| Literature DB >> 35516431 |
Xuancheng Guan1,2, Junhong Zhu1,2, Haichao Sun1,2, Xiaoqi Zhao3, Minghua Yang1, Ying Huang1, Hongbin Pan1, Yanguang Zhao4, Sumei Zhao1,2.
Abstract
The physiological state of the host affects the gut microbes. The estrus cycle is critical to the reproductive cycle of sows. However, the association between gut microbes and animal estrus is poorly understood. Here, high-throughput 16S rRNA sequencing and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) non-targeted metabolome technology were used to study the estrous cycles in Diannan small ear pigs. Significantly different gut microbiota and metabolites of sows at estrous and diestrus were screened out and the correlation was analyzed. We found that the intestinal microbial composition and microbial metabolism of Diannan small ear sows were significantly different at diestrus and metestrus. The abundances of Spirochaetes, Spirochaetia, Spirochaetales, Spirochaetaceae, Deltaproteobacteria, unidentified_Alphaproteobacteria, Ruminococcus_sp_YE281, and Treponema_berlinense in intestinal microorganisms of Diannan small ear sows at metestrus are significantly higher than that at diestrus. Propionic acid, benzyl butyrate, sucrose, piperidine, and 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotide (AICAR) were significantly enriched at metestrus compared with diestrus, which were involved in the energy metabolism-related pathways and activated protein kinase (AMPK) signaling pathway. At diestrus and metestrus, differential microbiota of unidentified_Alphaproteobacteria, Intestinimonas, Peptococcus, Terrisporobacter, and differential metabolites of piperidine, propionic acid, and benzyl butyrate, sucrose, 4-methyl catechol, and AICAR exist a certain degree of correlation. Therefore, unidentified_Alphaproteobacteria, Ruminococcus_sp_YE281, and Treponema_berlinense may have a potential role at metestrus of the Diannan small ear sows. AICAR may be apotential marker of estrus Diannan small ear sows feces, but further studies about the specific mechanism are needed. These findings provide a new perspective for sows production management and improving sows reproductive performance.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA; Diannan small ear pig; LC-MS; diestrus; intestinal microbiota; metestrus; sows
Year: 2022 PMID: 35516431 PMCID: PMC9062660 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.826881
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 6.064
FIGURE 1The OUT Wayne diagram.
FIGURE 2The histogram of relative abundance for intestinal microbiota in Diannan small ear sows (select the top 10 microbes at each level). (A) Phylum level, (B) genus level.
The alpha diversity results of different grouped samples.
| Sample name | DA | DC |
| Observed species | 741 ± 83.62 | 748.5 ± 55.81 |
| Shannon index | 6.6 ± 0.89 | 6.97 ± 0.35 |
| Simpson index | 0.96 ± 0.04 | 0.98 ± 0.01 |
| Chao1 index | 804.64 ± 76.84 | 789.36 ± 59.16 |
| ACE index | 806.44 ± 76.92 | 796.25 ± 65.55 |
| Goods coverage | 0.998 ± 0 | 0.998 ± 0 |
| PD whole tree | 57.98 ± 5.85 | 59.26 ± 6.01 |
FIGURE 3The beta diversity results of different grouped samples-UPGMA clustering tree.
FIGURE 4Analysis of LEfSe multilevel species difference discriminant.
FIGURE 5The function annotation abundance map of the KEGG level 2 (A) and level 3 (B).
FIGURE 6The quality control (QC) (A) chart positive ion mode (B) and negative ion mode.
FIGURE 7The partial least square-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) chart. (A) Positive ion mode and (B) negative ion mode.
FIGURE 8The volcano map of differential metabolites in estrus Diannan small ear sows. (A) Positive ion mode and (B) negative ion mode.
FIGURE 9Clustering diagram of differential metabolites. (A) Positive ion mode and (B) negative ion mode.
The significant different metabolites of positive and negative ion modes (top 10).
| ID | Metabolites | Model | FC |
| VIP | Up/Down |
| Com_8790_pos (P1) | Dibenzothiophene | + | 2.52 | <0.01 | 2.01 | Up |
| Com_3958_pos (P2) | 2-Acetamido-2-deoxy-alpha- | + | 0.3 | <0.01 | 2.33 | Down |
| Com_8630_pos (P3) | Ceanothine B | + | 0.39 | 0.01 | 1.92 | Down |
| Com_8467_pos (P4) | 3,3′,3′′,3′′′-[3,8,13,17-Tetrakis(carboxymethyl)-8,13-dimethyl-8,12,13,18,20,23-hexahydro-1H,7H-porphine-2,7,12,18-tetrayl]tetrapropanoic acid | + | 2.64 | 0.01 | 2.26 | Up |
| Com_6980_pos (P5) | spiro[3H-indole-3,5′(4′H)-thiazol]-2-ol, 2′-(methylthio)- | + | 0.42 | 0.01 | 2.31 | Down |
| Com_13726_pos (P6) | L-(+)-Valine | + | 2.64 | 0.01 | 1.93 | Up |
| Com_6320_pos (P7) | Ethyl mercury ion | + | 8.39 | 0.02 | 4.18 | Up |
| Com_3964_pos (P8) | Aminomethylphosphonic acid | + | 0.36 | 0.02 | 2.75 | Down |
| Com_3720_pos (P9) | 2-Amino-9-(2-deoxypentofuranosyl)-3,9-dihydro-6H-purin-6-one | + | 2.62 | 0.02 | 2.31 | Up |
| Com_4939_pos (P10) | + | 0.29 | 0.02 | 4.28 | Down | |
| Com_1306_neg (N1) | 6-Hydroxy-1,2-hexanediyl dioctanoate | − | 0.43 | <0.01 | 1.67 | Down |
| Com_4818_neg (N2) | Molindone | − | 0.34 | <0.01 | 2.41 | Down |
| Com_1461_neg (N3) | Maxacalcitol | − | 0.35 | <0.01 | 2.05 | Down |
| Com_3334_neg (N4) | 2-Ammonio-4-oxobutanoate | − | 0.45 | <0.01 | 1.52 | Down |
| Com_986_neg (N5) | (3R,4S,9R,11R)-27-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)-4-methyl-3,9,11-heptacosanetriol | − | 4.76 | <0.01 | 3.64 | Up |
| Com_2165_neg (N6) | (R)-3-Hydroxy myristic acid | − | 0.48 | <0.01 | 1.42 | Down |
| Com_2393_neg (N7) | Methylethylmethane | − | 0.35 | 0.01 | 1.96 | Down |
| Com_2977_neg (N8) | Manoalide | − | 0.49 | 0.01 | 1.33 | Down |
| Com_5521_neg (N9) | Sucrose | − | 0.28 | 0.01 | 2.34 | Down |
| Com_5715_neg (N10) | (2S,4R,9a′S)-1′-Hydroxy-4-{2-[(1S)-1-hydroxyethyl]-4-oxo-3(4H)-quinazolinyl}-2′,2′-dimethyl-1′,9a′-dihydro-3H-spiro[furan-2,9′-imidazo[1,2-a]indole]-3′,5(2′H,4H)-dione | − | 3.34 | 0.01 | 2.33 | Up |
The correlation of significant different metabolites of the top 10 in negative ion mode (top 10).
| Metabolites | N1 | N2 | N3 | N4 | N5 | N6 | N7 | N8 | N9 | N10 |
| N1 | 1 | |||||||||
| N2 | 0.648 | 1 | ||||||||
| N3 | 0.959 | 0.555 | 1 | |||||||
| N4 | 0.842 | 0.549 | 0.902 | 1 | ||||||
| N5 | −0.639 | −0.635 | −0.614 | −0.683 | 1 | |||||
| N6 | 0.699 | 0.766 | 0.725 | 0.820 | −0.717 | 1 | ||||
| N7 | 0.480 | 0.621 | 0.491 | 0.774 | −0.677 | 0.836 | 1 | |||
| N8 | 0.579 | 0.246 | 0.567 | 0.770 | −0.497 | 0.501 | 0.656 | 1 | ||
| N9 | 0.817 | 0.723 | 0.879 | 0.888 | −0.658 | 0.895 | 0.734 | 0.434 | 1 | |
| N10 | −0.619 | −0.635 | −0.554 | −0.521 | 0.120 | −0.477 | −0.354 | −0.422 | −0.502 | 1 |
*Difference is significant.
**Difference is extremely significant.
FIGURE 10The KEGG enrichment map. (A) Positive ion mode and (B) negative ion mode.
The significant difference of the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment table of the positive and negative ion modes.
| Pathway | Mode | Differential metabolites involved in this pathway | |
| Tropane, piperidine, and pyridine alkaloid biosynthesis | 0.04 | + | Piperidine |
| Protein digestion and absorption | 0.04 | + | Piperidine |
| Carbohydrate digestion and absorption | <0.01 | − | Benzyl butyrate, propionic acid, and sucrose |
| Galactose metabolism | 0.03 | − | Sucrose |
| Starch and sucrose metabolism | 0.03 | − | Sucrose |
| Xylene degradation | 0.03 | − | 4-methyl catechol |
| AMPK signaling pathway | 0.03 | − | AICAR |
FIGURE 11The correlation heat map of differential intestinal microbiota and metabolites. Note: Com_148_neg: propionic acid; Com_4607_neg: benzyl butyrate; Com_5521_neg: sucrose; Com_1794_neg: AICAR; Com_735_neg: 4-methyl catechol; Com_706_pos: piperidine.
FIGURE 12The correlation network map of differential intestinal microbiota and metabolites. Red/green indicates that the shape represents metabolite/bacteria, red/blue lines represent positive/negative correlation, and numbers represent correlation coefficients.
The correlation of significant different metabolites of the top 10 in positive ion mode (top 10).
| Metabolites | P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | P5 | P6 | P7 | P8 | P9 | P10 |
| P1 | 1 | |||||||||
| P2 | −0.444 | 1 | ||||||||
| P3 | −0.459 | 0.970 | 1 | |||||||
| P4 | 0.410 | −0.435 | −0.589 | 1 | ||||||
| P5 | −0.783 | 0.406 | 0.448 | −0.437 | 1 | |||||
| P6 | 0.789 | −0.236 | −0.237 | −0.014 | −0.613 | 1 | ||||
| P7 | 0.971 | −0.374 | −0.381 | 0.350 | −0.783 | 0.755 | 1 | |||
| P8 | −0.644 | 0.318 | 0.364 | −0.487 | 0.863 | −0.556 | −0.626 | 1 | ||
| P9 | 0.331 | −0.523 | −0.498 | 0.211 | −0.422 | 0.106 | 0.329 | −0.211 | 1 | |
| P10 | −0.770 | 0.333 | 0.394 | −0.459 | 0.872 | −0.500 | −0.768 | 0.640 | −0.486 | 1 |
*Difference is significant.
**Difference is extremely significant.