| Literature DB >> 35516370 |
Agnieszka Kaflak1, Stanisław Moskalewski2, Waclaw Kolodziejski1.
Abstract
The hydroxyl content of bone apatite mineral has been measured using proton solid-state NMR performed with a multiple-pulse dipolar filter under slow magic angle spinning (MAS). This new method succeeded in resolving and relatively enhancing the main hydroxyl peak at ca. 0 ppm from whole bone, making it amenable to rigorous quantitative analysis. The proposed methodology, involving line fitting, the measurement of the apatite concentration in the studied material and adequate calibration, was proved to be convenient and suitable for monitoring bone mineral hydroxylation in different species and over the lifetime of the animal. It was found that the hydroxyl content in the cranial bone mineral of pig and rats remained in the 5-10% range, with reference to stoichiometric hydroxyapatite. In rats, the hydroxyl content showed a non-monotonic increase with age, which was governed by biological processes rather than by chemical, thermodynamically driven apatite maturation. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 35516370 PMCID: PMC9064436 DOI: 10.1039/c9ra01902b
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Fig. 1The dipolar filter pulse sequence used in this work to acquire proton solid-state NMR spectra of apatite biomaterials.
Fig. 2Comparison of the dipolar filter (DF) and conventional π/2 pulse-acquire (BD) proton spectra of synthetic and natural materials containing apatite. The spectra of each sample have been scaled to the same intensity at 0 ppm, that is, at the position of the hydroxyl peak.
Assignment of proton NMR peaks of the bone components.[38,46,59–64] The peak numbers correspond to those in Fig. 3
| Peak | Chemical shift/ppm | Assignment |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | −0.1 to 0.0 | Apatite hydroxyl groups residing in crystal channels (main signal) |
| 2 | 0.8–1.3 | Apatite surface: either specific hydroxyl groups or atypical water (minor pool) |
| 3 | 5.8 | Apatite surface: adsorbed water (main pool) |
| 4 | 1.2 | Collagen Hβ and Hγ protons |
| 5 | 3.0 to 3.7 | Collagen Hα protons and –C |
| 6 | 4.6 | Collagen water |
| 7 | 7.4–8.2 | Collagen amide NH protons |
| 8 | 0.9 | Adipose tissue: C |
| 9 | 1.3 | Adipose tissue: –(C |
| 10 | 2.1 | Adipose tissue: –CH2–C |
| 11 | 2.9 | Adipose tissue: –CH |
| 12 | 4.8 | Adipose tissue water |
| 13 | 5.4 | Adipose tissue: –C |
| 14 | 0.12 | OCP hydroxyl groups |
Two alternative assignments: either hydroxyl groups at surface calcium sites[59] or structured and stacked water at the entrances to the hydroxyl channels.[60]
Large, broad, asymmetric signal with a sizable high-frequency shoulder expanding beyond 10 ppm.
Complex signal, with shoulders at 0.8 and 1.9 ppm.
Complex region, a sharper peak at 3.1 ppm and a broader peak at 3.5 ppm.
Fig. 3Details of the proton spectra of whole bone and its components. (a) Comparison of the R90 rat bone spectrum with the spectra of collagen and hydroxyapatite (HA), all acquired with the BD pulse sequence under MAS at 60 kHz and scaled to the same spectrum area. (b) Expanded regions of the DF spectra of rat bone showing discrete peaks from adipose tissue and OCP (R1 and R30, the same sample mass, MAS at 7 kHz). For assignments, see Table 1.
Fig. 4The proton spectra of whole bone from rats of various ages recorded with MAS at 7 kHz and compared for the same sample mass: (a) the BD pulse sequence; (b) the DF pulse sequence. The intensity scale is the same within the panels, but different between them.
Characteristics of the studied cranial bonee
| Sample | Pig | R1 | R30 | R90 | R180 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Animal age/days | 1 | 1 | 30 | 90 | 180 |
| Apatite crystal size/nm | 16.6 | 12.5 | 17.9 | 18.5 | 20.4 |
| Crystallinity index | 2.90 | 2.85 | 2.89 | 2.98 | 2.95 |
| Carbonate content/wt% | 8.6 | 4.0 | 7.0 | 7.1 | 8.4 |
| Bone mineral content/wt% | 59.6 | 42.1 | 61.1 | 62.4 | 60.9 |
| Hydroxyl content of the mineral/% | 5.14 (0.07) | 7.95 (0.20) | 7.48 (0.09) | 10.23 (0.09) | 10.07 (0.06) |
Along the crystal c-axis, calculated from the PXRD (002) reflection using Scherrer's equation.[65]
Splitting factor of Weiner and Bar-Yosef calculated from the ν4(PO4) IR spectral region.[66,67]
From the ratio [area ν3(CO3)]/[area ν1ν3(PO4)] of the IR spectral regions.[68]
Sample mass at 600 °C compared to that at 25 °C, measured using TGA under air flow.[57,58].
The results contain only significant figures that are justified by the precision of the method of analysis used.
From proton DF MAS NMR; by reference to stoichiometric hydroxyapatite; standard errors in parentheses.
Fig. 5Comparison of the deconvoluted regions of the rat bone DF proton spectra recorded with MAS at 7 kHz and scaled to the same mass of the bone apatite mineral. For each sample, the solid lines show the original spectrum (in colour) and the overall fitted trace (black). The dashed lines present the hydroxyl peaks of apatite (at 0 and −0.5 ppm), the peak of OCP (0.12 ppm; only in R1) and the strongest signals from the adipose tissue (0.9 and 1.3 ppm). For clarity, the remaining peaks have been skipped.