Literature DB >> 35516074

Exposing medical students to various difficulty levels of simulated endotracheal intubations improves success rate: a randomised non-blinded trial.

Roy Kazan1,2,3, Marilù Giacalone4, Jiaru Liu5, Etrusca Brogi4, Shantale Cyr1,2, Thomas M Hemmerling1,2,6.   

Abstract

Objective: Simulation training of endotracheal intubation (ETI) has proven to be an effective training tool. We used an adjustable airway mannequin that allows the achievement of various difficulty levels of laryngoscopy to train inexperienced medical students. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of training using this novel airway mannequin on ETI success rates of medical students.
Methods: This was a randomised non-blinded trial conducted at the Steinberg Centre for Simulation and Interactive Learning. Twenty recruited medical students were randomly allocated to two different training groups. During training, the mixed training group was asked to perform successful intubations in three levels of difficulty; the standard training group was asked to perform the same number of successful intubations in one level of difficulty. After training, all participants were asked to perform intubations using both the adjustable airway mannequin and a standard mannequin. Success rates and airway surface area visualised were compared between the two groups.
Results: Students in the mixed training group had a significantly higher success rate both in the adjustable airway mannequin (p=0.01) and in the standard mannequin (p=0.02). Students in the mixed group had 51%, 59% and 47% significantly more visual area surface than students in the standard group during standard and difficult setup of the adjustable airway mannequin and the standard airway mannequin, respectively. Conclusions: The use of an adjustable airway mannequin to train medical students leads to superior ETI success rates and better glottis visualisation. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endotracheal intubation; laryngoscopy; mannequin; simulation; success rate

Year:  2020        PMID: 35516074      PMCID: PMC8936646          DOI: 10.1136/bmjstel-2018-000402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn        ISSN: 2056-6697


  13 in total

1.  Fiberoptic orotracheal intubation on anesthetized patients: do manipulation skills learned on a simple model transfer into the operating room?

Authors:  V N Naik; E D Matsumoto; P L Houston; S J Hamstra; R Y Yeung; J S Mallon; T M Martire
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  The effect of cross-training with adjustable airway model anatomies on laryngoscopy skill transfer.

Authors:  Waylan Wong; Suraj Kedarisetty; Nathan Delson; Dale Glaser; Jennifer Moitoza; Daniel P Davis; Randolph H Hastings
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Insertion of the endotracheal tube, laryngeal mask airway and oesophageal-tracheal Combitube. A 6-month comparative prospective study of acquisition and retention skills by medical students.

Authors:  N Weksler; A Tarnopolski; M Klein; M Schily; V Rozentsveig; A R Shapira; G M Gurman
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Simulation in surgical education.

Authors:  Sandra L de Montbrun; Helen Macrae
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2012-09

5.  Preoperative airway assessment: predictive value of a multivariate risk index.

Authors:  A R el-Ganzouri; R J McCarthy; K J Tuman; E N Tanck; A D Ivankovich
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Parametrically adjustable intubation mannequin with real-time visual feedback.

Authors:  Nathan Delson; Conan Sloan; Thomas McGee; Suraj Kedarisetty; Wen-Wai Yim; Randolph H Hastings
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.929

7.  Medical simulation is needed in anesthesia training to achieve patient's safety.

Authors:  Chul-Ho Chang
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2013-03-19

Review 8.  Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review.

Authors:  S Barry Issenberg; William C McGaghie; Emil R Petrusa; David Lee Gordon; Ross J Scalese
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 9.  Impact and implementation of simulation-based training for safety.

Authors:  Federico F Bilotta; Samantha M Werner; Sergio D Bergese; Giovanni Rosa
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-11-07

10.  Comparison of the Glidescope®, flexible fibreoptic intubating bronchoscope, iPhone modified bronchoscope, and the Macintosh laryngoscope in normal and difficult airways: a manikin study.

Authors:  Adrian Langley; Gabriel Mar Fan
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 2.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.