| Literature DB >> 35516895 |
Runying Dai1, Xue Ma1, Quan Xu1, Limin Lu1.
Abstract
In this study, gelatin-based microcapsules were first proposed as a carbon source for the synthesis of nitrogen-doped hierarchical porous carbon (N-HPC) via a facile one-pot high-temperature treatment. The morphologies of the microcapsules could be well controlled by adjusting the synthesis parameters; this ensured the repeatability of the calcined products. The as-prepared N-HPC possesses a favorable three-dimensional network structure and hierarchical porous structure. As a promising modified electrode, N-HPC displayed remarkably improved stability and sensitivity for lead ion (Pb2+) detection. Moreover, two factors are responsible for the good analytical performance: (i) the morphologies of the microcapsules are controllable and reproducible; this improves the detection stability; and (ii) the nitrogen atoms in the shells of the microcapsules can efficiently interact with Pb2+; this enhances the detection sensitivity. The influences of various experimental parameters, including the pH value of the supporting electrolyte, deposition potential and deposition time, on the stripping signal of Pb2+ were investigated. The method displayed a wide linear range of the Pb2+ concentration from 7 nM to 7000 nM with the detection limit of 1.44 nM under the optimized conditions. The modified electrode possessed high selectivity, which might be due to the high binding affinity of the NH2 - groups to Pb2+. The developed method has been successfully applied to the detection of Pb2+ in actual water samples; this demonstrates that the N-HPC-based electrochemical sensors have prospective applications in the environmental monitoring of Pb2+. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 35516895 PMCID: PMC9065401 DOI: 10.1039/c9ra02270h
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 3.361
Fig. 1Surface morphology and particle size distribution of the microcapsules: (a) OM of GMs; (b) particle size distribution of GMs; (c) SEM of GMs; and (d) SEM of N-HPC.
Fig. 2Thermogravimetric analysis of GMs.
Fig. 3The effective surface area curves of the bare GCE and the N-HPC/GCE as a function of time.
Fig. 4The DPASV curves of the bare GCE (a) and N-HPC/GCE (b) in a 0.1 M HAc–NaAc buffer solution at pH 5.0 containing 5.0 μM Pb2+. Deposition potential: −0.8 V; amplitude: 50 mV; potential step: 4 mV; deposition time: 350 s; pulse period: 0.2 s; pulse width: 50 m s; sample width: 0.0167 s; and quiet time: 2 s.
Fig. 5The EDX spectrum of N-HPC before and after the adsorption of Pb2+.
Fig. 6The effects of (a) the pH of the acetate buffer solution; (b) deposition potential; and (c) deposition time on the current signal of Pb2+.
Fig. 7(a) DPASV responses of the N-HPC/GCE for the detection of Pb2+ at different concentrations in the 0.1 M HAc–NaAc buffer solution at pH 5.0. DPASV conditions are identical to those shown in Fig. 4; and (b) the corresponding linear calibration plots of the current signal for Pb2+.
Comparison of the analytical performance of the electrochemical methods for the determination of Pb2+
| Electrode | Method | Liner range (nM) | Determination limit (nM) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Poly(DTCPA)/GCE | SWASV | 100–1000 000 | — |
|
| TAPB-DMTP-COF/CPE | DPASV | 5–2000 | 1.9 |
|
| Mn(TPA)-SWCNTs/GCE | DPASV | 100–14 000 | 38 |
|
| L-cys-RGO/GCE | DPASV | 400–1200 | 1.04 |
|
| RGO-NH-Ci/GCE | DPASV | 5–1200, 1200–10 000 | 3.0 |
|
| N-HPC/GCE | DPASV | 7–7000 | 2.0 | This work |
Poly(DTCPA)/GCE: poly(7,9-dithiophene-2yl-8H-cyclopenta[a] acenaphthalene-8-one)-modified GCE.
SWASV: square-wave adsorptive stripping voltammetry.
TAPB-DMTP-COF/CPE: 1,3,5-tris(4-aminophenyl)benzene-2,5-dimethoxyterephaldehyde-covalent organic framework-modified carbon paste electrode.
Mn(TPA)-SWCNTs/GCE: manganese-terephthalic acid MOF/single-walled carbon nanotube modified GCE.
L-cys-RGO/GCE: l-cysteine-reduced graphene oxide-modified GCE.
Recovery of Pb2+ in waste water using the N-HPC/GCE electrode (n = 3)
| Spiked (nM) | Founded (nM) | Recovery (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 24.8 | — |
| 50 | 73.2 | 96.8 |
| 100 | 125.2 | 100.4 |
| 150 | 171.6 | 97.9 |