| Literature DB >> 35518272 |
Sakineh Omidi1, Ali Kakanejadifard1.
Abstract
Curcumin (1,7-bis[4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl]-1,6-heptadiene-3,5-dione) is the main pigment present in the turmeric rhizome and shows various biological properties. The synthesis of different derivatives is an effective way to improve the medicinal and biological properties of curcumin. Many researchers have chosen the carbonyl group of curcumin for modification and preparation of new analogues. This review critically surveys a general overview of the literature and summarizes the synthesis and biological activities of Schiff base, hydrazone and oxime derivatives of curcumin over the last decade. These compounds and also their metal complexes possess higher potency in biological activity. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 35518272 PMCID: PMC9056295 DOI: 10.1039/d0ra05720g
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Fig. 1The active groups of curcumin.
Fig. 2Structure of Schiff base derivatives of curcumin.
Fig. 3The suggested mechanism for formation of dihydropyridine-4-ones 7a–c.
Summary of properties of compounds 1 to 13
| Compound | Condition of synthesis | Yield (%) | Activity | Outcome | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 h reflux of precursors in EtOH | 80 | Antibacterial | Zn( |
|
| 2 | 6 h stirrer of precursors in EtOH at room temperature and in presence of piperidine | 72 | Antibacterial and antifungal | Cu( |
|
| 3 | 24 h reflux of precursors in MeOH | No reported | DNA cleavage | Cu( |
|
| 4 | 6 h stirrer of precursors in MeOH at room temperature and in presence of piperidine | 56.9 | Antioxidant | Lower antioxidant activity compared to curcumin |
|
| 5a–i | Heating of precursors in 2-methyl-THF or CHCl3 under microwave irradiation for 1–1.75 h at 80 °C in presence of MK10 clay and acetic acid | 11–58 | Anticancer and antioxidant | 5a–f showed comparable antioxidant activity to curcumin, 5i was strongest anticancer agent |
|
| 5j–m | Heating of 5d–g and acetic anhydride in 2-methyl-THF in presence of pyridine | 42–67 | Anticancer and antioxidant | No antioxidant activity and low anticancer activity |
|
| 6a–h | Heating of precursors in 2-methyl-THF or EtOH or DMF under microwave irradiation for 1–1.5 h at 70–100 °C in presence of MK10 clay and acetic acid | 8–40 | Anticancer and antioxidant | Enhanced water-solubility and anticancer activity and comparable antioxidant activity (6a–d) to curcumin |
|
| 7a–c | Heating of precursors in EtOH under microwave irradiation for 1–1.5 h at 70–100 °C in presence of MK10 clay and acetic acid | 3–12 | Anticancer and antioxidant | Enhanced water-solubility compared to curcumin |
|
| 8 | 12 h reflux of precursors in MeOH | 74 | Antibacterial and anthelmintic | Cu( |
|
| 9 | 4 h reflux of precursors in EtOH | 66 | Antibacterial/antifungal and DNA cleavage | Cu( |
|
| 10 | 3 h reflux of precursors in EtOH | 75 | Antibacterial/antifungal and DNA cleavage | Cu( |
|
| 11 | 24 h reflux of precursors in EtOH in presence of anhydrous K2CO3 | No reported | Antibacterial/antifungal and anticancer | Cu( |
|
| 12 | 6 h reflux of precursors in MeOH | 74 | Anticancer and antioxidant | Cu( |
|
| 13 | 6 h reflux of precursors in EtOH in presence of acetic acid | 85 | Antibacterial | Higher activity against Gram-positive and lower activity against Gram-negative bacteria compared to curcumin |
|
Fig. 4Sulfonamide derivatives of curcumin.
Summary of properties of compounds 14 to 17
| Compound | Condition of synthesis | Yield (%) | Activity | Outcome | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14a–e | 3–4 h reflux of precursors in EtOH | 87–91 | Antibacterial/antifungal and anti-inflammatory | 14b–e showed higher activity compared to curcumin |
|
| 15a–e | 2–3 h heating of precursors in EtOH at 60 °C in presence of acetic acid | 91–94 | Antibacterial/antifungal and anti-inflammatory | Only 15e showed higher activity compared to curcumin |
|
| 16a–f and 17a–f | Reflux of precursors in EtOH in presence of acetic acid | 71.5–92.5 | Antibacterial/antifungal and anti-inflammatory | 16a was most potent compound |
|
Fig. 5Structure of amino acid derivatives of curcumin.
Summary of properties of compounds 18 to 20
| Compound | Condition of synthesis | Yield (%) | Activity | Outcome | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 | 6 h reflux of precursors in EtOH | 60 | Antibacterial/antifungal and DNA cleavage | Cu( |
|
| 19 | 6 h reflux of precursors in EtOH | 60 | Antibacterial/antifungal and DNA cleavage | Cu( |
|
| 20 | 6 h reflux of precursors in EtOH | 63 | Antibacterial/antifungal and DNA cleavage | Cu( |
|
Fig. 6Structure of Schiff base derivatives of curcumin's analogues.
Summary of properties of compounds 21 to 23
| Compound | Condition of synthesis | Yield (%) | Activity | Outcome | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21a–f and 22d,f | Heating of precursors in 2-methyl-THF or EtOH under microwave irradiation for 75–105 min at 80–85 °C in presence of MK10 clay and acetic acid | 6–24 | Anticancer and antioxidant | Enhanced water-solubility, comparable anticancer and lower antioxidant activities to curcumin |
|
| 23a–m | 10 h reflux of precursors in EtOH in presence of acetic acid | 45–94 | Anticancer | 23l was the most potent compound but was not compared with curcumin |
|
Fig. 7(a) HNT–Curcumin prodrug, (b) dual responsive γ-PGA-SS-ADH-Cur conjugates.
Summary of properties of compounds 24 and 25
| Compound | Condition of synthesis | Curcumin loading (wt%) | Activity | Outcome | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 | Stirring of precursors in EtOH under microwave irradiation for 1 h at 80 °C | 2.9 | Anticancer | The prodrug showed the higher cytotoxicity compared to curcumin |
|
| 25 | Stirring of precursors in MeOH/H2O for 72 h at 37 °C in presence of acetic acid | 5 ± 2 | Anticancer | Compound showed a pH and redox-responsive and higher cytotoxicity compared to curcumin |
|
Fig. 8Structure of hydrazone derivatives of curcumin.
Summary of properties of compounds 26 to 31
| Compound | Condition of synthesis | Yield (%) | Activity | Outcome | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26 and 27 | Stirring of precursors in MeOH for 6 h, then 8 h reflux | No reported | DNA cleavage | Cu( |
|
| 28a–d | 24 h reflux of precursors in CHCl3/MeOH in presence of piperidine | 60–67 | DNA cleavage and anticancer | All compounds showed the good DNA interacting tendency |
|
| 29 | Stirring of precursors in MeOH for 24 h in presence of piperidine | No reported | DNA cleavage and anticancer | Two ruthenium( |
|
| 30 | Reflux of precursors in EtOH for 4 h in presence of acetic acid | 80 | Antibacterial/antifungal and DNA cleavage | Cu( |
|
| 31 | Reflux of precursors in EtOH | No reported | Antioxidant | All Cu( |
|
Fig. 9Structure of new synthetic curcumin-like oxime and oxime ether analogues by Qin et al.
Structures of new synthetic oxime and oxime ether 32 and 33
| compound | R1 | R′3 | R′4 | R′6 | R6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32a | CH2 | OCH3 | OCH3 | Br |
|
| 32b, 33b | CH–CH3 | OCH3 | OCH3 | Br | |
| 32c, 33c |
| OCH3 | OCH3 | Br |
Structures of new synthetic oxime and oxime ether 34 and 35
| compound | R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 | R5 | R′3 | R′4 | R′6 | R6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 34a | CH–CH3 | H | H | H | H | OCH3 | OCH3 | Br |
|
| 34b | CH2 | H | H | H | OH | OCH3 | OCH3 | Br | |
| 34c | CH2 | H | H | OCH3 | H | OCH3 | OCH3 | Br | |
| 34d | CH2 | H | OCH3 | OCH3 | H | OCH3 | OCH3 | Br | |
| 34e, 35e | CH2 | OCH3 | H | H | OCH3 | OCH3 | OCH3 | Br | |
| 34f, 35f | CH2 | H | NO2 | H | H | H | OCH3 | Cl | |
| 34g, 35g | CH2 | H | NO2 | H | H | OCH3 | OCH3 | Br |
Fig. 10Synthesis and structure of curcumin-like oxime analogues 36a–h.
Fig. 11Synthesis and structure of curcumin-like oxime ester analogues 37a–k.
Summary of properties of compounds 32 to 37
| Compound | Condition of synthesis | Yield (%) | Activity | Outcome | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32–35 | 32 and 34: 6–8 h reflux of α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds with NH2OH·HCl in EtOH | 42–62 | Anticancer | 34f and 34g were the most potent anticancer agents |
|
| 33 and 35: 8 h reflux of 32 and 34 with haloalkylamine in dry acetone in presence of K2CO3 | |||||
| 36a–h | Reflux of α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds with NH2OH·HCl in EtOH | 39–51 | Anticancer | 36g and 36h were the most potent anticancer agents |
|
| 37a–k | Stirring of precursors for 5 h at 0–5 °C in dry acetone in presence of K2CO3 | 48.2–76 | Anti-inflammatory | 37j was the most potent anti-inflammatory agent |
|