Pharmacokinetic profile and metabolite identification of bornyl caffeate and caffeic acid in rats by high performance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry.

Bornyl caffeate was initially discovered as a bioactive compound in medicinal plants. Despite the promising pharmacological activities including anti-tumor and antibacterial activities, the pharmacokinetics of the compound remain open. This work developed a high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric method for the determination of bornyl caffeate and caffeic acid (major metabolite and a main unit of bornyl caffeate) in vivo. Successful application of the method included identification of its metabolites and investigation on the drug pharmacokinetics. A total of 30 compounds were identified as the metabolites of bornyl caffeate in rats. We attributed these metabolites to phase I metabolic routes of reduction, oxidation, hydrolysis and phase II metabolic reactions of glucuronidation, sulfation, O-methylation and glycine. Glucuronidation, sulfation, O-methylation and reduction were the main metabolic pathways of bornyl caffeate. The method presented a linear range of 1-4000 ng mL-1. The pharmacokinetic profile of bornyl caffeate was found to be a three compartment open model, while caffeic acid fitted to a two compartment open model when it was administered alone or served as the main metabolite of bornyl caffeate. The time to peak concentration (T max) and the maximum plasma concentration (C max) of bornyl caffeate were 0.53 h and 409.33 ng mL-1. Compared with original caffeic acid, the compound displayed an increased half-life of elimination (T 1/2β), area under the concentration time curve from 0 to t (AUC0-t ) and area under the concentration time curve from 0 to ∞ (AUC0-∞), a decreased half-life of absorption (T 1/2α) and an identical C max. Taking together, we concluded that bornyl caffeate is able to rapidly initiate therapeutic effect and last for a relatively long time in rats; metabolic pathways of O-methylation and reduction is key to interpret the mechanism and toxicity of bornyl caffeate. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.

Introduction

Caffeic acid esters present a large group of bioactive compounds existed in medicinal plants and animals.[1-3] Among them, bornyl caffeate (Fig. 1s(a)†) is originally isolated and identified from numerous plants such as Valeriana wallichii,[12]Piper caninum (Piperaceae), Piper philippinum, Coreopsis mutica var. mutica and Verbesina turbacenina Kunth.[4] The compound has exhibited a broad spectrum of activities including anti-inflammatory,[5] antibacterial,[6] anti-platelet[7] and anti-tumor activity.[4] More interestingly, bornyl caffeate possesses a good inhibitory activity towards human neutrophil elastase (HNE),[8,9] HIV integrase,[10] trypanosome cysteine protease[11] and anti-leishmaniasis activity.[12] These reports pave the way to further development of the compound to a new drug. This necessitates pharmacokinetic investigation of bornyl caffeate to assess the druggability of the compound at an early stage.

In terms of pharmacokinetics and stability, a survey of literature has showed that there are a number of methods for the determination of caffeic acid esters.[13-15] Among these assays, high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) is the most powerful and canonical technique to determine several caffeic acid esters such as 3,4-dihydroxyphenethyl caffeate,[16] phenethyl caffeate[17] and their metabolites in plasma. In most cases, these studies have focused on the stability of the compounds, but much less attention was paid to their pharmacokinetics. The main conclusion of the abovementioned reports is the hydrolyzation of caffeic acid esters to caffeic acid in vivo. Such conclusion has referenced us to take caffeic acid (CA, Fig. 1s(b)†) into account during the pharmacokinetic investigation of bornyl caffeate because it is a dominant metabolite of caffeic acid esters.

Pharmacokinetic study is the key to evaluate the bioactivities and monitor the dynamic processes of a drug in vivo.[18-20] Several methodologies have applied in this case, including HPLC-MS, HPLC-UV and HPLC-DAD. As the most widespread assay, HPLC-MS/MS is advantageous due to high sensitivity, good selectivity and impressive accuracy.[21,22] To our knowledge scope, few literatures have concerned about the establishment of such method to simultaneous investigate the pharmacokinetics of bornyl caffeate and CA, in particular, to identify theirs metabolite. To obtain better pharmacokinetic and metabolic information of bornyl caffeate and CA, we firstly identified 30 metabolites of the compound by HPLC-Q-TOF MS/MS. We further validated an HPLC-Ion-Trap-MS/MS method to determine the concentration of bornyl caffeate and CA in rats. By these results, we declared that bornyl caffeate has potential to become a drug candidate.

Experimental

Chemicals and reagents

Bornyl caffeate was home synthesized and identified by infrared spectrum, mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The purity was determined to be 99.0% by HPLC. Caffeic acid (purity > 99%, Fig. 1s(b)†) and internal standard (IS) phenethyl caffeate (purity > 98%, Fig. 1s(c)†) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Corp. (St. Louis, MO, USA). HPLC grade methanol was purchased from Fisher Scientific (Pittsburgh, PA, USA). HPLC grade formic acid was acquired from Kermel Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Tianjin, China). Deionized water (>18 mΩ) was prepared by a Milli-Q water purification system (Bedford, MA, USA). Other reagents were of analytical grade unless specially stated.

Animals

Sprague-Dawley rats (200–220 g) were acquired from the Experimental Animal Center of Xi'an Jiaotong University (Xi'an, China). The rats were raised in an air-conditioned breeding room (temperature: 20–23 °C; humidity: 60 ± 10%; 12 h light/dark cycle). In prior to further experiment, the animals were fed with standard laboratory food and acclimatized for a week. The rats were fasted for 12 h with free access to water before conducting the experiment. All animal procedures were performed in accordance with the Guidelines for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of Northwest University and approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Northwest University.

Preparation of stock solutions, calibration standards and quality control samples

Primary stock solutions of bornyl caffeate, CA and the IS were prepared at a concentration of 1.6 mg mL−1 by dissolving the accurately weighed compounds in methanol. A series of standard working solutions of bornyl caffeate and CA were achieved at 0.01, 0.04, 0.20, 0.80, 2.00, 4.00, 8.00, 20.00, 40.00 μg mL−1 by diluting the stock solution with appropriate volume of methanol. The working solution of IS was prepared at 160 ng mL−1 by similar method.

Reference standard solutions for calibration curves were prepared by spiking 10 μL of the appropriate working solution with 100 μL blank rat plasma. The final concentrations were 1.0, 4.0, 20.0, 80.0, 200.0, 400.0, 800.0, 2000.0, 4000.0 ng mL−1. Using the same method, we prepared quality control solutions at high, medium, low concentration (4, 200 and 3000 ng mL−1). All samples were stored at 4 °C and were kept away from light until further analysis.

Sample pretreatment

Frozen plasma samples were thawed to room temperature without any other treatments. An aliquot of 100 μL plasma samples were spiked with 10 μL aliquot of IS working solution. Following the inclusion of 300 μL methanol, we vortexed the result mixture for 2.0 min to precipitate protein and free the conjugated drugs. The protein was removed by centrifuging the suspension for 10 min with a speed of 12 000 rpm and a temperature of 4 °C. After collection of the supernatant to a 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube, 200 μL methanol was applied to wash the precipitate protein. The supernatant was collected into the same tube and was dried under a stream of N2 at room temperature. The residue was dissolved by 100 μL 50% (v/v) methanol/water containing 0.1% formic acid. The result solution was filtered with 0.22 μm polytetrafluoroethylene membrane before HPLC-MS/MS analysis.

An aliquot of 600 μL urine was extracted by 1.8 mL methanol using the same method. Feces samples were dried naturally and then ground into crude powder 0.5 g of the powder was extracted with 4 mL methanol in an ultrasonic bath for 40 min, and the extracted solution was treated using the same method.

HPLC-MS/MS conditions

HPLC conditions

The mobile phase for pharmacokinetic profile determination consisted of 20% methanol (A) and 0.1% formic acid water (B) at a flow rate of 0.8 mL min−1. Gradient elution was utilized for identification of the metabolites with a program of 5% B to 10% B (0–10 min), 10% B to 30% B (10–30 min), 30% B to 40% B (30–45 min), 40% B to 65% B (45–60 min), 65% B to 90% B (60–80 min), 90% B to 100% B (80–90 min) and then an immediate reduction to 5% B for re-equilibration of the column. The injection volume was 50.0 μL for all samples.

Q-TOF/MS conditions

Identification of the metabolites in biosamples (plasma, urine, feces) were performed by an Agilent 1200 HPLC system on-line coupled with an Agilent 6520 Quadrupole Time-of-Flight (Q-TOF) mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA). The separation of the analytes were performed on Agilent Zorbax-C18 (4.6 mm × 150 mm, 5.0 μm particle size) at 25 °C. Mass spectrometer was operated in negative mode for the analytes and IS. Mass spectral data were acquisitioned in the profile and centroid mode ranged from m/z 50 to m/z 500. The other optimized conditions included: a transient accumulation rate of 1 spectrum per second; a drying gas flow rate of 10.0 L min−1; a drying gas temperature of 350 °C; a nebulizer gas pressure of 40 psi; a capillary voltage of 3500 V; a fragmentor voltage of 130 V; a skimmer voltage of 65 V and a octopole 1 RF voltage of 750 V. The post column splitting ratio was set at 4 : 1 before the small fraction was introduced into an Agilent Jet Stream dual spray electrospray ionization (ESI) interface. A reference standard solution of purine, hexakis(1H,1H,3H-tetrafluoropropoxy)phosphazine and ammonium trifluoroacetate was utilized to control the performance of ESI source by continuously introducing the solution into the interface. Under negative ion mode, the two solutions produced ions of m/z 112.9855 and 1033.9881. Such ion pattern was utilized for real-time internal mass calibration for pursuing the accuracy mass of the analyte ions. The MS/MS experiments were performed in target MS/MS mode with collision energies of 10, 20, 30, 40 eV for all the compounds. The MS data were acquisitioned at a rate of 1 spectrum per s in the range of m/z 50–500.

Identification of the original compound and the metabolites in the real samples was achieved by comparisons of the experimental mass and MS/MS spectra with accurate mass data and spectra in the online opened databases including the massbank (http://www.massbank.jp/index.html), the human metabolite database (http://hmdb.ca) and the METLIN database (http://metlin.scripps.edu). The comparison of accurate mass, retention time and MS/MS spectra with authentic reference standards or the data from the literature was also performed for the identification of several metabolites.

Ion trap mass spectrometry conditions

The Agilent 1100 high performance liquid chromatographic system includes a G1379A vacuum degasser, a G1311A quaternary pump, a G1316A thermostated column oven, and a G1313A autosampler (Agilent, Germany). Mass spectrometric detection was performed on an SL Agilent 1100 tandem mass spectrometer equipped with an electrospray ionization (ESI) source and a Chemstation 5.2 software was used for data acquisition and processing. Mass spectrometer conditions of the interface were as following: capillary voltage 3500 V, drying gas (350 °C, 10 L min−1), the temperature and pressure of nebulizer gas was set at 350 °C and 40 psi.

The MS/MS data were collected using a rate of 2 spectra per s over a range of m/z 20 to m/z 500 and a medium isolation width (∼4 Da). As showed in Fig. 1, quantitation were performed using ion patterns of m/z 315.2 [M − H]− to m/z 161.0 [M − H–C10H18O]− for bornyl caffeate, m/z 179.0 [M − H]− to m/z 135.0 [M − H–CO2]− for CA and m/z 283.1 [M − H]− to m/z 135.0 [M − H–C9H9O2]− for IS.

Fig. 1

The MS2 spectra of bornyl caffeate (a), caffeic acid (b) and phenethyl caffeate ((c) IS).

Method validation

Validation of the proposed method was examined in terms of selectivity, linearity, precision and accuracy, matrix and extraction recovery and stability according to FDA requirements of bioanalytical method validation. Selectivity was evaluated by comparing chromatograms of six different batches of blank plasma obtained from six rats with those corresponding to standard plasma samples spiked with bornyl caffeate, CA and IS.

Calibration curves were plotted by the peak area ratios (y) of bornyl caffeate, CA to IS against the nominal concentration (x) of bornyl caffeate and CA. Linear regression using 1/x2 as weighting factor was utilized to assess the calibration curves. The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was defined as the lowest drug concentration that is determined with both accuracy (relative error, RE) and precision (relative standard deviation, RSD) within ±20%.

Precision and accuracy of the method was evaluated in six replicates at three QC levels on the same day and three analytical batches on three consecutive days. Intra- and inter-day precisions (relative standard deviation, RSD) were required to be below 15%. The accuracy (relative error, RE) of such cases was within ±15%.

The extraction recoveries of the analytes were determined at three QC levels by comparing the mean peak area of QC samples with those of the blank plasma spiked with neat solutions after extraction (n = 6). The recovery of IS was determined in a similar way at 160 ng mL−1. The matrix effect was measured by referring the post-extracted spiked sample to the unextracted sample, using the following equation:% matrix effect = (where B is the peak area of a neat standard and A is the corresponding peak area for standards spiked into plasma after extraction.

Stability of bornyl caffeate and CA in plasma samples were investigated under varieties of storing and processing conditions. In case of freeze–thaw stability, three QCs were stored at −20 °C for 24 h and thawed at room temperature. Subsequent refreezing of the samples was performed under the same conditions. After three freezing–thawing cycles, the concentrations of bornyl caffeate and CA were determined by the proposed HPLC-MS/MS method. Long-term stability was examined using the three QCs after the plasma samples were stored at −20 °C for 3 weeks. Short-term stability was investigated after the three QCs were kept at room temperature for 24 h. In addition, for post-preparative stability, the processed QCs were placed in the autosampler at 20 °C for 24 h. The samples was regarded as stable if the relative error was within ±15%.

Metabolite identification

In the case of metabolite identification, we randomly divided 18 male Sprague-Dawley rats into three groups (six rats per group) assigned as A for plasma collection, B for urine and feces collection, and C for collection of blank plasma, urine and feces. We suspended bornyl caffeate in 5% poloxamer to prepare 7.5 mg mL−1 of the drug suspension. Such suspension was administered to the rats through intragastric gavage with a dosage of 30 mg kg−1. Same dose of 5% poloxamer was given to the rats assigned as blank group. Following administration, blood samples (0.2 mL) were collected from the ophthalmic veins at 0.5, 1, 2 h and 4 h and placed into heparinized tubes. Urine and feces samples were collected from each rat in group B at 12 h pre-dose and 0–12 h and 12–24 h post-dose using separate metabolic cages.

Pharmacokinetic study

To determine the pharmacokinetic profile of bornyl caffeate, we prepared bornyl caffeate at the concentration of 30 mg kg−1 using 5% poloxamer aqueous solution. According to the equimolar transformation from bornyl caffeate to caffeic acid, we prepared caffeic acid at 17 mg kg−1 using 5% poloxamer aqueous solution. 200 μL blood samples were collected from the ophthalmic veins into heparinized Eppendorf under anesthesia introduced by sevoflurane[39] at predefined time points: 0, 0.08, 0.17, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 h pre- and post-dosage. The blood samples were centrifuged at 12 000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C to collect plasma samples. The collected plasma was stored at −20 °C until further pretreatment.

Data analysis

Acquisition of the LC/MS data was achieved by Agilent Mass Hunter Qualitative Analysis software (version 4.0, Agilent Technologies). Using Molecular Feature Extractor (MFE), we mined the rough data to present the compounds in the sample by isotope peaks and adduct ions. The compounds were filtered when their ion intensities are larger than 5000 counts. Following normalization of the abundance, the peaks of diverse samples were aligned by a mass window of 10 ppm and a retention time window of 0.2 min. The differential metabolites exported from Agilent Mass Profiler Professional (MPP) software (version 12.0, Agilent Technologies) were confirmed by the Mass Hunter software with their ion peak area and symmetry for the pursuit of reducing the error caused by statistical analysis.

Pharmacokinetic analysis of all data was processed by the DAS 3.0.0 software (DAS, T.C.M. Shanghai, China). The parameters including the area under curve (AUC), the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and the time to achieve maximum plasma concentration (Tmax), the half-life of absorption (T1/2α) were calculated to describe the pharmacokinetic properties of bornyl caffeate and CA. All results were expressed as arithmetic mean ± standard deviation (SD).

Results

Selectivity

The selectivity was evaluated by comparing blank chromatograms of blank plasma samples with that spiked with standard solution (at LLOQ level) as well as the comparison with the samples collected after oral administration. Representative chromatograms of those samples were showed in Fig. 2. Under the optimized conditions, the retention times of CA, bornyl caffeate and IS were 29.9 min, 78.3 min and 74.4 min. No obvious interfering peaks appeared at the retention times of CA, bornyl caffeate and IS.

Fig. 2

Representative extracted ion chromatograms of rat plasma samples: (a) blank plasma; (b) blank plasma spiked with bornyl caffeate (0.7 ng mL−1) and caffeic acid (0.3 ng mL−1) at LLOQ; (c) plasma collected at 0.53 h after a single oral administration of 30 mg kg−1 bornyl caffeate; (d) plasma collected at 0.25 h after a single oral administration of 17 mg kg−1 caffeic acid.

Calibration curve and LLOQ

Representative regression equation for the calibration curve (y = ax + b) was carried out by a weighted linear least-squares regression of the analyte/IS peak area ratios against the analyte concentrations (x). The typical calibration curve were y = 1.0557x + 0.6219 (R2 = 0.9997) and y = 2.4395x + 0.4780 (R2 = 0.9996) for bornyl caffeate (Fig. 2s†) and CA (Fig. 3s†). The linear range was found to be 1.0–4000 ng mL−1. The lower limit of quantification of bornyl caffeate and CA were 0.7 ng mL−1 and 0.30 ng mL−1, which were sufficient for subsequent pharmacokinetic study.

Precision and accuracy

The intra- and inter- assay accuracy and precision of the method were summarized in Table 1. These results demonstrated RSD less than 15%. These values were within the acceptable range required by the guideline of Guidance for Industry Bioanalytical Method Validation, demonstrated a good precision and accuracy of the current method.

Precision and accuracy of bornyl caffeate and caffeic acid in plasma of rats (n = 6)

Compounds	Concentration added (ng mL−1)	Intra-day			Inter-day
		Concentration measured (ng mL−1)	(RSD%)	(RE%)	Concentration measured (ng mL−1)	(RSD%)	(RE%)
Bornyl caffeate	4	3.94 ± 0.13	3.23	1.54	3.9 ± 0.28	7.07	2.42
	200	195.72 ± 7.1	3.63	2.14	196.49 ± 9.93	5.05	1.75
	3000	2930.49 ± 103.04	3.51	2.32	2928.34 ± 199.48	6.81	2.39
CA	4	3.90 ± 0.21	5.30	2.50	3.93 ± 0.20	5.20	1.71
	200	194.84 ± 10.18	5.33	2.58	197.32 ± 7.71	3.91	1.34
	3000	2910.78 ± 149.34	5.13	2.97	3054.66 ± 119.08	3.90	1.82

Matrix effect and extraction recovery

Table 2 summarized the extraction recoveries and matrix effects of bornyl caffeate, CA and IS. All the variations of the matrix effect were in the range of 2% to 15%. This result confirmed little ion suppression or enhancement during the HPLC-MS/MS analysis. The extraction efficiency was within 78–91% with RSD ≤ 4.37% for bornyl caffeate and 86–102% with RSD ≤ 3.75% for CA, which were acceptable when the method was applied in pharmacokinetic analysis.

Extraction recovery and matrix effect of bornyl caffeate, caffeic acid and IS in rat plasma (n = 6)

Compound	Concentration added (ng mL−1)	Extraction recovery%	RSD%	Matrix effect	RSD%
Bornyl caffeate	4	86.04 ± 3.77	4.37	10.89 ± 3.22	6.08
	200	87.34 ± 3.49	3.99	5.87 ± 1.98	2.67
	3000	81.63 ± 3.13	3.84	7.22 ± 5.43	1.59
Caffeic acid	4	92.25 ± 6.25	2.87	8.54 ± 2.73	2.73
	200	95.41 ± 3.57	3.75	8.38 ± 3.39	3.20
	3000	98.83 ± 3.08	3.21	9.49 ± 3.05	2.53
IS	160	89.62 ± 1.74	1.94	4.78 ± 2.09	1.37

Stability

The results of stability examination were listed in Table 3. It implied that bornyl caffeate and CA have a good stability under the extracting and storaging conditions. Bornyl caffeate and CA were stable in plasma at room temperature for 24 h, at −20 °C for 3 weeks, or in autosampler for 24 h. After three freeze–thaw cycles, bornyl caffeate and CA displayed little stability changes.

Stability of bornyl caffeate and caffeic acid in rat plasma (n = 6)

Compounds	Concentration added (ng mL−1)	Freeze–thaw		Short-term		Long-term		Autosampler stability
		Concentration measured (ng mL−1)	Stability (%)	Concentration measured (ng mL−1)	Stability (%)	Concentration measured (ng mL−1)	Stability (%)	Concentration measured (ng mL−1)	Stability (%)
Bornyl caffeate	4	3.77 ± 0.14	94.29	3.97 ± 0.15	99.38	4.03 ± 0.18	100.79	3.97 ± 0.12	99.25
	200	202.1 ± 6.48	101.05	196.41 ± 4.57	98.2	197.22 ± 6.86	98.61	193.54 ± 9.16	96.77
	3000	2835.08 ± 9.86	94.23	3009.81 ± 6.45	100.33	2990.99 ± 4.97	99.7	2966.96 ± 11.78	98.89
Caffeic acid	4	3.77 ± 0.14	94.29	3.97 ± 0.15	99.38	4.03 ± 0.18	100.79	3.93 ± 0.16	98.25
	200	202.1 ± 6.48	101.05	196.41 ± 4.57	98.2	197.22 ± 6.86	98.61	191.9 ± 6.19	95.95
	3000	2835.08 ± 9.86	94.23	3009.81 ± 6.45	100.33	2990.99 ± 4.97	99.7	2991.17 ± 12.48	99.7

Identification of bornyl caffeate in plasma

Under the proposed conditions, the retention time of bornyl caffeate was 78.3 min (Fig. 4s†). The full-scan mass spectrum of the drug presented a deprotonated ion [M − H]− at m/z 315.1602 (Fig. 4s†). This father ion yielded daughter ions at m/z 179.0355, 161.0253 and 134.0379. The ion of 179.0355 was recognized as CA. The heterolytic cleavage of the C–O ester bond of the quasi-molecular ion produced a loss of 154 Da (C10H18O, bornyl ester group), which generated the daughter ion of m/z 161.0253. As reported in the literature,[14,17,23] the phenyl caffeate derivatives, phenylethyl and benzyl has showed a common negative fragment at m/z 161 in negative mode. The other fragment ion at m/z 134.0379 was yield from the product ion at m/z 179.0355 by the loss of COOH. These MS/MS patterns were in good line with the precursor studies,[14,17] thus, they were considerable as diagnostic ions to identify the metabolites of bornyl caffeate.

Identification of the metabolites

Full-scan mass spectra of rat plasma, urine and feces after administration of bornyl caffeate and the corresponding blank samples were illustrated in Fig. 5s.† The parent drug and 30 main metabolites were screened by comparing the full-scan mass spectra of the drug in biosamples with that of the control samples (Fig. 5s†). A total of 14 phase I metabolites (M3–M13) were observed as the products due to reactions of hydrolysis, dehydroxylation, oxidation and reduction. Typical drug conjugates were used as filter templates and designed to detect different classes of conjugated metabolites. Considering the characteristics of bornyl caffeate and known common metabolic pathways, glucuronide, sulfate, glycine and O-methylation were selected as the conjugate filters. Besides of the phase I reactions, this work attributed a total of 16 metabolites (M1a–M2b, M12a–M19b) to the effect of phase II. Their retention times, proposed elemental compositions, parent ions, characteristic fragments and the mass error between theoretical and measured values were listed in Table 5. As shown in Fig. 5s,† M9a was found in rat feces alone, while the parent drug (bornyl caffeate, M0) and eleven metabolites named M3, M4, M5, M6, M14b, M15a, M15b, M17a, M17b, M18a, M18b were observed in all the three kinds of samples. Except these compounds, the other metabolites were detected in rat urine. The structures of these metabolites were revealed on the basis of the accurate mass measurement, relevant drug biotransformation knowledge and the fragmentation pattern of the parent compound. Identification details of these compounds were enclosed in support materials (Fig. 4s†).

HPLC/Q-TOF/MS and HPLC/Q-TOF-MS/MS analysis of bornyl caffeate and its metabolites in ratsa

Metabolite	t R (min)	Elemental composition	Assigned identify	Calculated mass m/z	Measured mass m/z	Error (ppm)	Fragment ions	Metabolic pathway	Location
M0	78.3	C19H24O4	Caffeic acid bornyl ester	315.1602	315.1602	0	179.0355, 161.0253, 134.0379	Parent	p, u, f
Phase II metabolites of bornyl caffeate
M1a	73.7	C25H32O10	Bornyl 3-(3-O-glucuronyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-2-acrylic acid	491.1923	491.1923	1.49	315.1569, 179.0315, 175.0238, 161.0239, 134.0348, 113.0348, 85.0284	Glucuronidation	p, u
M1b	74.7	C25H32O10	Bornyl 3-(3-hydroxyphenyl-4-O-glucuronyl)-2-acrylic acid	491.1923	491.1925	2.61	315.1587, 179.0305, 161.0219, 134.0339, 113.0364, 85.0287	Glucuronidation	p, u
M2a	73.6	C26H34O10	Bornyl 3-(3-O-glucuronyl-4-O-methyl)-2-acrylic acid	505.2079	505.2085	−2.90	329.1806, 315.1627, 175.0258, 113.0264, 85.0313	O-Methylation + glucuronidation	p, u
M2b	74.7	C26H34O10	Bornyl 3-(3-O-methyl-4-O-glucuronyl)-2-acrylic acid	505.2079	505.2086	0.69	329.1756, 315.1581, 175.0272, 113.0248, 85.0302	O-Methylation + glucuronidation	p, u
Degradation product of bornyl caffeate
M3	29.9	C9H8O4	Caffeic acid[24–29]	179.0350	179.0355	0.31	135.0461	Hydrolysis	p, u, f
Phase I metabolites of caffeic acid
M4	23.0	C9H10O4	Dihydrocaffeic acid[27,28]	181.0506	181.0508	−2.51	163.0433, 136.9874	Reduction	p, u, f
M5	35.5	C9H10O3	m-Hydrophenyl propionic acid[30,31,33]	165.0557	165.0551	−2.23	147.0428, 121.0647, 106.0408, 77.0407	Dehydroxylated + reduction	p, u, f
M6	39.2	C9H8O3	m-Coumaric acid[32]	163.0401	163.0401		119.0502	Dehydroxylated	p, u, f
M7	20.5	C9H9 N O4	m-Hydroxy hippuric acid[32]	194.0459	194.0458	0.56	150.0552, 93.0348	Dehydroxylated + reduction + glycine	u, f
M8	42.9	C7H6O2	Benzoic acid[34]	121.0295	121.0292	−1.96	77.0402	-2C + dehydroxylated	u, f
M9a	33.4	C10H12O4	Dihydroferulic acid (DHFA)[28]	195.0663	195.0661	−8.48	178.0286, 151.0751, 136.0535, 119.9982	Reduction	f
M9b	37.6	C10H12O4	Dihydroisoferulic acid (DHiFA)[28]	195.0663	195.0663	−8.13	178.0279, 151.0763, 136.0527, 119.9979	Reduction	u, f
M10a	28.2	C10H12O7 S	Dihydroferulic-3-O-sulfate[28]	275.0230	275.0230	−9.16	195.0668, 177.0563, 151.0771, 136.0535, 123.0456, 79.9588	Reduction + sulfation	u, f
M10b	29.9	C10H12O7 S	Dihydroferulic-4-O-sulfate[28]	275.0231	275.0235	1.94	195.0670, 177.0571, 151.0785, 136.0547, 123.0462, 79.9590	Reduction + sulfation	u, f
M11a	24.5	C16H20O10	Dihydroferulic-3-O-glucuronide[28]	371.0984	371.0986	0.6	195.0662, 177.0554, 175.0251, 133.0661, 113.0256, 85.0308	Reduction + glucuronidation	u
M11b	27.4	C16H20O10	Dihydroferulic-4-O-glucuronide[28]	371.0984	371.0987	1.48	195.0709, 177.0588, 175.0274, 133.0682, 113.0268, 85.0325	Reduction + glucuronidation	u
M12	22.2	C8H8O4	Vanillic acid[34–36]	167.0350	167.0352	−6.12	152.0144, 123.0455, 108.0257, 77.0411	-2C	u, f
M13	23.4	C10H11NO5	Vaniloyglycine[34,37]	224.0564	224.0558	−9.84	180.0643, 165.0409, 123.0433, 100.0040, 74.0230	-2C + glycine	u
Phase II metabolites of caffeic acid
M14a	31.71	C10H10O4	Ferulic acid (FA)[25,26]	193.0506	193.0501	−1.71	178.0258, 149.0602, 134.0368	O-Methylation	p, u
M14b	42.5	C10H10O4	Isoferulic acid (IFA)[25,26]	193.0506	193.0505	−0.67	178.0262, 149.0597, 134.0365	O-Methylation	p, u, f
M15a	26.8	C9H8O7S	Caffeic acid 3-sulfate[28]	258.9918	258.9919	−0.57	179.0345, 135.0443, 96.9598	Sulfation	p, u, f
M15b	29.9	C9H8O7S	Caffeic acid 4-sulfate[28]	258.9918	258.9914	1.48	179.0341, 135.0446, 96.9584	Sulfation	p, u, f
M16a	22.8	C15H16O10	Caffeic acid 3-O-glucuronide[28]	355.0671	355.0665	0.56	311.0758, 179.0344, 175.0248, 135.0455, 113.0250, 85.0309	Glucuronidation	p, u
M16b	25.6	C15H16O10	Caffeic acid 4-O-glucuronide[28]	355.0671	355.0680	−1.64	311.0799, 179.0368, 175.0264, 135.0441, 113.0258, 85.0290	Glucuronidation	p, u
M17a	33.2	C16H18O10	3-(3-Methoxy-4-O-glucuronyl-phenyl)crylic acid[24,29]	369.0827	369.0825	−0.61	193.0474, 178.0241, 149.0617, 134.0399, 113.0227, 85.0283	O-Methylation + glucuronidation	p, u, f
M17b	35.2	C16H18O10	3-(3-O-Glucuronyl-4-methoxy-phenyl)crylic acid[24,29]	369.0827	369.0826	0.51	193.0490, 178.0267, 175.0233, 149.0678, 134.0367, 113.0267, 85.0295	O-Methylation + glucuronidation	p, u, f
M18a	31.7	C10H10O7S	Ferulic-4-O-sulfate[28]	273.0074	273.0072	0.15	193.0501, 178.0266, 149.0603, 134.0371, 96.9602	O-methylation + sulfation	p, u, f
M18b	34.2	C10H10O7S	Isoferulic-3-O-sulfate[28]	273.0074	273.0075	0.91	193.0508, 178.0265, 149.0405, 134.0369, 96.9608	O-Methylation + sulfation	p, u, f
M19a	20.2	C12H13NO5	Feruloylglycine[34,38]	250.0721	250.0721	−10.88	206.0827, 191.0542, 177.0510, 163.0657, 149.0588, 134.0348, 100.0026, 79.9566	O-Methylation + glycine	u
M19b	28.2	C12H13NO5	Isoferuloyglycine[34,38]	250.0721	250.0726	−11.91	206.0815, 191.0540, 177.0534, 163.0610, 149.0602, 134.0383, 100.0039, 79.9607	O-Methylation + glycine	u

Analysis was performed on plasma (p), urine (u) and feces (f) samples. Bornyl caffeate, bornyl 3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-2-acrylic acid.

Metabolic pathway of bornyl caffeate

Owning to the accurate mass measurement and MS/MS fragmentation information, the structures of bornyl caffeate and 30 metabolites were identified in rat plasma, urine and feces. Based on these structures, we proposed the metabolic pathway of bornyl caffeate as Fig. 5. O-Methylation or glucuronidation was firstly performed on the phenolic hydroxyl groups of bornyl caffeate to generate M1a–M2b. M3 was the phase I metabolite of the drug attributed to the hydrolysis at the ester bond. Subsequent metabolic reactions of M3 produced series further metabolites. The metabolic pathways involving in phase I reactions of M3 included hydrogenation (M4), dehydroxylation (M6), hydrogenation + dehydroxylation (M5), oxidation + dehydroxylation (M8), decarburization + glycine (M7), hydrogenation + O-methylation (M9a, M9b), hydrogenation + sulfation (M10a, M10b), hydrogenation + glucuronidation (M11a, M11b), O-methylation + decarburization (M12) and O-methylation + decarburization + glycine (M13) (Fig. 4).

Fig. 5

Proposed metabolic pathway and metabolites of bornyl caffeate.

Fig. 4

The extracted ion chromatograms (EICs) of in vivo metabolites M1 to M19 of bornyl caffeate in rat.

A survey of literature has showed that caffeic acid esters can be easily hydrolyzed to CA in vivo.[16,17] As a kind of caffeic acid ester, bornyl caffeate is composed of CA and borneol. We simultaneously examined the pharmacokinetics of bornyl caffeate and CA after administration of a single dose of bornyl caffeate. We investigated the pharmacokinetics of CA after single dose administration of the drug to elucidate the transformation from bornyl caffeate to CA in vivo. The mean concentration–time curves were presented in Fig. 3. The calculated pharmacokinetic parameters were listed in Table 4.

Fig. 3

Mean plasma concentration–time profile of bornyl caffeate, CA-metabolite and CA-ig (n = 6).

Pharmacokinetic parameters of bornyl caffeate (ig, 30 mg kg−1), CA (metabolite) and CA (ig, 17 mg kg−1) (n = 6)

Parameters	Bornyl caffeate	CA-metabolite	CA-ig
T 1/2α1 (h)	0.17 ± 0.04	0.24 ± 0.03	0.40 ± 0.09
T 1/2α2 (h)	0.79 ± 0.13	—	—
T 1/2β (h)	3.37 ± 0.24	3.56 ± 0.97	1.34 ± 0.22
AUC(0–t) (μg L−1 h)	1466.67 ± 67.76	1177.22 ± 77.37	786.84 ± 80.33
AUC(0–∞) (μg L−1 h)	1491.29 ± 66.42	1357.72 ± 76.85	820.77 ± 86.23
T max (h)	0.53 ± 0.28	0.37 ± 0.02	0.25 ± 0.01
T 1/2Ka (h)	0.18 ± 0.09	0.14 ± 0.05	0.12 ± 0.03
C max (ng mL−1)	409.33 ± 92.94	414.42 ± 9.81	450.07 ± 13.8

Bornyl caffeate presented a pharmacokinetic profile of a three-compartment open model. The Cmax of bornyl caffeate was 409.33 ± 92.94 ng mL−1, with a Tmax of 0.53 ± 0.28 h after oral administration. The half-life for distribution (T1/2α1 and T1/2α2)and elimination (T1/2β) were 0.17 ± 0.04, 0.79 ± 0.13 and 3.37 ± 0.24 h, respectively. These results demonstrated that the drug has the properties of fast absorption from gastrointestinal tract into blood circulatory system, and has the capacity to act quickly. The AUC0–∞ and AUC0– were determined to be 1491.29 ± 66.42 and 1466.67 ± 67.76 μg L−1 h. The ratio of the AUC value was below 120%, providing a proof of rationale time-points of blood collection for the pursuit of pharmacokinetic investigation.

Discussion

Method development

To obtain an efficient and sensitive qualitative analysis method for analyzing bornyl caffeate and caffeic acid, the conditions of mobile phase and MS were optimized. We compared the different kinds of mobile phase, such as formic acid and ammonium formate. When the mobile phase was formic acid, the peak intensities of analytes were 2.3 times more intense than those of the ammonium formate. Therefore, we selected the formic acid as the mobile phase. Subsequently, different percentages of formic acid (0.05, 0.1, 0.2%, v/v) were added to mobile phase to compare the sensitivity of the analytes. When the percentage of formic acid was 0.1% (v/v), the peak intensities of analytes were 1.1 and 1.2 times more intense than those in the mobile phase containing 0.05% and 0.2% formic acid, respectively. Ultimately, a solvent system consisting of 0.1% formic acid in water and methanol was selected for gradient elution. Besides that, we compared different fragmentor voltages (115 V, 125 V, 135 V, 145 V, 155 V) to optimum the sensitivity of the analytes. When the fragmentor voltage was 135 V, the peak area of analytes were 3.8, 3.6, 3.6, and 3.2 times intense than those whose fragmentor voltages were 115 V, 125 V, 145 V, 155 V.

Conjugation with glucuronidation, sulfation, O-methylation and glycine were the predominant phase II metabolic reactions. A total of 16 phase II metabolites were identified in plasma, urine and feces after dosing bornyl caffeate. Besides of M1 and M2, the other phase II metabolites were formed from M3. The phase II metabolic pathways of M3 included O-methylation (M14a, M14b), sulfation (M15a, M15b), glucuronidation (M16a, M16b), O-methylation + glucuronidation (M17a, M17b), O-methylation + sulfation (M18a, M18b) and O-methylation + glycine (M19a, M19b). Although the metabolites conjugation reaction with glycine was not demonstrable in plasma, these metabolites served as major components in urine. This result agreed well with previous research.[38] The other phase II metabolites produced by conjugation reactions with glucuronidation, sulfation and O-methylation were detectable in plasma. Phase I and phase II biotransformation of bornyl caffeate mainly involved in reduction, oxidation, hydrolysis, glucuronidation, sulfation, O-methylation and glycine. In these reactions, the polarity of the metabolites proved to be enhanced, which was promising for their elimination from the body.

A total of 30 metabolites were identified in this research. Among them, 17 were detected in plasma, 29 in urine, 19 in feces. The urine presented 10 metabolites more than that in feces. Among them, 4 metabolites of bornyl caffeate (M1a, M1b, M2a, M2b) and 4 metabolites of caffeic acid (M7, M13, M19a, M19b) were only detectable in urine. Different from the monoglucuronidation product of caffeic acid (M16a, Ma16b) in urine, both glucuronidated and methylated metabolite (M17a, M17b) presented in feces. Taking together, we concluded that the renal route of excretion was the main excretion pathway for bornyl caffeate and its metabolites. The conjugated products of bornyl caffeate with glucuronidation, sulfation and O-methylation were detected in plasma, urine and feces. They were believed to be catalyzed by glucuronosyltransferase, methyltransferase and sulfotransferase. Caffeic acid (CA, M3), hydrolyzed from bornyl caffeate by hydrolytic enzymes, was recognized in plasma, urine and feces. A. N. Booth et al. had demonstrated that some metabolites of caffeic acid conjugated with glycine in vitro, and then he verified that these metabolites can be detected in urine when it was administrated to humans and rats.[33] In this research, the glycine of bornyl caffeate (M7, M13, M19a, M19b) were mainly detected in urine. This finding was in accordance with the previous studies.[34,37,38] The dehydroxylated metabolites (M5, M6, M7, M8) were catalyzed by dehydroxylated enzymes.[41] M4 and M9a, M9b may be produced by CA and M14a, M14b under the action of hydrogenation enzyme and reductase.[42] M8 was detected in urine and feces, which was formed by dehydroxylation step and then beta-oxidation from CA.[34] M12 was generated by the beta-oxidation from M14a. It generated M13 by direct conjugation with glycine.[34]

After administration of bornyl caffeate, CA (the main metabolite) presented a pharmacokinetic profile of a two-compartment open model. This finding was in accordance with the results of CA administrated alone the declaration in previous reports.[40] By comparing the mean concentration–time curves of bornyl caffeate and its metabolite (CA), we concluded that bornyl caffeate is easy to form CA through hydrolyzation in vivo. Compared with CA administration alone, the metabolite (CA) exhibited clear changes of pharmacokinetic parameters when equimolar bornyl caffeate was administrated. The parameters of T1/2β, AUC0–∞, AUC0– and Tmax increased significantly, while T1/2α decreased obviously. The elimination of T1/2α and the growth of T1/2β indicated that bornyl caffeate enable sits main metabolite (CA) to act quickly and last longer in vivo. The increase of AUC values and the identical Cmax suggested that bornyl caffeate is capable of improving CA absorption but without increase the toxic dose. Taking together, we concluded that bornyl caffeate has potential to become a lead compound.

Conclusion

In this work, a sensitive, selective and reliable HPLC-Ion-Trap-MS/MS method was developed and validated for the quantitation of bornyl caffeate and CA in rats. Successful application of the method was confirmed by pharmacokinetic study of these substances. Bornyl caffeate proved to act quickly and last a long therapeutic effects. The metabolites of bornyl caffeate were tentatively identified in rat plasma, urine and feces samples by HPLC-Q-TOF/MS. To our knowledge, this is the first study to establish the metabolism profile of the substance by HPLC-Q-TOF/MS. These results are helpful and lay a solid foundation for investigating the metabolism and the pharmacological effect of bornyl caffeate. The biotransformation of the substance will provide scientific basis for elucidating the pharmacological activity and toxicity of bornyl caffeate in vivo.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.