Literature DB >> 35515891

Assessment tool for the instructional design of simulation-based team training courses: the ID-SIM.

Annemarie F Fransen1,2, M Beatrijs van der Hout-van der Jagt1,3, Roxane Gardner4, Manuela Capelle5, Sebastiaan P Oei6, Pieter J van Runnard Heimel1, S Guid Oei1,7.   

Abstract

Introduction: To achieve an expert performance of care teams, adequate simulation-based team training courses with an effective instructional design are essential. As the importance of the instructional design becomes ever more clear, an objective assessment tool would be valuable for educators and researchers. Therefore, we aimed to develop an evidence-based and objective assessment tool for the evaluation of the instructional design of simulation-based team training courses.
Methods: A validation study in which we developed an assessment tool containing an evidence-based questionnaire with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and a visual chart directly translating the results of the questionnaire. Psychometric properties of the assessment tool were tested using five descriptions of simulation-based team training courses. An expert-opinion-based ranking from poor to excellent was obtained. Ten independent raters assessed the five training courses twice, by using the developed questionnaire with an interval of 2 weeks. Validity and reliability analyses were performed by using the scores from the raters and comparing them with the expert's ranking. Usability was assessed by an 11-item survey.
Results: A 42-item questionnaire, using VAS, and a propeller chart were developed. The correlation between the expert-opinion-based ranking and the evaluators' scores (Spearman correlation) was 0.95, and the variance due to subjectivity of raters was 3.5% (VTraining*Rater). The G-coefficient was 0.96. The inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)) was 0.91 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.99), and intra-rater reliability for the overall score (ICC) was ranging from 0.91 to 0.99. Conclusions: We developed an evidence-based and reliable assessment tool for the evaluation of the instructional design of a simulation-based team training: the ID-SIM. The ID-SIM is available as a free mobile application. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  instructional design; simulation; team training

Year:  2018        PMID: 35515891      PMCID: PMC8990196          DOI: 10.1136/bmjstel-2016-000192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn        ISSN: 2056-6697


  16 in total

1.  Validity: on meaningful interpretation of assessment data.

Authors:  Susan M Downing
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.251

Review 2.  Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains.

Authors:  K Anders Ericsson
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  Cognitive Load Theory for the Design of Medical Simulations.

Authors:  Kristin L Fraser; Paul Ayres; John Sweller
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.929

Review 4.  Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM.

Authors:  Joseph P Weir
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  'I'm pickin' up good regressions': the governance of generalisability analyses.

Authors:  Jim Crossley; Jean Russell; Brian Jolly; Chris Ricketts; Chris Roberts; Lambert Schuwirth; John Norcini
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 6.251

Review 6.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.

Authors:  P E Shrout; J L Fleiss
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: a general overview.

Authors:  K Anders Ericsson
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 3.451

Review 8.  Simulation-based team training in healthcare.

Authors:  Walter Eppich; Valerie Howard; John Vozenilek; Ian Curran
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.929

Review 9.  Comparative effectiveness of instructional design features in simulation-based education: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  David A Cook; Stanley J Hamstra; Ryan Brydges; Benjamin Zendejas; Jason H Szostek; Amy T Wang; Patricia J Erwin; Rose Hatala
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2012-09-03       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 10.  Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review.

Authors:  S Barry Issenberg; William C McGaghie; Emil R Petrusa; David Lee Gordon; Ross J Scalese
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.650

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.