| Literature DB >> 35516429 |
Yan Su1,2, Haiyun Zi3, Xiaomeng Wei4, Binbin Hu1, Xiaopeng Deng1, Yi Chen1, Yonglei Jiang1.
Abstract
Continuous cropping leads to the development of serious fungal diseases in tobacco plants and depleted yield of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum), which can be mitigated by organic fertilization. Yet, we know little about how organic fertilizers affect the fungal community of continuous cropping tobacco soil. In this study, we investigated the soil fungal community after 11 years of tobacco planting with chemical fertilization (CF) or chemical fertilization combined with organic fertilizers obtained from plant or animal origin, including oil cake (CFO), straw (CFS), and farmyard fertilizer (CFM). The predominant phyla of Ascomycota (70%) and Mortierellomycota (15%) were identified in all the treatments. A significantly higher proportion of Pyrenochaetopsis and lower relative abundance of Sordariomycetes were observed in the CFM group compared to the controls. Compared to CF and non-fertilized control (CK), CFO and CFS led to higher species richness (P < 0.05), while CFM led to a less uniform fungal community, indicated by lower Shannon and higher Simpson diversity indices (P < 0.05). Pearson's correlation and redundancy analysis suggested that fertilizations primarily influenced the fungal community by altering the soil nutrient conditions, among which soil organic carbon and total phosphorus significantly correlated with the fungal diversity and community composition (P < 0.05). Notably, FUNGuild annotation suggested that while other treatments showed no significant effect on the fungal trophic modes, CFM strongly increased the abundance of saprotrophic fungi by more than 30% (P < 0.05), thus preventing the prevalence of potential pathotypes and symbionts. The results suggest that the type of organic fertilizers is essential to the long-term effects of organic application on the fungal community, and the animal-origin manure seems to be a better choice than plant-origin materials in continuous cropping tobacco fields.Entities:
Keywords: continuous cropping; fungal community; manure; organic fertilizer; tobacco
Year: 2022 PMID: 35516429 PMCID: PMC9063659 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.818956
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 6.064
Soil physicochemical properties after the long-term application of different fertilizers.
| Treatment | pH | SOC (g kg–1) | TN (g kg–1) | NH4+ (mg kg–1) | NO3– (mg kg–1) | TP (g kg–1) | TK (g kg–1) | EC (μ s cm–1) |
| CFO | 7.03 ± 0.23a | 6.88 ± 0.47b | 0.76 ± 0.12b | 2.58 ± 0.87a | 35.10 ± 5.43b | 1.02 ± 0.07b | 6.12 ± 0.25a | 143.80 ± 64.48ab |
| CFM | 7.01 ± 0.20a | 8.87 ± 0.65a | 0.97 ± 0.12a | 1.34 ± 0.57b | 81.20 ± 8.51a | 1.31 ± 0.08a | 6.14 ± 0.20a | 222.67 ± 112.06a |
| CFS | 7.02 ± 0.08a | 6.57 ± 0.27bc | 0.78 ± 0.06b | 0.20 ± 0.01c | 20.06 ± 2.10c | 1.03 ± 0.08b | 5.97 ± 0.36a | 157.50 ± 10.78ab |
| CF | 6.66 ± 0.11b | 6.21 ± 0.10bc | 0.55 ± 0.05c | 0.37 ± 0.07c | 37.79 ± 13.94b | 0.97 ± 0.13b | 5.64 ± 0.75a | 124.37 ± 54.16ab |
| CK | 7.30 ± 0.16a | 5.85 ± 0.45c | 0.58 ± 0.12c | 0.56 ± 0.47bc | 17.17 ± 5.81c | 0.90 ± 0.07b | 5.98 ± 0.34a | 85.23 ± 12.20b |
The data presented in the tables are expressed as mean ± standard error values (n = 3). Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference at P < 0.05 (Tukey’s test). SOC, soil organic carbon; TN, total nitrogen; NH
FIGURE 1Fungal alpha diversity index values observed in different fertilization management systems in continuous tobacco cropping soils (A–D); Pearson’s correlation analysis between alpha diversity index and soil parameters (E). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at P < 0.05 (Tukey’s test). SOC, soil organic carbon; TN, total nitrogen; TP, total phosphorus; TK, total potassium; EC, electrical conductivity. The significant levels are indicated by asterisk: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.001.
FIGURE 2The relative abundance of the dominant fungal phyla (A) and classes (B) under different fertilization management systems in continuous tobacco cropping soils.
FIGURE 3Fungal community structure in different fertilization regimes showed by a non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plot (A). Redundancy analysis (RDA) of soil physicochemical properties with soil fungal community structure (B). SOC, soil organic carbon; TN, total nitrogen; TP, total phosphorus; TK, total potassium; EC, electrical conductivity.
FIGURE 4Fungal trophic modes (A) and the details of each trophic medels (B) in tobacco continuously mono-cropped soils under different fertilization management systems. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 (Tukey’s test).