| Literature DB >> 35519616 |
Harry Duckworth1,2, Adriana Azor1,2, Nikolaus Wischmann1, Karl A Zimmerman1,2, Ilaria Tanini1,3, David J Sharp2,4, Mazdak Ghajari1.
Abstract
Finite Element (FE) models of brain mechanics have improved our understanding of the brain response to rapid mechanical loads that produce traumatic brain injuries. However, these models have rarely incorporated vasculature, which limits their ability to predict the response of vessels to head impacts. To address this shortcoming, here we used high-resolution MRI scans to map the venous system anatomy at a submillimetre resolution. We then used this map to develop an FE model of veins and incorporated it in an anatomically detailed FE model of the brain. The model prediction of brain displacement at different locations was compared to controlled experiments on post-mortem human subject heads, yielding over 3,100 displacement curve comparisons, which showed fair to excellent correlation between them. We then used the model to predict the distribution of axial strains and strain rates in the veins of a rugby player who had small blood deposits in his white matter, known as microbleeds, after sustaining a head collision. We hypothesised that the distribution of axial strain and strain rate in veins can predict the pattern of microbleeds. We reconstructed the head collision using video footage and multi-body dynamics modelling and used the predicted head accelerations to load the FE model of vascular injury. The model predicted large axial strains in veins where microbleeds were detected. A region of interest analysis using white matter tracts showed that the tract group with microbleeds had 95th percentile peak axial strain and strain rate of 0.197 and 64.9 s-1 respectively, which were significantly larger than those of the group of tracts without microbleeds (0.163 and 57.0 s-1). This study does not derive a threshold for the onset of microbleeds as it investigated a single case, but it provides evidence for a link between strain and strain rate applied to veins during head impacts and structural damage and allows for future work to generate threshold values. Moreover, our results suggest that the FE model has the potential to be used to predict intracranial vascular injuries after TBI, providing a more objective tool for TBI assessment and improving protection against it.Entities:
Keywords: cerebral vasculature injury; cerebrovasculature; finite element model; microbleeds; microhaemorrhages; multibody simulation; traumatic brain injury
Year: 2022 PMID: 35519616 PMCID: PMC9065595 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.860112
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
FIGURE 1Methods flowchart with data and process boxes coloured according to their theme: vein segmentation in purple, FE model creation in blue, reconstruction in green, and results in yellow.
FIGURE 2Vein properties. (A) Regression plot for vein wall thickness based on outer diameter from Monson (2001). (B) Box plots of vein elastic modulus calculated from individual test data found in literature.
FIGURE 3Finite element model creation. (A) Vein mesh sagittal cross-sections showing fine detail captured from segmentation and meshing. (B) Axial and sagittal views of FE model with sections cut away showing labelled venous system and subcortical structures underneath (coloured).
FIGURE 4Validation results. Violin plots of CORA scores in the Axial, Coronal, and Sagittal planes and the 20 rad/s and 40 rad/s rotational velocity simulations, split into the x, y, and z components of the head axes. ISO/TR 9790 biofidelity ratings are shown on the vertical axis.
FIGURE 5Rugby collision results. (A) Comparison of reconstruction to video at 50 ms intervals, patient of interest is tackling player on the left at t = 0. (B) (left) SWI image with microbleeds identified by blue arrow and (right) segmented microbleed in MNI5152 space. (C) Translational and rotational accelerations of player’s head taken from the multibody simulation.
FIGURE 6FE simulation results. (A) Axial slice of inferior section of veins with maximum strain over time fringe colours. (lower right) Zoomed area of left temporal region shows several elements reaching peak strain levels (0.25–0.30) and is the approximate location of the MBs (upper right) Grey box shows image processing technique used to create composite images in (B,C). (B) Vein axial strain results. (C) Vein axial strain rate results. NB. Strain and strain rate results (B,C)—henceforth called the data—present results in the same format: (top) composite images showing the pattern of data across all time with values calculated from maximum and mean filtering of raw data for visualisation; (middle) histogram of distribution of data from all vein elements in the simulation, not just those present in regions of interest; (bottom left) distribution of grouped regions with MBs compared to those without; (bottom right) 95th percentile of data per tract and per side, regions of interest with MBs present are highlighted in orange. Please see the Supplementary Figure S2 for the definition of the tracts.
Summary statistics of strain per microbleed and non-microbleed grouped tracts.
| Strain | Microbleeds | No Microbleeds |
|---|---|---|
|
| 345 | 2,732 |
| 95th Percentile | 0.197 | 0.163 |
| Median | 0.094 | 0.073 |
| Mean | 0.096 | 0.080 |
| Standard deviation | 0.053 | 0.044 |
Summary statistics of strain per microbleed and non-microbleed grouped tracts.
| Strain rate (s−1) | Microbleeds | No microbleeds |
|---|---|---|
|
| 345 | 2,732 |
| 95th Percentile | 64.9 | 57.0 |
| Median | 29.1 | 24.4 |
| Mean | 32.1 | 27.2 |
| Standard deviation | 18.2 | 15.4 |