Literature DB >> 35516824

Simulation training in non-cancer palliative care for healthcare workers: a systematic review of controlled studies.

Joanne Tropea1,2, Ross Bicknell1, Debra Nestel3, Caroline A Brand2,4, Christina E Johnson5,6, Sanjoy K Paul2,4, Brian H Le7,8, Wen Kwang Lim1,2.   

Abstract

Background: The need for healthcare workers (HCWs) to have skills and knowledge in non-cancer palliative care has been recognised. Simulation is increasingly being used for palliative care training, offering participants the opportunity to learn in a realistic environment and fully interactive way. Objective: The aim of this systematic review was to summarise and critically appraise controlled studies on simulation training in non-cancer palliative care for HCWs. Selection: Medline, CINAHL, PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were searched using palliative care and simulation terms. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomised RCTs and controlled before-and-after (CBA) studies were included. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts and undertook full article review using predefined selection criteria. Studies that met the inclusion criteria had data extracted and risk of bias assessed using the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care risk of bias criteria. Findings: Five articles were included: three RCTs and two CBA studies. All studies assessed learners' palliative care communication skills, most studies evaluated learners' perception of change in skills and one study assessed impact on patient outcomes and learners' change in behaviour when applied in practice. There was variation in intervention content, intensity and duration, outcome measures and study design, making it difficult to compare and synthesise results.
Conclusion: There is a paucity of evidence to support simulation training to improve non-cancer palliative care. This review highlights the need for more robust research, including multicentre studies that use standardised outcome measures to assess clinician skills, changes in clinical practice and patient-related outcomes. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Literature Review; Simulation Training

Year:  2020        PMID: 35516824      PMCID: PMC8936877          DOI: 10.1136/bmjstel-2019-000570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn        ISSN: 2056-6697


  14 in total

1.  Internal medicine trainee self-assessments of end-of-life communication skills do not predict assessments of patients, families, or clinician-evaluators.

Authors:  Robert P Dickson; Ruth A Engelberg; Anthony L Back; Dee W Ford; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 2.947

2.  Reporting Guidelines for Health Care Simulation Research: Extensions to the CONSORT and STROBE Statements.

Authors:  Adam Cheng; David Kessler; Ralph Mackinnon; Todd P Chang; Vinay M Nadkarni; Elizabeth A Hunt; Jordan Duval-Arnould; Yiqun Lin; David A Cook; Martin Pusic; Joshua Hui; David Moher; Matthias Egger; Marc Auerbach
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.929

3.  Self-Assessment Scores Improve After Simulation-Based Palliative Care Communication Skill Workshops.

Authors:  Crystal E Brown; Anthony L Back; Dee W Ford; Erin K Kross; Lois Downey; Sarah E Shannon; J Randall Curtis; Ruth A Engelberg
Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 2.500

4.  End-of-life care during and after an acute hospitalization in older patients with cancer, end-stage organ failure, or frailty: A sub-analysis of a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sanne Huijberts; Bianca M Buurman; Sophia E de Rooij
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 4.762

Review 5.  Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  David A Cook; Rose Hatala; Ryan Brydges; Benjamin Zendejas; Jason H Szostek; Amy T Wang; Patricia J Erwin; Stanley J Hamstra
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Patient outcomes in simulation-based medical education: a systematic review.

Authors:  Benjamin Zendejas; Ryan Brydges; Amy T Wang; David A Cook
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  The future vision of simulation in health care.

Authors:  D M Gaba
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-10

8.  Effect of communication skills training for residents and nurse practitioners on quality of communication with patients with serious illness: a randomized trial.

Authors:  J Randall Curtis; Anthony L Back; Dee W Ford; Lois Downey; Sarah E Shannon; Ardith Z Doorenbos; Erin K Kross; Lynn F Reinke; Laura C Feemster; Barbara Edlund; Richard W Arnold; Kim O'Connor; Ruth A Engelberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  What is the evidence that people with frailty have needs for palliative care at the end of life? A systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Authors:  Daniel Stow; Gemma Spiers; Fiona E Matthews; Barbara Hanratty
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 4.762

10.  Virtual Reality for Health Professions Education: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by the Digital Health Education Collaboration.

Authors:  Bhone Myint Kyaw; Nakul Saxena; Pawel Posadzki; Jitka Vseteckova; Charoula Konstantia Nikolaou; Pradeep Paul George; Ushashree Divakar; Italo Masiello; Andrzej A Kononowicz; Nabil Zary; Lorainne Tudor Car
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.