| Literature DB >> 35517297 |
Xumei Tao1, Chao Sun1, Liang Huang2, Yuanyuan Han1, Dongyan Xu1.
Abstract
Fe-MOFs were successfully synthesized with the dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) plasma method, and applied for degradation of methyl orange by the Fenton process. Fe-MOFs were characterized by XRD, SEM, EDS, BET and FT-IR. A systematic study was carried out to optimize the synthesis conditions, taking into account the Fenton capacity performance for degradation of methyl orange. The optimal synthesis conditions were a discharge time of 100 min, discharge voltage of 18 kV, reactant concentration of 14 g L-1 and reactant mass ratio (TA : FeCl3·6H2O) of 1 : 5, with influence on the crystallization, morphologies and particle size. The degradation rate of methyl orange could reach 85% within 40 min with the MO concentration of 50 mg L-1, Fe-MOF dosage of 0.12 g L-1, pH of 5 and H2O2 at 1 mL L-1. Meanwhile, the Fenton catalytic process was conducted covering a range of catalyst concentrations, initial MO concentrations, pH and H2O2 amounts. Higher catalyst concentration, lower MO initial concentration, pH of 3 and H2O2 amount of 1 mL L-1 were conducive to the degradation efficiency. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 35517297 PMCID: PMC9060920 DOI: 10.1039/c8ra09211g
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Fig. 1Reaction device diagram.
Synthesis conditions of Fe-MOFs
| Discharge time (min) | Discharge voltage (kV) | Reactant concentration (g L−1) | TA : FeCl3·6H2O |
|---|---|---|---|
| Changed | 15.6 | 8 | 1 : 2 |
| 90 | Changed | 8 | 1 : 2 |
| 90 | 15.6 | Changed | 1 : 2 |
| 90 | 15.6 | 8 | Changed |
Fenton catalytic conditions of MO degradation with Fe-MOFs
| Catalyst concentration (g L−1) | MO concentration (mg L−1) | pH | H2O2 amount (mL L−1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Changed | 50 | 5 | 1 |
| 0.12 | Changed | 5 | 1 |
| 0.12 | 50 | Changed | 1 |
| 0.12 | 50 | 5 | Changed |
Fig. 2XRD patterns of Fe-MOFs synthesized with different conditions (a) discharge voltage, (b) discharge time, (c) reactant concentration, (d) reactant mass ratio.
Fig. 3SEM images of samples synthesized with different conditions (a) 70 min, (b) 80 min, (c) 90 min, (d) 100 min, (e) 110 min, (f) 11.6 kV, (g) 15.6 kV, (h) 18 kV, (i) 20.8 kV, (j) 6 g L−1, (k) 8 g L−1, (l) 10 g L−1, (m) 12 g L−1, (n) 14 g L−1, (o) 16 g L−1, (p) 2 : 1, (q) 1 : 1, (r) 1 : 2, (s) 1 : 3, (t) 1 : 4, (u) 1 : 5, (v) Fe-MOF(o).
Composition of different samples
| Samples (TA : FeCl3·6H2O) | Element | EDS wt% |
|---|---|---|
| 1 : 4 | C | 42.83 |
| O | 22.03 | |
| Cl | 9.79 | |
| Fe | 25.35 | |
| 1 : 5 | C | 42.34 |
| O | 21.81 | |
| Cl | 9.86 | |
| Fe | 26.00 |
Fig. 4(a) Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms and (b) pore size distribution of Fe-MOFs(o) sample.
The surface and pore structure of Fe-MOFs(o) sample
| Samples | Surface area (m2 g−1) | Average pore size (nm) | Pore volume (cm3 g−1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fe-MOF(o) | 18.5 | 19.5 | 0.064 |
Fig. 5FT-IR spectrum of different samples.
Fig. 6Effect of preparation conditions on Fenton catalytic activity (a) discharge time, (b) discharge voltage, (c) reactant concentration, (d) reactant mass ratio.
Fig. 7Influence of Fenton reaction conditions on catalytic activity (a) catalyst concentration, (b) MO concentration, (c) pH, (d) H2O2 amount.
Comparison of the Fenton catalytic performance of different catalysts
| Sample | pH | H2O2 (mL L−1) | Catalyst concentration (g L−1) | Dyes |
| Reaction time (min) | Degradation rate (%) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fe3O4@MIL-100(Fe) | 3 | 1.2 | 0.1 | MB | 50 | 120 | 99 |
|
| MIL-100(Fe)/GO | 3 | 0.24 | 0.5 | MO | 50 | 240 | 99 |
|
| NH2-MIL-88B(Fe) | 5.6 | 6 | 0.2 | MB | 20 | 60 | 98 |
|
| FeSO4 | 2.5 | 0.003 | 0.14 | MO | 10 | 120 | 80 |
|
| MOF-235 | 3 | 1.2 | 0.2 | MO | 40 | 30 | 80 |
|
| Fe-MOF(o) | 5 | 1 | 0.12 | MO | 50 | 40 | 85 | This work |