Au@PdAg core-shell nanotubes as advanced electrocatalysts for methanol electrooxidation in alkaline media.

Developing active and cost-effective electrocatalysts for methanol electrooxidation is crucial to the commercialization of direct methanol fuel cells (DMFCs). In this study, Au@PdAg core-shell nanotubes are synthesized in an aqueous solution by sequential galvanic displacement between Ag nanowires and AuCl4 - and PdCl4 2-. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy studies demonstrate that the obtained Au@PdAg nanotubes consist of a Au-rich interior that is encapsulated with a three-dimensionally dendritic, porous PdAg alloy shell, forming a core-sheath nanostructure. Electrochemical studies indicate that the as-prepared Au@PdAg nanotubes exhibit apparent electrocatalytic activity and stability towards methanol electrooxidation in alkaline media. This remarkable high performance can be attributed to their large specific surface area and unique porous morphology. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.

Introduction

Direct methanol fuel cells (DMFCs) have drawn a surge of interest over recent decades due to their high power density, high energy-conversion efficiency, and zero or low emission of pollutants.[1-4] Pt-based nanostructured materials have been used as the leading catalysts for methanol electrooxidation in DMFCs.[5-9] However, there are two major disadvantages with Pt-based anodic catalysts. Firstly, the catalyst surface can be easily poisoned by the strong adsorption of CO-like intermediates during the oxidation of methanol fuel, which greatly lowers the catalytic performance.[10,11] Secondly, the high costs and limited supply of Pt seriously hinder its widespread applications in fuel cells. As a viable alternative, Pd-based catalysts have been attracting much attention in recent years due to their high abundance, good electrocatalytic activities and great resistance to CO poisoning for methanol oxidation in alkaline environment.[12-15]

In recent research, it has been shown that the fabrication of multimetallic Pd-based alloy nanostructures is an attractive way to improve the electrocatalytic performance, due largely to the synergistic interactions between the components.[16,17] This also addresses the cost and stability issues by the incorporation of economical and robust metal components into the catalysts.[18-20] In addition, it is well-known that the electrocatalytic performance highly depends on the shape as well as surface structure, size and composition of the catalysts.[21-23] Accordingly, the preparation of architecturally controlled multimetallic Pd-based alloy electrocatalysts is of great significance for further improvement of their electrocatalytic activity. In the past decades, there have been a number of studies on the synthesis of Pd-based electrocatalysts with well-defined morphologies, such as concave polyhedral structures, nanosheets, nanorings, right bipyramids, and nanoboxes.[24-28] Among these, one-dimensional tubular structures with a nanometer-sized wall are particularly attractive, not only because of the high surface area, but also for the reduced vulnerability than small nanoparticles to dissolution, Ostwald ripening, and aggregation.[29,30] Meanwhile, extensive research has demonstrated that multimetallic nanocatalysts can significantly improve the catalytic activity resulting from the synergistic interactions between the different metallic components. For example, Guo et al. reported the preparation of PtPd bimetallic nanotubes with a petal-like surface, which exhibited apparent activity and stability toward ethanol electrooxidation.[31] Han and co-workers reported the synthesis of PtPdAg ternary alloy nanotubes with a nanoporous framework, which exhibited superior electrocatalytic activity and stability over commercial Pd/C catalyst toward ethanol electrooxidation.[32] As such, nanotubes that consist of multiple metallic components are promising platforms for enhancing the electrocatalytic performance of Pd-based electrocatalysts.[33,34]

Despite extensive efforts in the synthesis of Pd-based nanocatalysts with well-defined morphologies, it remains a synthetic challenge to integrate a well-defined composition and architecture into a given multimetallic Pd-based nanostructure, due to the difficulty of controlling the reduction kinetics of multiple metal precursors of different redox potentials. Therefore, it is essential to develop an efficient and straightforward synthetic route to prepare multimetallic Pd-based nanotubes with a desirable structure to further optimize their electrocatalytic performance. Galvanic displacement, as a fast and simple route for the preparation of nanoalloy catalysts, has been used to synthesize an excellent electrocatalyst with high mass activities and good long-term durability.[35] However, to the best of our knowledge, Au@PdAg core–shell nanotubes with a nanoporous framework have not been reported before by using this method.

In this work, trimetallic Pd-based core–shell nanotubes with a nanoporous framework, Au@PdAg core–shell nanotubes (Au@PdAg-NTs), were synthesized by a facile and cost-effective method based on sequential galvanic displacement reactions between Ag nanowires and AuCl4− and PdCl42−. The morphology, crystal structure and composition of the obtained samples were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), and X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements. Moreover, electrochemical tests were carried out to analyze the electrocatalytic activity towards methanol oxidation in alkaline media. The results show that Au@PdAg-NTs might serve as promising electrocatalysts for high-performance alkaline DMFCs.

Experimental section

Materials

Ethylene glycol ((CH2OH)2), sodium chloride (NaCl), poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) (PVP, K-30), silver nitrate (AgNO3), chloroauric acid (HAuCl4), sodium tetrachloropalladate (Na2PdCl4), ethanol (CH3CH2OH), methanol (CH3OH), and potassium hydroxide (KOH) were all purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagents Co., Ltd. Pd/C commercial catalyst (10 wt%) and Nafion solution (1 wt% in ethanol) were obtained from Alfa Aesar and DuPont, respectively. All chemicals were used as received without any treatment. Water was supplied by a water purifier system (18.2 MΩ cm). All chemicals were of analytical grade.

Synthesis of Au@PdAg core–shell nanotubes

In a typical procedure, 2.5 mL of ethylene glycol and 0.11 mL of a NaCl solution (20 mM in ethylene glycol) were refluxed at 160 °C for 1 h under vigorous stirring. After that, 2.23 mL of a AgNO3 solution (0.1 M in ethylene glycol) and 2.23 mL of a PVP solution (0.3 M in ethylene glycol) were injected into the above solution at a rate of 20 mL h−1, simultaneously. The reaction mixture continued to be refluxed at 160 °C for another 45 min, resulting in an opaque gray solution, signifying the formation of Ag nanowires.[36] After the mixture solution was cooled down to 5 °C, 40 mL of pure water and 100 mL of a freshly prepared HAuCl4 solution (0.294 mM in pure water) were added dropwise into suspension, which was under stirring at 5 °C for 12 h. Then, 100 mL of a freshly prepared Na2PdCl4 solution (0.588 mM in pure water) was added dropwise into the above suspension, and stirred for another 12 h at room temperature. During the entire synthetic process, the reaction solution was under magnetic stirring and the flask was capped with a glass stopper except for the addition of reagent. The final solution was centrifuged at a rate of 3000 rpm for 10 min to remove the supernatant. The product was washed with a saturated NaCl solution three times to remove the AgCl byproduct that might have settled on the samples. Finally, the products, Au@PdAg-NTs, were centrifuged and washed with H2O until the supernatant was clear and dispersed in H2O (1 mg mL−1) for further use.

Materials characterization

XRD (Bruker D8 advance X-ray diffractometer, Cu-Kα radiation, λ = 0.154059 nm at 40 kV and 40 mA, 2θ range of 25–90°, scan rate 10° min−1) and field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, HITACHI S-4800) studies were carried out to examine the structure and morphology of Au@PdAg-NTs. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) measurements were performed with a FEI Tecnai G2 F20 S-TIWN transmission electron microscope operated at 200 kV.

Electrochemical tests

Electrochemical measurements were conducted with an electrochemical workstation (CHI 660D, CH Instruments Inc.) using a three-electrode configuration. The working electrode was prepared by pipetting a 30 μL aliquot of the catalyst ink (prepared by ultrasonically mixing 20 μL of the electrocatalyst and 10 μL of the Nafion solution) on the surface of a cleaned glassy carbon electrode, which was dried at room temperature. The electrodes prepared from Au@PdAg-NTs and Pd/C commercial catalysts were denoted as Au@PdAg-NTs/GC and Pd/C/GC, respectively. The counter electrode was a Pt foil. Hg/HgO (1 M KOH) was used as the reference electrode, which was calibrated against a reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE), and all potentials reported in this paper were referred to the RHE. Cyclic voltammetric (CV) measurements were performed in a 1 M KOH solution with or without 1 M methanol at room temperature in the potential range of −0.9 to +0.4 V at the potential sweep rate of 50 mV s−1. Linear sweep voltammetric (LSV) studies were conducted in a 1 M KOH + 1 M CH3OH solution between −0.9 to +0.4 V at different temperatures at a potential scan rate of 50 mV s−1. Chronoamperometric (CA) analysis was conducted at −0.25 V in 1 M KOH + 1 M CH3OH at room temperature for 1000 s.

Results and discussion

Structural characterization

The structure and the composition of Au@PdAg-NTs were first examined by SEM and TEM measurements. As depicted in Fig. S1,† the original Ag nanowires exhibited a diameter of about 100 nm, length of about 3 μm and a smooth surface. Yet, after galvanic replacement reaction with AuCl4− and PdCl42−, the resultant Au@PdAg-NTs show an obvious hollow tubular structure with a rough and porous wall, with a diameter of 160 to 180 nm, length of 1 to 2 μm, and an average wall thickness of approximately 10 nm, as manifested in SEM (Fig. 1a) and TEM (Fig. 1b) studies.[37-39]

Fig. 1

(a) SEM and (b and c) TEM images of as-synthesized Au@PdAg-NTs. Inset to panel (b) is the electron diffraction pattern of the Au@PdAg-NTs. (d) HAADF-STEM image and (e) the corresponding EDS cross-sectional composition line profiles of Au@PdAg-NT. (f) and (g) High-magnification HRTEM images of the corresponding red regions in (c). (h) STEM image and (i–l) the corresponding elemental maps of a section of Au@PdAg-NT.

The electron diffraction patterns (inset to Fig. 1b) suggest good crystallinity of Au@PdAg-NTs. In fact, the HRTEM image in Fig. 1c shows well-defined crystalline lattice fringes in Au@PdAg-NTs. Upon closer inspection, there appear to be two major types of lattice fringes, as exemplified by the dashed boxes marked as “f” and “g”: one with an interplanar spacing of 0.235 nm (Fig. 1f) that is consistent with that of the (111) planes of fcc Au (0.235 nm),[40] and the other with an interplanar spacing of 0.230 nm and 0.199 nm (Fig. 1g), which are between the lattice spacing of (111) and (002) planes of pure Ag and pure Pd,[40,41] indicating the formation of PdAg alloy. The formation of PdAg alloy can also be confirmed by XPS analysis (Fig. S3†). This suggests that the sample mostly consisted of a gold-rich interior and a PdAg alloy dendritic shell.[42] Consistent results of the elemental distribution were obtained in HAADF-STEM measurements (Fig. 1d), where linear scans of the cross-sectional profiles (Fig. 1e) and elemental mapping measurements (Fig. 1h–l) showed that the wall of Au@PdAg-NTs was rich in Au in the interior and PdAg alloy on the surface.

The crystalline phase of the obtained sample was then analyzed by powder XRD measurements. From Fig. 2, it can be seen that Au@PdAg-NTs exhibited broad XRD patterns, likely due to the nanocrystalline nature of the material, with four dominant diffraction peaks at ca. 38.5°, 44.6°, 65.1° and 78.1°, which are again in the intermediate between those of pure Pd (JCPDS card no. 65-6174, pink) and Ag (JCPDS card no. 65-8428, in green)/Au (JCPDS card no. 65-8601, blue), suggesting the formation of PdAg and/or PdAu alloy. It should also be noted that the ratio of the peak intensity of the (111) and (200) diffractions, I(111)/I(200), was estimated to be 3.76 for Au@PdAg-NTs, much larger than that (2.22) of bulk Pd (JCPDS no. 65-6174), suggesting preferential orientation along the (111) direction in Au@PdAg-NTs. In addition, in EDS analysis (Fig. S2†), Pd, Au and Ag can be readily identified in Au@PdAg-NTs, in good agreement with the above XRD results. From the EDS data, it can also be found that the atomic ratio of the Pd, Au and Ag is about 27 : 17 : 56.

Fig. 2

XRD patterns of the as-synthesized Au@PdAg-NTs and the standard patterns of Pd (#65-6174), Au (#65-8601) and Ag (#65-8428).

Formation mechanism

The formation mechanism of Au@PdAg-NTs is proposed in Fig. 3. At the initial stage of the reaction when HAuCl4 was added into the suspension of Ag nanowires, galvanic replacement occurred preferentially at surface defect sites with a high surface energy (such as steps, stacking faults, etc.), where Ag was oxidized and dissolved into the solution, resulting in the formation of small pits in the Ag nanowires. This might be facilitated by the adsorption of released Cl− ions on the Ag surface, AuCl4− + 3Ag → Au + 3AgCl + Cl−.[43] Because of Ag corrosion, the electrons would quickly migrate to the surface of the Ag nanowires and be captured by AuCl4− to generate Au atoms via galvanic reduction. Because of the good match between Ag and Au in terms of crystal structures (fcc) and lattice constants (4.086 vs. 4.078 Å for Ag and Au, respectively),[44] the newly formed Au atoms were most likely deposited epitaxially on the surface of the Ag nanowires, which is helpful for preserving the morphology of the Ag nanowire template, leading to the formation of a thin and incomplete layer of Au atoms on the surface of Ag nanowire. Meanwhile, because of higher activity of the fresh surfaces of the etch pits, the interior Ag atoms became gradually dissolved into the solution forming a nanotube nanostructure. Nevertheless, alloying will not occur between Au and the underlying Ag due to slow interdiffusion between them at low temperature and the high stability of Au nanoparticles (the bonding energy is 226.2 kJ mol−1 for Au–Au, and 162.9 kJ mol−1 for Ag–Ag).[45,46] Consequently, a porous incomplete Au shell was formed on the Ag template surface along with continuous etching of the silver core and deposition of Au.

Fig. 3

Schematic illustration of the formation process of Au@PdAg-NTs by sequential galvanic replacement reactions between Ag nanowires and AuCl4− and PdCl42−.

In the second step, after AuCl4− was consumed, PdCl42− was added into the above suspension. The galvanic replacement only occurred between the remaining Ag and PdCl42− because the standard reduction potential decreases in the order of AuCl4−/Au > PdCl42−/Pd > AgCl/Ag. As a result, Ag atoms will be continuously oxidized and dissolved into the solution, while the newly formed Pd atoms were poorly epitaxially deposited on the surfaces of the Ag–Au nanotubes due to the relatively large mismatch of the lattice constants between Pd and Ag or Au (∼4.8%),[47] forming a rough surface. Because the bonding energies of Pd–Pd (100 kJ mol−1) is lower than that of Pd–Ag (137 kJ mol−1),[44] solid–solid inter-diffusion occurred over the surface of the Ag template, resulting in the formation of a conformal and homogeneous PdAg alloy shell.

As the reaction proceeded, the interior Ag of the Ag template gradually disappeared or diffuse, resulting in the formation of tube walls that are rich of Au in the interior. Additionally, based on the stoichiometric relationship, the galvanic replacement of two or three Ag atoms by one Pd or Au atom led to the formation of lattice vacancies, and hence a significant increase of the total surface energy.[48] These lattice vacancies coalesced to form pinholes at specific spots in the wall of the tubes by an Ostwald ripening process in order to decrease the surface energy, leading to the formation of nanoporous Au core and PdAg alloy dendritic shell by surface diffusion.[49] Eventually, a Au@PdAg-NTs nanostructure comprised of a Au-rich interior and three-dimensional PdAg alloy dendritic shell was formed.

Electrochemical studies

Fig. 4a shows the CV curves of Au@PdAg-NTs and commercial Pd/C modified electrodes in a N2-saturated 1.0 M KOH solution at the potential scan rate of 50 mV s−1. For both samples, nonzero voltammetric currents started to appear at ca. +0.2 V in the anodic scan, due to the formation of a PdO layer, and the broad cathodic peak at around −0.2 V can be attributed to the reduction of PdO. It can be seen that the peak potential of PdO reduction is about 0.03 V more positive for the Au@PdAg-NTs than for the commercial Pd/C, suggesting reduced oxophilicity of the former. This may facilitate the complete oxidation of intermediate CO formed during methanol electrooxidation at the anode of DMFCs.[50] In addition, the hydrogen adsorption/desorption (Had/Hdes) peaks for the commercial Pd/C catalyst are better-defined than those of Au@PdAg-NTs, indicating that for Pd-containing catalyst the adsorption of hydrogen cannot be distinguished from its desorption and the Pd surface was significantly modified due to the incorporation of Au and Ag (the double-layer charging current for the Au@PdAg-NTs catalyst was obviously smaller than that of Pd/C, likely due to contributions from the carbon support in the latter).[51] Interestingly, the voltammetric results of Au@PdAg-NTs did not show the typical electrochemical features of Ag or Au in alkaline media, suggesting no separate Ag or Au domains were formed/accessible on the surface of Au@PdAg-NTs and the stability of Ag and Au in alkaline media for the as-prepared sample was enhanced.

Fig. 4

Cyclic voltammograms of the Au@PdAg-NTs/GC and Pd/C/GC electrodes in 1.0 M KOH solution (a) without and (b) with 1.0 M CH3OH at a scan rate of 50 mV s−1.

The steady-state cyclic voltammograms of Au@PdAg-NTs/GC and Pd/C/GC electrodes in 1.0 M CH3OH + 1.0 M KOH are shown in Fig. 4b. Note that the voltammetric currents have been normalized to the effective electrochemical surface areas (ECSA) estimated from the reduction charge of PdO according to the CV curves in Fig. 4a.[52] It is evident from Fig. 4b that Au@PdAg-NTs exhibited two anodic current peaks, similar to results observed in ethanol electrooxidation on Pd-based electrocatalysts in alkaline media and methanol electrooxidation on Pt-based electrocatalysts in acid media.[33,53] It is apparent that the electrocatalytic activity of the Au@PdAg-NTs/GC electrode is significantly higher than that of Pd/C/GC electrode, as manifested by the forward anodic peak current density that is 3.50 mA cm−2 for the former, 2.2 times higher that for the latter (1.59 mA cm−2). Furthermore, the onset potential (Eonset = −0.40 V) for methanol oxidation at the Au@PdAg-NTs/GC electrode is 100 mV more negative than that (−0.30 V) at the Pd/C/GC electrode. This onset potential is also more negative than those of the relevant Pd-based catalysts reported in the literature,[54-56] again, implying a higher intrinsic electrocatalytic activity for methanol oxidation with the Au@PdAg-NTs.[57,58]

In order to gain further insights into the superior electrocatalytic performance of Au@PdAg-NTs, LSV tests were conducted within the temperature range of 20 to 40 °C (Fig. 5a and b). One can see that for both Pd/C and Au@PdAg-NTs, the anodic currents for methanol oxidation increased with increasing temperature. Fig. 5c and d show the corresponding Arrhenius plots of the voltammetric currents at −0.02 V vs. temperature. It can be seen that both Pd/C and Au@PdAg-NTs exhibited a linear profile, with an obviously higher current density for Au@PdAg-NTs than for Pd/C. In addition, from the linear regression, the apparent activation energy (Ea) was estimated to be 41.5 and 28.7 kJ mol−1 for Pd/C and Au@PdAg-NTs, respectively.[59] The markedly lower activation energy of Au@PdAg-NTs is again consistent with the higher electrocatalytic activity towards methanol oxidation than Pd/C, as was observed above in Fig. 4.

Fig. 5

LSV curves of (a) commercial Pd/C/GC and (b) Au@PdAg-NTs/GC electrodes in 1 M KOH + 1 M CH3OH solutions at different temperatures. Potential scan rate 50 mV s−1. Arrhenius plots of the voltammetric currents at −0.02 V (vs. RHE) with temperature for (c) commercial Pd/C and (d) Au@PdAg-NTs.

Electrochemical stability is another key issue for electrocatalysts in DMFCs. To evaluate the stability of the catalysts under continuous operating conditions, CA measurements were performed (Fig. 6). It can be seen that both the initial and steady-state current densities for methanol oxidation on Au@PdAg-NTs are markedly higher than those on commercial Pd/C, further demonstrating a significantly enhanced electrocatalytic activity of Au@PdAg-NTs. This result also coincides with the above CV and LSV data. Furthermore, Au@PdAg-NTs exhibited much slower current attenuation in comparison to Pd/C, signifying enhanced stability in the electrooxidation of methanol. For instance, at 1000 s, the current density (J) was 0.275 mA cm−2 for Au@PdAg-NTs, more than three times higher than that (0.075 mA cm−2) for Pd/C.

Fig. 6

Chronoamperometric curves of the Au@PdAg-NTs/GC and Pd/C/GC electrodes in 1.0 M KOH+1 M CH3OH solution at the electrode potential of −0.15 V (vs. RHE).

These results are summarized in Table S1,† where the much enhanced catalytic activity of Au@PdAg-NTs, as compared to that of Pd/C, may be attributed to the following factors. First, the nanotubular structure of Au@PdAg-NTs can not only facilitate electron transport, but also improve mass transport and catalyst utilization.[60] Furthermore, Au@PdAg-NTs can be connected to each other to form a three-dimensional hollow framework in which efficient electrical pathways are established. In addition, the porous wall and hollow interior in Au@PdAg-NTs can promote mass transport. These unique characteristics are important for the efficient electrochemical oxidation of methanol at the interface. Second, the micrometer-sized length of the Au@PdAg-NTs makes it less vulnerable to dissolution, Ostwald ripening and aggregation than commonly used catalysts that are of small size and spherical shape, which will be helpful for the electrocatalytic stability of the catalysts in methanol electrooxidation. Additionally, the dendritic surface structure of Au@PdAg-NTs can not only provide sufficient accessible active sites but also prevent undesirable agglomeration usually encountered with nanoparticle electrocatalysts. Finally, alloying Pd and Ag may change the electronic properties of Pd and enhance the reactivity of Pd for the poisonous intermediates formed in the process of methanol electrooxidation, leading to improved poison tolerance of the Au@PdAg-NTs catalysts.[61,62]

Conclusions

Au@PdAg-NTs with a Au-rich interior and a PdAg alloy dendritic shell were synthesized in aqueous solution by sequential galvanic displacement reactions between Ag nanowires and AuCl4− and PdCl42−. The obtained samples showed an excellent electrocatalytic performance toward methanol oxidation as compared to commercial Pd/C, due to their large specific surface area and unique porous tubular morphology, with a significantly negative shift of the onset potential and markedly enhanced anodic peak current density. This facile and cost-effective strategy may be exploited as a generic method to prepare multimetallic nanostructures for catalysis of diverse important reactions.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.