| Literature DB >> 35518289 |
Muhammad Imran Din1, Rida Khalid1, Zaib Hussain1, Jawayria Najeeb2, Ahsan Sahrif1, Azeem Intisar1, Ejaz Ahmed1.
Abstract
Conversion of nitroaniline (NA), a highly toxic pollutant that has been released into aquatic systems due to unmanaged industrial development in recent years, into the less harmful or a useful counterpart is the need of the hour. Various methods for its conversion and removal have been explored. Owing to its nominal features of advanced effectiveness, the chemical reduction of 4-NA using various different nanocatalytic systems is one such approach that has attracted tremendous interest over the past few years. The academic literature has been confined to case studies involving silver (Ag) and gold (Au) nanoparticles, as these are the two most widely used materials for the synthesis of nanocatalytic assemblies. Focus has also been given to sodium borohydride (NaBH4), which is used as a reductant during the chemical reduction of NA. This systematic review summarizes the fundamentals associated with the catalytic degradation of 4-NA, and presents a comprehensive and critical study of the latest modifications used in the synthesis of these catalytic systems. In addition, the kinetics, mechanisms, thermodynamics, as well as the future directions required for understanding this model reaction, have been provided in this particular study. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 35518289 PMCID: PMC9054049 DOI: 10.1039/d0ra01745k
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Silver and gold catalysts prepared by utilizing different methodologies and supporting materials for 4-NA reduction
| Supporting system | Catalyst system | MNPs | Methods | Reducing agent | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Soapnut shells | Au NPs | Au | Biosynthesized | Soapnut shells |
|
| Reduced graphene oxide | Ag NWs-rGO | Ag | Green synthesis, | — |
|
| Protein extract ( | Au NPs | Au | Biosynthesized | Protein extract ( |
|
| Leaf extract ( | Ag NPs | Ag | Microwave assisted synthesis | Leaf extract ( |
|
| Biosurfactant ethoxylated sterol | Au NPs BPS-30 | Au | Tentative-growth mechanism | — |
|
|
| |||||
| Cefditorene | Ag NPs | Ag | Chemical reduction | NaBH4 |
|
| Silica | Fe3O4/SiO2/Ag | Ag | Sonochemical | NaBH4 |
|
| Glass slide | Immobilized Ag NPs | Ag | Self-assembly | NaBH4 |
|
| Porous silica (PSi) | Ag NPs/PSi chips | Ag | Not available | NaBH4 |
|
| Gelatin | Colloidal hollow silver nanoparticles | Ag | Chemical reduction method | NaBH4 |
|
| Quantum clusters (QCs) | Ag QCs | Ag | Interfacial etching method | NaBH4 |
|
| Polymer | PVP-Au NPs | Au | Microwave heating method | NaBH4 |
|
| Silica matrix | Ag NPs (SNSM) | Ag | Impregnation technique | NaBH4 |
|
| Microgels | Ag-P(NIPAM-AAc-AAm) hybrid microgels | Ag | Precipitation method | NaBH4 |
|
| Resorcinarene | RPAMA-capped Au NPs | Au | Not available | NaBH4 |
|
Fig. 1Organic nanocatalytic assemblies: (a) polymeric gels/microgels, (b) dendrimer-stabilized system, (c) chitosan as a supporting material.
Fig. 2Inorganic supporting nanocatalytic assemblies: (a) metal nanoparticles impregnated on porous silica, (b) nanomaterial-decorated silica-coated magnetic nanoparticles, (c) graphene oxide sheet containing nanomaterial.
Organic and inorganic assemblies used for the catalytic reduction of 4-NA
| Assemblies | Nanocatalytic assembly | Pollutant | Recyclability | Catalytic reduction of 4-NA | Ref. | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nanomaterial | Fabrication medium | Reductant/oxidant | Diameter (nm) | Reductant | Solvent | Reaction settings | ||||
| Organic | Ag | Polyoxymethylene/poly( | 1,6-Hexanediamine/2 propanol | 7.6 ± 2.5 | 4-NA | 4 | NaBH4 | Aqueous solution | [Catalyst] = —; [4-NA] = 0.15 × 10−3 M; [NaBH4] = 15 × 10−3 M |
|
| Organic | Os | DNA | Ethanol | 1.5 ± 0.2 | 4-NA, 2-NA, 4-NP, 2-NP and MB | — | NaBH4 | Aqueous solution | [Catalyst] = 10 μL, [4-NA] = 1 × 10−3 M, [NaBH4] = 1 × 10−1 M |
|
| Organic | Pt | Peptide bolaamphiphiles | Phosphate buffer | 1–3 | 4-NA | — | NaBH4 | Aqueous solution | [Catalyst] = 1 × 10−2 M, [4-NA] = 5 mg, [NaBH4] = 6 mg |
|
| Organic | Ni | Starch | Fe3O4 | 20–50 | 4-NA, 2-NA, 3-NA, 2-NT, 3-NT, 4-NT, 2-NP, 3-NP, 4-NP, 2-NBA, 3-NBA, 4-NBA, and other nitroaromatics | 3 | NaBH4 | Aqueous solution | [Catalyst] = 12 mg, [4-NA] = 3.62 ×10−2 M [NaBH4] = 1.44 × 10−3 M |
|
| Organic | Ag | Polyurethane/keratin nanofibrous mats | Hexafluoro-2-isopropanol (HFIP) and electro-spinning | 70 | 4-NA | 5 | NaBH4 | Aqueous solution | [Catalyst] = 0.025 g mL−1, [4-NA] = 1 × 10−3 M, [NaBH4] = 5 × 10−2 M |
|
| Inorganic | MnO | Iron oxide Fe3O4 |
| 0.67 | 4-NA, RhB | 5 | NaBH4 | Aqueous solution | [Catalyst] = 2 mg mL−1, [4-NA] = 25 × 10−6 M, [NaBH4] = 2 × 10−1 M |
|
| Organic | Pt–Ni | Cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) micelle | N2H4 | 19 ± 3 | 4-NP, 2-NP, 4-NA, 4-AP | — | NaBH4 | Aqueous solution | [Catalyst] = 4.0 μg, [4-NA] = 8.5 × 10−5 M, [NaBH4] = 1.2 × 10−2 M |
|
| Inorganic | CuNi | Co3O4 | Cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) and NaBH4 | 19 ± 3 | 4-NP, 4-NA, 3-NA, 4-NT, 2-NA | 6 | NaBH4 | Aqueous solution | [Catalyst] = 2.0 mg, [4-NA] = 2 × 10−3 M L−1, [NaBH4] = 2 × 10−2 M L−1 |
|
| Inorganic | Ag | Fe3O4 nanocubes, silica | Ultrasonication, high temperature and pressure | 10–20 | 4-NA | 15 | NaBH4 | Aqueous solution | [Catalyst] = 1 × 10−3 M, [4-NA] = 1 × 10−3 M, [NaBH4] = 1 × 10−2 M |
|
| Organic | Au | Amphiphilic pillararene | Ascorbic acid | 6.5 ± 1.4 | 4-NA | 20 | NaBH4 | Aqueous solution | [Catalyst] = —, [4-NA] = 1 × 10−4 M L−1, [NaBH4] = 8 × 10−3 M |
|
| Organic | Au | Mesoporous carbon | Ammonia solution | >5 | 2-NP, 4-NP, 2-NA, 4-NA | 10 | NaBH4 | Aqueous solution | [Catalyst] = 8.5 × 10−5 g, [4-NA] = 5 × 10−4 M, [NaBH4] = 8 × 10−2 M |
|
| Inorganic | Ag | Silicon | Hydrofluoric acid | — | 4-NA | — | NaBH4 | Aqueous solution | [Catalyst] = —, [4-NA] = 12 × 10−4 M, [NaBH4] = 100 mg |
|
| Inorganic | Ag | Alumina | Quantum clusters and vacuum drying | 4-NP, 4-NA | 5 | NaBH4 | Aqueous solution | [Catalyst] = 50 mg, [4-NA] = 7 × 10−3 M, [NaBH4] = 160 × 10−3 M |
| |
| Inorganic | Au | Graphene oxide | Microwave heating | 50–350 | 4-NA | — | NaBH4 | Aqueous solution | [Catalyst] = 600 μL, [4-NA] = 1 × 10−3 M, [NaBH4] = 1 × 10−1 M |
|
| Inorganic | Ag | Reduced graphene oxide |
| 92 | 4-NA | — | NaBH4 | Aqueous solution | [Catalyst] = 10 μg, [4-NA] = 1 × 10−4 M, [NaBH4] = 1 × 10−2 M |
|
| Organic | Cu, Ni, Co, Fe, Mn | Polyaniline | NaBH4 | 4–10 | 4-NA | 5 | NaBH4 | Aqueous solution | [Catalyst] = 1 × 10−5 M, [4-NA] = 1 × 10−3 M, [NaBH4] = 5 × 10−3 M |
|
| Organic | Au | Poly( | Microwave heating | 22 ± 1.2 | 4-NA | — | NaBH4 | Aqueous solution | [Catalyst] = —, [4-NA] = 1 × 10−3 M, [NaBH4] = 1 × 10−2 M |
|
| Organic | Au | 1-Dodecyl-3-methylimidazolium bromide | Ascorbic acid, HNO3 | 24.9 ± 3.6 | 4-NA, 4-NP | — | KBH4 | Aqueous solution | [Catalyst] = 300 μL, [4-NA] = 1 × 10−3 M, [KBH4] = 1 × 10−1 M |
|
| Organic | Cu, Co, Ag | Chitosan | NaBH4 | 5 | 4-NA, 4-NP, RhB | — | NaBH4 | Aqueous solution | [Catalyst] = 10 μL, [4-NA] = 1 × 10−3 M, [NaBH4] = 1 × 10−2 M |
|
| Organic | Au–Pd | Reduced graphene oxide | Ultra-sonication and NaBH4 | 5–15 | 4-NA | 4 | NaBH4 | Aqueous solution | [Catalyst] = 10 μL, [4-NA] = 1 × 10−3 M, [NaBH4] = 1 × 10−2 M |
|
Fig. 3Biogenic nanocatalytic assemblies: (a) cefditoren as an antibiotic, (b) nanomaterial stabilized by plant parts.
Biogenic assemblies for the catalytic degradation of 4-NA
| Nanocatalytic assembly | Pollutant | Recyclability | Catalytic reduction of 4-NA | Ref. | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nanomaterial | Fabrication medium | Plant part | Diameter (nm) | Reductant | Solvent | Reaction settings | |||
| Ag |
| Seed | 40 | 2-NA, 4-NA | — | NaBH4 | Aqueous solution | [Catalyst] = 5 × 10−1 mL, [4-NA] = 1 × 10−3 M, [NaBH4] = 5 × 10−2 M |
|
| Au |
| Fruit | 6 ± 46 | 4-NA | — | NaBH4 | Aqueous solution | [Catalyst] = 1 × 10−1 mg mL−1, [4-NA] = 2 × 10−3 M L−1, [NaBH4] = 2 × 10−2 M L−1 |
|
| Au |
| Fruit | 9 | 4-NA | 6 cycle | NaBH4 | Aqueous solution | [Catalyst] = 1 × 10−3 M, [4-NA] = 1 × 10−3 M, [NaBH4] = 1 × 10−2 M |
|
| Au |
| Flower | 3–5 | 4-NP, 4-NA | — | NaBH4 | Aqueous solution | [Catalyst] = —, [4-NA] = 2 × 10−4 M, [NaBH4] = 15 × 10−2 M |
|
| Au |
| Protein | 61.47–29.30 | 4-NA | — | NaBH4 | Aqueous solution | [Catalyst] = 0.19 mg mL−1, [4-NA] = 5 × 10−4 M, [NaBH4] = 5 × 10−2 M |
|
| Ag |
| Rhizome | 9 | 4-NA | — | NaBH4 | Aqueous solution | [Catalyst] = 0.02 mL, [4-NA] = 1 × 10−2 M, [NaBH4] = 5 × 10−2 M |
|
| Ag | Cefditorene | — | 14.1 ± 2.2 | 2-NA, 3-NA, 4-NA | — | NaBH4 | Aqueous solution | [Catalyst] = —, [4-NA] = 4 × 10−4 M, [NaBH4] = 1 × 10−2 M |
|
| Au–Pd | Porous | Fruit | 7–10 | 4-NA | — | HCOONa | Aqueous solution | [Catalyst] = 0.1 mg, [4-NA] = 3 mg mL−1, [HCOONa] = 1 × 10−2 M |
|
Fig. 4Organic–inorganic composite nanocatalytic assemblies: (a) dendrimer and graphene supported nanomaterial, (b) hexagonal boron nitride containing nanomaterials and ionic liquid, (c) core–shell microgel.
Inorganic–organic hybrid assemblies for the catalytic degradation of 4-NA
| Nanocatalytic assembly | Pollutant | Recyclability | Catalytic reduction of 4-NA | Ref. | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nanomaterial | Inorganic fabrication medium | Organic fabrication medium | Diameter (nm) | Reductant | Solvent | Reaction settings | |||
| Fe3O4 NMs | Reduced graphene oxide | Poly(amidoamine) | — | 4-NA | — | — | Aqueous solution | [Catalyst] = 10 mg, [4-NA] = 5.8 × 10−3 M L−1 |
|
| Au | Fe3O4 | Polydopamine | 12–45 | 2-NA, 3-NA, 4-NA, 2-NT, 3-NT, 4-NT, 2-NCB, 2,4-DNT | 8th > 98% | NaBH4 | Aqueous solution | [Catalyst] = 1 × 10−5 M, [4-NA] = 1 × 10−3 M, [NaBH4] = 5 × 10−3 M |
|
| CuFe2O4 | Boron nitride nanosheets |
| 20 | MB, AR, 4N2PDA, 3NA, 4NA, 2NA | — | NaBH4 | Aqueous solution | [Catalyst] = 0.2 mg mL−1, [4-NA] = 0.01 M, [NaBH4] = 0.5 M |
|
| Au | Graphene oxide | Polyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimer | — | 4-NP, 4-NA, 2-NA, 3-NA, NB, and other nitroaromatics | — | NaBH4 | Aqueous solution | [Catalyst] = 5 mg, [4-NA] = 0.01 M, [NaBH4] = 0.1 M |
|
| Cu | Fe3O4 nano particle | Citric acid | 25–35 | NB, 4-NP, 4-NA and other nitroarenes | 8 | NaBH4 | Aqueous solution | [Catalyst] = 20 mg, [4-NA] = 1 × 10−3 M, [NaBH4] = 5 × 10−3 M |
|
| Cu | 1,6-Diaminohexane (DAH) | Polystyrene- | 3 | 4-NA, 4-NP | 18 | NaBH4 | Aqueous solution | [Catalyst] = 20 mg, [4-NA] = 1 × 10−3 mol L−1, [NaBH4] = 2 × 10−3 M |
|
| Ag | Silica | Gelatin | 16 ± 4 nm | 4-NA, 4-NP | — | NaBH4 | Aqueous solution | [Catalyst] = 5.3 × 10−3 g, [4-NA] = 4.3 × 10−4 M, [NaBH4] = 1 × 10−1 M |
|
| Au, Pd | Fe3O4 | Polyaniline | — | 4-NA | — | NaBH4 | Aqueous solution | [Catalyst] = 0.2 mL, [4-NA] = 4 × 10−4 M, [NaBH4] = 30 × 10−3 M |
|
Properties of different catalytic systems utilized for 4-NA reduction
| Catalytic system | Analytical techniques | Remarks | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Au NPs | XRD, TEM, HR-TEM, SEM, UV-VIS, FTIR | Soapnut shell-mediated gold nanoparticles showed efficient catalytic activity. Gold nanoparticles chemically reduced 4-nitroaniline into 4-PDA. The UV-visible spectroscopy results suggested that 1 mM of HAuCl4 possessed better catalytic properties. |
|
| FTIR, XRD, TEM, SEM, UV-VIS | Formation of gold nanoparticles was confirmed by XRD. TEM displayed various shapes of Au NPs formed with varying concentrations of IPE. UV-Vis spectra showed the reduction of 4-NA. |
| |
| XRD, FTIR, UV-VIS, DLS, EDX, TEM, HR-TEM | SEM and EDS confirmed that the gold nanoparticles possessed a crystalline nature and size in the nano-range. UV-Vis spectra displayed the reduction of 4-NA into 4-PDA. |
| |
| XRD, FTIR, UV-VIS, DLS, EDX | Reduction of 4-NA using Au NPs was observed by UV-visible spectroscopy. The TEM image showed that the Au NPs were spherical in shape, having an average size of 16 nm. |
| |
| Ag NPs | XRD, FTIR, UV-VIS, DLS, EDX | Reduction of 4-NA using Au NPs, Ag NPs were observed by UV-visible spectroscopy. The TEM image showed that the Au NPs and Ag NPs were spherical in shape, having average sizes of 16 nm and 20 nm. |
|
| TEM, SEM, UV-VIS, FTIR | Ag NPs were self-assembled into a two-dimensional sub-monolayer structure on a glass slide surface confirmed by SEM. Raman spectra showed that in the absence of a catalyst, the reduction proceeded very slowly. However, 4-NA reduction was completed within 27 min in the presence of a catalyst. |
| |
| XRD, TEM, SEM, UV-VIS, FTIR | Cefditorene-mediated Ag NPs were small-sized and monodispersed, as confirmed by TEM. UV-Visible spectroscopy examined changes in the absorbance. At 240 nm, a new peak appeared within 2 min, confirming the 4-PDA formation. |
| |
| XRD, TEM, UV-VIS, DLS | TEM analysis showed that the Ag nanospheres had a hollow spherical structure. DLS showed a hydrodynamic diameter within the range of 10–40 nm, and UV visible spectra showed the reduction of 4-NA. |
| |
| Fe3O4/SiO2/Ag | TEM, HR-TEM, SQUID, EDS, XRD, UV-VIS | The XRD pattern confirmed the face-centered cubic structure of Ag in Fe3O4/SiO2/Ag. UV-Vis spectra showed that reduction was completed within 200 s. |
|
| Flower-like Bi2S3 microspheres | XRD, TEM, HR-TEM, SEM, UV-VIS, EDS | Metash 6100 UV-Vis spectrophotometer monitored the reducing reaction of 4-NA into 4-PDA. |
|
| Au nano crystals | SEM, UV-VIS, TEM, XPS | TEM analysis showed that the size of the rhombic dodecahedron was 71.8 nm. UV-Vis analysis confirmed that the rhombic dodecahedral gold nanocrystals showed the best catalytic activity, as compared to the octahedral and cubic gold nanocrystals. |
|
| Ag NWS-rGO | FTIR, XRD, TEM, FE-SEM, UV-VIS | GO reduction was confirmed by XDR and UV-VIS analysis. UV-Vis absorption spectra confirmed the reduction of 4-NA. |
|
| BPS-30 capped gold nanoparticles | XRD, TEM, UV-VIS | UV-Vis absorption spectroscopy examined the yield of the gold nanoparticles and evaluated the reduction of 4-NA. |
|
| Ag-p(NiPA- | FTIR, XRD, TEM, SEM, UV-VIS, DLS | XRD indicated the crystalline nature of the Ag NPs. DLS analysis showed that the hydrodynamic diameter of the microgel particles increased significantly in the pH range of 4–7. At pH ≥ 8, no change in the hydrodynamic diameter was observed with an increase in the temperature due to the dominant pH effect. |
|
| PVP- Au NPs | FTIR, XPS, TEM, HR-TEM, EDS, SEM, UV-VIS, XRD | Spherical shape of the Au NPs confirmed by TEM analysis. XPS technique resolved the chemical identity of the atoms through the measured binding energy. |
|
| Au–Pd bimetallic nanoparticles | TEM, EDS, SEM, UV-VIS | SEM analysis showed the average size of 7–10 nm for the Au–Pd bimetallic nanoparticles grown on porous germania. UV-Vis analysis showed the complete reduction of 4-NA in 4 min, with a rate constant of 53 × 10−2 min−1 in the presence of bimetallic Au–Pd nanoparticles. |
|
| FeAgPt trimetallic NPs | FTIR, XPS, TEM, EDS, SEM, UV-VIS, XRD, EDAX | Crystalline nature of the FeAgPt trimetallic NPs confirmed by XRD and EDX analysis. TEM, UV-VIS and FTIR studies confirmed that |
|
| TCPIL/CuFe2O4/BNONS nanomaterial | FTIR, XPS, UV-VIS, XRD, EDS, SEM, DSC-TGA, TEM, HR-TEM, STEM, AFM | The successful formation of bimetallic CuFe2O4 NPs, their stability, identification, functional group analysis and composition or morphologies were confirmed by XRD, EDS, SEM, DSC-TGA, TEM, HR-TEM, STEM, AFM and FTIR techniques. UV-Vis spectra showed that the catalyst effectively improved (complete reduction in 30 min) the photocatalytic performance of 4-NA. |
|
Values of rate constant, order of reaction and reaction time obtained in the reduction of 4-NA utilizing different catalytic systems
| Catalyst used | Order of reaction | Rate constant (min−1) | Reaction completion time (min) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Au NPs | Pseudo first-order kinetics | 9.1 × 10−5 | Not available |
|
| Ag NPs | 7.67 × 10−5 | |||
| Au NPs | First-order kinetics | 4.5 × 10−2 | 59 |
|
| Au NPs | Pseudo first-order kinetics | 6.5 × 10−2 | 6 |
|
| Ag NPs | Not available | Not available | 2 |
|
| Colloidal hollow silver nanoparticles | Pseudo first-order kinetics | 4.2 × 10−2 | 10 |
|
| BPS-30 capped gold nanoparticles | First-order kinetics | 1.52 × 10−1 | 25 |
|
| Ag-P(NIPAM-AAc-AAm) hybrid microgels | Pseudo first-order kinetics | 6.06 × 10−1 | 22 |
|
| Gold nano crystals | First-order kinetics | 1.8717 × 10−1 | 12.5 |
|
| Ag NWS-rGO | Pseudo first-order kinetics | 1.7034 × 10−4 | 4 |
|
| Pt NPs/GA | First-order kinetics | 4.4 × 10−1 | 10 |
|
| Ag-p(NiPA- | Pseudo first-order kinetics | 9.41 × 10−2 | Not available |
|
| CuNPs-chiston | Pseudo first-order kinetics | 7.51 × 10−3 s−1 | 6 |
|
Fig. 5Effect of nanomaterial shape on the reduction of 4-NA.[39]
Fig. 6Comparison based on the recyclability of various catalysts used for 4-NA reduction.[31,44,50]