Literature DB >> 35518809

Living donor liver transplantation versus donation after brain death and donation after circulatory death liver transplantation in the US.

Matthew Black1, Amar Gupta1, Sumeet K Asrani1, Tsung-Wei Ma1, Giuliano Testa1, Anji Wall1.   

Abstract

While previous research has compared outcomes between living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and deceased donor liver transplantation, evidence is lacking regarding how donation after circulatory death (DCD) vs donation after brain death (DBD) affects this comparison. Using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients for adults listed for liver transplant from 2012 to 2018, we compared 5-year patient and graft survival, readmissions, posttransplant chronic kidney disease (CKD), and return to work for 25,151 patients who underwent LDLT (1223 [4.9%]), DCD-LT (1431 [6.4%]), and DBD-LT (22,497 [89.4%]). LDLT recipients were significantly more likely to have a Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score < 15 and to be working prior to transplant (P < 0.001 for both). At 5 years posttransplant, LDLT recipients had significantly more readmissions, but significantly less CKD and better survival than DBD-LT and DCD-LT recipients, as well as significantly better graft survival than DCD-LT recipients (P ≤ 0.01 for all). Significantly more LDLT recipients also returned to work for income (P < 0.01). This study shows a clear advantage of LDLT vs DCD-LT. This information should be weighed in transplantation decisions for patients such as those with low MELD scores who will realistically only be considered for DCD-LT.
Copyright © 2022 Baylor University Medical Center.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Liver transplantation; living donation; readmission; return to work; survival

Year:  2022        PMID: 35518809      PMCID: PMC9037473          DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2022.2034202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)        ISSN: 0899-8280


  15 in total

1.  Persistent ascites and low serum sodium identify patients with cirrhosis and low MELD scores who are at high risk for early death.

Authors:  Douglas M Heuman; Souheil G Abou-Assi; Adil Habib; Leslie M Williams; R Todd Stravitz; Arun J Sanyal; Robert A Fisher; Anastasios A Mihas
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 17.425

2.  Moderate ascites identifies patients with low model for end-stage liver disease scores awaiting liver transplantation who have a high mortality risk.

Authors:  Ma Somsouk; Rachel Kornfield; Eric Vittinghoff; John M Inadomi; Scott W Biggins
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.799

3.  A new prognostic model to predict dropout from the waiting list in cirrhotic candidates for liver transplantation with MELD score <18.

Authors:  Maurizio Biselli; Marco Dall'Agata; Annagiulia Gramenzi; Stefano Gitto; Caterina Liberati; Lucia Brodosi; Matteo Ravaioli; Martina Gambato; Roberto Montalti; Antonio D Pinna; Patrizia Burra; Giorgio E Gerunda; Umberto Cillo; Pietro Andreone; Mauro Bernardi
Journal:  Liver Int       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 5.828

4.  Outcomes of 385 adult-to-adult living donor liver transplant recipients: a report from the A2ALL Consortium.

Authors:  Kim M Olthoff; Robert M Merion; Rafik M Ghobrial; Michael M Abecassis; Jeffrey H Fair; Robert A Fisher; Chris E Freise; Igal Kam; Timothy L Pruett; James E Everhart; Tempie E Hulbert-Shearon; Brenda W Gillespie; Jean C Emond
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Mortality Risk Factors Among Patients With Cirrhosis and a Low Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Sodium Score (≤15): An Analysis of Liver Transplant Allocation Policy Using Aggregated Electronic Health Record Data.

Authors:  K Atiemo; A Skaro; H Maddur; L Zhao; S Montag; L VanWagner; S Goel; A Kho; B Ho; R Kang; J L Holl; M M Abecassis; J Levitsky; D P Ladner
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 8.086

6.  Adult Living Donor Versus Deceased Donor Liver Transplant (LDLT Versus DDLT) at a Single Center: Time to Change Our Paradigm for Liver Transplant.

Authors:  Abhinav Humar; Swaytha Ganesh; Dana Jorgensen; Amit Tevar; Armando Ganoza; Michele Molinari; Christopher Hughes
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Predictors of Waitlist Mortality in Portopulmonary Hypertension.

Authors:  Michael J Krowka; Richard N Channick; Hilary M DuBrock; David S Goldberg; Norman L Sussman; Sonja D Bartolome; Zakiyah Kadry; Reena J Salgia; David C Mulligan; Walter K Kremers; Steven M Kawut
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  OPTN/SRTR 2019 Annual Data Report: Liver.

Authors:  A J Kwong; W R Kim; J R Lake; J M Smith; D P Schladt; M A Skeans; S M Noreen; J Foutz; S E Booker; M Cafarella; J J Snyder; A K Israni; B L Kasiske
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 8.086

9.  Meta-analysis and meta-regression of outcomes for adult living donor liver transplantation versus deceased donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Arianna Barbetta; Mayada Aljehani; Michelle Kim; Christine Tien; Aaron Ahearn; Hannah Schilperoort; Linda Sher; Juliet Emamaullee
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 9.369

10.  Renal Dysfunction After Liver Transplantation: Effect of Donor Type.

Authors:  Dagmar Kollmann; Shuet Fong Neong; Roizar Rosales; Bettina E Hansen; Gonzalo Sapisochin; Stuart McCluskey; Mamatha Bhat; Mark S Cattral; Les Lilly; Ian D McGilvray; Anand Ghanekar; David R Grant; Markus Selzner; Florence S H Wong; Nazia Selzner
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 5.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.