| Literature DB >> 35516699 |
Anuradha J Kuppan1, Victor Samuel2, R Mahesh1, P M Jaganath3, Sukumaran Anil4,5.
Abstract
Context: The city of Chennai is one of the largest metropolitan cities in India where apart from a large traditional population, there has been a continuous migration from rural areas and growing sophistication in lifestyle. Twinning rates trend in the present world would be interesting to study. Aims: The aim of the present study was to analyse the twinning rate in the city of Chennai, the distribution amongst various city zones and the present trends in the co-relation between the maternal age of the twins with the zygosity. Settings and Design: A population-based study was conducted on twin births in various corporation Zones in the Chennai Metropolitan, between 2010 and 2012. As per the Chennai corporation and Health Department register, there were a total of 2,32,884 births registered in the city of which 4,500 were twin births over the 3 years. Only 1371 pairs were found residing in Chennai at the time of study, and hence, a study was conducted on this population only. Satistical Analysis Used: The data were analysed with Epiinfo software.Entities:
Keywords: Maternal age; twinning rate; zygosity determination
Year: 2022 PMID: 35516699 PMCID: PMC9067235 DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1223_21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Family Med Prim Care ISSN: 2249-4863
Figure 1Distribution of twin birth in Chennai Zones between 2010 and 2012
Twins distribution and sample size calculated in the study zones
| No. | Zone | No of twins | Twin sample size | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zone 4 | Tondairpet | 189 | 13.8% | 30 |
| Zone 5 | Royapuram | 100 | 7.3% | 10 |
| Zone 6 | Thiruvika nagar | 175 | 12.8% | 20 |
| Zone 7 | Ambattur | 66 | 4.8% | 10 |
| Zone 8 | Anna nagar | 123 | 9.0% | 10 |
| Zone 9 | Teynampet | 160 | 11.7% | 30 |
| Zone 10 | Kodambakkam | 146 | 10.7% | 20 |
| Zone 12 | Alandur | 31 | 2.3% | 10 |
| Zone 13 | Adyar | 147 | 10.7% | 10 |
| Total | 1371 | |||
Mean PSQ value by zygosity determination. Independent samples t-test to compare the mean zycosity scores
| Zygosity |
| Mean | Std. deviation |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zygosity score | ||||
| Monozygotic | 34 | 0.3368 | 0.03574 | <0.001 |
| Dizygotic | 116 | 0.7385 | 0.08064 |
Figure 2Distribution of the physical similarity quotient (PSQ) score
Figure 3Zygosity distribution in the nine study zones
Birth events
| Time of delivery | Monozygotic | Dizygotic | Normal Delivery | C-Section | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preterm | 22 (14.7%) | 72 (48%) | 7 (4.7%) | 87 (58%) | 94 (62.7%) |
| Term | 12 (8%) | 44 (29.4%) | 7 (4.7%) | 49 (32.7%) | 56 (37.3%) |
Age group and zygosity
| Zygosity | Age group | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||
| 0-12 months | 13-24 months | 25-36 months | Total | |||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
| % |
| % |
| % |
| % | |
| Monozygotic | 2 | 5.9 | 14 | 41.2 | 18 | 52.9 | 34 | 100.0 |
| Dizygotic | 9 | 7.8 | 52 | 44.8 | 55 | 47.4 | 116 | 100.0 |
| Total | 11 | 7.3 | 66 | 44.0 | 73 | 48.7 | 150 | 100.0 |
Maternal age distribution and twinning rates
| Age of mother | Total twins delivered | Monozygotic | Dizygotics | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||
| Number | % | Number | % | ||
| <25 | 5 (3.3%) | 2 | 1.3 | 3 | 2 |
| 25-30 | 80 (53.3%) | 21 | 14 | 59 | 39.3 |
| 30-34 | 62 (41.3%) | 14 | 9.3 | 48 | 32 |
| >35 | 3 (2%) | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 |
Birth order and twinning rates
| Order of birth | Total twins delivered | Monozygotic | Dizygotics | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||
| Number | % | Number | % | ||
| 1 | 140 (93.3%) | 28 | 18.7 | 112 | 74.7 |
| 2 | 9 (6%) | 3 | 2 | 6 | 4 |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 or more | 1 (0.67%) | 1 | 0.67 | 0 | 0 |