Co9S8-NSA/NF	n/a	1 M KOH	1098.8 F g−1	0.5 A g−1	120
ZIF-67	NiCo2O4/Co3O4	33.6	6 M KOH	1046 F g−1	1 A g−1	128
ZIF-8	ZnO/C/NiCo2O4	n/a	2 M KOH	2650 F g−1	5 A g−1	129
ZIF-67	NiCo2O4	43.2	6 M KOH	956 F g−1	1 A g−1	117
Mn/Co-ZIF	MnCo2O4	117	2 M KOH	1763 F g−1	1 A g−1	130
ZIF-67	Mg/Co nanocages	196	1 M KOH	1203 F g−1	1 A g−1	131
ZIF-67	Porous hollow Co3O4	128	3 M KOH	1205 F g−1	1 A g−1	73
ZIF-PPy	Porous hollow Co3O4	16.9	Na2SO4	598 F g−1	1 A g−1	132

Cobalt-based ZIF-derived metal oxide and hydroxide electrodes

Among various metal compounds, cobalt oxide (Co3O4) is regarded as an outstanding electrode for applications related to supercapacitors due to its relatively low cost, environmentally friendly nature, and great electrochemical activity and stability (e.g., high theoretical capacitance of ∼3600 F g−1).[133] Another Co-based material that has gained research interest for application in supercapacitor electrodes is cobalt hydroxide. Co(OH)2 possesses a layered structure with a large inter-layer space and high surface area; it can also be prepared through the thermolysis of MOF precursors. The MOF-derived Co(OH)2 maintains its unique porous structure, which is valuable for rapid ion transportation, rich redox reactions and robust structure stability of supercapacitor electrodes.[124]

Nanoporous MOF-derived Co3O4 electrodes have been developed for application in asymmetric supercapacitors.[83] Of significance, the polyhedral shape of the MOF precursor (e.g., ZIF-67) could be well preserved by Co3O4 by fine-tuning the synthesis procedures.[134] The nanoporous structures led to higher current sweeps and contributed greatly to the high performance of supercapacitors. Another double-walled tetrahedral MOF was also chosen as a precursor to formulate porous hollow Co3O4, which showed potential as a supercapacitor electrode with better performance because of its hollow structure and high electronic conductivity.[135]Fig. 10 presents a ceria-based composite of a MOF and GO that shows excellent performance compared to a CNTs-based composite.

Fig. 10

TEM images of (a–c) Ce-MOF/GO, (d) cyclic voltammetry response of the Ce-MOF/GO composite at various scan rates in 3 M KOH electrolyte, (e) galvanostatic charge–discharge behavior in 3 M KOH electrolyte, and (f) Ragone plots of the Ce-based composites. Reproduced with the approval from ref. 136, Copyright 2018, the Royal Society of Chemistry.

ZIF-derived layered double hydroxide electrodes

Layered-double-hydroxides (LDHs) composed of Fe, Ni, Co, or NiCo are attracting wide attention as active electrodes of supercapacitors due to their distinct characteristics, such as anion exchange, intercalation, high theoretical capacity and specific surface area.[137-139] However, concerns exist about accumulation and lower electrical conductivity because of hydrogen bonding as well as the nano-size effect, which lead to reduced performance. A hollow micro or nanostructure with clear inner spaces and functional shells may efficiently avoid accumulation of the LDH materials. On the other hand, porous structures may assist the infiltration of the electrolytes, aid the insertion and withdrawal of the charged species, shorten the ion transportation pathways and enable fast redox reactions and surface charge adsorption, which significantly increases the capacitance on the surface.[140-142]

Jiang et al. prepared hollow nano-polyhedron LDHs by cobalt-based ZIF-67 to be used as a sacrificial model for electrode materials of supercapacitors with a specific capacitance of 1203 F g−1 at a current density of 1 A g−1.[131] Zhang et al. obtained hollow porous Co3O4via the process of calcination of the ZIF-67 precursor in the air, which contains a specific capacitance of 1100 F g−1 at the current density of 1.25 A g−1.[73] Xiao et al. described a hierarchical Ni/Co LDH microsphere obtained from MOFs, which reported a specific capacitance of 1652 F g−1 at a Ni/Co ratio of 7/3.[143]

Zheng et al.[24] successfully synthesized 3D ultrathin nickel-cobalt layered double hydroxide (NiCo-LDH) nanosheets that were vertically grown on Ni foam using a facile one-step hydrothermal route. The phase of NiCo-LDH can be tuned from a single α phase to multiphase (α and β) simply by changing the volume ratio of the solvent. The multiphase NiCo-LDH has superior electrochemical efficiency compared to the single alpha structure. The multiphase shows a larger specific capacitance of 2617 F g−1 at 1 A g−1, a better rate capacity of 60 percent at 10 A g−1 and enhanced cycling stability compared to the single alpha phase, which can be used as a promising positive material for supercapacitors. Additionally, an asymmetric supercapacitor device was developed for NiCo-LDH/NF/AC, which shows a high specific capacitance of 439.5 mF cm−2 at 2 mA cm−2 and good cycling stability (Fig. 11).

Fig. 11

(a) Specific capacitance of NiCo-LDH/NF (α and β) at different current densities; (b) retention capacity; (c) comparison of the XRD patterns of NiCo-LDH/NF (β) before and after the life cycles; (c and d) SEM and TEM images of NiCo-LDH/NF, respectively. Reproduced with the approval from ref. 24, Copyright 2019, Elsevier.

Diverse ZIF-based nanostructures for supercapacitor electrodes

Structural morphology contributes significantly to the transportation of electrons and ions to direct effect the capacitance and stability of electrodes. Lou et al.[127] successfully prepared Co3O4/NiCo2O4 double-shelled nanocages with a box-in-box structure using the ZIF-67 precursor. The Co3O4/NiCo2O4 hybrid material showed greater performance compared to Co3O4, with a high specific capacitance of 1000 F g−1 at a current density of 5 A g−1 and 92.5% capacitance retention after 12 000 cycles. The exclusive double-shelled structure may cause the electrolyte to be sandwiched between the shells; thus, a more rapid concentration can be anticipated, resulting in a greater driving force for electrochemical reactions. In other work, Yu et al.[128] synthesized a core–shell nanowire array architecture in which NiCo2O4 nanoflakes were combined with a Co3O4 nanowire substrate, and an increased energy density of 51 W h kg−1 was observed at a power density of 860 W kg−1. However, it was found that a majority of the nanowires were wrecked and slanted in nanowire bunches and that the nanowire arrays lost their original structure while running the charge–discharge cycles, decreasing the cycling stability during long-term operation. To date, various morphologies have been investigated. Some of them are listed below in Table 5, and their benefits are also discussed.

Benefits of diverse nanostructures for high-performance supercapacitors

Morphology	Advantages
Nano-sheets/nano-flakes	(1) Greatly improve the contact area of the electrode/electrolyte and shorten the pathways of diffusion. The porosity increases the number of functional electro- sites[144,145]
	(2) Efficient transport of ions and electrons and for better adaptation to volume variation[146]
Nano-wire (NWs)@nanoflakes core–shell structure	(1) Allow a quick, reversible faradaic reaction. Offers a small ion diffusion pathway & preserves the core's structural integrity during the load-discharge process[145]
	(2) Act as both the “superhighway” backbone & electron for load storage & distribution & the mesoporous function makes a big electrode/electrolyte interface[147]
Nanoflake@nanowire hetero-structure	(1) Enhance ion and electron diffusion, facilitating the penetration of electrolytes that progresses the use of the functional materials[148]
	(2) Generates great active spots for the electrochemical reactions[147]
	(3) The interrelated flake network whereas the nano-wires reinforced cross-configuration makes them a robust structure that helps to mitigate the damage to the assembly which happened due to the volume expansion during the cycle, resulting in increased stability[149]
Mesoporous nanoparticles	(1) Small ion transportation path & support direct communication of electrolytes to the electrochemically active interfacial area[150]
	(2) Promote mass diffusion/transfer (e.g., infiltration of electrolytes & transfer of ions) and have a high electro-active surface[151]
Nanoneedles	(1) The small diameter makes most of the surface effortlessly available to electrolytes, which will provide increased capacity and boosted electrochemical kinetics[89,152]
	(2) During the extended charge/discharge cycle, the single-crystalline nature of nano-needles plays its part in the cycling stability in supporting electron transfer and giving high mechanical robustness[153]

Conclusion and outlook

ZIFs have become popular templates for the derivation of porous carbon, single/binary metal compounds, or their composites due to their designable compositions, tunable structures, controllable porosities, high surface areas, and bifunctionality with both sacrificial templates and metal precursors. Significant progress and achievements have been made in the design and development of ZIF-derived porous carbon, metal oxide materials, and their composites in the areas of micro/nano-structures, conductivity, stability, flexibility, capacitance, and stability, as shown in this review. The advantages of ZIF-derived materials as electrodes in supercapacitors are listed as follows:

For carbon-based materials:

(1) ZIF-derived PC materials not only have controlled porous structures and unique morphologies but also have excellent super capacitance behavior, such as specific capacitance, cycling stability and rate capability. Most ZIF-derived carbon electrodes do not require a conductive agent in their preparation.

(2) The large surface areas of ZIF-derived carbon and metal oxide-based materials increase the number of redox-active sites, which leads to close and strong contact at the electrode–electrolyte boundary.

(3) The large pore volume and hierarchical porous structure accelerate the distribution and migration of the ions of electrolytes. The porous hierarchy benefits electron and ion transport as well as mass diffusion and exchange.

(4) In N-doped ZIF-derived PC materials, the diverse nitrogen and oxygen functionalities not only enhance the surface properties and pseudocapacitance performance but also enhance the wettability of the inner structure of the microspores in the carbon electrodes.

(5) With the addition of carbon nanotubes, graphene, carbon nanofibers, or activated carbon, ZIF-derived carbon materials can be obtained, with improvements in areas such as extraordinary conductivity, good electrochemical steadiness, high strength, low density, and rapid charge–discharge procedures.

For metal oxides/hydroxides/sulfides-based materials:

(1) The porous and hollow structures of ZIF-derived metal oxide/hydroxide/sulfide or metallic compounds provide shortened pathways for the diffusion of electrolyte ions, thus promoting surface and near-surface redox reactions and remarkably enhancing the reaction kinetics and the long-term operational stability.

(2) The pseudo-capacitive performance, rate capability and cycling performance of ZIF-derived metallic compounds can be further increased by coupling with very conductive carbon-based substrates such as graphene, rGO, carbon nanosheets, or carbon nanotubes.

(3) The introduction of S2− into the O2− sites can efficiently promote the conductivity and electrochemical properties.

(4) Through fine-tuning of the compositions of precursory ZIFs, spinel-type binary metal oxide-based compounds and nano-structured LDH electrodes can also be derived, which possess higher electrical conductivity and better redox capability compared with simple oxides and therefore hold potential for high-performance supercapacitors.

Although great progress has been made in the synthesis and applications of ZIF-based materials, more new synthesis strategies and utilization fields of ZIFs will undoubtedly emerge in the future. Their features of porous structures and tunable compositions offer the flexibility to design and prepare ZIF-derived nanomaterials with the desired catalytic active sites from the microscopic molecular level to macroscopic structural construction. This would include studies of their porous structure, the structural stability of metal dispersion in the precursor, metal diffusion during post-processing, suitability and controllability of template-based chemical reactions, and stability of catalytic activity for electrocatalysis. The variety of organic linkers and the diversity of link–link interactions offer rich chemistry to be developed and provide vast possibilities to form ZIFs with a wide range of structures and properties, which is a much larger area compared to conventional zeolites.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.