| Literature DB >> 35519607 |
Cinthia Cristine Moura1, Ana Maria Salazar-Bryam2, Rodolfo Debone Piazza3, Caio Carvalho Dos Santos3, Miguel Jafelicci3, Rodrigo Fernando Costa Marques3,4, Jonas Contiero1,2.
Abstract
Environmental contamination caused by inorganic compounds is a major problem affecting soils and surface water. Most remediation techniques are costly and generally lead to incomplete removal and production of secondary waste. Nanotechnology, in this scenario with the zero-valent iron nanoparticle, represents a new generation of environmental remediation technologies. It is non-toxic, abundant, cheap, easy to produce, and its production process is simple. However, in order to decrease the aggregation tendency, the zero-iron nanoparticle is frequently coated with chemical surfactants synthesized from petrochemical sources, which are persistent or partially biodegradable. Biosurfactants (rhamnolipids), extracellular compounds produced by microorganisms from hydrophilic and hydrophobic substrates can replace synthetic surfactants. This study investigated the efficiency of a rhamnolipid biosurfactant on the aggregation of nanoscale zer-valent iron (nZVI) and its efficiency in reducing nitrate in simulated groundwater at pH 4.0. Two methods were tested: 1) adding the rhamnolipid during chemical synthesis and 2) adding the rhamnolipid after chemical synthesis of nZVI. Scanning electron microscopy field emission, X-ray diffractometry, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, Dynamic Light Scattering, and zeta potential measurements were used to characterize bare nZVI and rhamnolipid-coated nZVI. The effects of the type of nZVI and initial NO3 concentration were examined. Nanoscale zer-valent iron with the addition of the rhamnolipid after synthesis achieved the best removal rate of nitrate (about 78%), with an initial nitrate concentration of 25 mg L-1. The results suggest that nZVI functionalized with rhamnolipids is a promising strategy for the in situ remediations of groundwater contaminated by NO3, heavy metal, and inorganic carbon.Entities:
Keywords: NZVI; groundwater; nitrate removal; rhamnolipids; stabilizer
Year: 2022 PMID: 35519607 PMCID: PMC9062033 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.794460
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
nZVI stabilization method.
| Sample | RL |
|---|---|
| bare-nZVI | Without rhamnolipids |
| nZVI-A | Rhamnolipids addition in ferric chloride solution |
| nZVI-S | Stocked in rhamnolipids solution |
FIGURE 1FTIR spectrum of rhamnolipids.
FIGURE 2X-ray diffraction peaks associated with nZVI particles were recorded: freshly synthesized samples (lighter colour) and 30-day old samples (darker colour). The Pattern Diffraction File (PDF) of metallic iron (PDF 87-7194), lepidocrocite (PDF 8-98) and, magnetite (PDF 74-419) were displayed as well.
Average crystallite diameter according to Scherrer’s equation. * Crystallographic plane (1 1 0) and ** (3 1 1).
| Sample | Crystallite diameter (nm) |
|---|---|
| nZVI-S | 7.88 * |
| nZVI-S 30 d | 7.16 * |
| nZVI-A | 6.52 ** |
| nZVI-A 30 d | 4.77 * |
| nZVI | 9.05 * |
| nZVI 30 d | 11.3 ** |
FIGURE 3Zeta potential and pzc of nZVI.
FIGURE 4Average particle diameter size distribution of nZVI particles.
FIGURE 5SEM images of (A) bare-nZVI (B) nZVI-A (C) nZVI-S.
FIGURE 6TGA and DTA curves for (A) bare-nZVI, (B) nZVI-A and (C) nZVI- S.
Regions of weight loss and gain (%) of nZVI-A and nZVI-S samples.
| Region | Temperature °C | Weight | nZVI-A (%) | nZVI-S |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | 50–230 | Loss | 8 | 9% |
| II | 230–480 | Loss | 5 | 5% |
| III | 480–700 | Gain | 1 | 0.5% |
FIGURE 7Effect of time and initial nitrates concentration on nitrates reduction using nZVI at pH 4 (A) 25 mg/L NO3 (B) 50 mg/L NO3 (C) 100 mg/L NO3 and effect of time and initial nitrates concentration on ammonia concentration using nZVI at pH 4 (D) 25 mg/L NO3 (E) 50 mg/L NO3 (F) 100 mg/L NO3.
Observed pseudo-first-order rate coefficient of nitrate reduction with nZVI.
| NO3 (mg L−1) | Bare-nZVI | nZVI-S | nZVI-A | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Efficiency removal (%) | kobs | Efficiency removal (%) | kobs | Efficiency removal (%) | kobs | |
| 25 | 47.57 | 0.043 | 78.62 | 0.107 | 20.18 | 0.015 |
| 50 | 43.54 | 0.038 | 77.65 | 0.101 | 12.45 | 0.009 |
| 100 | 46.29 | 0.041 | 68.89 | 0.078 | 13.62 | 0.010 |