| Literature DB >> 35519193 |
Mohamed A Ismail1, Mohamed H Abdel-Rhman1, Ghada A Abdelwahab1, Wafaa S Hamama1, Heba M El-Shafeai1, Wael M El-Sayed2.
Abstract
Three thienylpicolinamidine derivatives 4a-c were prepared from their corresponding picolinonitriles 3a-c on treatment with lithium trimethylsilylamide, LiN(TMS)2, followed by a de-protection step using ethanol/HCl (gas). DFT calculations were used to optimize the geometric structure of the newly synthesized picolinamidines. The comparison of DFT calculated spectral data with the experimental data (1H-NMR and 13C-NMR) showed a good agreement. The in vitro antiproliferative activity of the cationic compounds 4a-c was determined against 60 cancer cell lines representing nine types of cancer. The tested picolinamidines were highly active with compounds 4a and 4b eliciting mainly cytotoxic activity with GI values ranging from -7.17 to -86.03. Leukemia (SR and K-562), colon (SW-620 and HT29), and non-small cell lung cancer (NCI-H460) cell lines were the most responsive to the investigated picolinamidines. In particular, 4-methoxyphenyl derivative 4a showed a profound growth deterring power with GI50 of 0.34 μM against SR, 0.43 μM against SW-620, and 0.52 μM against NCI-H460. The three tested picolinamidines elicited potent GI50 values against all tested cell lines at low micromolar to sub-micromolar level. The new picolinamidines were selective and did not affect normal human fibroblasts. The selectivity index ranged from 13-21 μM. The novel picolinamidines downregulated the expression of key genes in the cell cycle, cdk1 and topoII, but did not affect p53 or txnrd1. Compounds 4b and 4c caused a significant reduction in the concentrations of TopoII and MAPK proteins but were devoid of any effect on the activity of caspase 3. Taken together, these promising anticancer candidates are effective at very low concentrations and safe to normal cells, and most probably work through arresting the cell cycle, and therefore, they deserve further investigations. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 35519193 PMCID: PMC9057764 DOI: 10.1039/d0ra08796c
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Fig. 1Synthesis scheme for the new thienylpicolinamidine derivatives. Reagents and conditions: (i) Pd(PPh3)4, anhydrous K2CO3, 1,4-dioxane; (ii) (a) LiN(TMS)2, (b) ethanol/HCI (gas).
Fig. 2The frontier molecular orbital of cationic picolinamidines 4a–c.
The HOMO–LUMO energies and chemical reactivity descriptors (eV) of the investigated picolinamidines 4a–c
| Compound | HOMO | LUMO | Δ |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4a | −8.08 | −5.89 | 2.19 | 6.99 | 1.09 | 0.91 | 22.30 |
| 4b | −8.17 | −5.91 | 2.27 | 7.04 | 1.13 | 0.88 | 21.87 |
| 4c | −7.94 | −5.89 | 2.05 | 6.92 | 1.03 | 0.98 | 23.33 |
Fig. 3The linear regression between experimental and DFT calculated 1H NMR chemical shifts of the investigated cationic picolinamidines 4a–c.
Fig. 4The linear regression between experimental and DFT calculated 13C NMR chemical shifts of the investigated cationic picolinamidines 4a–c.
In vitro percent growth inhibition of the new picolinamidines 4a–c at a single dose of 10 μM
| Leukemia | 4a | 4b | 4c | Colon cancer | 4a | 4b | 4c |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCRF-CEM | −43.35 | −48.98 | 89.10 | COLO 205 | −52.23 | −56.05 | NT |
| HL-60 (TB) | −47.33 | −48.71 | −40.59 | HCC-2998 | −44.90 | −43.85 | 87.93 |
| K-562 | −26.99 | −29.78 | 94.42 | HCT-116 | −60.38 | −65.49 | 99.05 |
| MOLT-4 | −53.72 | −49.30 | 76.19 | HCT-15 | −76.97 | −77.39 | 78.61 |
| RPMI-8226 | −41.90 | −45.37 | NT | HT29 | −43.08 | 97.48 | 85.79 |
| SR | 99.71 | −7.17 | 93.69 | KM12 | −73.71 | −86.03 | 50.93 |
| SW-620 | −65.69 | −79.80 | 70.82 |
In vitro anti-proliferative activity of the new picolinamidines 4a–c against a panel of 60 cell lines at five dose levela,b
| Leukemia | 4a | 4b | 4c | Colon cancer | 4a | 4b | 4c |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCRF-CEM | 1.43 | 1.18 | 2.49 | COLO 205 | 1.89 | 1.94 | 1.60 |
| HL-60 (TB) | 1.78 | 1.66 | 1.87 | HCC-2998 | 1.82 | 1.86 | 2.00 |
| K-562 | 1.09 | 0.90 | 1.39 | HCT-116 | 1.62 | 1.82 | 1.47 |
| MOLT-4 | 1.90 | 1.72 | 2.53 | HCT-15 | 1.27 | 1.57 | 2.18 |
| RPMI-8226 | 2.13 | 2.25 | 1.67 | HT29 | 0.88 | 1.35 | 1.37 |
| SR | 0.34 | 0.58 | 2.48 | KM12 | 1.81 | 1.81 | 2.78 |
| SW-620 | 0.43 | 1.79 | 2.09 |
Data represent GI50 in μM against the tested cell lines.
This table includes the data for the most two responsive types of cancer (for the full data of the nine types of cancer, see Table S9 ESI).
Median GI50, TGI and LC50 (μM) of the new picolinamidines 4a–c against a panel of 60 cell lines at five dose level
| MG-MID | 4a | 4b | 4c |
|---|---|---|---|
| GI50 | 1.62 | 1.73 | 2.39 |
| TGI | 3.31 | 3.54 | 6.16 |
| LC50 | 8.12 | 8.31 | 19.49 |
MG-MID = mean graph midpoint representing mean sensitivity of all examined cell lines to the test compound.
GI50 = compound concentration causing 50% growth inhibition of tested cells.
TGI = compound concentration causing 100% growth inhibition of tested cells.
LC50 = compound concentration causing 50% lethality of tested cells.
In vitro cytotoxicity (IC50 in μM) of the new picolinamidines 4a–c against WI-38 and their selectivity index (SI)a
| Compounds | WI38 | SI |
|---|---|---|
| Dox | 2.9 ± 0.8 | NA |
| 4a | 21.1 ± 3.1 | 13.0 |
| 4b | 23.7 ± 2.5 | 13.7 |
| 4c | 51.3 ± 9.0 | 21.5 |
The viability of the cells was measured after 48 h of incubation with different concentrations of the investigated compounds by MTT assay. The dose–response curves from as the mean of two parallel experiments were used to determine the IC50; three wells were assigned for every concentration. Doxorubicin (Dox) was used as a positive control. The data are presented as mean ± SEM.
Significant toxicity as compared to the untreated cells.
SI: selectivity index = WI-38 IC50/median GI50.
Effect of picolinamidine derivatives 4a–c (100 nM) on the expression of p53, cdk1, caspase 3 and topoII in HepG2 after 8 h incubation
| Treatment |
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| DOX | 3.14 ± 0.81 | 0.31 ± 0.09 | 4.17 ± 0.91 | 0.47 ± 0.08 | 0.47 ± 0.10 |
| 4a | 1.19 ± 0.43 | 0.37 ± 0.04 | 1.57 ± 0.76 | 1.23 ± 0.05 | 1.32 ± 0.14 |
| 4b | 1.03 ± 0.08 | 0.51 ± 0.15 | 1.85 ± 0.11 | 0.57 ± 0.08 | 1.29 ± 0.13 |
| 4c | 1.18 ± 0.10 | 0.30 ± 0.04 | 3.37 ± 0.25 | 0.27 ± 0.02 | 1.07 ± 0.12 |
Significant difference (p < 0.05) as compared to untreated cells. The data are expressed as mean ± SEM for two independent experiments.
Fig. 5The effect of the picolinamidine derivatives 4a–c on (A) topoisomerase II (Topo II) concentration, (B) cleaved caspase 3 activity, and (C) MAPK concentration in HepG2 cells. Each compound has been assigned three wells and the experiment was performed twice. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. *Significant change compared to untreated cells.