| Literature DB >> 35518013 |
Jing Zhou1, Huacong Zhao1, Luyao Chen1, Xiaowei Xing1, Tingmei Lv1, Xinyi Yang1, Qinan Wu1, Jinao Duan1, Hongyue Ma1.
Abstract
The population of Bufo bufo gargarizans Cantor in China has been alarmingly declining due to environmental pollution. Deltamethrin is a pyrethroid pesticide frequently used in agriculture and much of its residues are present in crops, soil and water. Deltamethrin has been shown to have toxicity to toads. Herein, we assumed that deltamethrin contamination might influence the biosynthesis of toxic substances present in toad venom. Bufadienolides present in venom are the toad's chemical defense and highly toxic to predators, and they are important for the survival of toad species against predators. In this study, we determined the contents of bufadienolides in toad venom using a HPLC-triple quadrupole mass spectrometer to evaluate the change in bufadienolide profiles in toad venom before and after cutaneous exposure to deltamethrin. The results indicated that toads exposed to high concentration of deltamethrin survive the least, do not exuviate, and their movements are stiff. Furthermore, it was observed that high level of deltamethrin contamination induces a marked decrease in the levels of toxic bufadienolides in toad venom. These changes in the toxin profiles could lead to the compromised chemical defense of toad, leading to more susceptible to attack by predators. This is the first study to report that environmental contaminants (pesticides) can influence the toad's toxic profiles, suggesting one factor contributing to the decline in the population of B. bufo gargarizans Cantor. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 35518013 PMCID: PMC9059647 DOI: 10.1039/c8ra07871h
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Fig. 1Skeletons of bufadienolides and chemical structure of deltamethrin.
Chemical structures of bufadienolides in toad venom
| Trivial name | Skeleton | Substituent group |
|---|---|---|
| Bufalin | a | R1 |
| Bufotalin | a | R1 |
| Desacetylbufotalin | a | R1 |
| Resibufogenin | b | R1 |
| Cinobufagin | b | R1 |
| Cinobufotalin | b | R1 |
| Arenobufagin | c | R1 |
Fig. 2(Left) Total ion current (TIC) chromatogram of Venenum Bufonis (Chansu) by UPLC-MS. (Right) The MS/MS spectrum of bufotalin for the [M + H]+ ion at m/z 445, [M + H–HOAc]+ ion at m/z 385, [M + H–HOAc–H2O]+ ion at m/z 367 and [M + H–HOAc–3H2O]+ ion at m/z 349.
The standard curve, sensitivity precision, stability and accuracy of seven bufadienolide compounds detected by MRM (n = 6)
| Analytes | Calibration curves |
| Linear range (ng mL−1) | LOD (ng mL−1) | LOQ (ng mL−1) | Precision (RSD, %) | Repeatability (RSD, %) | Stability (RSD, %) | Recovery (%), (2000 ng mL−1) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intra-day | Inter-day | S1 | S1 | RSD | Mean | ||||||
| Resibufogenin |
| 0.9981 | 40–500 | 6.86 | 22.86 | 4.7 | 4.1 | 3.1 | 8.4 | 4.7 | 99 |
| Desacetylcinobufotalin |
| 0.9996 | 100–1000 | 26.14 | 87.14 | 6.0 | 5.9 | 5.8 | 4.6 | 3.8 | 102.2 |
| Arenobufagin |
| 0.9922 | 8–1000 | 1.53 | 5.10 | 7.3 | 3.8 | 5.8 | 3.7 | 7.1 | 103.8 |
| Cinobufagin |
| 0.9997 | 40–1000 | 6.32 | 21.05 | 8.8 | 6.8 | 4.2 | 6.1 | 7.5 | 102.3 |
| Bufotalin |
| 0.9998 | 40–1000 | 2.61 | 8.70 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 2.6 | 3.7 | 9.2 | 106.8 |
| Cinobufotalin |
| 0.9979 | 40–1000 | 1.74 | 5.80 | 4.8 | 5.5 | 5.7 | 5.8 | 6.3 | 95.1 |
| Bufalin |
| 0.9999 | 40–1000 | 1.51 | 5.03 | — | — | 5.2 | 5.8 | 4.4 | 112.8 |
Weight of toads and venom secreted by toads before and after exposure to different concentrations of deltamethrin
| Groups | Dose (g L−1) | Weight of toads (g) | Weight of venom (mg) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 66.8 ± 16.3 | 1.5 ± 0.8 | |
| Deltamethrin | 0.5 | 66.8 ± 13.5 | 1.25 ± 0.75 |
| 0.75 | 71.3 ± 14.2 | 1.25 ± 0.63 | |
| 1.0 | 73.9 ± 13.9 | 1.0 ± 0.5 |
The relative level of bufadienolides in toad venom secreted by deltamethrin-exposed toads and normal toads (mean ± SEM; n = 5–7)a
| Group | Dose (g L−1) | Resibufogenin | Cinobufagin | Bufalin | Bufotalin | Resibufagin | Hellebrigenin | Arenobufagin | Desacetylcinobufotalin | Gamabufotalin | Telocinobufagin | Desacetylcinobufagin | Cinobufotalin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 8.35 × 106 ± 5.01 × 106 | 4.55 × 107 ± 1.47 × 107 | 6.07 × 107 ± 1.62 × 107 | 8.45 × 107 ± 1.23 × 107 | 5.67 × 105 ± 6.42 × 105 | 7.62 × 103 ± 4.49 × 103 | 3.48 × 105 ± 1.28 × 105 | 2.34 × 105 ± 1.31 × 105 | 3.90 × 105 ± 4.16 × 105 | 6.68 × 105 ± 7.19 × 105 | 5.46 × 105 ± 2.82 × 105 | 4.70 × 106 ± 3.00 × 106 | |
| Deltamethrin | 0.5 | 6.11 × 106 ± 1.90 × 106 | 3.29 × 107 ± 8.12 × 106 | 4.41 × 107 ± 9.08 × 106* | 7.31 × 107 ± 1.63 × 107 | 1.88 × 105 ± 1.30 × 105 | 8.28 × 103 ± 6.78 × 103 | 5.37 × 105 ± 5.27 × 105 | 4.45 × 105 ± 5.74 × 105 | 2.15 × 105 ± 1.45 × 105 | 2.99 × 105 ± 1.52 × 105 | 3.36 × 105 ± 1.73 × 105 | 2.65 × 106 ± 1.59 × 106 |
| 0.75 | 5.41 × 106 ± 2.85 × 106 | 3.20 × 107 ± 8.30 × 106 | 4.20 × 107 ± 1.23 × 107* | 6.40 × 107 ± 1.18 × 107* | 9.25 × 104 ± 4.83 × 104 | 2.07 × 104 ± 2.11 × 104 | 2.52 × 105 ± 1.65 × 105 | 1.30 × 105 ± 1.23 × 105 | 1.72 × 105 ± 6.58 × 104 | 3.61 × 105 ± 1.22 × 105 | 3.38 × 105 ± 1.74 × 105 | 3.66 × 106 ± 1.79 × 106 | |
| 1.0 | 5.51 × 106 ± 3.16 × 106 | 2.59 × 107 ± 9.95 × 106* | 3.16 × 107 ± 1.22 × 107** | 5.28 × 107 ± 1.58 × 107** | 1.73 × 105 ± 2.13 × 105 | 5.09 × 103 ± 6.23 × 103 | 1.34 × 105 ± 5.27 × 104** | 1.05 × 105 ± 7.14 × 104 | 1.28 × 105 ± 1.27 × 105 | 2.10 × 105 ± 1.43 × 105 | 2.18 × 105 ± 1.08 × 105 | 1.99 × 106 ± 1.09 × 106 |
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, compared with control.
Fig. 3The percentages of bufadienolides in venom severed by normal and deltamethrin-exposed toads. Stacked bar graphs represent the percentages of bufadienolides in samples that were normal (blue), exposed to low dose of deltamethrin (orange), medium dose of deltamethrin (gray), and high dose of deltamethrin (yellow) groups.