| Literature DB >> 35518002 |
Nasrin Safajoo1, Bi Bi Fatemah Mirjalili1, Abdolhamid Bamoniri2.
Abstract
Fe3O4@nano-cellulose/Cu(ii) as a green bio-based magnetic catalyst was prepared through in situ co-precipitation of Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions in an aqueous suspension of nano-cellulose. The mentioned magnetically heterogeneous catalyst was characterized by FT-IR, XRD, VSM, FESEM, TEM, XRF, EDS and TGA. In this research, the synthesis of 4H-pyrimido[2,1-b]benzothiazole derivatives was developed via a three component reaction of aromatic aldehyde, 2-aminobenzothiazole and ethyl acetoacetate using Fe3O4@nano-cellulose/Cu(ii) under solvent-free condition at 80 °C. Some advantages of this protocol are good yields, environmentally benign, easy work-up and moderate reusability of the catalyst. The product structures were confirmed by FT-IR, 1H NMR, and 13C NMR spectra. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 35518002 PMCID: PMC9059560 DOI: 10.1039/c8ra09203f
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Scheme 1Synthesis protocol for Fe3O4@nano-cellulose/Cu(ii).
Fig. 1FT-IR spectra of (a) nano-cellulose, (b) Fe3O4 @ nano-cellulose and (c) Fe3O4@nano-cellulose/Cu(ii).
Fig. 2XRD pattern of Fe3O4@nano-cellulose/Cu(ii).
Fig. 3Magnetization loop of (a) Fe3O4 and (b) Fe3O4@nano-cellulose/Cu(ii).
Fig. 4(a) FESEM image of Fe3O4@nano-cellulose/Cu(ii) and (b) TEM of Fe3O4@nano-cellulose/Cu(ii).
Results of XRF analysis of catalyst, pure NaCl and CuSO4
| Elemental component | Fe3O4@nano-cellulose/Cu( | CuSO4 | NaCl | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KCPS | wt% | KCPS | wt% | KCPS | wt% | |
| CO2 | 1.5 | 74.8 | 0.2 | 13.3 | ||
| Fe2O3 | 1118.9 | 21.7 | 0.6 | 0.0174 | ||
| CuO | 19.5 | 1.45 | 563.9 | 41.2 | ||
| SiO2 | 2.8 | 0.796 | 0.1 | 0.0403 | ||
| Na2O | 0.9 | 0.573 | 0.2 | 0.218 | ||
| CaO | 4.3 | 0.190 | 0.2 | 0.00479 | ||
| I | 2.0 | 0.0799 | 1.2 | 0.145 | ||
| Cl | 1.0 | 0.0681 | 516.5 | 62 | ||
| Sb2O3 | 1.7 | 0.0606 | 0.7 | 0.0746 | ||
| Al2O3 | 0.2 | 0.0565 | ||||
| SO3 | 0.4 | 0.0523 | 184.8 | 43.7 | ||
| MnO | 2.2 | 0.0482 | ||||
| MgO | 0.2 | 0.0432 | 2.2 | 1.02 | ||
| SnO2 | 1.2 | 0.0340 | 0.7 | 0.0546 | ||
| Re | 0.7 | 0.0333 | 0.5 | 0.0585 | ||
| CoO | 2.2 | 0.0285 | ||||
| Cr2O3 | 0.4 | 0.0100 | ||||
| Pd | 0.1 | 0.00860 | ||||
| TiO2 | 0.3 | 0.00860 | ||||
| Rh | 0.1 | 0.00747 | ||||
| K2O | 0.2 | 0.00734 | ||||
| SrO | 0.5 | 0.00340 | ||||
| Ho2O3 | 0.4 | 0.0446 | ||||
| HfO2 | 1.8 | 0.0381 | ||||
| P2O5 | 0.1 | 0.0346 | ||||
| Rh | 0.1 | 0.0213 | ||||
| Total | 100 | 100 | ||||
Fig. 5EDS (EDX) spectra of Fe3O4@nano-cellulose/Cu(ii).
Fig. 6Thermal gravimetric analysis pattern of Fe3O4@nano-cellulose/Cu(ii).
The reaction of 2-aminobenzothiazole, 4-nitrobenzaldehyde, and ethyl acetoacetate in the presence of Fe3O4@nano-cellulose/Cu(ii) under various conditionsa
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | Solvent | Catalyst (g) | Condition | Time (h) | Yield |
| 1 | — | — | 80 °C | 7 h | 30 |
| 2 | — | CuCl2 | 80 °C | 3h | 69 |
| 3 | — | Fe3O4 | 70 °C | 3h | 37 |
| 4 | — | Fe3O4@nano-cellulose | 80 °C | 4 h | 41 |
| 5 | C2H5OH | — | R. T | 7 h | — |
| 6 | C2H5OH | Catalyst (0.04) | R. T | 3 h | 35 |
| 7 | C2H5OH | Catalyst (0.04) | Reflux | 3 h | 57 |
| 8 | H2O | Catalyst (0.04) | Reflux | 3 h | 42 |
| 9 | CH3OH | Catalyst (0.04) | Reflux | 3 h | 51 |
| 10 | — | Catalyst (0.04) | R. T | 3 h | 43 |
| 11 | — | Catalyst (0.04) | 70 °C | 1 h | 85 |
| 12 | — | Catalyst (0.05) | 80 °C | 0.5 | 93 |
| 13 | — | Catalyst (0.04) | 80 °C | 0.5 | 97 |
| 14 | — | Catalyst (0.03) | 80 °C | 0.5 | 97 |
| 15 | — | Catalyst (0.02) | 80 °C | 0.5 | 84 |
| 16 | — | Catalyst (0.03), 2thrun | 80 °C | 0.5 | 93 |
| 17 | — | Catalyst (0.03), 3rdrun | 80 °C | 0.5 | 88 |
| 18 | — | Catalyst (0.03), 4thrun | 80 °C | 0.5 | 83 |
The amount ratio of 2-aminobenzothiazole (mmol), 4-nitrobenzaldehyde (mmol) and ethyl acetoacetate (mmol) are equal to 1 : 1 : 1.
Isolated yield.
Fe3O4@ nano-cellulose/Cu(ii).
Comparative study of the present method and some other reported methods for synthesis of 4H-pyrimido[2,1-b]benzothiazole derivatives
| Ent. | Solvent | Catal. | Tem. (°C) | Time (h) | Yield | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CH3OH | Acetic acid (20 mol%) | 65 | 18 | 62 |
|
| 2 | EG | TBAHS (30 mol%) | 120 | 2 | 72 |
|
| 3 | HOAc | Chitosan (0.080 g) | 70 | 1.6 | 93 |
|
| 4 | — | TMGT (0.080 g) | 100 | 5 | 53 |
|
| 5 | — | AlCl3 (10 mol%) | 65 | 1.2 | 97 |
|
| 6 | — | Fe3O4@NCs/TiCl (0.03 g) | 70 | 0.6 | 96 |
|
| 7 | — | Fe3O4@ nano-cellulose/Cu( | 80 | 0.5 | 97 | This work |
Isolated yield.
Tetrabutylammonium hydrogen sulfate.
1,1,3,3-N,N,N′,N′-Tetramethylguanidinium trifluoroacetate.
Synthesis of 4H-pyrimido[2,1-b]benzothiazole derivatives (IVa–m) in the presence of Fe3O4@ nano-cellulose/Cu(ii) under solvent-free condition at 80 °Ca appear here with headings as appropriate
|
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ent. | R | Prod. | Time (min) | Yield | M. P. | Ref. | |
| Found | Report | ||||||
| 1 | H– | IVa | 45 | 84 | 178–180 | 177–179 |
|
| 2 | 4-NO2– | IVb | 30 | 97 | 171–173 | 170–172 |
|
| 3 | 4-Cl– | IVc | 30 | 95 | 87–89 | 86–88 |
|
| 4 | 4-Br– | IVd | 30 | 97 | 110–114 | 110–114 |
|
| 5 | 4-OH– | IVe | 60 | 82 | 210–212 | 210–212 |
|
| 6 | 2-NO2– | IVf | 45 | 88 | 122–125 | 122–125 |
|
| 7 | 2-Cl– | IVg | 40 | 87 | 124–126 | 125–127 |
|
| 8 | 2-EtO– | IVh | 60 | 75 | 171–175 | 171–175 |
|
| 9 | 3-NO2– | IVi | 35 | 93 | 222–224 | 222–224 |
|
| 10 | 3-OH– | IVj | 65 | 79 | 260–263 | 260–263 |
|
| 11 | 2,4-(Cl)2– | IVk | 45 | 85 | 133–135 | 133–135 |
|
| 12 | 2,4-(MeO)2– | IVl | 75 | 74 | 164–166 | 164–166 |
|
| 13 | 3,4-(OH)2– | IVm | 70 | 71 | 225–227 | 225–227 |
|
I (mmol) : II (mmol) : III (mmol) : Fe3O4@ nano-cellulose/Cu(ii) (g) is equal to 1 : 1 : 1 : 0.03.
Isolated yield.
Scheme 2Proposed mechanism for the synthesis of 4H-pyrimido [2,1-b]benzothiazole derivatives IVa–m.
| No. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pos. [°2 | 13.6815 | 16.4566 | 22.1853 | 29.1068 | 32.0094 | 34.2572 |
| FWHM [°2 | 0.6298 | 0.4723 | 0.2362 | 0.2362 | 0.3149 | 0.3149 |
| No. | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pos. [°2 | 35.7935 | 43.4246 | 45.7114 | 53.9425 | 57.5101 | 63.0810 |
| FWHM [°2 | 0.3936 | 0.7872 | 0.3149 | 0.9446 | 0.3149 | 0.9600 |