| Literature DB >> 35517596 |
Si Chen1,2, Bo Bai2,3,4, Yunhua He1,2, Na Hu3,4, Honglun Wang3,4, Yourui Suo3,4.
Abstract
A multitude of heteroatom-doped carbon adsorbents have been explored to cope with ever-growing organic pollution. However, development of these advanced carbon materials with adequate activity and stability remains challenging. Herein, unique 3D cage-like magnetic N-doped Fe3O4@C adsorbents were rationally constructed by a one-step pyrolysis of Prussian blue@yeast (PB@yeast) bio-templates. By using yeast as an available biological support, the prepared Fe3O4@C hybrids were demonstrated to provide a sufficient number of Fe, N and C atoms for the novel cage-like microstructures, making them a new type of Fe, N co-doped carbon absorbents with a facile preparation procedure and remarkable adsorption behavior. Rhodamine B (RhB) removal indicated that the prepared N-doped Fe3O4@C adsorbents displayed high adsorption capabilities in a near-neutral solution, and Fe3O4@C (1 : 0.11) exhibited a maximum adsorption capability of 257.06 mg g-1. More importantly, spent N-doped Fe3O4@C absorbents, which could be recovered by magnetic separation and cohesive persulfate (PS) activated photo-Fenton regeneration, showed excellent adsorption reusability and high stability even after 5 cycles. Overall, this paper presents a simple method for fabrication of a 3D cage-like magnetic N-doped Fe3O4@C adsorbent, which provides a significant guidance for the study of Fe, N co-doped carbon adsorbents towards dye wastewater treatment. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 35517596 PMCID: PMC9059510 DOI: 10.1039/c8ra08886a
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Scheme 1Schematic illustration of the formation of 3D cage-like N-doped Fe3O4@C adsorbent.
Fig. 1FE-SEM images of (a) naked yeast; (b) PB nanocubes; (c) PB@yeast (1 : 0.11) bio-template; (d) magnified details for PB@yeast (1 : 0.11) bio-template; (e) the sample Fe3O4@C (1 : 0.11); and (f) magnified details for Fe3O4@C (1 : 0.11).
Elemental composition of different products determined by EDS
| Sample | Weight percent (wt%) | Atomic percent (at%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | N | O | Fe | C | N | O | Fe | |
| Yeast-based sample | 64.94 | 10.90 | 11.99 | — | 76.91 | 11.07 | 10.66 | — |
| PB-based sample | 14.30 | — | — | 70.16 | 46.44 | — | — | 49.01 |
| Fe3O4@C (1 : 0.05) | 47.17 | 10.46 | 16.56 | 17.98 | 64.45 | 12.25 | 16.99 | 5.24 |
| Fe3O4@C (1 : 0.11) | 47.26 | 10.53 | 17.68 | 19.71 | 64.01 | 12.22 | 17.98 | 5.79 |
| Fe3O4@C (1 : 0.22) | 39.76 | 4.68 | 23.47 | 23.74 | 59.42 | 5.88 | 25.56 | 7.29 |
Fig. 2(a) Survey XPS spectrum of N-doped Fe3O4@C; High-resolution XPS spectra of N 1s in (b) N-doped Fe3O4@C and (c) yeast-based carbon; high-resolution XPS spectra of (d) C 1s; (e) Fe 2p and (f) O 1s in N-doped Fe3O4@C sample.
Fig. 3Characterization of N-doped Fe3O4@C: (a) XRD patterns; (b) FT-IR spectra; (c) N2 adsorption–desorption isotherm and pore size distribution curve (inset) and (d) zeta potential.
Fig. 4RhB adsorption performance of (a) Fe3O4@C adsorbents and (b) different predecessor-derived adsorbents. (c) Adsorption kinetics curves of Fe3O4@C (1 : 0.11). (d) Intra-particle diffusion model.
Adsorption isotherm parameters for RhB adsorption on different adsorbents
| Sample | Langmuir model | Freundlich model | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| 1/ |
|
| |
| Fe3O4@C (1 : 0.05) | 206.19 | 0.0439 | 0.9961 | 0.4019 | 9.0635 | 0.9824 |
| Fe3O4@C (1 : 0.11) | 257.06 | 0.0343 | 0.9961 | 0.4874 | 8.5676 | 0.9733 |
| Fe3O4@C (1 : 0.22) | 171.53 | 0.0442 | 0.9955 | 0.3575 | 9.0228 | 0.9873 |
Fig. 5(a) Adsorption capacity at 10, 25, 40, and 55 °C; (b) the linear plots of ln KCvs. 1/T and ln(1 − θ) vs. 1/T for RhB adsorption on Fe3O4@C (1 : 0.11) at 10, 25, 40, and 55 °C. (c) Effect of pH; (d) effects of ionic strength and urea.
Thermodynamic parameters for RhB adsorption on Fe3O4@C (1 : 0.11)
|
| Δ | Δ | Δ |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | −3.42 | 92.40 | 22.73 | 18.95 | 0.0395 |
| 25 | −4.81 | ||||
| 40 | −6.19 | ||||
| 55 | −7.58 |
Fig. 6(a) Adsorption capacity and (b) adsorption efficiency of Fe3O4@C (1 : 0.11) for RhB removal in five consecutive adsorption–reduction cycles. Inset: images of RhB solution and the magnetic separation after adsorption.